Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 6

965

Colon Polyp Morphology on


Double-Contrast Barium
Enema: Its Pathologic Predictive
Downloaded from www.ajronline.org by 202.67.32.3 on 04/13/21 from IP address 202.67.32.3. Copyright ARRS. For personal use only; all rights reserved

Value

1
David J. Ott The morphologic appearance of 9 6 polyps seen on double-contrast barium enema
1
David W. Gelfand was reviewed t o assess t h e predictive value of various signs described t o diagnose

Wallace C. W u 2 malignancy. Size, surface contour, basal i n d e n t a t i o n , a n d p e d u n c u l a t i o n w e r e s t u d i e d .


1 3 Sessile p o l y p s h a d a n a p p r e c i a b l e i n c i d e n c e o f m a l i g n a n c y , w i t h size being t h e best
Deborah S. A b l i n -
indicator o f that risk. Pedunculation w a s f o u n d t o be a reliable sign of benignity in
predicting t h e absence of malignant invasion into t h e adjacent colonic wall. Polyps
under 1 c m a n d having a s m o o t h contour were invariably benign. Conversely, polyps
larger than 1 c m with a lobulated c o n t o u r a n d basal indentation had a significant
incidence of malignancy.

The term "polyp" is u s e d to d e s c r i b e any growth that protrudes into the


c o l o n i c l u m e n [ 1 ] . N e a r l y all c o l o n i c p o l y p s a r i s e f r o m t h e e p i t h e l i u m , w i t h t h e
t w o m o s t c o m m o n t y p e s b e i n g h y p e r p l a s t i c o r n e o p l a s t i c in o r i g i n [ 1 - 6 ] . Hyper­
plastic polyps are typically s m o o t h , sessile, and under 5 m m , and they constitute
t h e b u l k o f all c o l o n i c p o l y p s in t h i s s i z e r a n g e . N e o p l a s t i c e p i t h e l i a l p o l y p s a r e
generally larger than 5 mm and include benign a d e n o m a s , a d e n o m a s with focal
carcinoma, and polypoid adenocarcinomas. Neoplastic polyps vary in their
appearance from small, smooth, and sessile lesions simulating hyperplastic
p o l y p s to larger lesions that m a y be l o b u l a t e d or p e d u n c u l a t e d .
Several radiographic criteria have been used to estimate the malignant p o t e n ­
tial of a c o l o n i c polyp [ 7 - 1 5 ] . The most useful have included size, surface
c o n t o u r , b a s a l i n d e n t a t i o n , a n d p e d u n c u l a t i o n . W e h a v e r e a s s e s s e d t h e v a l u e of
t h e s e c r i t e r i a a s p r e d i c t o r s of m a l i g n a n c y t h r o u g h a r e v i e w o f t h e r a d i o g r a p h i c
a p p e a r a n c e of 9 6 p o l y p s p a t h o l o g i c a l l y e x a m i n e d a n d seen o n d o u b l e - c o n t r a s t
barium enema.

