Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Teaching For Intl MND in CPS Humanities
Teaching For Intl MND in CPS Humanities
Teaching For Intl MND in CPS Humanities
https://www.emerald.com/insight/1933-5415.htm
Abstract
Purpose – The International Baccalaureate (IB) programme centers on developing students’ international
mindedness. Central to this effort is the programme’s “Learner Profile,” which details ten attributes that
teachers seek to cultivate through classroom instruction. This article reports on the ways that middle grades
and high school social studies and English teachers in Chicago Public Schools’ (CPS) IB programmes are
attempting to implement the Learner Profile as part of their classroom practice to support students’
international mindedness.
Design/methodology/approach – The project was carried out as a two phase, sequential mixed-methods
design. Phase I entailed a survey of IB teachers and programme coordinators across CPS to assess the
incorporation of the Learner Profile into instruction. Phase II consisted of mixed-methods case studies of CPS IB
programmes selected partially on Phase I data analysis.
Findings – We find that while teachers express high levels of familiarity with the Learner Profile attributes
and confidence in incorporating them into practice, we find wide variation in the actual implementation. Taken
as a whole, we find CPS programmes take divergent approaches to incorporating the Learner Profile based on
differences in understanding of the attributes and its purposes as well as key organizational facets related to
implementation.
Originality/value – Ultimately, we argue that the wide variation and lack of explicit incorporation of the
Learner Profile into classrooms is related in large part to the broad, indistinct nature of “international
mindedness” as a concept. The programme would benefit from creating more space for teacher and students to
critique the concept, especially those working from non-Western traditions.
Keywords International Baccalaureate, Middle years programme, International mindedness, Middle school,
High school, Social studies, Humanities, Urban education
Paper type Research paper
Introduction
While there are many philosophies, definitions, and curricular approaches to global education, the
space in which this teaching and learning occurs is local, specific, and particular. A key mediating
factor in the realization of global education is teachers who, through their instructional practices,
Social Studies Research and
Practice
This research was funded by the International Baccalaureate Organization. The findings and view © Emerald Publishing Limited
1933-5415
expressed in this article are those of the authors. DOI 10.1108/SSRP-09-2020-0040
SSRP create learning experiences for students that are informed by curriculum (Ball and Cohen, 1996).
How teachers approach this work, especially the contextual factors that influence their efforts, is
an important, but open issue. In this article, we take advantage of the International
Baccalaureate’s (IB) clearly articulated approach to “international mindedness” through its
“Learner Profile” (LP) to examine how high school teachers in the humanities understand and try
to incorporate this particular approach to global citizenship in their classrooms.
To promote the development of international mindedness in students, the IB created the
“Learner Profile” to serve as foundation for teaching and learning in all subject areas. The LP
provides a “. . . common framework, as a clear and concise statement of the aims and values of
the IB, and an embodiment of what the IB means by ‘international-mindedness’” (IBO 2008, p. 1).
The LP has ten defined attributes, spanning academic and social-emotional domains, that
teachers seek to cultivate through their instruction. The ten LP attributes are listed in Table 1.
We begin by providing an overview of the context for the research: the implementation of
the IB in Chicago Public Schools (CPS). We then review the research literature on the
incorporation of international mindedness and the LP attributes into classroom practice. We
next discuss the research methods employed in this study before presenting results from our
survey of IB Middle Years Programmes (MYP) [1] across CPS. This is followed by a short case
study of one MYP, located in a CPS high school, to further illustrate our findings. We find that
while teachers express high levels of familiarity with the LP attributes (and by relation
international mindedness) and confidence in incorporating them into practice, we see
Learner profile
attribute Description of the learner profile attribute
Inquirers We nurture our curiosity, developing skills for inquiry and research. We know how to
learn independently and with others. We learn with enthusiasm and sustain our love
of learning throughout life
Knowledgeable We develop and use conceptual understanding, exploring knowledge across a range
of disciplines. We engage with issues and ideas that have local and global
significance
Thinkers We use critical and creative thinking skills to analyze and take responsible action on
complex problems. We exercise initiative in making reasoned, ethical decisions
Communicators We express ourselves confidently and creatively in more than one language and in
many ways. We collaborate effectively, listening carefully to the perspectives of other
individuals and groups
Principled We act with integrity and honesty, with a strong sense of fairness and justice, and
with respect for the dignity and rights of people everywhere. We take responsibility
for our actions and their consequences
Open-minded We critically appreciate our own cultures and personal histories, as well as the values
and traditions of others. We seek and evaluate a range of points of view, and we are
willing to grow from the experience
Caring We show empathy, compassion, and respect. We have a commitment to service, and
we act to make a positive difference in the lives of others and in the world around us
Risk-takers We approach uncertainty with forethought and determination; we work
independently and cooperatively to explore new ideas and innovative strategies. We
are resourceful and resilient in the face of challenges and change
Balanced We understand the importance of balancing different aspects of our lives –
intellectual, physical and emotional – to achieve well-being for ourselves and others.
