Mary Louise Kelly NPR Coverup Fraud

Mary Louise Kelly NPR Coverup Fraud

Mary Louise Kelly is a fraud and a hypocrite and must be exposed.

Mary Louise Kelly knew that NPR destroyed the lives of many people. She knew that NPR was
responsible for destroying a humanitarian cause, thereby destroying the chances for 10’s of
thousands of children not to be able to receive wheelchairs who are landline victims.

She knew the facts about NPR’s own in house attorney Ashley Messenger who was also
responsible for destroying innocent peoples lives, she knew about Ashley’s deceit and blatant
lies and coverups. She also knew that all of NPR’s board members including their bosses,
CEO’s Jarl Mohn, and John Lansing, were well aware of the cruel and despicable actions, yet
when presented all the evidence and case files, as a journalist, she refused to do anything.

Mary Louise Kelly knew that 2 innocent people, who were trying to do humanitarian work,
reputations and character was ruined by NPR, and that their lives were in danger, yet she did
nothing.

She also knew there were many other peoples lives that were affected by NPR, such as the 2
ministers reputations that had been destroyed because of NPR’s “All Things Considered” radio
broadcast, including over 30 people who were involved in this charity event.

Mary Louise Kelly was also fully aware of over 4-lawsuits filed by the Yeager’s, and because
she is an “investigative journalists” she was also fully aware of the mounds of evidence, the
documents, recorded conversations, emails between Ashley Messenger and the Yeager’s, she
was aware of NPR’s confession, admission, and their tricks to cover-up the truth, she was also
aware of the hundreds of exhibits and documents provided in the lawsuit files.

Mary Louise Kelly was also well aware that NPR had schemed and devised a plan to cover for
their admitted mistake, (see original emails from Messenger in case files) by offering an
“opportunity” for the defamed and destroyed person to “write your own story” yet refused the
severely damaged person the chance to address the accusations that were broadcast around
the world on the airwaves. She knew that NPR “censored” the defamed, telling them what could
be written and what could not be written. ( email correspondence in case files)

Mary Louise Kelly knew that NPR had used censorship, she knew NPR’s Ombudsman covered
it up, and she was fully aware that this person was severely ruined, depressed, on serious anti –
depressants medications, and tried to commit suicide twice, yet refused to interfere and stand
up to his bosses keeping her mouth shut.

Billy Yeager V. NPR (The Official Movie Trailer)

Mary Louise Kelly broke everyone of the standards that are required by the Society of
Professional Journalism CODE OF ETHICS

The Society declares these four principles as the foundation of ethical journalism and
encourages their use in its practice by all people in all media.

• Seek Truth and Report It

• Minimize Harm

• Act Independently

• Be Accountable and Transparent

These case files were all seen by the accused. (2017-2020)

https://billyyeagervnpr.com/writ-of-certiorari/

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1E9rR2KUaXzB91geqA22f-vZQZydiUW0ILxhQ8TkAUOE/
edit#

He was also aware of the most recent lawsuits. (2020-2021)

https://billyyeagervnpr.com/current-lawsuits/

Mary Louise Kelly was well aware (for over 4-years) of their own organizations (NPR) dozens
and multiple breach of codes and ethics that journalist are suppose to adhere to.

NPR MOCKING JESUS CHRIST

Mary Louise Kelly was also aware of NPR’s music journalist, Andrew Flanagan, that mocked the
crucifixion of Jesus on his Facebook account, also mocking the sinners prayer “Jesus Come into
my life” and changing it to “Jesus Cum in my Mouth” posting it to his Twitter account. She was
well aware that this was the journalist that was fully responsible for destroying all these peoples
lives, and yet all of these so called “investigative journalists” simply looked the other way.
Mary Louise Kelly condoned the behavior of NPR and everyone involved, and supported NPR in
their decision to take 100’s of thousands of tax payers money, and use it to pay 3 attorneys to
fight this case of injustice all the way to the United States Supreme Court, all under the medias
protection of “freedom of the press.”
Each of these so called “investigative journalists” reused to do anything and instead looked the
other way.

Trust these people?

I am just a drummer. But I have followed the case, read the files for 4 years, read about the
coverups, and this is a story that is bigger and is more of a public outrage story than any I have
ever seen.

In my entire life, I have never witnessed a more serious case of injustice, yet hear sits all these
people with big fat paychecks, and they have nothing to say.