Materials and Methods


The study extended over a 2-year period a n d included 61 patients with 9 6 colonic
p o l y p s . All lesions w e r e originally d i a g n o s e d o n d o u b l e - c o n t r a s t b a r i u m e n e m a a n d w e r e
later r e m o v e d a n d e x a m i n e d pathologically. T h e patients i n c l u d e d 2 2 w o m e n a n d 3 9 m e n
Received March 2 1 , 1983; accepted after re­ aged 2 3 - 8 1 years (mean, 57). Thirty-nine patients (64%) had single polyps; 2 2 (36%) had
vision July 8, 1 9 8 3 .
multiple polyps. The radiographic diagnosis of a colonic polyp was confirmed by e n d o s c o p y
'Department of Radiology, Bowman Gray in 3 9 p a t i e n t s ( 6 4 % ) a n d b y s u r g e r y in 2 2 ( 3 6 % ) .
School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC 2 7 1 0 3 .
T o d e t e r m i n e t h e v a l u e o f p o l y p m o r p h o l o g y i n p r e d i c t i n g t h e l i k e l i h o o d of c a r c i n o m a ,
Address reprint requests to D. J . Ott.
the original double-contrast barium enemas were reviewed a n d correlated with t h e histo­
d e p a r t m e n t of Medicine, Bowman Gray
logic f i n d i n g s . T h e 9 6 p o l y p s s t u d i e d w e r e s e g r e g a t e d a c c o r d i n g t o size (diameter) into
School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC 2 7 1 0 3 .
t h r e e c a t e g o r i e s : 5 - 1 0 m m , 11 - 2 0 m m , a n d g r e a t e r t h a n 2 0 m m . P o l y p s i z e w a s m e a s u r e d
'Present address: Department of Radiology,
directly from the films, a n d n o correction f o r magnification w a s made. T h e radiographic
Children's Orthopedic Hospital, Seattle, WA
98105. m o r p h o l o g y of each polyp w a s evaluated. Surface c o n t o u r w a s categorized as s m o o t h or
i r r e g u l a r . B a s a l i n d e n t a t i o n a n d p e d u n c u l a t i o n , if p r e s e n t , w e r e a l s o n o t e d .
AJR 1 4 1 : 9 6 5 - 9 7 0 , November 1 9 8 3
0361-803X/83/1415-0965 Polyps smaller than 5 m m were excluded from t h e study because w e d o not routinely
© American Roentgen Ray Society report these lesions radiographically [ 4 ] . Most of these minute polyps a r e probably no
966 OTT ET AL. AJFC141, November 1983

greater than 3 - 4 m m in a c t u a l s i z e if m a g n i f i c a t i o n f a c t o r s are TABLE 1: Radiographic Morphology and Malignant Incidence


c o n s i d e r e d . T h e i n c i d e n c e of i n v a s i v e c a r c i n o m a in p o l y p s of t h i s of 71 Sessile Polyps
s i z e r a n g e r e m a i n s m i n u s c u l e [ 1 - 6 ] , w h i l e t h e d e g r e e of f a l s e -
Size (mm)
p o s i t i v e r a d i o g r a p h i c e r r o r in d i a g n o s i n g s u c h d e f e c t s is m o s t l i k e l y Total
c o n s i d e r a b l e . For t h e s e r e a s o n s , w e believe that m u c h u n n e c e s s a r y 5-10 11-20 >20
c o l o n o s c o p y w o u l d b e p e r f o r m e d in a t t e m p t i n g t o r e s o l v e every
Smooth surface:
minute defect seen on double-contrast barium enema.
Downloaded from www.ajronline.org by 202.67.32.3 on 04/13/21 from IP address 202.67.32.3. Copyright ARRS. For personal use only; all rights reserved