We recognize our interdependence with other people and with the world in which we
live
Reflective We thoughtfully consider the world and our own ideas and experience. We work to
Table 1. understand our strengths and weaknesses
IB learner profile Source(s): IB’s Learner Profile retrieved from http://www.ibo.org/contentassets/fd82f70643ef4086b7d3f292cc214962/
attributes learner-profile-en.pdf
variation in the actual implementation. We end with a discussion of our findings, namely that International
CPS programmes take divergent approaches to incorporating the LP based on differences in mindedness in
understanding of the attributes and its purposes as well as key organizational factors related
to implementation. We argue that the wide variation and lack of explicit incorporation of the
Chicago Public
LP into classrooms is related in large part to the broad, indistinct nature of “international Schools
mindedness” as a concept. The IB would benefit from creating more space for teachers and
students to critique the concept, especially those working from non-Western traditions.
Table 2.
International
Objectives for
individuals and
years programme
Objective A: (1) use vocabulary in context (1) use a range of terminology in context (1) use a wide range of terminology in
Knowing and (2) demonstrate knowledge and (2) demonstrate knowledge and understanding context
understanding understanding of subject-specific of subject-specific content and concepts, (2) demonstrate knowledge and
content and concepts, using through descriptions, explanations and understanding of subject-specific
descriptions, explanations and examples content and concepts through developed
examples descriptions, explanations and examples
Objective B: (1) explain the choice of a research (1) formulate/choose a clear and focused (1) formulate a clear and focused research
Investigating question research question, explaining its relevance question and justify its relevance
(2) follow an action plan to explore a (2) formulate and follow an action plan to (2) formulate and follow an action plan to
research question investigate a research question investigate a research question
(3) collect and record relevant (3) use methods to collect and record relevant (3) use research methods to collect and
information consistent with the information record appropriate, varied and relevant
research question (4) evaluate the research process and results, information
(4) reflect on the research process and with guidance (4) evaluate the research process and results
results
Objective C: (1) communicate information and ideas (1) communicate information and ideas in a (1) communicate information and ideas
Communicating with clarity way that is appropriate for the audience and effectively using an appropriate style for
(2) organize information and ideas purpose the audience and purpose
effectively for the task (2) structure information and ideas according (2) structure information and ideas in a way
(3) list sources of information in a way to the task instructions that is appropriate to the specified
that follows the task instructions (3) create a reference list and cite sources of format
information (3) document sources of information using a
recognized convention
(continued )
Year 1 In order to reach the aims of Year 5 In order to reach the aims of
individuals and societies, students should Year 3 In order to reach the aims of individuals individuals and societies, students should be
be able to and societies, students should be able to able to
Objective D: (1) identify the main points of ideas, (1) analyse concepts, issues, models, visual (1) discuss concepts, issues, models, visual
Thinking critically events, visual representation or representation and/or theories representation and theories
arguments (2) summarize information to make valid, well- (2) synthesize information to make valid,
(2) use information to give an opinion supported arguments well-supported arguments
(3) identify and analyse a range of (3) analyse a range of sources/ data in terms of (3) analyse and evaluate a wide range of
sources/data in terms of origin and origin and purpose, recognizing values and sources/ data in terms of origin and
purpose identify different views and limitations recognize different perspectives purpose, examining values and
their implications and explain their implications limitations
(4) interpret different perspectives and their
implications
Source(s): International Baccalaureate Organization. (2014, May). Middle Years Programme: Individuals and societies guide. Cardiff, Wales: International Baccalaureate
Organization
International
Schools
Chicago Public
mindedness in
Table 2.