In 2017 the lives of 10’s of thousands of children in 3rd world countries were affected by the
despicable actions of National Public Radio, Andrew Flanagan, NPR General Counsel Ashley
Messenger, NPR’s CEO’s Jarl Mohn, John Lansing, attorneys David J. Bodney and Matthew E.
Kelley. (and dozens more such as all of Flanagans superiors who were aware of the serious
situation for over 3 -weeks) Ashley Messenger QUOTE “We are taking this very serious” ( See
case files and 8 part series documentary)

Shards of the mine had blinded him torn his stomach open and had blown off both his arms and
legs. As his intestines spilled onto the ground he was not the first in his family to die this way.

Each day, 70 people die as a result of landmines. Hundreds of thousands of children, herding
animals, planting crops or just playing, have been killed or maimed by these deadly devices.
An estimated 100 million people around the world today are still in need of a wheelchair, the
vast majority of whom cannot get one on their own, must use handmade wooden crutches,
unless you are missing both arms and legs, if so then you must crawl on the ground.

There are in fact children whose parents have been seriously maimed and the only way to earn
a living is to remove land mines, children do this dangerous task, many have lost arms and legs,
there are some who crawl on the ground and remove them with their mouths.

The affordable wheelchairs made out of lawn chairs and bicycle wheels, are shipped to those
who need them worldwide.

It costs less than $60 to have each chair made, shipped and delivered to “some of the most
remote corners of the globe,” according to Schoendorfer’s website, freewheelchairmission.org.

Husband and wife William and Anais, who are musicians, filmmakers, artist, activist and
humanitarians, wanted to do something for these people.
For over 1 year they planned, organized and marketed a benefit concert that was raising money
to purchase those wheelchairs. I was a part of these concerts, as a professional drummer for
over 15 years, I was hired for the charity events.
In 2016 husband and wife team William and Anais Yeager began planning a series of musical
benefit concerts to raise money for these wheelchairs.
The event was called Mindy’s Wish.
NPR journalist Andrew Flanagan wrote an extremely defamatory article about the Yeagers’ in
March of 2017, he also took to the air-waves on NPR’s “All Things Considered” to tell over 100
million people world-wide that the Yeager’s were nothing more than charlatans and frauds.

Mocked and insulted so badly by Flanagan, NPR readers compared William Yeager to Charles
Manson.

The Yeager’s name was destroyed so badly that their reputations were forever ruined. Needless
to say, the concerts and venue, including 1 year of preparation that included over 30 people (
stage managers, lights and sound, musicians, caterers, ) was permanently terminated.

Yeager became severely depressed and tried to commit suicide, NPR’s attorneys, board
members, CEO’s and all of these journalists knew, the proof was in his wifes letter that was
addressed to them, informing them of his severe drama and mental condition.

Throughout the Federal Courts, Courts of Appeals, all the way to The United States Supreme
Court this case of injustice has been fought for over 4 years. Over 5 lawsuits have been filed
regarding this case.

The accused was fully aware that these concerts were bonafide, there were links to the event,
website including Brown Paper Tickets.

Proof

https://billyyeager.com/concert-kansas-malibu/

https://www.brownpapertickets.com/event/2596931

The Yeager’s, whose lives are destroyed because of NPR, have no lawyer, instead they have
had to fight their own case.
For NPR it has cost them nothing. Because you, me, we all . . . over 300 million Americans have
paid for their attorneys with our tax dollars.

NPR has taken our American citizen tax dollars ( yes NPR is government funded 500 million a
year) and spent 100’s of thousands of dollars hiring 3 attorneys to defend their 1st Amendment
Right of “freedom of the press” defending their “right” to destroy good peoples lives.

The story William Yeager v. NPR, is being made into a feature film documentary, with hopes to
be acquired by Netflix, assuring that the American people will learn about this travesty and
about all the people who are involved in this story.
The 8- part series about “the making” of the documentary film called “WILLIAM YEAGER V NPR
can be seen here. https://billyyeagervnpr.com/the-making-of-the-billy-yeager-v-npr/

I learned about the Yeager’s and their mission when I read their posting on a website, they were
looking to hire professional musicians. I began doing a little background research about Billy.