Number 34 6 2 42
Malignant 0 1 (17) 0 1 (2.4)
Lobulated surface:
Results Number 3 9 17 29
Malignant 0 1(11) 12(71) 13(44.8)
Forty-one polyps (43%) were 5-10 mm in diameter, 32
Note.—Numbers in parentheses are percentages.
(33%) were 11-20 mm, and 23 (24%) were over 20 mm.
Seventy-one polyps (74%) were sessile radiographically; 25
(26%) were pedunculated (tables 1 and 2). Pedunculation
was seen in 53% of 11 -20 mm polyps, but was infrequent T A B L E 2: R a d i o g r a p h i c M o r p h o l o g y a n d M a l i g n a n t Incidence
of 25 Pedunculated Polyps
in polyps in the other two size categories. Six (15%) of 41
polyps measuring 5-10 mm showed lobulation, compared Size (mm)
to 17 (53%) of 32 polyps of 11 -20 mm and 21 (91 %) of 23 Total
5-10 11-20 >20
polyps over 20 mm.
Smooth surface:
Benign adenomas of various histologic types accounted Number 1 9 0 10
for 63 (66%) of the 96 polyps (table 3). Twelve (86%) of the Malignant 0 1 * (11) 0 1 (10)
14 hyperplastic polyps were in the 5-10 mm range. One Lobulated surface:
(2.4%) of 41 polyps of 5-10 mm harbored invasive carci­ Number 3 8 4 15
Malignant 1f(33) 1 f (13) 0 2(13.3)
noma; three (9.4%) of 32 polyps of 11-20 mm and 12
(52.2%) of 23 polyps over 20 mm were carcinomatous. Note.—Numbers in parentheses are percentages.
* Adenoma with carcinoma in situ.
Although only one (1.9%) of 52 radiographically smooth t Adenoma with focally invasive carcinoma.
polyps contained invasive carcinoma, 15 (34%) of the 44
lobulated polyps were carcinomatous. Of the 15 lobulated
carcinomas, 13 were sessile and two were pedunculated
T A B L E 3: P a t h o l o g i c F i n d i n g s i n 9 6 P o l y p s S e e n o n D o u b l e -
adenomas with focally invasive carcinoma (fig. 1). Most Contrast Barium Enema
small (5-10 mm) hyperplastic and adenomatous polyps
were smooth and sessile radiographically and were indistin­ Size (mm)
Total
guishable from each other (fig. 2). 5-10 11-20 >20
Indentation was present radiographically at the base of
Hyperplastic 12 2 0 14
11 (15%) of 71 sessile polyps (table 4). Only one (3%) of
Lipoma 0 0 2 2
37 polyps in the 5-10 mm range showed indentation, con­ Benign adenomas:
trasted to four (27%) of 15 polyps of 11 -20 mm and six Tubular 27 22 5 54
(32%) of 19 polyps larger than 20 mm. Basal indentation Mixed 0 1 2 3
was found in both benign and malignant polyps smaller than Villous 1 3 2 0

Carcinomas:
20 mm; however, malignancy was invariably present when
In s i t u 0 1 0 1
this sign was seen in polyps larger than 20 mm (fig. 3). Invasive* 1 3 12 16
' Includes two adenomas with focally invasive carcinoma.

Discussion
The double-contrast barium enema has improved the ra­ not the subject of this investigation, it has been demon­
diologic detection of colonic polyps and also has permitted strated that polyps smaller than 5 mm are almost invariably
better evaluation of their morphology. The radiographic benign [4, 14, 17-20]. Many of these minute growths are
criteria currently used for predicting the malignant nature of hyperplastic in origin, while the adenomas of this size have
a colon polyp include size, contour, basal indentation, and less than a 0.5% incidence of invasive malignancy. How­
pedunculation. With the advent of colonoscopy, evaluation ever, polyps larger than 5 mm have an increasing chance of
of growth of a polyp between separate radiographic exami­ harboring invasive carcinoma, the average reported inci­
nations, a previously used criterion [7, 8, 11, 16], has
dence of malignancy being 1 % of 5-9 mm polyps, 6% for
generally become unnecessary.
10-20 mm polyps, and 26% for polyps greater than 20 mm
[4].
Polyp Size
As expected, our results showed a strong correlation
between polyp size and malignancy. Only 2.4% of 5-10 mm
Size is an important criterion used to judge the malignant polyps were malignant, compared with 9.4% of 11 -20 mm
potential of a sessile colonic polyp [1, 4, 5, 7, 9, 11]. While polyps and 52.2% of those over 20 mm. Since 10 mm
PREDICTIVE VALUE OF POLYP MORPHOLOGY 967
AJR: 1 4 1 , November 1 9 8 3

Fig. 1.—A, C a r c i n o m a in situ in s m o o t h , p e ­


d u n c u l a t e d a d e n o m a (arrow), with head measur­
ing 1 2 m m . Additional 1 6 m m , lobulated, sessile
a d e n o m a (arrowhead), harboring focally invasive
c a r c i n o m a . B, P e d u n c u l a t e d a d e n o m a w i t h l o b u ­
lated 1 6 x 1 8 m m head containing focally invasive
carcinoma. Pedicle w a s 4 c m long.
Downloaded from www.ajronline.org by 202.67.32.3 on 04/13/21 from IP address 202.67.32.3. Copyright ARRS. For personal use only; all rights reserved

T
Fig. 2 . — A , S m o o t h , sessile, 8 m m adenoma

1
y
(arrow) in s i g m o i d c o l o n , similar in a p p e a r a n c e to
h y p e r p l a s t i c p o l y p s h o w n i n B. B, S m o o t h , s e s s i l e , s
hyperplastic polyp (arrow) in s i g m o i d colon.
Larger, lobulated adenoma (arrowhead) also

/
present.

