Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Measures For Effective Implementation of Poverty Alleviation Schemes in 21st Century
Measures For Effective Implementation of Poverty Alleviation Schemes in 21st Century
Measures For Effective Implementation of Poverty Alleviation Schemes in 21st Century
net/publication/280105505
CITATIONS READS
0 3,585
1 author:
Sanjay Aswale
Shri Chhatrapati Shivaji College, Omerga
91 PUBLICATIONS 5 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by Sanjay Aswale on 18 July 2015.
Affiliated to
Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University Aurangabad
Title
Measures for Effective Implementation of Poverty Alleviation
Schemes in 21st century
ABSTRACT
Measures for Effective Implementation of Poverty Alleviation
Schemes in 21st century
Key words – Domestic Economy, Poverty – Poverty Alleviation Schemes – Impact of
Schemes – Measures and Strategy for 2050
Introduction:
As of July 2008, the world’s population is estimated to be just over 6.684 billion, out of which the Asia and
Pacific region is 3.8 billion i.e. 50 per cent of the world’s population. This region also includes 7 of the 10
countries identified as having the largest number of poor people in the world. So far as India is concerned
population of India was 1027 millions in 2001 and the growth rate is 1.9 percent. The rate of poverty is 19.3 per
cent in 2007. The Number of poor people in India was 49 Million in 2007.Thus till today most of Indian people
who live in the rural area have been suffering from acute poverty from centuries. Mainly because proper and
special attention had not paid to get rid them from the poverty. The World Bank has been suggested the special
schemes might be implemented. The government of India also sponsored 51 poverty alleviation schemes with
budgeted expenditures about Rs. 72000 crores in 2006-07 to rural poor. Various anti poverty employment
generation and house services programes like Pradhan mantra Gram Sadak Yojna (PGSY), Indira Awas Yojna
(IAY), Suwarnjayanti Gram Swarozgar Yojna (SGSY), Drought Prone Area Prrograme (DPAP) etc. have been
in operation for decades in India. Several studies reveals that benefits of such programes fail to reach their
intended beneficiaries.
In this context the objectives have been framed like to analyze the various poverty alleviation schemes in India,
to identify measures for enhancing effective implementation of poverty alleviation schemes and to suggest the
future strategy for poverty alleviation schemes in India The hypothesis of the study are H1 - Anti poverty
programes help to reduce the poverty line and H2 - Anti poverty programes implemented properly The various
poverty alleviation schemes are in operation in India since independence. Out of these schemes 10 Schemes are
randomly selected for the present study. The secondary data required for the study is collected through
published text and statistical records of Government and other agencies. The data were analyzed by using simple
statistical techniques and hypotheses framed are tested.
The measures and future strategy for alleviating poverty find out by analyzing data of the study. The various
programes have been introduced for alleviating poverty in rural areas but yet 26 per cent of people still living
below poverty line. The programe has not touched all aspects of improvement of quality life of people. Lack of
people participation in decision making and actual implementing process is another obstacle of the programes.
There is need of re- structure of the Anti-poverty programes. The government should re-structure the Anti
poverty programes as per the need of rural people. But in the era of 21st century leaving the responsibility to the
government alone will be the biggest mistake. There is need to bring change by participation of people in the
global era.
Measures for Effective Implementation of Poverty Alleviation
Schemes in 21st century
1 - Introduction:
Since the 1950s the Indian government has made poverty reduction a priority in its development planning.
Policies have focused on improving the poor standard of living by ensuring food security, promoting self-
employment through greater access to assets, increasing wage employment and improving access to basic social
services. Even after more than 50 years of Independence India still has the world's largest number of poor
people in a single country. Of its nearly one billion inhabitants, an estimated 260.3 million are below the poverty
line. More than 75% of poor people reside in villages1.
Does our Domestic economy reach potential in this situation?
2 - Statement of Problem:
What needs to be done to reach potential?
The answer is reduction of poverty. The government of India has sponsored various income generations,
employment creation and house services poverty alleviation schemes to poor. Till today most of Indian people
who live in the rural area have been suffering from acute poverty from centuries. Mainly because proper and
special attention had not paid to get rid them from the poverty.
4 – Review:
Several studies reveals that benefits of poverty alleviation schemes fail to reach their intended beneficiaries.
8 - Poverty:
Poverty is a condition in which person fails to maintain their standard of living. Poverty defines on basis of the
money required to buy food worth 2100 calories in urban areas and 2400 calories in rural areas.(Since 1972). It
is a situation people want to escape.
