Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Transformational Generative Rules
Transformational Generative Rules
GENERATIVE RULES
SALAH-EDDINE BELJADID ET
ABDERRAZEK ELKADI
THIS HANDOUT HANDLES THE MOST COMMON AND
NEEDED TRANSFORMATIONAL GENERATIVE RULES,
FROM AFFIX-HOPPING UP TO IMPERATIVE.
ACCOMPANIED BY SOME OF S6 EXAMINATIONS
20/01/2020
Part one Salah-Eddine Beljadid
2
Part one Salah-Eddine Beljadid
Dedication
I dedicate this piece of work to my best and silliest friends, I have ever had and
Known Mr. ABDERAZZEK EL KADI & Mr. MOHAMED NEJMI for their encouragements
3
Part one Salah-Eddine Beljadid
Table of contents
Dedication……………………………………………………………………………………………………3
Table of contents……………………………………………………………………………………….… 4
Introduction…………………………………………………………………………………………….…...5
Preface………………………………………………………………………………………………….….…..6
Affix-Hopping…………………………………………………………………………………………….…7
Application of Affix-Hopping……………………………………………………………………….12
Yes/No Question………………………………………………………………………………………….17
Do support ……………………………………………………………………………………………..…...32
Do support Application……………………………………………………………………………….35
Passive transformation……………………………………………………………………………….45
Agent Deletion………………………………………………………………………………….…………53
Echo-Questions……………………………………………………………………………………………64
Wh-movement …………………………………………………………………………………...………..68
Application of wh-Fronting……………………………………………………….…………………74
Transformational rules…………………………………………………………………………….…81
Bibliography/References…………………………………………………………………………….93
4
Part one Salah-Eddine Beljadid
Introduction
We have seen that PSG accounts only for simple declarative sentences as an extreme. But
what about the other types of sentences which are grammatically correct. However, they
cannot be accounted by PSG. For instance, the passive sentences in this latter we will
find that the aux will be rewritten as Tns (M) (have-en) (be-ing) + be-en we notice
that there is a new inserted element which is (be-en) , why have we inserted the
element be-en? Because if we want to invert sentence from the active order to the
passive, we have to add be-en to the aux.
The same thing for the imperatives since they are representing as VP (Go home, Move
now, Be strong) these imperatives contain tenseless verbs and have no NPs the reason
why cannot be accounted, as they are ungrammatical for PSG.
For this, PSG deals only with simple declarative sentences and any other type of
sentences that is not of this nature is totally ungrammatical. Nevertheless, we know in
linguistic competence the well and the ill formdness of structures, we intuit that the
passive sentences are grammatically structured and imperatives are also grammatically
correct sentences. So the dilemma is that we have to find a way to include these types of
sentences within a Grammar that governs all types of sentences that are considered to
be grammatically structured by the native speaker and if the Grammar considers them
as ungrammatical and the intuitions consider them as grammatical then it is Inadequate
Grammar in terms of the criteria of a adequacy we are to shed light on observational,
descriptive and explanatory criteria , so if it cannot observe, describe or explain what is
grammatical and what is not then there is a problem with this grammar. It is a broken-
down Grammar.
Phrase structure rule is not capable to deal with other sentences more than declarative
ones then it is a psychologically implausible. However it should be plausible so as to
constrain a Grammar model of the native speaker competence.
In the linguistic competence, any native speaker possesses a knowledge that the passive
sentences, active sentences, imperative sentences, and other types of sentences are
grammatically correct and if we account only for one single type and neglect the other
party then the problem is within the Grammar and not within the native speaker’s
competence. So as to handle this problem of PSG we are not to reject it as inadequate.
However, we ought to build a new constrained Grammar.
Phrase structure grammar is going to be kept for only one model level analysis.
Although, it has a lot of short comings in the accounting of other types of sentences but
this is not a justification and reason to be completely abandoned.
Phrase structure grammar will be kept and it will launch a new type of reasoning which
is Transformational Generative Grammar which in turn going to add some new features
to this Grammar.
5
Part one Salah-Eddine Beljadid
Phrase structure rule said to be generative Grammar; word class Grammar too is a
generative grammar. If we want to generate all types of sentences we will fall in the
problem of infinity of number of rules and the implication of this has to do with
acquisition process that is if we have limitless rules, how can we possess it? Acquire it?
And know it? It will be impossible for any child to acquire this in a very considerable
short time. Thus, this short time is a very important criterion in language. Then why do
we acquire our language in 2 or 3 years and not until we grow up? So if we follow the
reasoning of WCG then we need a long time not 2 or 3 years, it is probably the whole life
will be spent just for acquiring and internalizing the different patterns of every single
sentence by itself and that will be extremely impossible.
We are not already taught how to acquire grammar? How to know the subject, the
predicate or the verb? … We are not given any bit of information about the language that
we are acquiring, but unconsciously we acquire this language and learn the process of
the acquisition. The mother tongue is unconsciously learnt. Thus, TGG is a new theory
that is going to be built on the findings of PSG and also will be built on particular
postulates. However, the drawbacks of PSG, but it still the core of declarative sentences
which the other type of sentences are derived from that is to say; we need to keep PSG as
one of the most important constituent for this new Grammar.
In a very beginning, PSG was claimed to be a grammar that is going to account for
language but by the end this presupposition was disproved. For this reason, TGG or the
new grammar has emerged as a reaction to the inferiority of PSG and claimed that we
have a deep notion which is we recognize that sentences are derived and formulated on
the basis of certain deep structure (Deep notion) deeper than the surface structure for
instance, PSG was seen to account only for one type of sentences which is the declarative
and the declaratives in turn are seen as surface structure.