1
f.
w
lis
\

seems to be a critical diameter, polyps larger than this TABLE 4: Basal Indentation in 71 Radiographically Sessile

s h o u l d be r e m o v e d r o u t i n e l y [ 4 , 5, 9, 1 5 ] . D e p e n d i n g o n t h e Polyps

clinical circumstances, 5-10 mm polyps should probably Size (mm)


a l s o b e r e m o v e d t o e l i m i n a t e t h e small f r a c t i o n of carcino­ Total

5-10 11-20 >20


mas already present in t h i s s i z e r a n g e a n d t h o s e t h a t may
Total 37 15 19 71
potentially develop from benign a d e n o m a s [ 4 , 5, 20-23].
No. with indentation . . . 1 (3) 4(27) 6(32) 11 ( 1 5 )
P a t h o l o g y of i n d e n t e d
polyps:
Polyp Contour
Adenoma 1 2 0 3
Carcinoma 0 2 (50) 6(100) 8 (73)
T h e s u r f a c e c o n t o u r of a p o l y p h a s p r o v e n t o b e a r e l i a b l e

but s o m e w h a t less valuable sign for d i a g n o s i n g malignancy N o t e . — N u m b e r s in parentheses are percentages.


968 OTT ET AL. AJR:141, November 1983
Downloaded from www.ajronline.org by 202.67.32.3 on 04/13/21 from IP address 202.67.32.3. Copyright ARRS. For personal use only; all rights reserved

[7, 8, 1 1 - 1 5 ] . Although surface irregularity has been re­ i m p o r t a n t c o n s i d e r a t i o n in e v a l u a t i n g s m a l l e r p o l y p s w i t h


g a r d e d a s i n d i c a t i n g t h a t a p o l y p is i n c r e a s i n g l y l i k e l y t o be smooth, minimal indentation.
m a l i g n a n t , it d o e s n o t a l w a y s c o r r e l a t e w i t h t h e p r e s e n c e of B a s a l i n d e n t a t i o n w a s c l e a r l y e v i d e n t in 1 1 ( 1 5 % ) of t h e
c a r c i n o m a . T h i s is p a r t i c u l a r l y t r u e in s m a l l , s l i g h t l y l o b u ­ 7 1 s e s s i l e p o l y p s in o u r s e r i e s , a n d its p r e s e n c e w a s s i z e -
l a t e d p o l y p s w h e r e mild s u r f a c e i r r e g u l a r i t y m a y b e of little d e p e n d e n t . I n d e n t a t i o n w a s s e e n in o n l y o n e 5 - 1 0 mm
v a l u e in f o r e c a s t i n g m a l i g n a n c y [ 1 4 , 1 5 ] . p o l y p , a b e n i g n a d e n o m a . F u r t h e r m o r e , t w o of t h e f o u r 1 1 -
In o u r s t u d y , a s m o o t h s u r f a c e n e a r l y a l w a y s i n d i c a t e d a 2 0 mm polyps s h o w i n g basal indentation w e r e also b e n i g n .
b e n i g n l e s i o n , r e g a r d l e s s of s i z e . C o n v e r s e l y , o n e - t h i r d of T h e s e f i n d i n g s s u p p o r t t h e c o n c e p t t h a t t h e p r e s e n c e of
t h e l o b u l a t e d p o l y p s w e r e m a l i g n a n t , w i t h t h e i n c i d e n c e of b a s a l i n d e n t a t i o n in s m a l l e r c o l o n i c p o l y p s m a y r e p r e s e n t a
m a l i g n a n c y d e p e n d i n g o n t h e s i z e of t h e l e s i o n . A l t h o u g h g e o m e t r i c p h e n o m e n o n r a t h e r t h a n a s i g n of m a l i g n a n c y .
o n l y t h r e e ( 1 3 % ) of 2 3 l o b u l a t e d p o l y p s of 2 0 m m or less O n t h e o t h e r h a n d , e i g h t of t h e 1 0 p o l y p s o v e r 1 0 m m t h a t
w e r e m a l i g n a n t , 1 2 ( 5 7 % ) of 21 l a r g e r t h a n 2 0 m m w e r e s h o w e d basal indentation w e r e malignant. A most important
c a r c i n o m a t o u s . T h u s , t h e p r e s e n c e of l o b u l a t i o n in a s m a l l observation, however, was that among these larger malig­
c o l o n i c p o l y p s e e m s to be a p o o r p r e d i c t o r of m a l i g n a n c y . nant polyps, the basal indentation seen w a s prominent and
I n d e e d , t h e s u r f a c e m o r p h o l o g y of a s m a l l c o l o n i c p o l y p i r r e g u l a r , a n d o n p a t h o l o g i c e x a m i n a t i o n it i n v a r i a b l y r e p ­
w a s of little v a l u e in i n d i c a t i n g t h e h i s t o l o g i c o r i g i n of t h e resented carcinomatous infiltration.
lesion. Hyperplastic polyps were invariably smooth and typ­
ically s e s s i l e , a s w e r e m o s t of t h e s m a l l e r b e n i g n a d e n o m a s .
In t h e 5 - 1 0 m m r a n g e , t h e s e l e s i o n s w e r e u s u a l l y i n d i s t i n ­ Polyp Pedunculation