Besides being one of the most impressive guitar players I had ever heard, I saw he had a
website, that he had been discovered as a songwriter by some very famous people, ones like
Grammy Award Winner Bruce Hornsby. From 1992- 2001 I discovered he began producing his
own films, writing, directing, casting and even acting in his films. I also learned that several of
them had won awards. I also learned that since he met his wife, that they both embarked on a
spiritual journey leaving society and heading out into the Mojave Desert for 4 years making
another film called Jesus of Malibu.
I also learned that the Yeager’s were discovered by a producer in Hollywood from one of their
protests, and a film documentary was produced about their lives. The film was called “The Film
That Changed The World” and it told the story about their journey and their desire to use their
talents to help those who cannot help themselves.
It won Most Inspirational Movie Award at the Red Dirt International Film Festival.
I was excited and more so curious, and I came across another documentary film that was all
about Billy’s life, I watched it on Vimeo and I was sold, hooked, I wanted too be part of this
event.

I sent Damon Blalack ( Billy and Anais’s personal manager) files of my drumming abilities, and
after a few personal phone calls from Billy himself, I was hired. I was then sent audio files, song
arrangements, and the overall script and breakdown of the theater play and film projection that
was to be interwoven into the concert.

Piece by piece, musician by musician, it all was coming together and then . . .crash.

NPR’s journalist Andrew Flanagan.

Flanagan contacted no one, not Billy, not his manager or anyone of the 100’s of professional
people Billy had worked with in over 40 years.

He watched none of the documentaries.

He stated that Billy in fact did not have any music videos, (this was a lie, he did have several) he
also stated that his entire website was a fraud and fake, and that Yeager made up his entire
biography and was nothing more than an embittered, untalented nut case that was interested in
nothing but fame and infamy, and that he invested more of his energy creating scams,
bamboozles, rather than actual art and music. He stated that Billy had no purpose in life, and
that his wife married him because he was a nutcase, Flanagan made no attempt to tell the truth,
and he couldn’t.

He fabricated his entire article (in less than an hour) and then took to the airwaves accusing
Billy Yeager of something that he never had proof of, accusing Billy of something that he didn’t
do, and could never do, because NPR’s attorneys even ADMITTED they didn’t have proof of the
accusations. (see NPR’s attorneys email admission / case files)

I also learned from watching the documentaries and reading more files that Billy was interested
in helping people throughout his life while he was recording music and making films, such as the
time he wrote a song about a little girl called Anna.
Anna was run over by a drunk boater in Miami, her body destroyed, she became a vegetable.
Billy read about the girl, wrote and recorded a song and sent it to the mother who thanked him
in this letter.
How did I get that letter? Easy. It was included in case files, files and dozens of exhibits that the
Yeager’s had to provide to the courts to prove what kind of reputation NPR destroyed.
I have invested literally 100’s of hours reading these cases that have continued now for over 4
years.

More proof of good character destroyed by NPR.

Again, Billy and his wife reached out to CNN’s Hero, Krishnan. Billy heard about the 5 star
restaurant chef who gave up his career to take care of the mentally disabled and destitute in
India, wanting to help in another fashion.

Billy custom designed these handmade flutes from PVC pipe, scientifically tuned them to a
“sacred geometric wave frequency and vibration” and sent them to Krishnan to be given to the
mentally disabled. He included a rope to be attached, to be worn around the neck, so as not to
get lost.
The Yeager’s also included this in their exhibits in their “Motion for Reconsideration” since the
Federal Judges didn’t find the accusations and insults unlawful enough to forward the cases to a
trial.

This is because there are serious laws that protect the media, the media (by law) is freely
protected and allowed to lie and destroy peoples lives, there is never a case of defamation that
goes to court in the US. Correct me if I am wrong. Oh yeah! Johnny Depp! Oh, forgot, that was
in LONDON!

I rest my case.

The attorneys for NPR, David J. Bodney and Matthew Kelley fought adamantly against the
Yeagers. Their phone conversations are recorded and featured in the 8-part segment. They in
fact fought so dirty, that even though they were both well aware that Billy had been to the
hospital, emergency room, was on serious anti-depressants and PSTD medications, it didn’t
matter to the attorneys.

They made the decision to mock and defame Billy again in their motions, sending him into
deeper depression.

