Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The Role of The Green Tribunals in India
The Role of The Green Tribunals in India
The Role of The Green Tribunals in India
net/publication/266676374
CITATIONS READS
0 1,882
1 author:
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by Swapan kumar Patra on 08 May 2018.
General Article
Government of India has formed National Green Tribunal (NGT) during the year 2010. NGT is a ‘quasi-judicial’
body exclusively deals with the environment related civil litigations. Before NGT has evolved, there were two
previous efforts to establish green courts in India. These were National Environment Tribunal Act, of 1995 (NETA)
and National Environment Appellate Authority Act, of 1997 (NEAA). However, the most effective environment
court in the form of NGT has come into reality in 2010. After its establishment, NGT has settled many
environmental issues and has got overwhelm response from different corners. This study conducted an empirical
analysis of NGT judgments since its inception in October 2010 to December 2013. It analyzes the impact of NGT,
the locations of conflicts. Special emphasis is given to the Coastal Zone management related conflicts settled in
NGT. Although there many limitations in NGT act and its procedures, it can be viewed as a positive step towards
the environmental justice in India.
*
The earlier version of this paper “The role of the "green tribunals” in India” was presented by Swapan Kumar Patra at the
Environmental Justice Organizations, Liabilities and Trade (EJOLT) conference in Rome held on 15 th November 2013 at the
session "Geographies of Environmental Injustice: Knowledge, experience and instruments in service of communities"
of the Stockholm Declaration stated that people 8 percent. India is evolving as one of the fastest
have “the fundamental right to freedom, equality growing emerging market, riding on the wave of
and adequate conditions of life, in an environment extensive industrial growth. The liberalization
of a quality that permits a life of dignity and well- process has unabatedly poured many project
being and he bears a solemn responsibility to clearances in manufacturing, mining and
protect and improve the environment for present exploration and other industrial sectors10. After
and future generations”6, 7. In unanimity with the the economic liberalization, it was observed that
Stockholm Declaration of 1972, the Indian the exports and FDI grew in the more polluting
Parliament amended the Indian Constitution and sectors relative to the less polluting sectors in the
adopted Articles 48A, (g), and Article 253.7. post-liberalization period11. As a result the issues
Consequently, The Water (Prevention and of ecology and social justice have come into a
Control of Pollution) Act 1974 popularly known sharp focus along with the surge of social
as Water Act, The Air (Prevention and Control of movements in the recent years. So, the need for
Pollution) Act, 1981 known as Air Act and the effective, powerful, technically equipped Green
Environment (Protection) Act, of 1986 were Courts are too obvious and was the need of the
passed by the Parliament. The Water Act of 1974 hour5.
(Amended in 1988) passed in the parliament to As a government initiative, before the
ensure that untreated domestic and industrial NGT Act come into existence, there were two
pollutants are not discharged into the water other efforts to establish specialized environment
bodies. Air Act of 1981 (Amended in 1987) was courts in India. The first was National
passed to control and reduce air and noise Environmental Tribunal Act (NETA) of 1995. The
pollution. Environmental Protection Act 1986 second one was National Environmental
(EP Act) was to protect and improve the Appellate Authority (NEAA) constituted under the
environment. The legislation consolidated the National Environmental Appellate Authority Act,
provisions of the Air and the Water Act including 1997.
rules relating to storing, handling and use of National Environment Tribunal Act, 1995
hazardous waste8. was passed by the Indian Parliament as a
The second environment related consequence of the Rio de Janeiro
conference, the Rio Conference of 1992 stressed Conference. In 1995, the Central Government of
the need for judicial and administrative access to India established the National Environment
the citizens of a nation-state. Also, it emphasized Tribunal (under the National Environment
national law regarding liability and compensation Tribunal Act, 1995). The main objective of the
for environmental damages for the pollution tribunal was to compensate the affected who deals
victims. Principle 10 of the Rio Declaration stated with the harmful substances.
that “Environmental issues are best handled with National Environment Appellate
the participation of all concerned citizens, at the Authority Act, (NEAA) of 1997 was passed
relevant level. At the national level, each specifically for the purpose of applying certain
individual shall have appropriate access to industries, operations or processes or class of
information concerning the environment that is industries, operations or processes shall be or
held by public authorities, including information shall not be carried out under the Environment
on hazardous materials and activities in their (Protection) Act, 1986. Ministry of Environment
communities, and the opportunity to participate in and Forests, Government of India established
decision-making processes. States shall facilitate NEAA to address the environment clearances and
and encourage public awareness and related issues required in certain restricted areas.
participation by making information widely However, the Authority become defunct and the
available. Effective access to judicial and Act repealed with the enactment of the National
administrative proceedings, including redress and Green Tribunal Bill 200912, 13, 14.