SSRP The research literature on the IB, international mindedness and the learner
profile
Our problem is framed by the ways teachers and curriculum resources interact to
significantly shape instructional quality (Remillard, 2005). This is a complex process that
entails not only the nature of the curriculum, but also teacher beliefs and knowledge, student
beliefs and knowledge, and contextual factors at the school- and community-levels (Ball and
Cohen, 1996; Davis and Krajcik, 2005).
While the LP sets a high expectation for the traits students will develop through their IB
education, ambitious curriculum material does not itself guarantee high-quality instruction
(Tarr et al., 2008). Strong and comprehensive content knowledge one key (Lloyd and Wilson,
1998), as is well structured materials (Akkers, 1988) that are supportive of teacher and
student learning in their design (Hill and Charalambos, 2012). Still, teacher knowledge and
beliefs are strong mediating factors, with a teachers’ general approach – traditional,
mechanistic or inquiry-based – a powerful factor. Moreover, the presence of strong
instructional leadership within the school and the complex interaction that occurs when
multiple reform efforts are being simultaneously implemented profoundly shapes the ways
teachers create learning experiences from curriculum (Reohrig et al., 2007). Recognizing the
multiple, interacting influences on instructional quality can highlight the strengths and
limitations of both teacher knowledge and curriculum materials as contributing factors to the
quality of instruction (Hill and Charalambos, 2012). Considering these elements were vital in
our exploration of international mindedness in the IB classroom.
The research literature reveals that IB aims to support schools in their locally
contextualized journey towards international mindedness through development of the
learner profile attributes. While IB expects schools to embed development of the attributes
throughout classroom and school practices, IB aims to preserve local school autonomy for
how they reach the IB ethos of international mindedness. The literature reveals the recurring
theme for needed guidelines, additional training, and supports for teachers’ sense-making of
the attributes as well as international mindedness.
A recurring notion appears in the literature implying that relevance of the LP is directly
related to the challenges in teacher and student interpretations of attributes, adaptations
across cultural contexts and inconsistency in implementation across different schools as well
as different countries (Billig et al., 2014; Rizvi et al., 2013; Walker, 2010; Walker et al., 2014;
Wells, 2011; Weiss, 2013). The most recently published study of developing international
mindedness (Hacking et al., 2017) contends that it is more important for schools to make
international mindedness with implicit reference to the LP their own, adapted to their
distinctive community perspectives and circumstances. Sketching a similar depiction of the
international mindedness journey, Wells (2011) presented a similar sentiment as Hacking
et al. (2017) that school communities should not view international mindedness as an endpoint
but rather as an ongoing journey they undertake with continuous discussion for defining its
meaning, cultivating its practice and assessing its development.
In a recent study aimed to identify association between LP attribute development and
students’ exposure to IB programs, Bryant et al. (2016) found “that students and staff
attribute development of the Open-Minded attribute to international school contexts rather
than to the IB Continuum” (p. 100). However, a comparative case study of two suburban IB
middle schools serving a substantial number of immigrant and refugee youth revealed a wide
divergence in teacher practice whereby there was limited observation of practices
exemplifying a flexible teacher orientation towards global education, acknowledging the
global experiences, multiple languages and variety of viewpoints that students brought into
the classroom (Quaynor, 2015). The LP framework and the school context are not necessarily
exclusive of each other rather each may serve to drive the needed interactions between
teachers, students, and the intentional pursuit of international mindedness.
The literature denotes effective implementation of the LP is at least influenced, if not International
contingent on teachers’ readiness to embed the language and practice the attributes across mindedness in
subjects and design classroom practices that enable student acquisition of the attributes
(Billig et al., 2014; Rizvi et al., 2013; Stevenson et al., 2016; Walker et al., 2014; Wells, 2011).
Chicago Public
Weiss (2013) asserts teacher’ confusion stems from the ambiguity of the LP attributes, Schools
partly due to lack of available research as to how and why the current attributes were chosen.