The declaratives have to do with two levels of analysis the surface structure and the
deep structure.
Surface structure
Deep structure
6
Part one Salah-Eddine Beljadid
These simple declarative sentences seem very simple for PSG and they are easy to be
accounted. They are going through NP aux VP rule but for TGG these declaratives have
two levels of interpretation. The deep structure and the surface structure for examples
TGG keeps the notion of PSG as device for the description of the deep structure because
from the deep structure of the active declaratives we can derive the interrogative, the
passive, the imperative and other types of grammatical structures which are going to be
considered as grammatical by the native speaker.
In TGG, the deep structure contains the maximal projection of aux that is, the Aux can be
rewritten as Tns (M) (have-en) (be-ing)
This doesn’t mean we are going to find sentences consist of all of these elements.
However, it depends on every single sentence. If we take the deep structure of this
surface one Ahmed has been travelling to England, so the deep structure of this sentence
is Ahmed pre have-en be-ing travel to England it is ungrammatical sentence because we
cannot have such forms in English and they cannot be used. Only the surfaces are
allowed.
7
Part one Salah-Eddine Beljadid
Preface:
In the early to mid1960s, Noam Chomsky developed the idea that each sentence in language
has two levels of representation a deep structure and a surface structure. The deep
structure represented the semantic relations of a sentence, and was mapped on to the
surface structure (which followed the phonological form of the sentence very closely) via
transformations. Chomsky emphasizes the importance of modern formal mathematical
devices in the development of grammatical theory.
The deeper connections between sentences which cut across surface grammar are said to be
TRANSFORMATIONAL. Any grammar that claims to assign to each sentence that it generates
both a deep structure and a surface structure analysis and systematically to relate the two
analyses is a “transformational grammar”. Chomsky’s proposal was to split the syntax of the
language into two parts: a Phrase Structure component (base component) containing PS
rules; a Lexicon; Lexical Insertion rules; sub-categorization restrictions and selection
restrictions. A Transformational component containing supplementary rules studying
sentences in terms of two levels: Deep Structure and Surface Structure.
8
Part one Salah-Eddine Beljadid
Affix-Hopping:
What does Affix- Hopping stand for?
Affix Hopping is a Morpho-syntactic rule. It deals with those aspects of the structure of aux.
√ Tns(past) Affix
√ ( en) Affix
√ ( Ing) Affix
We have extracted three Affixes from our maximal projection which are (Tns ,en ,and ing).
Then we move to the verbal elements.
Second: Identifying the verbal elements.
9
Part one Salah-Eddine Beljadid
Our verbal elements which have been extracted from the aux are four elements:
((M),(have),(Be) ) and verb V.
1) The occurrence of the affixes (en) and ( ing) in a certain sentence is optional the reason
why we have marked them between parentheses ( ).whereas, Tns is obligatory .that is, it is
possible to occur in all cases. Thus, we did not mark it between brackets.
2) The Occurrence of the verbal elements (M), (Have), and (Be) in a certain sentence is
optional. Thus, they should be marked between parentheses. However, the verb is
obligatory hence has no brackets.
The classification of affixes and the verbal components:
Classifying the bound affixes in one single set, and the verbal constituents in the other
category. Bearing in mind that the optional elements should be marked between
parentheses ( ), and where X and Y are variables that can be taking any element category in
certain given sentence. Then, the result of structure description(SD) will be :
Tns (M)
x (en) (Have) y
(ing) (Be)
V
In The structure change (SC), every affix should be attached to its real verbal element
(A1) : past will have-en be-ing v (leave)
should be moving over to its target verbal element look at the notion in (A1) and it final
result in (A2).
(B1) : X Past Will have-en be-ing leave Y
1 2 3 2 3 2 3 4
In addition, we will number each affix with number 2 and each verbal constituent with the
number 3 as in (B1),Have is also a verbal element but in this case it won’t be attached by any
10
Part one Salah-Eddine Beljadid
affix. However, it is possible in other cases. In order these affixes to be attached to their
verbal constituents we need to move them towards their target verbal elements or to
reverse their positions. In other words, in the position of the element 2, we place the
element 3 and vice-versa in structure change (SC).Then, the outcome will look like:
SC: 1 3+2 3+2 3+2 4
in this aspect, every affix has moved towards its suitable verbal element
Tns (M)
SD: X (en) (have) y
(ing) (be)
V
1 2 3 4
11
Part one Salah-Eddine Beljadid
SD: salah-eddine and hajar pre have-en postpone their research paper
12
Part one Salah-Eddine Beljadid
X (en) (Have) y
(Ing) (Be)
1 2 3 4
SC: 1 3+2 4
SD: salah-eddine and hajar pre have-en postpone their research paper
1 2 3 2 3 4
SC: salah-eddine and hajar have pre postpone-en their research paper
The final result: Salahe-eddine and hajar have postponed their research paper
X (en) (Have) y
(ing) (Be)
1 2 3 4
SC: 1 3+2 4
1 2 3 2 3 2 3 4
13
Part one Salah-Eddine Beljadid
X (en) (Have) y
(ing) (Be)
1 2 3 4
SC: 1 3+2 4
1 2 3 4
➢ 4) Youssef would have been dedicating his research project to his friend
SD: Youssef past will have-en be-ing dedicate his research project to his friends
X (en) (Have) y
( ing) (Be)
1 2 3 4
SC: 1 3+2 4
SD: Youssef past will have-en be-ing dedicate his research project to his friends
1 2 3 2 3 2 3 4
SC: Youssef will past have be-en dedicate-ing his research project to his friend
The final result: Youssef would have been dedicating his research project to his friend
14
Part one Salah-Eddine Beljadid
APPLYING AFFIX-HOPPING
1 2 3 2 3 4
APPLYING AFFIX-HOPPING
1 2 3 2 3 4
➢ 7) We should go home
APPLYING AFFIX-HOPPING
1 2 3 4
APPLYING AFFIX-HOPPING
1 2 3 2 3 4
15
Part one Salah-Eddine Beljadid
➢ 9) Time is money
APPLYING AFFIX-HOPPING
1 2 3 4
APPLYING AFFIX-HOPPING
1 2 3 4
➢ 11) Asma will have completed her presentation before the deadline
SD: Asma pre will have-en complete her presentation before the deadline
APPLYING AFFIX-HOPPING
SD: Asma pre will have-en complete her presentation before the deadline
1 2 3 2 3 4
SC: Asma will pre have complete-en her presentation before the deadline
The final result: Asma will have completed her presentation before the deadline
16
Part one Salah-Eddine Beljadid
Question Transformations:
A- yes/no question:
Yes /no questions are questions which require an answer by either Yes or No.