remedy, shall be provided”9. With the four path breaking judgments by
Almost at the same time, after about four the Supreme Court of India (M.C. Mehta vs.
decades of self-reliance strategy, India initiated its Union of India, 1986 (2) SCC 176; Indian Council
economic reforms in 1991. Subsequently, Indian for Environmental-Legal Action Vs Union of
economy was gradually liberalized. Indian India: 1996(3) SCC 212; A.P. Pollution Control
Government facilitates the flow of Foreign Direct Board vs. M.V. Nayudu: 1999(2) SCC 718 (dated
Investment (FDI) by raising the limits of foreign 27.1.1999) and A.P. Pollution Control Board vs.
equity holding in many priority industries. After M.V. Nayudu II: 2001(2) SCC 62,), it was
the reform, since 2003, Indian economy realized that for environment related lawsuits a
experienced average annual growth of more than separate environment court is required (for detail
S.K. PATRA & V.V. KRISHNA: ENVIORNMENTAL JUSTICE IN INDIA
447
see Ref12, 13, 14). It was understood that Appellate Authority and has wider scope and
environmental cases involve interpretation and coverage than NEAA. This judicial body was
assessment of scientific data. Hence, meant to deal exclusively with the environmental
environmental courts require subject experts laws and to provide citizens the right to
along with professional judges. Also in another environment. Initially, it was decided in the bill
significant judgment, (A P Pollution Control that the main bench of the tribunal will be set up
Board vs. M.V. Nayudu), the idea of “multi- in Bhopal along with four other circuit Benches.
faceted” environmental court containing both However, now the main bench of NGT is located
judicial and technical/scientific experts gained the in Delhi, the national capital of India. The other
momentum. In all these above mentioned branches are in Bhopal, Chennai and Kolkata15.
significant cases, because of scientific data and Recently, the NGT started its Pune Circuit Bench.
complexity involved, it was realized the need of Pune Bench will have its jurisdiction over
both judicial members along with the subject Maharashtra, Gujarat, Goa and Daman & Diu16.
experts who are familiar with the issues. Setting up of court in different parts of the
Following the observation, the Law country serve as an example of global principles
Commission of India was assigned to undertake a of environmental justice translated at the local
detail study of the subject for the establishment of level1, 2, 3.
“Environment Courts” in India. The study took
examples from Lord Woolf in England and Composition of Tribunal
Environmental Court legislations from Australia, Section 4 of the NGT Act is dealing with
New Zealand and other countries. The the composition of the Tribunal. Section 4 states
Commission has prepared a report recommending that the tribunal will consist of a full time
the laws on “Environmental Courts and suggested chairperson. Chairperson will be appointed from
that Courts must be established to reduce the Judge of the Supreme Court of India or Chief
pressure and burden on the High Courts and Justice of a High Court. The chairperson has
Supreme Court. These Courts will be Courts of power to invite any expert member in the related
fact and law, exercising all powers of a civil court field to assist in the case if necessary.
in its original jurisdiction. They will also have Chairperson along with the Central Government
appellate judicial powers against orders passed makes rules for governing the procedures and
by the concerned authorities under the Water rules of the tribunal.
(Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974; The tribunal consists of 10-20 judicial
Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, members. According to the act, there should not
1981 and The Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 be less than ten but maximum twenty full time
with an enabling provision that the Central judicial members. Usually judges form different
Government may notify these Courts as appellate high courts and Supreme Court are appointed as
courts under other environment related Acts as judicial members of the tribunal. Beside the
well. Such a law can be made under Art. 253 of judicial members, the tribunal also consists of
the Constitution of India, read with Entry 13A of subject experts. The numbers of subject experts
List I of Schedule VII to give effect to decisions are also the same as judicial numbers. Subject
taken in Stockholm Conference of 1972 and Rio experts in the tribunal work as full time
Conference of 1992”. The commission also employees and their number will be not less than
recommends that the proposed Environment ten but subject to maximum twenty. The balance
Courts will be established initially at the State in number of the judicial and expert member is
level and later many more courts may be kept so that the equal representations from both
established in other part of the country. According the groups are possible. Expert members are
to the law commission, along with these doctorate degree holder either in physical sciences
establishments, the court will be accessible to or life sciences. Engineering post graduates can
citizens from the remotest part of the country14. also act as an expert member. The experts must
have experience of fifteen years in the relevant
National Green Tribunal Act, 2010 field including five years practical experience in
The National Green Tribunal (NGT) the field of environment related issues1.