David Bodney fought so low as an attorney can go, that he stated in his argument for the
defense that Yeager was “nothing more than a film flam artist.” He even tried to convince the
judges that Billy had “permanently dyed his skin black and impersonated to be Jimi Hendrix’s
long lost son.” Yet Bodney knew perfectly well that this was an outright lie and that Billy had
played a character in a film called Jimmy Story, that was in fact a made-up character (Jimmy
Story) who was pretending to be the long lost son of Hendrix in a fictional comedy / drama film
that was produced by Billy Yeager way back in 1997.

David J. Bodney is one of the creepiest scumbags on this earth, if you thought Jeffery Epstein is
bad, check out this person.

NPR and David Bodney also fought for their right to destroyed other innocent peoples lives that
were friends and supporters of the Yeagers such as these 2 pastors who were mocked and
ridiculed by NPR’s readers who heard the malicious accusations and took to forums, social
media to trash and accuse these two pastors of being fakes and actors.
Tim and David submitted these letters to the judges, but it didn’t matter, the media wins.

Mary Louise Kelly also supported this.

Many of us still active as activists reach out, create videos, blogs, articles, we want those who
are responsible to be held accountable.

Looking into the matter more carefully a trail of corruption follows.

There are dirty lawyers and their own family’s condoning this behavior, there are editors,
journalists, and people like Craig Newmark and Kelly Mcbride, also Al Tompkins Conan Gallaty,
Lori Bergen, Caryn Baird, Baybars Örsek, and Harrison Mantas, each of them corrupt hypocrites
who knew all about this tragic event, all of these people were sent files from the lawsuits,
exhibits, videos, and excerpts from a documentary film that covers every aspect about the
details of this horrific injustice. ( links provided below)

All of them turned their backs.

Including NPR’s top Investigative Journalists ; Mary Louise Kelly, Sacha Pfeiffer, Mary Louise
Kelly, Laura Sullivan, Nancy Barnes, Mary Louise Kelly, and Mary Louise Kelly.

What exactly was Andrew Flanagan’s agenda?

The journalist who broke the story and who destroyed the concerts mocked Jesus Christs
crucifixion in his Facebook page. He also took the sinners prayer of “Jesus come into my life”
and replaced the words with “Jesus cum into my mouth” and this is who NPR defends for over 4
years now hiring 3 attorneys with OUR TAX DOLLARS, and all these people know this, these
screenshots from Andrew Flanagan’s twitter and Facebook account were submitted as evidence
in the case against NPR, yet NPR’s attorney David Bodney had Flanagan remove his social
media accounts committing serious violations.

A cover-up, and proof of something very disturbing about NPR. ( watch the 8-part series)

Mary Louise Kelly has no moral values or ethics, people can know what is right and even want
to do what is right but still not act rightly, because they are afraid. They lack the courage to
support their convictions. Coward is an adjective. It applies to one who lacks the courage to
perform a risk action or to confront a situation.

Beyond what we can feel or think there are moments when the situation asks us to act upon
something.

Not doing anything, not taking action is the best known and the most visible form of cowardice.
These are people who adopt a passive position in most areas of their lives.
Cowardice is also
evident in the lack of intervention in an external situation, in the face of something negative that
is happening to a third party.

The Oxford English Dictionary calls cruel those persons or, by extension, things that are
“disposed to inflict suffering; indifferent to or taking pleasure in another’s pain or distress;
destitute of kindness or compassion; merciless, pitiless, hard-hearted. Everyday sadists get
pleasure from hurting others or watching their suffering. Cowards can never be moral, said
Mohandas Gandhi.

Mary Louise Kelly knew that the Yeager’s lives were destroyed by NPR and their evil attorneys,
they knew the suffering they were going through because they all watched this video.

https://billyyeagervnpr.com/the-making-of-the-billy-yeager-v-npr/

The segments contain information about these people we intend to expose.

They did nothing. In fact they actually supported NPR and their agenda and still do.

I have had to wait for over 4 years for justice, learning over 40 songs and rehearsing for months
is a lot of work, I left a well paying gig to do this benefit concert that was destroyed.

Now we will spread the truth everywhere, since the media loves the first amendment and free
speech and wants to protect it ant any cost, then let it be fair game, all is fair in love and war
isn’t it?

Boycott Mary Louise Kelly make it well known.

These are evil people, all of them.

All aware, and they still hide in their closets, too afraid to come out and address the truth, we will
keep this crusade up insisting until they do come out and take full responsibility.

Peace


Greg

Who am I? I am a drummer, have played professionally for over 25 years. I have followed this
case very closely, 4 years is along time for justice.