No because in 1999-2000 only 27% of our rural population cannot afford 2400 Kcal?” According to NSSO 55th
round data the rural poverty line of Rs.327 in 1999-2000 corresponds not to 2400 Kcal but to 1868 Kcal. Thus
in 1999-2000, 75% of our rural population cannot afford 2400 Kcal. It is clearly seen from the following graph
that planning commission defined poverty ratio 27 percent, whereas NSS 55th Round report defined poverty
ratio is 74. 95 per cent in 1999-00. It can be concluded that there is 75 percent of the people are below poverty
line in India inspite of 26 per cent poverty ratio issued by government report. According to the National Sample
Survey results, people living Below Poverty Line (BPL) have come down came down from 36 per cent in 1993-
1994 (50th Round, NSSO)4 to 26 per cent in 1999-2000 (55th Round, NSSO)5.
Poverty Ratio- Planning Commission v/s NSS
74.95
Ratio ( Percentage )
27
Planning
1 Commission Ratio NSS
2 Ratio
Trends ( Y0 = a + bx )
2500
2187
2000
1691
1500
1269
1000 869 870 871 873 897 873 848 823 798
500
0
957
1008
1077
1132
1110
1162
960
1116
555
Projected
Projected
Projected
1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2015 2030 2050
Source : Ministry of Rural Development Note : 2001-02 - SGSY - upto January, 2002
Graph – 9.1.1 – Trends in Expenditure under Poverty Alleviation Programes – IRDP and SGSY
Trends in Families Swarojgaries in Lakhs
Trends ( Y0 = a + bx )
160
140 136
120
100 90
80
60
40 31
20 26 23 21 19 18 21 23 28
16
0
6
Lakhs)
25
22
21
19
17
17
10
Projected
Projected
Projected
( In
1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2015 2030 2050
Source : Ministry of Rural Development Note : 2001-02 - SGSY - upto January, 2002
Graph –9.1.2 –Trends in Families Swarojgaries under Poverty Alleviation Programes–IRDP and SGSY
From the above graph 9.1.2 it is concluded that the trends in number of swarojgaries is unchanged up to 2002,
but it will increase in the year 2015, 2030 and 2050.
Trends ( Y0 = a + bx )
25000 23725
20000
15000 15643
10000 8773
5000 3520 3924 4328
1499 1903 2307 2711 3116
0 1095
3879
4268
4467
2164
2440
2525
2032
1929
699
Projected
Projected
Projected
1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2015 2030 2050
Source : Ministry of Rural Development Note : 2001-02 - JGSY - upto October, 2001
Graph – 9.2.1 – Trends in Expenditure under Poverty Alleviation Programes – JRY and JGSY
Trends in Emloyment man Days in Lakhs
Trends ( Y0 = a + bx )
70000 66617
60000
50000
40000 42990
30000
20000 22908
10000 7550 8732 9913
0 462 1644 2825 4006 5188 6369
Days In
9517
8958
4006
3956
3766
2683
2683
861
10258
Projected
Projected
Projected
( Man
1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2015 2030 2050
Source : Ministry of Rural Development Note : 2001-02 - JGSY - upto October, 2001
Graph – 9.2.2 – Trends in Employment in Man days under Poverty Alleviation Programes – JRY and JGSY
Trends ( Y0 = a + bx )
7000
6000 5994
5000
4000 4358
3000 2722
2000 1904 1986 2068
1000 1414 1495 1577 1659 1740 1822
0
184
1236
1721
2160
2905
2882
2183
1861
531
Projected
Projected
Projected
1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2015 2030 2050
Source : Ministry of Rural Development Note : 2001-02 - EAS - upto September, 2001,
Graph – 9.3.1 – Trends in Expenditure under Poverty Alleviation Programes – EAS
From the graphs 9.3.1, and 9.3.2 it is evident that the trend in expenditure and swarojgaries in lakhs days under
EAS are fluctuated. There is need of restructure of the expenditure under this scheme.