introduced on 18th October 2010 under the According to Section 21 of NGT Act the
‘National Green Tribunal Act 2010’. Lok Sabha decision of the Tribunal are taken by the opinion
(the lower house of Indian Parliament) adopted of the majority. Section 21 of NGT Act further
the National Green Tribunal Bill, in 2009. The states that after hearing a ligation if the opinions
Bill replaces the earlier National Environmental are equally divided the Chairperson has the power
448 INDIAN J. MAR. SCI., VOL. 44, NO. 4 APRIL 2015
to decide the case after hearing. If the opinion by the Tribunal unless it is made within a period
equally divided even after the hearing in presence of five years from the date on which the cause for
of Chairperson himself, the case may be referred such compensation or relief first arose”1. Still,
to other Members of the Tribunal for his hearing. the Tribunal may entertain applications beyond
The other member has the responsibility to hear that prescribed time limit if it is satisfied by the
such application or appeal and decide the dispute1. causes mentioned by the applicant. If the court is
satisfied, another sixty days of leniency period
Jurisdiction of Tribunal might be granted in that case.
The tribunal’s jurisdictions include all The tribunal has also right to order for
environmental laws on air and water pollution, the compensation of property damaged and also for
Environment Protection Act, the Forest restitution of the environment in the affected
Conservation Act and the Biodiversity Act. With areas. In this case the tribunal has the authority
this effort, India joined Australia and New similar to a civil court. Tribunal has also power
Zealand, which have such specialized to divide the compensation or relief payable under
environment tribunals15. separate head specified in schedule II1. NGT Act
Schedule - I of the NGT Act for the first time gives a statutory recognition of
compromises of The Water (Prevention and the principle of no fault liability (absolute liability
Control of Pollution) Act, 1974, The Water – first recognized in the Oleum Gas leak case) and
(Prevention and Control of Pollution) Cess Act, principles of sustainable development,
1977, The Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980, The precautionary principle and polluter pays
Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, principle.
1981, The Environment (Protection) Act, 1986,
The Public Liability Insurance Act, 1991 and The Materials and Methods
Biological Diversity Act, 2002. Section 14 of For this study all judgments from the very
National Green Tribunal Act mentioned that the first judgment (The Sarpanch Grampanchayat &
Tribunal has jurisdiction over all civil cases Others Vs MoEF, application no 1/2011, date 25th
related to environmental issues. However, it is May 2011) to the judgments come in December
important to mention here that two major 2013 are collected from the NGT website. The
environment related legislations have been collected cases are stored in an in-house
excluded from the Schedule I of NGT Act. These developed database to investigate the trends. The
two important legislations are The Scheduled judgments are further analyzed for the types of
Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers judgments, the areas of conflicts and from which
(Recognition of Forest Rights) Act, 2006 and The state of India the conflicts have come up. For this
Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972. Section 14 purpose, the locations of conflicts are plotted on
further adds the time limit of disputes to be India’s map using Geographic information
entertained by the court. Point three of the section systems (GIS) software. DIVA-GIS is an open
states “No application for adjudication of dispute source software used to map the locations. This
shall be entertained by the Tribunal unless it is GIS software is downloaded used in this analysis
made within a period of six months from the date from the website http://www.diva-gis.org/.
on which the cause of action for such dispute first
arose. Provided that the Tribunal may, if it is The impact of NGT: 2011-2013
satisfied that the applicant was prevented by Since its inception in October 2010, the
sufficient cause from filing the application within National Green Tribunal of India is successfully
the said period, allow it to be filed within a upholding its mandate. It is acting as a ‘fast-track
further period not exceeding sixty days”. court’ for effective and expeditious disposal of
Tribunal has the authority to hear and dispose off cases relating to environment protections and
case related to the acts specified in Schedule I in conservations. The following graph shows the
accordance with sec 14 of the Act1. number of cases settled by NGT till December
The tribunal has the authority to provide 2013. It is observed from the Figure 1 that number
relief and compensation to the pollution victims of cases settled is increasing with the span of
and other damages to the environment arising time. The number of cases settled is almost
under the enactments specified in the Schedule II. double in first half (January –June) of 2013 than
This schedule includes accident occurred while first half (January-June) of 2012. Similarly the
handling any hazardous substance. However, “no July-December session of 2013 has settled more
application for grant of any compensation or than double number of cases than July-December
relief or restitution of property or environment session of 2012. In this way NGT is proved to be
under section 15 of the act would be entertained the first-track court in environmental justice.
S.K. PATRA & V.V. KRISHNA: ENVIORNMENTAL JUSTICE IN INDIA
449
The green court had also fined rupees 1 lakh each Authorities (CZMA) of five coastal states and a
to both the state and the environment ministry for Union Territory19.
violating the notification18. Among the many, the above mentioned
cases have shown that NGT is concern about the
NGT and coastal zone management conservation and preservation of coastal ecology.