I also initiated this investigation and was part of a team of writers and contributors (36 people)
that wrote and published this article about the fine details of this case.

It can be read here>

https://lawsuitnprspin2018.wordpress.com/2018/01/08/billy-yeagers-18000-00-record-album-an
d-400-million-dollar-lawsuits/

Recently I have invested my time reading every single document about this case, I have also
been in close contact with Damon the producer of the film documentary.
I am aware of the contacts made (emails to Poynter, Newmark, McBride and the rest) and those
are all verified.

ALL CASE FILES ARE HERE: https://billyyeager.com/current-lawsuits/

Sincerely Greg

Think you can sue me? ( Any of these posts: WordPress, Medium, Facebook, RipOff Report,
Blogger, Twitter, Petition.org, )

Think again.

All of this information will be posted on a site called Ripoff Report.

It has the highest search engines above anything else.

Your name will be found there, once that it IS NEVER, EVER REMOVED!

Think you have a lawsuit, better read! Freedom of Press works both ways, go cry to David
Bodney.

From Ripoff!

The Law You Need To Know – The Communications Decency Act

Because we will not remove reports, Ripoff Report has been sued on many occasions based on
the content which our users have created and posted. If you are considering suing Ripoff Report
because of a report which you claim is defamatory, you should be aware that to date, Ripoff
Report has never lost such a case (with one exception; explained below). This is because of a
federal law called the Communications Decency Act or “CDA”, 47 U.S.C. § 230. Because this
important law is not well known, we want to take a moment to explain the law, and to also
explain that the filing of frivolous lawsuits can have serious consequences for those who file
them, both parties and their attorneys.

The CDA is part of our federal laws. An excellent Wikipedia article discussing the history of the
law can be found here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Section_230_of_the_Communications_Decency_Act

In short, the CDA provides that when a user writes and posts material on an “interactive
website” such as Ripoff Report, the site itself cannot, in most cases, be held legally responsible
for the posted material. Specifically, 47 U.S.C. § 230(c)(1) states, “No provider or user of an
interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information
provided by another information content provider.”

Because the reports on Ripoff Report are authored by users of the site, we cannot be legally
regarded as the “publisher or speaker” of the reports contained here, and hence we are not
liable for reports even if they contain false or inaccurate information (NOTE: we occasionally
create editorial comments and other material, but when we do, this is clearly marked as such).
The same law applies to sites like FaceBook, MySpace, and CraigsList – users who post
information on these sites are responsible for what they write, but the operators of the sites are
not.

The reasons for this law are simple. Websites cannot possibly monitor the accuracy of the huge
volume of information which their users may choose to post. If an angry plaintiff were permitted
to hold a website liable for information that the site did not create, this would stifle free speech
as fewer and fewer sites would be willing to permit users to post anything at all. See generally
Batzel v. Smith, 333 F.3d 1018, 1027-28 (9th Cir. 2003) (recognizing, “Making interactive
computer services and their users liable for the speech of third parties would severely restrict
the information available on the Internet. Section 230 [of the CDA] therefore sought to prevent
lawsuits from shutting down websites and other services on the Internet.”)

Based on the protection extended by the CDA, Ripoff Report has successfully defended more
than 20 lawsuits in both state and federal courts. Each time, the courts have consistently found
that the CDA shields Ripoff Report from any claims seeking to treat it as the speaker or
publisher of information posted by a third party.
Here are just a few recent examples:

Intellect Art Multimedia, Inc. v. Milewski, 2009 WL 2915273 (N.Y.Sup. Sept. 11, 2009) (claims
against Ripoff Report dismissed for failure to state a claim due to CDA immunity)

GW Equity, LLC v. Xcentric Ventures, LLC, 2009 WL 62173 (N.D.Tex. 2009) (summary
judgment entered in favor of Ripoff Report based on CDA immunity)

Global Royalties, Ltd. v. Xcentric Ventures, LLC, 544 F.Supp.2d 929 (D.Ariz. 2008) (claims
against Ripoff Report dismissed pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) without leave to amend
based on CDA immunity)

Global Royalties, Ltd. v. Xcentric Ventures, LLC, 2007 WL 2949002 (D.Ariz. Oct. 10, 2007)
(claims against Ripoff Report dismissed pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) based on CDA
immunity)

Whitney Info. Network, Inc. v. Xcentric Ventures, LLC, 2008 WL 450095; 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS
11632 (M.D.Fla. Feb. 15, 2008) (summary judgment entered in favor of Ripoff Report based on
CDA immunity)

So, why should you care about the CDA? Well, it’s simple – if someone posts false information
about you on the Ripoff Report, the CDA prohibits you from holding us liable for the statements
which others have written. You can always sue the author if you want, but you can’t sue Ripoff
Report just because we provide a forum for speech.

