This document provides 13 references for model predictive control and process control. The references include books, journal articles, and documentation related to model predictive control techniques, system identification, process dynamics and control, distillation column control case studies using MPC, and DeltaV DCS documentation. The document also discusses how MPC was able to better handle constraints compared to PID control for an interactive multivariable process and control system.
This document provides 13 references for model predictive control and process control. The references include books, journal articles, and documentation related to model predictive control techniques, system identification, process dynamics and control, distillation column control case studies using MPC, and DeltaV DCS documentation. The document also discusses how MPC was able to better handle constraints compared to PID control for an interactive multivariable process and control system.
This document provides 13 references for model predictive control and process control. The references include books, journal articles, and documentation related to model predictive control techniques, system identification, process dynamics and control, distillation column control case studies using MPC, and DeltaV DCS documentation. The document also discusses how MPC was able to better handle constraints compared to PID control for an interactive multivariable process and control system.
This document provides 13 references for model predictive control and process control. The references include books, journal articles, and documentation related to model predictive control techniques, system identification, process dynamics and control, distillation column control case studies using MPC, and DeltaV DCS documentation. The document also discusses how MPC was able to better handle constraints compared to PID control for an interactive multivariable process and control system.
217.620 F 94.40% H 69.71BPD Bbl/day Edition,1993. 69.95KPP 76.90 218.910 F 218.910 F 94.45% H 71.13 BPD Bbl/day 65.11KPP 74.75 [ 3] Bѐla G. Lipták, Instrument Engineers’ handbook : 217.620 F 217.620 F 92.48% H 70.25 BPD Bbl/day Process Control, Third Edition, 1995.
[ 4] B. Wayne Bequette, ‘Process Control, Modelling
and Simulation’, Prentice Hall of India Pvt. Ltd.2003.
[ 5] S. Joe Qin, Thomas A. Badgwell, ‘A survey
of industrial model predictive control technology’, Control Engineering Practice 11 (2003) 733-764.
[ 6] Sudhir Panditrao, Sudhir Agashe, Prashant
Shevgaonkar, ‘Model Predictive Control of Pilot Spray Dryer Unit Designed and implemented for an Educational Institute ’.
[ 7] Dale E. Seborg, Thomas. F. Edgar, Duncan A.
Mellichamp, ‘Process Dynamics and Control’,Second Edition, 2004.
[ 8] W.K. Wojsznis (2005), Model Predictive Control
and Optimization.
[ 9] Tri Chandra S.Wibowo, Nordin Saad, and Mohd
Noh Karsiti, ‘System Identification of an Interacting Series Process for Real-Time Model Predictive Control’, 2009 American Control Conference Hyatt Regency Riverfront, St. Louis, MO, USA June 10- 12, 2009. Figure7: How better Interactive process is handled by MPC over PID [ 10] Vu Trieu Minh, Wan Mansor Wan Muhamad, ‘Model Predictive Control of a Condensate Distillation Column’, International Journal of Systems Control (Vol. 1-2010/ Iss.1). 10 CONCLUSION Model generated in MPC is of high accuracy, as it is [ 11] Saniye Ay and Suleyman Karacan, rightly confirmed from the methods used in Model ‘Decoupling Constrained Model Predictive Control Verification. Further MPC gives better results over PID in of Multi-component Packed Distillation Column’, World Applied Sciences Journal 13, 2011. the application of Interactive Multivariable Control System. As seen from above results MPC was able to [ 12] Yucai Zhu, Rohit Patwardhan, Stephen B. handle constraints very effectively as in this case Reflux Wagner, Jun Jhao, ‘Toward a low cost and high Valve Position and Reboiler Valve Position was performance MPC: The role of system constrained between low limit and high limit. identification’, Computers and Chemical Engineering 51 (2013) 124-135.
[ 13] Books on-line, DeltaV DCS Documentation,
ACKNOWLEDGMENT: Emerson Process Management, USA. We are very thankful to Emerson Export Engineering Centre for giving us opportunity. We would like to thank Mr. Koustubh Palnitkar and Mr. Archis Labhe for technical assistance. We are very grateful to Mr. Sachin Soman for moral inspiration while carrying out this project.
REFERENCES:
[ 1] Willian L. Luyben, ‘Process Modelling, Simulation
and Control for Chemical Engineers’, 1990.
[ 2] Warren L. McCabe, Julian C. Smith, Peter
Harriott, ‘Unit Operations of Chemical engineering’, Mc GRAW-HILL International Editions, Chemical