Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Project For Performance Management: Research Proposal Mid Term Assignment
Project For Performance Management: Research Proposal Mid Term Assignment
5.1 Model...........................................................................................................................................................6
5.2 Hypothesis...................................................................................................................................................6
5.3 Requisite Scale of Variables.........................................................................................................................6
1|Page
CHAPTER # 2
HRM FUNCTIONS & PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION
Employee retention now a day is the biggest challenge that almost all employers are
facing. People join and leave organizations almost all over the world however, this
turnover and re-induction processes cost a lot of finances and efforts to the
organization. Therefore, in order to reduce employee turnover organizations, need to
have a strong employee retention and performance management plan. Like majority of
the organizations, Askari Bank is also finding it difficult to retain employees over a
longer period of time. Employees are always striving for better opportunities in terms
of better compensation packages and work environment. Focus of the organizations
have changed over the period of time, organizational focus has been changed from
turnover to retention of employees in order to save turnover and re-induction cost.
2|Page
Job Satisfaction has always played a pivotal role in improving employee’s performance
and his loyalties with the organization. It acts as a base of enthusiasm and motivation
for employees to improve their performance. Excessive work timings, difficult targets
and relationships with supervisors in Askari Bank sometimes results in decrease job
satisfaction which results in decrease employee performance. Organizations needs to
satisfy its employee by providing positive working environment and attractive pay
packages that will ultimately results in increase job satisfaction and ultimately in better
employee performance and retention. By lack of motivation and stressed working
environment employees at Askari Bank start losing interest in job and thus can’t fully
develop loyalties which ultimately results in decreased employees’ satisfaction and
increase turnover. Managing employee turnover is the biggest challenge for Askari
bank.
For this research study I have taken Compensation as independent variable which will
be analyzed in detail with its impact on Employee Retentions and Employee
Performance with a mediating role of Job Satisfaction.
2. RESEARCH OBJECTIVES
With this research I intend to find out the impact of dependent variable (compensation),
mediating variable (Job Satisfaction) on dependent variables (Employee performance and
retention). Besides finding out the impact of variable, this study will also analyze the HRM
functions along with the performance management system and their impact on employees.
3|Page
The secondary objectives achieved by this research includes:
3. RESEARCH QUESTIONS
a. Primary Questions:
b. Secondary Questions:
I. What are the standards set by Askari Bank for employees to achieve the
objectives?
II. Do employees have awareness of their job functions and responsibilities?
III. How employees contribute in achieving the objectives/ goals of bank?
IV. What are the gaps between ideal performance management system and
current system of Askari Bank?
4|Page
4. RESEARCH GAP
5. RESEARCH MODEL
1.1 Model
5|Page
1.2
Hy
pothesis
H1: Compensation has positive relationship with the Employee Retention and
Employee Performance.
Instrument for data collection will be the questionnaire. Questionnaire will consist of
two sections. In first section respondents will be requested to provide demographic
information. In second section to measure the Performance Management variable, the
questionnaire was based on the questionnaires used by Snell & Dean (1992), Boselie et
al. (2001), Singh (2004), Laka (2004), Qureshi et al. (2007).
7 Items Likert Scale method will be used to measure Compensation System and
Employee Performance (Masood, 2010). 5 items Likert Scale will be used to measure
Job Satisfaction (Macdonald, & Maclntyre, 1997). 7 item Likert Scale to measure
Employee retention (Iqbal, & Hashmi. 2015) will be used.
6|Page
(3) Neither agree nor disagree
(4) Agree
(5) Strongly agree
Reference:
7|Page
j. In general, I understand why I get what I get.
Reference:
Macdonald, S., & Maclntyre, P. (1997). The generic job satisfaction scale: Scale
development and its correlates. Employee Assistance Quarterly, 13(2), 1-16.
Reference:
8|Page
e. Over all employees targets achievements has improved over the last 5 years.
f. Employees feel happy to work in teams.
g. Majority of employees can work independently and give high performance.
h. Employees in organization have been enabled to make decisions well.
i. Employees’ communication skills have been improved in this organization.
j. Employees’ competencies are in line with the org. operational and strategic goals.
Reference:
a. I’m planning on working for another Institution within a period of three years.
b. Within this Institution my work gives me satisfaction.
c. If I wanted to do another job or function, I would look first at the possibilities
within this Institution.
d. I see a future for myself within this Institution.
e. It doesn’t matter if I’m working for this Institution or another, as long as I have
work.
f. If it were up to me, I will definitely be working for this Institution for the next
five years.
g. If I could start over again, I would choose to work for another Institution.
h. If I received an attractive job offer from another Institution, I would take the job.
i. The work I’m doing is very important to me.
j. I love working for this Institution.
k. I have checked out a job in another Institution previously.
9|Page
10 | P a g e
Reference:
Kloot, L., & Martin, J. (2000). Strategic performance management: A balanced approach
to performance management issues in local government. Management accounting
research, 11(2), 231-251.
Bragger, J. D., Kutcher, E. J., Menier, A., Sessa, V. I., & Sumner, K. (2014). Giving
nonselective downsizing a performance review. Human Resource Development
Review, 13(1), 58-78.
Rock, D., & Jones, B. (2015). Why more and more companies are ditching performance
ratings. Harvard Business Review, 8, 2-4.
Rynes, S. L., Gerhart, B., & Minette, K. A. (2004). The importance of pay in employee
motivation: Discrepancies between what people say and what they do. Human Resource
Management: Published in Cooperation with the School of Business Administration, The
University of Michigan and in alliance with the Society of Human Resources
Management, 43(4), 381-394.
Macdonald, S., & Maclntyre, P. (1997). The generic job satisfaction scale: Scale
development and its correlates. Employee Assistance Quarterly, 13(2), 1-16.
11 | P a g e