guishable. P e d u n c u l a t i o n of a c o l o n p o l y p h a s b e e n u s e d a s a s i g n
of b e n i g n i t y f o r m a n y y e a r s [ 7 - 1 2 ] , a n d t h e l e n g t h of t h e
pedicle has been e m p h a s i z e d . Polyps on stalks longer than
Basal Indentation
2 c m are almost never associated with malignant invasion
I n d e n t a t i o n at t h e b a s e of a p o l y p h a s b e e n s u g g e s t e d a s into t h e a d j a c e n t c o l o n i c w a l l [ 2 6 ] . T h i s is t r u e r e g a r d l e s s of
a s i g n i n d i c a t i v e of m a l i g n a n t i n f i l t r a t i o n i n t o t h e c o l o n i c wall t h e p r e s e n c e of f o c a l l y i n v a s i v e c a r c i n o m a in t h e h e a d of
[ 7 - 1 5 ] . T h e f r e q u e n c y a n d r e l i a b i l i t y of t h i s f i n d i n g , p a r t i c ­ the polyp [ 2 7 , 2 8 ] . As a result, p e d u n c u l a t e d polyps must
ularly f o r p o l y p s of v a r i o u s s i z e s , h a s n o t b e e n w e l l d o c u ­ be viewed s o m e w h a t differently from sessile lesions r e g a r d ­
mented [7]. Indeed, recent studies have suggested that ing t h e i r c u r r e n t d a n g e r t o t h e p a t i e n t a n d t h e i r likely m e a n s
smooth basal indentation m a y be a p r o j e c t i o n a l artifact of r e m o v a l .
r e l a t e d to t h e g e o m e t r y at t h e j u n c t i o n of t h e b a s e of t h e P e d u n c u l a t i o n w a s not a c o m m o n f i n d i n g in o u r i n v e s t i ­
polyp and colonic wall [ 2 4 , 2 5 ] . This w o u l d seem to be an g a t i o n . It w a s s e e n in j u s t o v e r o n e - f o u r t h of all p o l y p s , w i t h
AJR:141, November 1983 PREDICTIVE VALUE OF POLYP MORPHOLOGY 969