1 2
Hamza and Manal pre be-ing go to University (A1)
17
Part one Salah-Eddine Beljadid
2 1
Where zero article Ø means that the place of displaced element stays empty.
Our operation is to move or to reverse the first two elements of aux which are Tns and Be
with NP (Hamza and Manal)
Taking into consideration that the verbal element (be) must not be followed by the affix
(ing) . Look at notion in (A1) and its final result in (A2).
1 2
2 1
Following the same steps, which are moving or reversing the first two elements of aux
Which are Tns and Have with NP (you), bearing in mind that the element (have) should not
be followed by the affix (en). Look at notion in (B1) and its final result in (B2).
1 2
18
Part one Salah-Eddine Beljadid
2 1
Moving or reversing the first two elements of aux which are Tns and M (Will) with NP (She)
as in (C1) and (C2).
1 2
2 1
Reversing the first two elements of aux, which are Tns and M (Can) with NP (I) as in (D1) and
the final result in (D2).
1 2
19
Part one Salah-Eddine Beljadid
2 1
Reversing the first two elements of aux which are Tns and M (Shall) with NP (We) as in (E1)
and the final result in (E2).
Remark:
We notice that during forming Yes / No question we are merely moving the first two
elements of Aux which are the obligatory Tns and either followed by optional modal, have,
or be. And placing them in front of NP.That is, we displace Tns( past/present) accompanied
by M( would/ can /could/ will/should ), Have ( have/had/has ),or Be( is/was/are/were ) to
the front of NP. So, our structure description (SD) will consist only of these elements
(M,Have,Be ) plus NP and also the variable X which refers to any constituent comes after
Giving NP number 1 as well as Tns, M, Have, and be number 2 and finally variable X number
3 Hence our structure description will look like:
Be
1 2 3
Keeping in mind that the structure change (SC) must be stated precisely enough to cover the
above cases when they are to reverse, Bearing in mind also that in structure change we are
only moving the first two elements of aux which take the number 2 and reversing them with
NP that holds the number 1. So, our structure change (SC) will look like:
20
Part one Salah-Eddine Beljadid
SC: 2+1 3
Then, forming an adequate yes/no question rule depending on the structure description
(SD) and the structure change (SC)
Be
1 2 3
SC: 2+1 3
Commentary:
Why are we obliged to move only the verbal elements (Be and Have) without accompanying
them by the affixes (ing and en)?
1) Is He eating an apple
2) Has Hajar done her homework
1) Is He eating an apple?
21
Part one Salah-Eddine Beljadid
Be-ing
1 2 3
SC: 2+1 3
1 2 3
Affix-Hopping rule
Tns (M)
SD: X (en) (have) Y
(ing) ( be)
V
1 2 3 4
SC: 1 3+2 4
2 3 2
So, we conclude that the final result or the surface structure of this sentence is totally
ungrammatical because of the misplacement of the affix ing. That is the affix ing has been
22
Part one Salah-Eddine Beljadid
attached to non-target element which is the pronoun He and resulted Heing which in turn
ungrammatical.
In the structure changes (SC) of Affix-hopping, the affix (ing) has been attached to the
subject pronoun He and resulted He-ing, instead of being attached to the verbal element
(eat). Why did this happen? Because the pronoun or the NP (He) intervened between the
affix (ing) and its verbal constituent (eat). Thus, Affix-Hopping gets blocked and resulted
ungrammatical hopping.
Be-ing
1 2 3
SC: 2+1 3
AFFIX-HOPPING RULE
2 3 2
23
Part one Salah-Eddine Beljadid
The same problem also occurred in this sentence (2) .So, we conclude that the final result or
the surface structure of this sentence is totally ungrammatical because of the misplacement
of the affix en. That is the affix en has been attached to non-target element which is the
proper noun Hajar and resulted Hajar-en which in turn ungrammatical.
In the structure changes (SC) of Affix-hopping , the affix(en) has been attached to the noun
Hajar and resulted Hajar-en instead of being attached to the verbal element (do). Why did
this happen? Because the NP (Hajar ) intervened between the affix (en) and its verbal
element (do). Thus Affix-Hopping gets blocked and resulted ungrammatical hopping.