Now, to be 100% accurate – some people have said that Ripoff Report DID lose one case in the
past, and that’s technically almost true. Here’s the deal – there was ONE case in 2003 where a
predecessor website to the Ripoff Report was sued in a foreign country and a default judgment
was entered in the plaintiff’s favor for more than $27 million “Eastern Caribbean Dollars” (we’re
not sure how much this would be in U.S. dollars). However, when the plaintiff tried to
domesticate that judgment in the United States, we fought it. The case was resolved and the
judgment was satisfied without any money being paid. If you think this still counts as a “loss”
you’re entitled to that opinion but we don’t see it that way. NOTE – as explained further below, a
new law was enacted in August 2010 which generally prohibits U.S. courts from honoring
foreign judgments like this.

Other websites say courts have determined Ripoff Report isn’t protected by the CDA, who’s
telling the truth?

In our opinion, the debate between Ripoff Report and our critics isn’t even close – we give you
the TRUTH and our critics don’t. Want an example? Here’s a good one…if you find someone
who claims that courts have determined we’re not protected by the CDA, ask them these two
questions:

What’s your authority for that? AND

Are there any more recent cases which have rejected that authority?

Here’s our response to these two questions. When we try to explain what the CDA does and
does not cover, some of our less-than-honest critics will cite two cases and claim that in those
cases, the court “held” or “found” that Ripoff Report is NOT protected by the CDA. These two
cases are MCW, Inc. v. Badbusinessbureau.com, LLC, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6678, *(N.D.Tex.
2004), and Hy Cite Corp. v. badbusinessbureau.com, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 38082 (D.Ariz.
2005). If you’re looking for a way to successfully sue Ripoff Report, these cases might sound
really helpful.

Trust us – they’re not. Here’s why.

Both cases involved basically the same facts – the plaintiffs alleged that Ripoff Report itself
(rather than a third party user) created false statements about them. Based on these unproven
allegations, the courts refused to dismis the cases under Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of
Civil Procedure. Does that mean we LOST the case? NO! Does that mean the plaintiff won?
NO! Does that mean the courts “held” or “ruled” that we lost CDA immunity? NO!

Because most people reading this page are not lawyers, we need to explain a simple point
about civil lawsuits – there’s a difference between making an allegation and proving that
allegation. You can allege that Donald Trump owes you $1 billion, but unless you have PROOF
to support that claim, Mr. Trump isn’t going to worry very much.

The decisions in both MCW and HyCite involved allegations, not proof. What does this mean?
Well, in both cases the courts refused to throw out the cases because the judges determined
that if the plaintiffs could prove that Ripoff Report actually created the statements at issue, then
the CDA would not apply. When courts make this type of ruling at the start of a case, it doesn’t
mean the plaintiff has won or that the plaintiff is likely to win. Rather, this type of technical legal
ruling does only one thing – it tests the legal sufficiency of the plaintiff’s claims. In so doing, the
court cannot review any evidence, and it must assume the allegations are true even if they are
not true. Based on this hypothetical, the court then determines if those unproven allegations
might support a claim IF the plaintiff can offer evidence to prove their case.

This is why the rulings in both MCW and HyCite are basically meaningless – the decisions were
not based on any evidence, they were merely based on unproven allegations. But don’t just take
our word for it. Look at what other judges have said in more recent decisions.

Bearing in mind that these are old cases (MCW was from 2004 and Hy Cite was from 2005), in
more recent cases judges have reviewed both MCW and Hy Cite and found both of them to be
absolutely irrelevant to our immunity under the CDA. See GW Equity, LLC v. Xcentric Ventures,
LLC, 2009 WL 62173, *4 (N.D.Tex. 2009) (finding MCW did not support argument that Ripoff
Report was not entitled to CDA immunity); Global Royalties, Ltd. v. Xcentric Ventures, LLC,
2007 WL 2949002 (D.Ariz. 2007) (finding plaintiff’s reliance on Hy Cite to be “unavailing”