Fig. 4 . — A, 1.5 x 2 . 5 c m , l o b u l a t e d p o l y p n e a r
splenic flexure, thought to be sessile radiograph­
i c a l l y a n d h i g h l y s u s p e c t f o r c a r c i n o m a . B, S u r g i ­
c a l s p e c i m e n . S h o r t p e d i c l e (arrows) is e v i d e n t .
Colonoscopic polypectomy could have been done
easily. Pathologic examination revealed benign
adenoma.
Downloaded from www.ajronline.org by 202.67.32.3 on 04/13/21 from IP address 202.67.32.3. Copyright ARRS. For personal use only; all rights reserved

t h e h i g h e s t i n c i d e n c e in p o l y p s w h o s e h e a d s m e a s u r e d 1 1 - ing t h e risk of m a l i g n a n c y in a c o l o n i c p o l y p . S m o o t h , s e s s i l e
2 0 m m . P r e s u m a b l y , t h e s m a l l e r p o l y p s w e r e of i n s u f f i c i e n t p o l y p s of 5 - 1 0 m m a r e a l m o s t a l w a y s b e n i g n . In t h i s size
size t o p r o m o t e f o r m a t i o n of a r a d i o g r a p h i c a l l y v i s i b l e p e d ­ r a n g e , t h e p r e s e n c e of s l i g h t l o b u l a t i o n a n d m i n i m a l b a s a l
icle, w h i l e t h e l a r g e r o n e s w e r e o f t e n m a l i g n a n t , having i n d e n t a t i o n a r e m i s l e a d i n g a s s i g n s of m a l i g n a n c y . P o l y p s
infiltrated the colonic wall. Also, radiographic m e t h o d s seem l a r g e r t h a n 1 0 m m , h o w e v e r , h a v e a n i n c r e a s i n g c h a n c e of
to b e less s e n s i t i v e t h a n e n d o s c o p y in d e m o n s t r a t i n g p e ­ invasive malignancy. Lobulation and irregular basal i n d e n ­
d u n c u l a t i o n , e s p e c i a l l y if a r e l a t i v e l y s h o r t p e d i c l e e x i s t s tation a r e v a l u a b l e a d d i t i o n a l i n d i c a t o r s of c a r c i n o m a in
(fig. 4 ) . I n d e e d , in m a n y of o u r " r a d i o g r a p h i c a l l y s e s s i l e " these larger polyps.
p o l y p s , s h o r t s t a l k s w e r e p r e s e n t e n d o s c o p i c a l l y . It is i m ­ R a d i o g r a p h i c p e d u n c u l a t i o n is a r e l i a b l e s i g n of b e n i g n i t y ,
p o r t a n t to a p p r e c i a t e this l i m i t a t i o n , s i n c e e v e n l a r g e p o l y p s virtually e x c l u d i n g malignant invasion into the a d j a c e n t c o ­
o n s h o r t s t a l k s c a n be r e a d i l y r e m o v e d e n d o s c o p i c a l l y . lonic w a l l . C o m p a r e d w i t h t h e s e s s i l e p o l y p , e v a l u a t i n g t h e
A s a n t i c i p a t e d , p e d u n c u l a t i o n p r o v e d to b e a r e l i a b l e s i g n size a n d s u r f a c e c o n t o u r of t h e h e a d of a pedunculated
of a b s e n c e of c a r c i n o m a t o u s i n v a s i o n into t h e c o l o n i c w a l l . p o l y p is l e s s c r u c i a l b e c a u s e t h e s e l e s i o n s a r e e a s i l y r e ­
Of 2 5 p a t h o l o g i c a l l y e x a m i n e d p e d u n c u l a t e d polyps, 22 m o v e d e n d o s c o p i c a l l y , r e g a r d l e s s of t h e h i s t o l o g i c n a t u r e
( 8 8 % ) were benign, including four lobulated lesions with of t h e p o l y p h e a d .
heads larger than 2 c m . The three "malignant" lesions
i n c l u d e d o n e c a r c i n o m a in situ a n d t w o f o c a l l y invasive REFERENCES
c a r c i n o m a s in o t h e r w i s e b e n i g n a d e n o m a s , w i t h t h e p e d i ­
1 . M o r s o n B C , D a w s o n I M P . Gastrointestinal pathology, 2nd ed.
c l e s in all t h r e e l e s i o n s b e i n g f r e e of c a r c i n o m a . T h u s , all
Oxford: Blackwell Scientific, 1 9 7 9 : 6 0 7 - 6 4 7
2 5 p e d u n c u l a t e d p o l y p s in o u r s e r i e s r e q u i r e d o n l y s i m p l e
2 . L a n e N, F e n o g l i o C M . O b s e r v a t i o n s o n t h e a d e n o m a a s p r e ­
s u r g i c a l or e n d o s c o p i c r e m o v a l .
c u r s o r t o o r d i n a r y l a r g e b o w e l c a r c i n o m a . Gastrointest Radiol
1976;1 : 1 1 1 - 1 1 9
3. L a n e N. T h e p r e c u r s o r t i s s u e of o r d i n a r y l a r g e b o w e l c a n c e r :
Clinical Significance of Radiologic Signs i m p l i c a t i o n s f o r c a n c e r p r e v e n t i o n . In: Y a r d l e y J H , M o r s o n B C ,
A b e l l M R , e d s . The gastrointestinal tract. B a l t i m o r e : W i l l i a m s
T h e d o u b l e - c o n t r a s t b a r i u m e n e m a is a n e f f e c t i v e m e a n s
& Wilkins, 1 9 7 7 : 9 5 - 1 0 0
of discovering and morphologically describing colonic
4. O t t D J , G e l f a n d D W . C o l o r e c t a l t u m o r s : p a t h o l o g y a n d d e t e c ­
polyps. Although the method cannot make specific histo­
t i o n . AJR 1 9 7 8 ; 1 3 1 : 6 9 1 - 6 9 5
logic d i a g n o s e s , a g o o d e s t i m a t i o n of t h e p o t e n t i a l risk of 5. S h i n y a H, W o l f f W l . M o r p h o l o g y , a n a t o m i c d i s t r i b u t i o n a n d
m a l i g n a n c y in a c o l o n i c p o l y p c a n be g i v e n . c a n c e r p o t e n t i a l o f c o l o n i c p o l y p s . Ann Surg 1 9 7 9 ; 1 9 0 : 6 7 9 -
Size and surfce contour are important criteria for estimat­ 683
970 OTT ET AL. A J R : 1 4 1 , November 1 9 8 3