We conclude that yes/no question which is accompanied by the affixes en and ing is
*ungrammatical transformation rule
Answers:
24
Part one Salah-Eddine Beljadid
SD: M
Be
1 2 3
SC: 2+1 3
1 2 3
Affix-Hopping rule
Tns (M)
SD: X (en) (have) Y
(ing) ( be)
V
1 2 3 4
SC: 1 3+2 4
2 3 2 3 2 3 4
25
Part one Salah-Eddine Beljadid
SD: M
Be
1 2 3
SC: 2+1 3
1 2 3
AFFIX-HOPPING
2 3 2 3 4
26
Part one Salah-Eddine Beljadid
SD: M
Be
1 2 3
SC: 2+1 3
1 2 3
AFFIX-HOPPING
2 3 2 3
27
Part one Salah-Eddine Beljadid
SD: M
Be
1 2 3
SC: 2+1 3
1 2 3
AFFIX-HOPPING
2 3 2 3 4
SD: M
Be
1 2 3
SC: 2+1 3
28
Part one Salah-Eddine Beljadid
1 2 3
AFFIX-HOPPING
2 3 2 3 4
This is ungrammatically correct sentence because once forming such interrogative we are
obliged to move only the first two elements of aux which are Tns followed by modal Will and
never accompanied by any other constituent. In order this interrogative to be grammatically
correct, we need to abide by the usual following steps.
SD: M
Be
1 2 3
SC: 2+1 3
1 2 3
29
Part one Salah-Eddine Beljadid
AFFIX-HOPPING
2 3 2 3 4
The final result: Will Salah-eddine have finished the concision style
The surface structure of this interrogative sentence is totally grammatical. So, we conclude
that in forming yes /no question we have to move only the first two elements of aux .BUT
what about if we have sentences such:
And we want to form an adequate yes/no question should we move the first two elements
of aux as in former examples? But in these cases we have only one element of aux which the
obligatory Tns . Does Tns alone able to formulate a superior yes/no question?
We have "Ahmed went home" which is a declarative sentence; we desire to change it into
an interrogative form so as to form a question. So let us follow these steps.
As we know that in yes/no question we move only the first two elements of aux and placing
them at/in the front of NP. However, in these cases we have only one element of aux.
Although, it should be moved even. Look at (A1) and its final movement in (A2).
30
Part one Salah-Eddine Beljadid
So the final result of this sentence is ungrammatical. Let us prove our evidence
(ungrammaticality of the sentence) by applying yes/no question rule.
SD: M
Be
1 2 3
SC: 2+1 3
1 2 3
Note: This modal of such sentence will never be available as surfaces in English. Thus, they
are ungrammatical.
Yes/ no question
1 2 3
Open conclusion: In both cases, we have only one element of aux (Tns) which seems
impossible to form an adequate yes/no question. However, once these sentences are
31
Part one Salah-Eddine Beljadid
grammatically correct in the active declarative form it means that they are able to be
reversed into interrogatives. But how?
In the case of these sentences, we are to apply another rule which completely allows us to
form a perfect question .Although; we only have one element of aux. It is Do support known
also as Do insertion.
Do insertion is rule which supports us to form a question when we lack the three optional
elements of aux which are (M, have, or be).
We apply Do support rule when we are only to deal with one element of aux which is Tns(
past/present)
Examples of Do support
Do appears typically in question and negative forms. We shall focus here on the appearance
of DO in question. For example, Salah broke his wrist. Did salah break his wrist?
The tense is attached in the declarative sentence to Break which is not an auxiliary verb.Thus
DO helps us move Tns even when no AUX verb is present. DO is inserted normally after Tns
movement and just before Affix-Hopping.
32
Part one Salah-Eddine Beljadid
The affix past is not followed by any AUX verb to be attached to, but rather an NP. All that
we need in order to produce a perfect question from above is to insert DO to the left of past.
The DO support or insertion is an obligatory rule which permits us to attach the verb DO
immediately to the left of any Tns marker that is not attached to a verb.
DO SUPPORT (OBLIGATORY):
SD: X Tense
1 2
SC: 2#do 1
NOTE: The active declarative form of such interrogatives (did you go home?) is not (you did
go home (b1)). Why this last form (b1) cannot be accounted as an active declarative?
Called emphatic sentences, they cannot be accounted as active declarative forms especially
in forming a question with do insertion rule. Let us prove this. So, if we consider that the
33
Part one Salah-Eddine Beljadid
active declarative of did you go home? Is you did go home and we want to apply do support
rule we will fall in the problem of doubling the DO element which obviously results
ungrammatical question.
Explanations:
DO SUPPORT:
SD: X Tns
1 2
SC: 2#do 1
1 2
AFFIX-HOPPING:
34
Part one Salah-Eddine Beljadid
Examples:
Answers:
SD: M
Be
1 2 3
SC: 2+1 3
35
Part one Salah-Eddine Beljadid
1 2 3
DO SUPPORT (OBLIGATORY):
SD: X Tense
1 2
SC: 2#do 1
AFFIX-HOPPING
2 3 4
36
Part one Salah-Eddine Beljadid
SD: M
Be
1 2 3
SC: 2+1 3
1 2 3
DO SUPPORT (OBLIGATORY):
SD: X Tense
1 2
SC: 2#do 1
AFFIX-HOPPING
2 3 4
37
Part one Salah-Eddine Beljadid
SD: M
Be
1 2 3
SC: 2+1 3
1 2 3
DO SUPPORT (OBLIGATORY):
SD: X Tense
1 2
SC: 2#do 1
AFFIX-HOOPING
2 3 4
38
Part one Salah-Eddine Beljadid
Note: The application of yes/no question rule in such cases is optional. For instance, we take
the first example. Does Maroua defend her project?