From the beginning of the court, till NGT can oversee the functioning of government
December 2013, about 29 judgments are given by mechanism related to conservation prevention &
the NGT in relation to Coastal Zone related abatement of pollution in the coastal zones of the
litigations. Among these 29 judgments, 12 country.
applications are allowed, 8 applications are
dismissed, 6 applications are disposed with Results and Discussion
directions one each application is not allowed, As discussed in the genesis of the NGT,
partly allowed and modified. the Supreme Court of India had observed many
NGT has imparted many notable complexities in a number of environment related
judgments on the litigations to coastal zone litigations. So, the Court had realized for a special
related cases. In a couple of judgments NGT green court to deal with those complex issues.
ordered to stop illegal constructions made by the Accordingly SC had given responsibility to the
individuals in the coastal areas. NGT has also Law Commission of India to do a feasibility study
contested and question about the legality of for setting up special fast track ‘environmental
environment clearances granted by the respective courts’ to specially deal with the environmental
authorities. Among many notable judgments of related litigations. Law Commission in its report
high profile cases like OPG Power Gujarat Pvt recommended environmental courts under Article
Ltd, Sesa Goa and so on are worth noting. 247 of the Constitution. ‘Tribunals’, on the other
Following the petitions by fishermen, salt hand, are established under Article 323A or
workers and local residents NGT has Article 323B of the Constitution. The Tribunal
ordered OPG Power Gujarat Pvt Ltd to stop does not have the same constitutional power and
construction of its thermal power plant at Mundra authority like the Civil Courts or High Courts20.
in Gujarat till the requisite environmental So, in many of the recent cases accused questions
clearance granted (Review Application No. the authority of tribunal to hear the litigations.
4/2012, M/s OPG Power Gujarat Private Ltd. and There are confrontations in different level
Others vs. Husain Saleh Mahmad Usman Bhai between the government and NGT. Ministry of
Kara and Others). Environment and Forest (MoEF), Government of
In another case NGT has set aside a Goa India has told the Supreme Court of India that the
Coastal Zone Management Authority’s order. Goa tribunal does not have the powers to act suo moto
Coastal Zone Management Authority (GCZMA) in environmental related cases. MoEF mentioned
had issued notice to iron-ore mining company several shortcomings in the way the NGT
Sesa Goa (a Vedanta Group firm) to stop function and points that sometimes it has been
expansion of a jetty for loading and unloading of going beyond its jurisdiction. Ministry has
iron ores. GCZMA alleged that the construction recently told the Supreme Court that the tribunal
and expansion of dock is illegal and ordered the lacks legal mandate and also sometimes
demolition of the structure (Application No. government (here MoEF) disagree with the
49/2012, M/s Sesa Goa Ltd. and Another vs. State tribunal. Despite this NGT has gone beyond its
of Goa and Others). NGT in its judgment suspend jurisdiction and begun suo motu proceedings in a
the earlier order issued by GCZMA saying the couple of cases. The Ministry has raised other
GCZMA‘s order to stop and dismantle the issues of impropriety and claimed the NGT
structure violated the ‘principles of natural indulged in anti-government norms and
justice’. However, GCZMA has given permission regulations21.
to initiate further legal proceedings against the Government of Goa has also raised its
company with the fresh issue of show cause objection in the recent ban imposed by the NGT
notice if they intended to do that. on sand mining across the country. Goa
Following a petition filed by a Non- government considered that the ban imposed is a
governmental Organization (NGO), named case of judicial “over-reach”. As a consequence of
Coastal Action Network, the Southern Bench of NGT Order, many construction activities stopped
NGT has directed the MoEF to chalk out a because the high price and black marketing of
comprehensive management plan for the sea coast sands happened in the state22.
including the Coastal Zone Management
452 INDIAN J. MAR. SCI., VOL. 44, NO. 4 APRIL 2015
References
1. The National Green Tribunal Act, 2010, Ministry of Law 4. Sharma, R., Green Courts in India: Strengthening
and Justice, New Delhi, June 2, 2010 Environmental Governance? 4/1 Law, Env Dev J, 4(2008),
2. Yadav, N. K., & Kesav, P. K. B., Centre for Science and 50-71.
Environment, National Green Tribunal: A new beginning 5. Astrea Legal Associates LLP, The National Green Tribunal
for environmental cases? (http://astrealegal.com/the-national-green-tribunal), 2010
(http://www.cseindia.org/print/2900), 2011 6. United Nations Environment Program, Declaration of the
3. WWF India, Green Tribunal United Nations Conference on the Human Environment.
(http://www.wwfindia.org/about_wwf/enablers/cel/national The United Nations Conference on the Human
_green_tribunal/ ) 2014 Environment, Stockholm 1972
7. Khoday, K., & Perch, L., Green Equity: Environmental
Justice for more Inclusive Growth. Policy Research Brief,
S.K. PATRA & V.V. KRISHNA: ENVIORNMENTAL JUSTICE IN INDIA
453