6. Williams GT, Arthur JF, Bussey H J R , M o r s o n B C . Metaplastic 18. L a n e N , K a p l a n H, P a s c a l R R . M i n u t e a d e n o m a t o u s a n d h y ­


polyps and polyposis of the colorectum. Histopathology perplastic p o l y p s of t h e c o l o n : d i v e r g e n t p a t t e r n s of epithelial
1980;4:155-170 growth with specific associated mesenchymal changes. Gas-
7 . Y o u k e r J E , W e l i n S , M a i n G . C o m p u t e r a n a l y s i s in t h e d i f f e r ­ troenterology 1971;60:537-551
entiation of b e n i g n a n d m a l i g n a n t p o l y p o i d lesions of t h e c o l o n . 19. G r a n q v i s t S , G a b r i e l s s o n N , S u n d e l i n P. D i m i n u t i v e c o l o n p o ­
Radiology 1968;90:794-797 lyps: clinical significance and management. Endoscopy
8. Y o u k e r J E , D o d d s W J , Welin S. C o l o n i c p o l y p s . In: M a r g u l i s 1 9 7 9 ; 11 : 3 6 - 4 2
Downloaded from www.ajronline.org by 202.67.32.3 on 04/13/21 from IP address 202.67.32.3. Copyright ARRS. For personal use only; all rights reserved