The superiority of the do support is that it has the ability to reverse in the way yes/no
question does plus it has the adequacy of inserting do next to the tense.
DO SUPPORT (OBLIGATORY):
SD: X Tense
1 2
SC: 2#do 1
1 2
AFFIX-HOPPING
2 3 4
39
Part one Salah-Eddine Beljadid
INTDODUCTION:
The passive of an active tense is formed by putting the verb to be into the same tense as the
active verb and adding the past participle of the active verb. The subject of the active verb
becomes the agent of the passive verb. The agent is very often not mentioned. When it is
preceded by preposition by and placed at end of the clause.
40
Part one Salah-Eddine Beljadid
+ S+will+be+ptp
Future - S+will+not+be+ptp
? Will+S+be+ptp?
+ S+v to be (am/is/are)
TO - S+v to be (am/is/are)
? v to be(am/is/are)+s
+going to +be+ptp
S+had+been+ptp
P + S +was/were+ptp
A S+was/were+being+ptp
S S+had+not+been+ptp
T - S+was/were+not+ptp
S+was/were+not+being+ptp
Had +S+been+ptp?
? Was/were+S+ptp?
Was/were+S+being+ptp?
41
Part one Salah-Eddine Beljadid
Short answers
42
Part one Salah-Eddine Beljadid
Our car was stolen last night. (We don’t know who stole it)
2. If we are not interested in who has done what we are talking about or it is not
important to mention it.
He has been taken to hospital. (What we are interested in is the fact that he has been
taken to hospital and not who has taken him.)
3. If it is easy to understand who did something without it being mentioned.
The murderer was arrested last night. (It is not necessary to mention that he has been
arrested by the police because it is Self-evident.)
4. If the subject of the active voice sentence is something like somebody, people, they, you,
etc.
Someone broke the window. →The window was broken.
ACTIVE TO PASSIVE
To change a sentence from the active voice to the passive voice.
•The object of the active voice sentence becomes the subject of the passive voice
Sentence.
Agatha Christie wrote this book.
This book was written by Agatha Christie.
• We change the main verb of the active voice sentence into the passive voice.
The tense remains unchanged.
• The subject of the active voice sentence becomes the agent of the passive Sentence. It is
placed after the past participle and it is preceded by the preposition by.
Mouad wrote this book
43
Part one Salah-Eddine Beljadid
BY OR WITH
2) With to refer to the instrument, object or material that was used for something to be
done.
The door was opened with a key. (a key =the object that was used )
The omlette was made with eggs, cheese and peppers.(eggs, cheese and peppers =the
material that was used )
When we have verbs that take two objects, For example give somebody something; we can
convert the active sentence into a passive one in two ways:
A: by making the indirect (animate) object the subject of the passive voice sentence, which
is also the way that we usually prefer
B: by making the direct (inanimate) object the subject of the passive voice.
Some of the verbs that take the two objects are: give, show, tell, send, write, offer, pay etc
When the indirect object is alone after the verb in the passive voice sentence, it needs the
preposition to. if the indirect object of the active voice sentence is a personal pronoun it has
to be change into a subject pronoun to be the subject of the passive voice sentence.
SUBJECTS OBJECTS
I Me
You You
He Him
She Her
It It
We Us
You You
They Them
44
Part one Salah-Eddine Beljadid
PASSIVE TRANSFORMATION
In order any sentence to be grammatically applied in the passive form, we should have at
least the doer of the action called the agent (subject) and the receiver of the action called
the patient (one who/which receives the action), and the main verb should be [+ transitive]
(Verb which needs a direct object) because we cannot apply the passivization to [-transitive]
(verb which does not need an object). Thus it does not allow the object or the patient to
occur in certain sentence. So in the passivization, it is necessary to have at least one object.
No complements No adverbs in general are allowed to replace the object. For example.
Youssef is a doctor.
subject complement because of the verb to be which functions as a linking verb that links
Linking verbs/copular verbs: (be, get, become, seem, feel, look, etc).
The confusion of accounting the adverbs of manner, place, time, and frequency as objects.
Form of home = NP
This sentence also cannot be passivized even we have an NP home because this NP functions
as an adverb of place and adverbs cannot function as objects thus the passivization of such
sentences is totally impossible. *Home was gone/been by youssef
45
Part one Salah-Eddine Beljadid
NOTE: The transivity of verbs is not restricted only in one direct object. As well as, it can be
Mono -transitive, Di -transitive, or poly -transitive verbs such as write, buy, offer, and send
etc… for example.
Jamal bought a birthday present for teen dollars to his girlfriend. In this aspect, we have two
indirect objects and one direct. so the verbs do not function in the same way. In general,
The requirement for the passivization is that the verb should be [+transitive]. It does not
matter whether it permits one, two, or three objects. As [-transitive] should be excluded
from the operation.
We notice that in all structural descriptions (SDs) of the passive sentences, we have got new
Let us realize the surface details of what happened during the transformation from the
46
Part one Salah-Eddine Beljadid
Moving or reversing the position of NPs (Noun phrases = Ahmed and Apple). That is, in the
position of Ahmed we place apple and vice versa. In addition, we insert the verbal element
be and the affix en combined as one single element (be-en) accompanied by the preposition
(By).
