CHAPTER V

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS, SUGGESTIONS AND CONCLUSION

5.1 FINDINGS

5.1.1 PERCENTAGE ANALYSIS

1. Majority (40%) of the respondents belongs to the age group of 21-30 years.
2. Majority (67.5%) of the respondents are male.
3. Majority (40%) of the respondents possess school level education.
4. Majority (46.5%) of the respondents’ family size is 4.
5. Majority (72%) of the respondents are married.
6. Majority (48%) of the respondents have their monthly income between 5001-
15000.
7. Majority (55%) of the respondents are bottom level employees.
8. Majority (46%) of the respondents have 3-5 years of experience.
9. Majority (55%) of the respondents have given their satisfactory level as good.
10. Majority (62.5%) of the respondents are satisfied with the salary.
11. Majority (61.0%) of the respondents are satisfied with the increment.
12. Majority (47.5%) of the respondents are neutral with the promotion.
13. Majority (33.0%) of the respondents are neutral with the settlement of complaints.
14. Majority (64.0%) of the respondents’ satisfaction level is medium in restroom
facility.
15. Majority (79.5%) of the respondents’ satisfaction level is high in drinking water
facility.
16. Majority (48.0%) of the respondents’ satisfaction level is high in first aid facility.
17. Majority (48.5%) of the respondents’ satisfaction level is low in Creeches facility.
18. Majority (109.0%) of the respondents’ satisfaction level is medium in canteen
facility.
19. Majority (53.0%) of the respondents’ satisfaction level is medium in mask
facilities.
20. Majority (72.0%) of the respondents’ satisfaction level is high in fencing of
machinery.
21. Majority (74.5%) of the respondents’ satisfaction level is high precautions for use
of portable electric light.
22. Majority (71.0%) of the respondents’ satisfaction level is medium in Precautions
against explosive or inflammable dust, gas, etc.,
23. Majority (50.5%) of the respondents’ satisfaction level is low in Precautions in
case of fire.
24. Majority (55.5%) of the respondents have given their satisfaction level in
technical skills is good.
25. Majority (43.5%) of the respondents feel about the bonus and incentives is good.
26. Majority (59%) of the respondents feel about the working environment is
excellent.
27. Majority (51.0%) of the respondents feel about the level of relationship between
employer and employee is good.
28. Majority (47.5%) of the respondents feel about the level of relationship between
employee and co-employee is good.
29. Majority (39.5%) of the respondents feel that they are able to meet and
communicate with their superiors only at sometimes.
30. Majority (53.5%) of the respondents feel that the organizational facilities are
provided always.
31. Majority (43.5%) of the respondents feel that the management often takes steps to
solve their problems.
32. Majority (37.0%) of the respondents feel that the management never discuss while
taking decision.

5.1.2 CHI-SQUARED TEST

33. There is a close significant relationship between the age group of the respondents
and the level of satisfaction.
34. There is a close significant relationship between the gender of the respondents and
the level of satisfaction.
35. There is a close significant relationship between the qualification of the
respondents and the level of satisfaction.
36. There is no significant relationship between the family size of the respondents and
the level of satisfaction.
37. There is no significant relationship between the marital status of the respondents
and the level of satisfaction.
38. There is no significant relationship between the monthly income of the
respondents and the level of satisfaction.
39. There is a close significant relationship between the nature of job of the
respondents and the level of satisfaction.
40. There is a close significant relationship between the experience of the respondents
and the level of satisfaction.
41. There is no significant relationship between the age of the respondents and the
employer employee relationship.
42. There is a close significant relationship between the gender of the respondents and
the employer employee relationship.
43. There is no significant relationship between the qualification of the respondents
and the employer employee relationship.
44. There is no significant relationship between the family size of the respondents and
the employer employee relationship.
45. There is no significant relationship between the marital status of the respondents
and the employer employee relationship.
46. There is no significant relationship between the marital status of the respondents
and the employer employee relationship.
47. There is no significant relationship between the nature of job of the respondents
and the employer employee relationship.
48. There is no significant relationship between the experience of the respondents and
the employer employee relationship.
49. There is no significant relationship between the age group of the respondents and
the employee co-employee relationship.
50. There is no significant relationship between the gender of the respondents and the
employee co-employee relationship.
51. There is no significant relationship between the qualification of the respondents
and the employee co-employee relationship.
52. There is a close significant relationship between the family size of the respondents
and the employee co-employee relationship.
53. There is no significant relationship between the marital status of the respondents
and the employee co-employee relationship.
54. There is no significant relationship between the monthly income of the
respondents and the employee co-employee relationship.
55. There is no significant relationship between the nature of job of the respondents
and the employee co-employee relationship.
56. There is no significant relationship between the experience of the respondents and
the employee co-employee relationship.
57. There is no significant relationship between the age group of the respondents and
their opinion towards welfare facilities.
58. There is no significant relationship between the gender of the respondents and
their opinion towards welfare facilities.
59. There is no significant relationship between the qualification of the respondents
and their opinion towards welfare facilities.
60. There is no significant relationship between the family size of the respondents and
their opinion towards welfare facilities.
61. There is no significant relationship between the marital status of the respondents
and their opinion towards welfare facilities.
62. There is no significant relationship between the monthly income of the
respondents and their opinion towards welfare facilities.
63. There is no significant relationship between the nature of job of the respondents
and their opinion towards welfare facilities.
64. There is no significant relationship between the experience of the respondents and
their opinion towards welfare facilities.
65. There is a close significant relationship between the age group of the respondents
and their opinion towards safety facilities.
66. There is no significant relationship between the gender of the respondents and
their opinion towards safety facilities.
67. There is no significant relationship between the qualification of the respondents
and their opinion towards safety facilities.
68. There is no significant relationship between the family size of the respondents and
their opinion towards safety facilities.
69. There is no significant relationship between the marital status of the respondents
and their opinion towards safety facilities.
70. There is no significant relationship between the monthly income of the
respondents and their opinion towards safety facilities.
71. There is no significant relationship between the nature of job of the respondents
and their opinion towards safety facilities.
72. There is no significant relationship between the experience of the respondents and
their opinion towards safety facilities.

