Professional Documents
Culture Documents
MGMT 601 Syllabus TEMPLATE
MGMT 601 Syllabus TEMPLATE
MGMT601 - 3 credits
Leadership in the Global Context: 4 hours/week
Term/Year:
Instructor: Office:
Course Description
Through incorporating elements of leadership at all levels within an organization, students explore
leadership theories and best practices that differentiate successful leaders from others. With a view to
enhancing their ability to lead teams, students are challenged to identify their own leadership style and to
adopt new leadership approaches, skills and strategies. Strategic planning, leadership skills and critical
thinking skills are developed through applying strategic management tools and processes to real world
problems with a particular focus on ethical leadership.
Pre-requisite: None
Co-requisite: None
Learning Outcomes
At the completion of this course a student will be able to:
Contrast the role of leadership on communal, corporate and societal levels in terms of styles,
models and the philosophy of leadership in order to lead diverse teams with cross-cultural
differences
Assess the key role of critical thinking in leadership development and the importance of various
reflection frameworks as powerful tools for enhancing leadership skills
Categorize a wide range of leadership skills and attributes and assess various sources of power
and multiple approaches to influencing others
Compare different leadership styles in terms of benefits, limitations and impact of emotional
intelligence and apply different leadership techniques to real world examples
Assess the role of ethical leadership and the resources available to overcome the challenges to
sustainable leadership development
Required Resources
1
UCC and Partnership Collaboration to AC
● Hughes, R., R. Ginnett & G. Curphy, Leadership: Enhancing the Lessons of Experience, 9th
Edition, 2019, McGraw-Hill
Print ISBN: 9781259963261, 1259963268
eText ISBN: 9781260167702, 1260167704
Recommended Resources
● Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association, APA, 7th edition
ISBN: 978-14338- 3216-1
Weekly Schedule
Course
Week
2
UCC and Partnership Collaboration to AC
Course
Week
3
UCC and Partnership Collaboration to AC
Student Performance Assessment
Week 1
Article Review Review of the article related to the toplic
(Presenting: studied in class in the format of PPT 10%
Weeks 3- (Presentaton) presentation
10)
Total 100%
Applicable Policies
4
UCC and Partnership Collaboration to AC
The following documents form an integral part of this Syllabus, therefore need to be updated each term
by the Instructor and made accessible at the same time as this Syllabus to students:
Term-dependent policies:
Format for Assignment Report (see course page)
Grading Rubric for Papers (see course page)
Class Participation / Expectations. Class participation is an essential aspect of the course.
Students are expected to come to class prepared, having completed all necessary pre-class work,
which includes: reading the textbook; exploring presentations and articles on the portal, looking
up the meaning of unknown terms; formulating questions, etc. Students are expected to be
prepared and willing to engage in exploratory and discovery-based discussions. Participation can
take the form of the oral response as well as the voluntary presentation of new ideas, concepts,
relevant and interesting sources and other positive interaction in the class environment described
below. Students are also expected to be punctual and attentive, and points will be deducted for
lateness, inappropriate conduct, and other kinds of distracting behaviour such as text messaging,
inappropriate internet surfing, etc.
Students' contributions will be assessed according to the following guidelines:
90% - Excellent Contribution - substantial participation, offers relevant ideas, has clear and
thoughtful views, offers analysis and interpretation, encourages others' understanding, and
initiates original comments and direction, moves the discussion to conclusion or synthesis.
80% - Good Contribution - significant participation, expresses views, offers related analysis, and
facilitates some clarification of others' thoughts.
70% - Fair Contribution - some contribution of facts but minimal analysis.
< 70% - Minimal or no contribution - participate by attending but little more; minimal awareness
of the flow of discussion.