We can infer our passive rule from the following maximal projection of aux
SD: The teacher pre M have-en be-ing explain the lesson (AD)
Taking the aux in which we indicate the optional elements between brackets:
47
Part one Salah-Eddine Beljadid
Passivizing the same sentence taking into consideration the mentioned steps of passive
transformation which are the movement of NPs , insertion of be-en , and the insertion of
Preposition by.
The lesson will have been being explained by the teacher (passive)
SD: The lesson pre will have-en be-ing be-en explain by the teacher (passive)
Taking the maximal projection of aux in which we indicate the optional elements between
Parentheses plus inserting the element be-en and the preposition by as not to forget the
movement of NPs. Thus our pre- structural change (SC) will be:
AUX
Depending on the structural description SD: NP1 aux v NP2 and structural change
SC: NP2 aux be-en v by NP1 we can form our adequate passive rule.
48
Part one Salah-Eddine Beljadid
1 2 3 4
1 2 3 4
SC: 4 2 + be-en 3 by 1
4) 10 million tourists will have been received by Morocco the end of 2023
Answers:
49
Part one Salah-Eddine Beljadid
1 2 3 4
SC: 4 2 + be-en 3 by 1
1 2 3 4
AFFIX-HOPPING:
1 2 3 2 3 4
1 2 3 4
SC: 4 2 + be-en 3 by 1
1 2 3 4
AFFIX- HOPPING:
50
Part one Salah-Eddine Beljadid
1 2 3 2 3 2 3 4
The final result: the meeting has been postponed by the chair.
1 2 3 4
SC: 4 2 + be-en 3 by 1
1 2 3 4
AFFIX-HOPPING:
1 2 3 2 3 2 3 4
4) 10 million tourists will have been received by Morocco the end of 2023
AD: Morocco will have received 10 million tourists the end of 2023
SD: Morocco pre will have-en receive 10 million tourists the end of 2023
51
Part one Salah-Eddine Beljadid
1 2 3 4 5
SC: 4 2 + be-en 3 by 1 5
SD: Morocco pre will have-en receive 10 million tourists the end of 2023
1 2 3 4 X (5)
SC: 10 million tourists pre will have-en be-en receive by Morocco the end of 2023
AFFIX-HOPPING:
SD: 10 million tourists pre will have-en be-en receive by Morocco the end of 2023
1 2 3 2 3 2 3 4
SC: 10 million tourists will pre have be-en receive-en by Morocco the end of 2023
The final result: 10 million tourists will have been received by Morocco the end of 2030
Grammatically and semantically correct sentence. But, it cannot be passivized due to ADVP.
of a copular verb which functions as linking verb that links the subject and its complement.
52
Part one Salah-Eddine Beljadid
Agent Deletion is a rule which allows us to delete the doer of an action in the passive form
In the above examples, we cannot apply our agent deletion because the agent is known. In
Other words, we apply agent deletion when the doer of the action is completely unknown
Illustrations:
53
Part one Salah-Eddine Beljadid
In these cases, we have the agent is completely unknown .thus, it should be deleted
Let us deduce our agent deletion rule from the following passive sentences. Depending on
54
Part one Salah-Eddine Beljadid
SD: The lesson pre will have-en be-ing be-en explain by someone
Since the aux in the above sentences can rewrite only as Tns, Tns M have-en, Tns be-ing
and Tns M have-en be-ing. It means that the elements of aux are optional (except Tns) to
occur in a certain case which obviously states that the aux should rewrite and take the
maximal projection in which its optional elements are indicated between brackets. Thus, the
Note: (pre-) refers to an affix which means before not the present Tns (Pre)
Aux
55
Part one Salah-Eddine Beljadid
SD: The girl pre will have-en be-ing be-en hit by someone
We conclude that the same elements of structural description SD have been kept in
56
Part one Salah-Eddine Beljadid
the structural change SC, except the preposition by and the agent NP1 are deleted.
Once we have four identical elements (NP2 aux be-en V) in both SD and SC, we will only
need to number them so as not to fall in the duplication of each element. Thus the final
version of agent deletion rule will be:
1 2 3 4 5
SC: 1 2 3 4 Ø
Answers:
These sentences go through 3 transformational rules which are Passive, Agent Deletion and
Affix-Hopping)
57
Part one Salah-Eddine Beljadid
passive rule
1 2 3 4
SC: 4 2 + be-en 3 by 1
1 2 3 4
Agent deletion
1 2 3 4 5
SC: 1 2 3 4 Ø
1 2 3 4 4
Affix-Hopping
Tns (M)
SD: X (en) (have) Y
(ing) ( be)
V
1 2 3 4
SC: 1 3+2 4
1 2 3 2 3 2 3
58
Part one Salah-Eddine Beljadid
Passive rule
1 2 3 4
SC: 4 2 + be-en 3 by 1
1 2 3 4 X
Agent deletion
1 2 3 4 5
SC: 1 2 3 4 Ø
1 2 3 4 5 X
Affix-Hopping
1 2 3 2 3 4
59
Part one Salah-Eddine Beljadid
Passive rule
1 2 3 4
SC: 4 2 + be-en 3 by 1
1 2 3 4
SC: Yassine and Amine pre will have-en be-en punish by someone
Agent deletion
1 2 3 4 5
SC: 1 2 3 4 Ø
1 2 3 4 5
Affix-Hopping
1 2 3 2 3 2 3
The final surface structure: Yassine and Amine will have been punished
60
Part one Salah-Eddine Beljadid
Passive rule
1 2 3 4
SC: 4 2 + be-en 3 by 1
1 2 3 4 y
SC: The milk pre have-en be-en split by someone in the kitchen
Agent deletion
1 2 3 4 5
SC: 1 2 3 4 Ø
SD: The milk pre have-en be-en split by someone in the kitchen
1 2 3 4 5 y
Affix-Hopping
Tns (M)
SD: X (en) (have) Y
(ing) (be)
V
1 2 3 4
SC: 1 3+2 4
1 2 3 2 3 2 3 4
61
Part one Salah-Eddine Beljadid
The final result: the milk has been split in the kitchen
Passive rule
1 2 3 4
SC: 4 2 + be-en 3 by 1
1 2 3 4 X
Agent deletion
1 2 3 4 5
SC: 1 2 3 4 Ø
1 2 3 4 5 X
Affix-Hopping
Tns (M)
SD: X (en) (have) Y
(ing) (be)
V
1 2 3 4
SC: 1 3+2 4
62
Part one Salah-Eddine Beljadid
63
Part one Salah-Eddine Beljadid
An echo question is a type of direct question that repeats part or all of something which
someone else has just said. It is also called a parrot question or a "repeat, please"
question. An echo question is one type of echo utterance. We do this when we do not
fully understand or hear what someone has said. Asking an echo question with rising or
falling intonation allows us to clarify what we think we heard. (Albert Ramsdell
Gurney, The Comeback, toughtco echo Questions 1993)
Examples and Observations:
We use echo questions either because we did not fully hear or understand what was
said, or because its content is too surprising to be believed.