Trends in Family Swarojgaries in Lakhs under EAS
Trends ( Y0 = a + bx )
5000
4605
4000 3917
3000 3227
2679 2714 2748 2783 2817 2851 2886 2920 2955
2000
1000
0
Lakhs)
495
666
2730
3465
4030
4718
4279
2786
2184
Projected
Projected
Projected
( In
1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2015 2030 2050
Source : Ministry of Rural Development Note : 2001-02 - EAS - upto September, 2001,
Graph – 9.3.2 – Trends in Families Swarojgaries under Poverty Alleviation Programes – EAS
Trends ( Y0 = a + bx )
25
20 20
15 15
10 10
7 7 7 7 8
5 5 5 5 6 6 6
0 6
8
Hectares)
Projected
( In Lakh
Projected
Projected
1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2015 2030 2050
Source : Ministry of Rural Development Note : 2001-02 - EAS - upto September, 2001,
Graph – 9.7.1 – Trends in area treated in lakh hectares under DPAP
9. 9 - Housing Programe:
This programe is started in 19985-86. The Indira Awas Yojna is the core programe for providing free housing to
BPL families in rural areas and targets SC/STs households and freed bounded labourers. It was first merged
with the JRY in 1989 and then it became separate housing scheme in 1996. The funds were provided for this
scheme in Ninth Plan is higher than Eighth Plan. Inspite of this during the period 1997-98 to 2001-02, the target
of 109.53 lakh new houses only 45 lakhs houses constructed.
Strategy
Use of ICT Fund
Allocation
Implementation Fund
Distribution
12.5 -Implementation:
The implementation of poverty alleviation schemes depends on the implementing department or its authorities.
Successful implementations of poverty alleviation schemes require an appropriate policy framework, adequate
funds, and an effective delivery mechanism.
Hypotheses Testing:
After analyzing the various poverty alleviation schemes in this paper we found that
1) The IRDP programe has significantly increased the income of 57 per cent of assisted families.
2) The table 10.1 reveals that the success of poverty alleviation schemes is reflected in the decline in
poverty ratio from 54.9 in 1973-74 to 36 per cent in 1993-94
So the first hypotheses “Anti poverty programes help to reduce the poverty line in India” is proved
After analyzing the various poverty alleviation schemes in this paper we found that
1) Under Social Security Programmes 8.71 million eligible elderly were identified, but the scheme could
reach out to only 5 million beneficiaries.
2) Under NOAPS 10 kilograms of food grains given per month free of cost. But only Rs. 174.4 million
were utilized out of the allocated fund of Rs. 990.5 million.
3) The government provided financial assistance under Urban Micro Enterprises to start 621,000 micro
enterprises but only 149,000 were trained in various trades to start micro-enterprises. Out of those
trained, how many were able to start micro-enterprises was not known.
4) Food grains under food for work programes lifted 21.26 lakh tones against allocation of 35.31 lakh
tones food grains in Jan 2002.
5) The target of 109.53lakhs construction of new houses under IAY only 45 lakhs houses constructed
during 1998-2002.
6) Under Land reform schemes 74.9 lakh acres area declared as ceiling surplus and only 52.13 lakh acres
was distributed among 5.5 millions beneficiaries.
Thus the second hypotheses “Anti poverty programes implemented properly” is not proved
To Conclude:
The measures and future strategy for alleviating poverty find out by analyzing data of the study. The various
programes have been introduced for alleviating poverty in rural areas but yet Millions people still living below
poverty line. The programe has not touched all aspects of improvement of quality life of people. Lack of people
participation in decision making and actual implementing process is another obstacle of the programes. The
government should re-structure the Anti poverty programes as per the need of rural people. But in the era of 21 st
century leaving the responsibility to the government alone will be the biggest mistake. There is need to bring
change by participation of people in the global era.
At last it can be said that effective implementation of poverty alleviation schemes help to reach potential
References:
1 Government of India (1995) -Consumer expenditure, NSS 50th round New Delhi
2 Government of India. (2001) -Consumer Expenditure, Employment & Unemployment
and Non-agricultural Enterprises in the Informal Sector in India NSS 55th
round (July’1999-June’2000).New Delhi
3 Kumar PV.(2007) -India’s GDP expanded at fastest pace in 18 years: Annual GDP up 9.4%,
but growth could moderate this year .Market Watch 2007; May
4 Poverty alleviation in rural India (2007) – Strategy and programmes, Available from http/planning
commission.nic.in/plans/2010
5. Monthly Public Opinion (2010) – Monthly journal Vol- LV No. 8 May 2010 P-14
6 National Sample Survey Organisation (2001); New Delhi:.
7 - Rajendran M, Mehts D, Pattanaik P K (2007), - Poverty alleviation through community participation-
Available from : http://www.unesco.org accessed on January 16, 2010
8 Rajendran M, Mehts D, Pattanaik P K (2007),- Poverty alleviation through community participation-
Urban basic services for the poor UBSP India. Available from
http://www.unesco.org/ most/asia12.htm,accessed on January 16, 2010.
9 Srinivasulu Bayineni, (2006) .- "Poverty Alleviation Programs In India: A Study," The IUP Journal of
Managerial Economics, IUP Publications, vol.(3), P- 79-89,