A R , B u r h e n n e H J , e d s . Alimentary tract roentgenology, vol 2, 20. Tedesco F J , Hendrix J C , Pickens CA, Brady PG, Mills LR.
2d e d . St. Louis: M o s b y , 1 9 7 3 : 1 0 3 7 - 1 0 5 2 Diminutive polyps: histopathology, spatial distribution, a n d clin­
9. M a r s h a k R H , L i n d n e r A E , M a k l a n s k y D. A d e n o m a t o u s p o l y p s i c a l s i g n i f i c a n c e . Gastrointest Endosc 1982;28:1 - 5
of t h e c o l o n : a r a t i o n a l a p p r o a c h . JAMA 1976;235:2856- 21. Christie JP. W h i c h colonic polyps should be excised e n d o s -
2858 c o p i c a l l y ? South Med J 1976;69:1143-1145
10. W i o t J F , F e l s o n B. S o l i t a r y b e n i g n c o l o n t u m o r s . Semin Roent- 22. Parrish JF. M a n a g e m e n t of patients with polypoid lesions of
genol 1976;11:123-137 t h e c o l o n : c u r r e n t c o n c e p t s a n d c o n t r o v e r s i e s . Am J Gastroen­
11. W e l i n S , W e l i n G . The double contrast examination of the terol 1 9 7 9 ; 7 1 : 3 1 5 - 3 2 4
colon: experiences with the Welin modification. Stuttgart: 23. Colacchio TA, Forde KA, Scantlebury VP. Endoscopic polyp­
Georg Thieme, 1976:18-42 ectomy: inadequate treatment for invasive colorectal c a r c i ­
12. L a u f e r I. Double contrast gastrointestinal radiology with endo­ n o m a . Ann Surg 1981;194:704-707
scopic correlation. Philadelphia: Saunders, 1979:517-560 24. Ament A E , Alfidi RJ. Sessile polyps: analysis of radiographic
13. M a r u y a m a M . Radiologic diagnosis of polyps and carcinoma p r o j e c t i o n s w i t h t h e a i d of a d o u b l e - c o n t r a s t p h a n t o m . AJR
of the large bowel. Tokyo: Igaku-Shoin, 1 9 7 8 : 3 3 - 6 3 1982;139:111-114
14. S k u c a s J , S p a t a r o R, C a n n u c c i a r i D P . T h e r a d i o l o g i c a p p e a r ­ 25. Ament A E , Alfidi RJ, Rao PS. Basal indentation of sessile
a n c e o f s m a l l c o l o n c a r c i n o m a s . Radiographics 1981;1:66- p o l y p o i d lesions: a f u n c t i o n of g e o m e t r y r a t h e r t h a n a s i g n of
72 m a l i g n a n c y . Radiology 1982;143:341 - 3 4 4
15. Skucas J , Spataro RF, Cannucciari DP. The radiologic features 26. M a r s h a k R H . T h e p e d u n c u l a t e d a d e n o m a t o u s p o l y p . Am J Dig
of s m a l l c o l o n c a n c e r s . Radiology 1982;143:335-340 Dis 1965;10:958-967
16. Figiel L S , Figiel S J , W i e t e r s e n F K . R o e n t g e n o l o g i c observa­ 27. Smith TR. Pedunculated malignant colonic polyps with super­
t i o n s of g r o w t h rates of c o l o n i c p o l y p s a n d c a r c i n o m a . Acta f i c i a l i n v a s i o n o f t h e s t a l k s . Radiology 1975;115:593-596
Radio [Diagn] (Stockh) 1 9 6 5 ; 3 : 4 1 7 - 4 2 9 28. O k i k e N, W e i l a n d L H , A n d e r s o n M J Sr, A d s o n M A . S t r o m a l
17. A r t h u r J F . S t r u c t u r e a n d s i g n i f i c a n c e of metaplastic n o d u l e s in i n v a s i o n o f c a n c e r in p e d u n c u l a t e d a d e n o m a t o u s colorectal
t h e r e c t a l m u c o s a . J Clin Pathol 1968;21:735-743 p o l y p s . Arch Surg 1977;112:527-530

You might also like