Echo questions are usually spoken with a rising intonation and with a strong emphasis
on the wh-word what, which, how, when, where and so on.
Where the symbol ( ) is a rising Intonation
Examples
A: What do you want?
B: What do I want?
64
Part one Salah-Eddine Beljadid
We use echo questions to repeat part of what we have just heard when we want to
confirm what we have heard. Or because its content is too surprising to be believed, we
use rising or fall rising intonation. In English, Echo questions are usually spoken with a
rising intonation ( ) and with a strong emphasis on the wh-word.
❶ How did you ever escape? [ haʊ dɪdjuː ˈevə [r] iˈskeɪp ].Here, as in common
with wh-questions, there is a rising intonation on the question word, and a falling
intonation at the end of the question.
❷ He found it on the street? [ hiː ˈfaʊnd ɪt ɒn ðə ˈstɹiːt ].Here the rising pitch on
street indicates that the question hinges on that word. Exactly, on where he found it, not
whether he found it.
The same thing has been observed in our Moroccan dialect with a slight change.
A≕ mæʒdæ tχtəbæt el- mʊhæmed el- jum : (Majda was engaged to Mohammed)
A≕ dɪk el–bnt kʌj -ejəʕjtɒlɪhæ Tɒkju : (They call that girl Tokyo)
A≕ wɑχ f -χbærk bəlɪ ħʌmzʌ ʒrʌw ʕlɪh mn el-χdmæ : (Did you Know that hamza
was fired from job)
B≕ ħʌmzʌ ʒrʌw ʕlɪh mn el- χdmæ : (hamza was fired from his job)
65
Part one Salah-Eddine Beljadid
B≕ ʌʃ kændɪr f- bjɪtk kænʒmʕ hʌd el- fɒdɑː elɪ drtɪ : (What am I doing) ,
B≕ fɪn əhwæ bæbæ ʕlɑh ntæ fɪn ʕmrək ʒbtɪ el- χbʌr el- ʃɪħʌʒʌ : (Oh Where is
dad), ( as usual, you have no idea about what is going on)
In these cases, the speaker B seeks from the speaker A to repeat what he/ she has just
said because of getting surprised from what the speaker said or wanting the speaker to
clarify more.
Questioning a Question
a speaker may question a question by repeating it with a rising intonation. Note that we
use normal question structures with inverted word order.
Speaker B largely echoes what Speaker A says, except for replacing someone by who
and something by what. For obvious reasons, the type of question produced by speaker
B is called an echo question. However, speaker B could alternatively have replied with
66
Part one Salah-Eddine Beljadid
a non-echo question like, "Who had he said would do what?" If we compare the echo
question, He had said who would do what? With the corresponding non-echo
question who had he said would do what? We find that the latter involves two
movement operations which are not found previously. One is an auxiliary inversion
operation by which the past-tense auxiliary had is moved in front of its subject he. The
other is a wh-movement operation by which the wh-word who is moved to the front of
the overall sentence, and positioned in front of had, Andrew Radford, English Syntax:
An Introduction. Cambridge University Press, 2004
67
Part one Salah-Eddine Beljadid
Wh/operation as follows:
Illustrations:
Example one:
Forming a wh/question
We move the wh/word (which) accompanied by its complement category (car), thus.
The result will be:
Complement category
Wh/word
68
Part one Salah-Eddine Beljadid
So as to form a wh/question, we have to move the wh/word (which) and its complement
category (car) to the front.
Then we have to reverse subject-aux, subject (You) and Aux (Tns Pre)
However, in this case, we have only one element of aux (Tns) which is inadequate to form a
superior wh/question. Thus, we call for a do support.
Do insertion
Affix-Hopping
Example two:
SD: Amal past have-en be-en elect when as a head of English department
In this case, the wh/word will be moved without complement category, thus we will move
only the adverb category (when) to the front.
SD: Amal past have-en be-en elect when as a head of English department
69
Part one Salah-Eddine Beljadid
The result:
Note:
What is meant by Aux is only the first two elements of Aux and not the whole maximal
projection.