5.1.3 ANOVA ANALYSIS

73. There is no significant difference between the age group of the respondents and
their opinion towards working environment.
74. There is no significant difference between the qualification of the respondents and
their opinion towards working environment.
75. There is no significant difference between the family size of the respondents and
their opinion towards working environment.
76. There is no significant difference between the monthly income of the respondents
and their opinion towards working environment.
77. There is no significant difference between the nature of job of the respondents and
their opinion towards working environment.
78. There is no significant difference between the experience of the respondents and
their opinion towards working environment.
79. There is no significant difference between the age group of the respondents and
their opinion towards solving their problems by the management.
80. There is no significant difference between the qualification of the respondents and
their opinion towards solving their problems by the management.
81. There is no significant difference between the family size of the respondents and
their opinion towards solving their problems by the management.
82. There is no significant difference between the monthly income of the respondents
and their opinion towards solving their problems by the management.
83. There is no significant difference between the nature of job of the respondents and
their opinion towards solving their problems by the management.
84. There is no significant difference between the experience of the respondents and
their opinion towards solving their problems by the management.

5.1.4 ‘T’ TEST

85. There is a close significant difference between the gender of the respondents and
their opinion towards working environment.
86. There is a close significant difference between the marital status of the
respondents and their opinion towards working environment.
87. There is a close significant difference between the gender of the respondents and
their opinion towards solving their problems by the management.
88. There is a close significant difference between the marital status of the
respondents and their opinion towards solving their problems by the management.

5.2 SUGGESTIONS

By analyzing the collect data and assigned findings, the following suggestions and
recommendation are given.

• Major causes of dissatisfaction as perceived by the employees are lack of

promotional opportunities and personal growth, absence of incentive bonus of
recognition for good work. Hence, promotion should be on the basis of merit and
performance.
 • Providing recognition by introducing reward system for outstanding
contribution in the company.
• To enhance job satisfaction and to improve overall performance of employees
incentives, bonus and target based reward should be introduced.
• The facilities regarding canteen and restroom are not found to be fully
satisfactory. Hence, necessary and adequate measures have to be taken to
improvise the prevalent facilities.
• The extra measures offered by the company are not found to be satisfactory.
The HRA and TA are not up to the workers expectation. Management should take
effective steps regarding extra measures.
• At present the company provides mainly on the job training programmes of
the employees which are not satisfactory, so the management has to provide
proper training to the employees before and after the placement. Training
programs are helpful to avoid personal obsolescence. It will help to develop their
ability and skills regarding job.
• For improving the level of welfare measure the organisation may introduce
employees welfare schemes such as,
 Medical claim policy
 Post retirement benefits
 Dependents benefits after death of employees.
 Financial loan facilities for house hold equipments, conveyance, wards
education etc.
 Policies regarding personal growth and development.

5.3 CONCLUSION

The study reveals that employees job satisfaction is influenced not only based on

nature of job but also various facilities provided by the company. The managerial staff

and workers are very cordial. The employees are offering their maximum support for the

improvement and uplift of the company. The employees enjoy the various facilities
offered by the study unit. Suitable amenities and benefits are made available to the

employees within the framework of the rules and regulations formulated.

Finally, the management should conduct job satisfaction surveys at least once in

every two years which would enable them to take necessary steps to improve job

satisfaction of their employees.

The management should also provide proper guidance about the technical side of

the respective jobs so as to make the Armstrong Knitting Mills, Tirupur City, a great

success.
FORMULA

Percentage

Percentage refers to special kind of ratio percentage are used in the marketing

comparison between two or more data. Percentage is used to describe relationship. Since

the percentage reduce everything to a common base and there by allow meaningful

comparison to be made.

A percentage is a way of expressing a number as a fraction of 100 (per cent

meaning "per hundred").

Number of frequency
--------------------------------- × 100
Total number of frequency

CHI - SQUARE TEST

A family of probability distribution, differentiated by their degree of freedom,

used to test a number of different hypotheses about variances, proportions and

distributional goodness of fit.

(O − E ) 2
2
Chi–square test (χ ) = ∑ E

Degrees of freedom = (R-1) (C-1)

whereas, O = observed frequency

E = expected frequency
R = number of rows
C = number of columns
ANOVA

To judge whether the difference among several sample means is significant or

not.

Mean Squares (MS) between

F-ratio =
Mean Squares (MS) within

where,

Sum of Squares (SS) between

MS between =
(k–1)

Sum of Squares (SS) within

MS within =
( n – k)

and k = number of samples,

n = Total number of items in all the samples.

INDEPENDENT ONE-SAMPLE T-TEST

This equation is used to compare one sample mean to a specific value μ0.

where s is the grand standard deviation of the sample. n is the sample size. The degrees of
freedom used in this test is n − 1.