Late Assignments: The penalty for late submission without a pre-approved extension is 10
percentage points per calendar day
Standard UCW policies (hyperlinked and under various sections on the policy website):
APA Guidelines
http://www.myucwest.ca/attachments/librarian/files/APA_QuickGuide_7thEd.pdf
Policy 6006 – Copyright (Library section)
https://resources.finalsite.net/images/v1576849648/uwoca/c9nrtjt9mga2o50lexui/6006-copyright-
policy-rev-feb-14.pdf
Policy 6751 – Information Privacy and Security (Records Management)
https://resources.finalsite.net/images/v1576850207/uwoca/hrytdxbi0jbsjqmxgmon/6751-
informationprivacysecurity.pdf
Policy 9024 – Examinations (Registrar’s Office)
https://resources.finalsite.net/images/v1576852124/uwoca/hzmbkt5vyzfwnhyyyat4/9024-
examinations-policy-ac-approved-june-14-2019.pdf
o Out-of Time Final Examination Form (Registrar’s Office)
https://resources.finalsite.net/images/v1576852185/uwoca/jmratrpy6r70o4xo48dv/9024a-
examinations-out-of-time-form.pdf
o Out-of-Time Final Examination Form (Registrar’s Office)
https://resources.finalsite.net/images/v1576852185/uwoca/jmratrpy6r70o4xo48dv/9024a-
examinations-out-of-time-form.pdf
5
UCC and Partnership Collaboration to AC
Policy 5002 – Turnitin (Academics)
https://resources.finalsite.net/images/v1576846438/uwoca/szss2nvacyftjcwajue1/5002-turnitin-
policy-rev-feb-14.pdf
o You may be asked to submit some assignments electronically to Turnitin (via the UCW
portal), which checks for originality before evaluation by the instructor.
Grade Point and Letter Grades – see table below.
DESCRIPTOR GRADE
Exceptional: Normally achieved by a small minority of students who
90-100% A+
have consistently exceeded performance expectations in all evaluation
(4.33)
criteria.
Excellent: Demonstrates a comprehensive knowledge and
understanding of subject matter and achievement of learning outcomes 85-89% A (4.00)
at high levels of performance in almost all of the evaluation criteria.
Very good: Demonstrates a comprehensive knowledge and
understanding of the subject matter and achievement of learning 80-84% A-
outcomes at well above average levels of performance in most of the (3.67)
course evaluation criteria.
Good: Demonstrates substantial knowledge and understanding of the 76-79% B+
subject matter and achievement of learning outcomes at average to (3.33)
above average performance levels in most of the course evaluation
criteria 72-75% B (3.00)
Satisfactory: Demonstrates sufficient knowledge and understanding of
68-71% B-
the subject matter and achievement of learning outcomes at average
(2.67)
levels of performance in most of the course evaluation criteria.
6
UCC and Partnership Collaboration to AC
Submitting false records, information or data, in writing or orally.
Cheating : includes, but is not limited to:
Submitting the same work for different courses without prior permission from the faculty member;
Copying another person’s answers or other work;
Sharing information or answers when doing take-home assignments, tests, and examinations except
where the instructor has authorized collaborative work;
Having any unauthorized materials or equipment in an examination or test;
Submitting an assignment completed (or partially completed) by someone else;
Falsifying or making up data or bibliographic information;
Impersonating a candidate in an examination or test, or being assigned the results of such
impersonation;
Reproducing, sharing or otherwise making unauthorized copies of UCW materials in any format;
Using technological means such as cell phones, data storage units and other electronic devices
without prior permission from the faculty; and
Assisting others or attempt to help others to engage in any conduct described above or any other
activities prohibited by UCW.
Penalties for Academic Misconduct
Penalties for academic misconduct include, but are not limited to:
At the course level:
Written reprimand for retention in the student file (no transcript entry)
Repetition of the assignment or completion of a different, but similar, assignment (no transcript entry)
Failing grade for the assignment (no transcript entry)
Failing grade for the course (recorded on transcript)
At the program level:
Disciplinary probation for a defined period with written documentation retained in the student’s file
(transcript notation for period of probation)
At the University level:
Suspension (permanent transcript entry)
Expulsion (permanent transcript entry)
Rescission of degrees granted (permanent transcript entry)
Instructor biography:
7
UCC and Partnership Collaboration to AC