Affix-hopping:
SC: When have past Amal be-en elect-en as a head of English department
SD: You pre will hunt which animal in the Atlas Mountains
Aux
NP Tns M VP
Pronoun V NP PP
P NP
DET Compound N
70
Part one Salah-Eddine Beljadid
Aux
NP Tns M NP VP
Pro V PP
P NP
DET Compound N
Aux
NP Tns M VP
Noun V NP advp
71
Part one Salah-Eddine Beljadid
Aux
NP Tns M NP VP
N V Advp
Aux
NP Tns be-ing VP
Pro V advp pp
Adv p NP
72
Part one Salah-Eddine Beljadid
Aux
Adv Pro V pp
p NP
Aux
NP Tns Ø VP
Adv
73
Part one Salah-Eddine Beljadid
Aux
Advp NP VP
Tns + Do support
Adv N V Advp
SD: Q X [Wh] Y
1 2 3 4
SC: 1 3+2 4
Obligatory rule: we move the wh-word from the middle of the sentence to the
beginning Plus subject-aux inversion
Applications:
74
Part one Salah-Eddine Beljadid
Answers:
SD: Q X [Wh] y
1 2 3 4
SC: 1 3+2 4
Applying yes/no question so as to invert subject-aux (the first two element of aux)
SD: M
Be
1 2 3
SC: 2+1 3
Affix-Hopping rule
75
Part one Salah-Eddine Beljadid
Tns (M)
SD: X (en) (have) y
(ing) (be)
V
1 2 3 4
SC: 1 3+2 4
The final surface structure: How long have you been waiting here?
SD: Q X [Wh] y
1 2 3 4
SC: 1 3+2 4
Affix-Hopping rule
76
Part one Salah-Eddine Beljadid
SD: Q X [Wh] y
1 2 3 4
SC: 1 3+2 4
Affix-Hopping rule
Wh-question rule
Affix-Hopping rule
The surface structure: what were they talking about yesterday morning?
77
Part one Salah-Eddine Beljadid
Wh-question rule
SD: Q X [Wh] y
1 2 3 4
SC: 1 3+2 4
However, in this case is optional because the Do support rule can also invert subject-aux
as it adds a do element to the TNs. that is, when we have only one element of aux, which
is Tns , it is obviously that we need a Do insertion, in order to form an adequate
question, and do support also has the superiority to reverse the Subject and Aux .thus,
yes/no question rule becomes optional .
Do support/insertion rule
SD: X Tns
1 2
SC: 2#Do 1
Affix-Hopping rule
The surface structure: Which toy did she want last Monday?
78
Part one Salah-Eddine Beljadid
79
Part one Salah-Eddine Beljadid
80
Part one Salah-Eddine Beljadid
TRANSFORMATIONAL RULES
Tns (M)
SD: X (en) (have) Y
(ing) (be)
V
1 2 3 4
SC: 1 3+2 4
Be
1 2 3
SC: 2+1 3
81
Part one Salah-Eddine Beljadid
SD: X Tense
1 2
SC: 2#do 1
1 2 3 4
SC: 4 2 + be-en 3 by 1
1 2 3 4 5
SC: 1 2 3 4 Ø
82
Part one Salah-Eddine Beljadid
SD: Q X Wh Y
1 2 3 4
SC: 1 3+2 4
SD: X V NP (TO/FOR) NP
1 2 3 4 5
SC: 1 2 5+3 Ø
SD: X V NP Y
1 2 3 4
SC: 1 2 Ø 4+3
1 2 (3) (4) 5
83
Part one Salah-Eddine Beljadid
1 2 3 4
SC: 1 2 3 4 [+Réflexive]
Be
1 2 (3) 4
SC: 1 2 (3) 4 ‚ 2#nʼt + 1[+pronominal]
1 2 3
SC: Ø Ø 3
84
Part one Salah-Eddine Beljadid
Semester 6
SD: NP AUX X
1 2 3
SC: 2 1 3
85
Part one Salah-Eddine Beljadid
Semester: 6
SD: NP AUX VP
1 2 3
86
Part one Salah-Eddine Beljadid
SEMESTER 6
-Relational Grammar
-Morphosyntactic rule
87
Part one Salah-Eddine Beljadid
SEMESTER 6
SD: NP AUX BE VP
1 2 3 4
SC: There 2 3+ 1 4
88
Part one Salah-Eddine Beljadid
Department of English
2-There were many people offered new houses by the ministry, weren’t they?
4-Mary sent to Paris the gift that she bought from Casablanca
I- Are quiet
III- I kicked me
89
Part one Salah-Eddine Beljadid
Department of English
Catch-up Exam
1-
SD: X V NP PP
1 2 3 4
SC: 1 2 4+3
2-
SD: NP X be
1 2 3
90
Part one Salah-Eddine Beljadid
F.E.ANG: SEMESTER6
Catch-up Exam
SD: NP X be-en
1 2 3
4 - Mary sent to London a big parcel which she bought from Madrid, didn’t she?
91
Part one Salah-Eddine Beljadid
SEMESTER 6
Catch-up Exam
SD: NP AUX X
1 2 3
SC: 2 1 3
92
Part one Salah-Eddine Beljadid
Bibliography
93
Part one Salah-Eddine Beljadid
94
Part one Salah-Eddine Beljadid
95
Part one Salah-Eddine Beljadid
96
SALAH-EDDINE BELJADID
&
ABDERRAZEK EL KADI
20/01/2020