IB provided MYP educators web resources that included a template for documenting the
integration of LP in curriculum and teacher professional development yet emphasized
application is not meant to be universal. Whereas IB aims to advocate for local autonomy
teachers and coordinators appreciate, schools voiced the need for additional guidance as
recommended by Chatlos (2015) in which he encouraged IB to provide additional guidance to
teachers as to how they can formulate more personalized or localized values in relation to the
LP. Chatlos argued that the content area and personal perspective of a teacher could influence
the attributes that they choose to emphasize in their teaching.
Although several of the studies (Walker et al., 2014; Ateskan et al., 2016; Billig et al., 2014;
Hacking et al., 2017; Rizvi et al., 2013; Stevenson et al., 2016; Van Oord, 2013; Walker et al., 2014;
Weiss, 2013) have included varying levels of implications of skilled teacher expectations for
developing LP attributes, Jones (2014) and Chatlos (2015) asserted in findings that teachers need
improved training for an in depth understanding of the LP. For instance, Ateskan et al. (2016)
highlighted teachers’ perspective of valuing administrators who experienced IB as teachers or
educators as this contributes to their ability to recognize the importance of specific training to
support MYP teachers. Qualitative data revealed teachers valued coordinators’ direct support
for developing LP attributes across instructional activities that met both MYP as well as
national curriculum requirements. Further, coordinators network with peers across their region
to exchange ideas and best practices of MYP implementation, which they bring back to their
building (Ateskan et al., 2016). Hacking et al. (2017) recognized that international mindedness is
to be personalized and contextualized to meet the local uniqueness of the school community.
Hacking et al. highlighted tools, rubrics and frameworks including the LP (among three others)
which schools could choose to adopt and establish structure, while maintaining flexibility as the
school approaches meaning-making, defining and developing international mindedness.
Research methods
This was a larger project on MYP teachers’ understanding of the learner profile (LP) and
incorporation of it into their instructional practice. For the purposes of this article, we focus
our examination of the data on the Humanities teachers. The research question guiding this
study was as follows:
RQ. How do humanities teachers in Chicago Public Schools Middle Years Programmes
understand the Learner Profile (LP) and incorporate the LP into their instructional
practice?
We utilized a multiphase mixed-method study approach to addressing the research question
in order to get a broad sense of how teachers incorporated the LP in MYPs across the district
as well as fine grain look at how individual teachers conceptualized the LP as well as
employed it in practice. Phase I involved a survey methodology emphasizing quantitative
data collection from MYP teachers and coordinators who are working Chicago Public Schools
with an IB curriculum. Phase II involved a set of instrumental cases studies of IB MYP
schools. The purpose of Phase I was to gain a broad understanding of CPS teachers and
coordinators understanding of the LP domains, perceptions of their level of incorporation of
the LP into classroom instruction, teachers and coordinators perceptions of how LP is being
implemented in their school curriculum and classroom instruction, and what resources
support their incorporation of the LP into classroom instruction.
SSRP The research team identified all CPS MYP (N 5 52) through public records. From school
websites and public records, the name and e-mail of the principal was collected. Principals at
the identified MYP schools were sent an e-mail describing the purpose of the research, the
URL for the online questionnaire, and a request to forward the e-mail to all faculty and IB
coordinators in the school. A total of 157 respondents accessed and started the questionnaire
(response rate: 51.48%) however, only 120 questionnaires were determined to be complete
enough to include in data analysis.
Data analysis focused on descriptive statics (e.g., measure of central tendencies, and
variability) for the sets of items from the survey (e.g., demographics, LP incorporation, LP
familiarity and confidence) to provide a descriptive analysis of the survey results. Tables and
figures were constructed for ease of reporting results. These descriptive statistics, tables and
figures are presented in the results section of the body of this report. In some instances,
correlation coefficients were calculated to report the associations between two sets of items.
Non-parametric statistics were used in order to make comparisons between grade level,
subject areas and length of school authorization.
Phase II utilized a multiple instrumental case study design at both the individual case
(teachers) level and the site case (school building) design to examine the practices by teachers
and schools as they incorporate LP into the curriculum and classroom instruction. The
purpose of Phase II provided a qualitative examination of how teachers incorporated the IB
LP into their classroom practice and school sites. Four case study sites were researched, a
selection based on grade levels (i.e., 6–8 and 9–12), years of authorization as an IB school and
reported level of LP incorporation from Teacher AND Coordinator Survey completed in
Phase I. For this article we focus on one site, Buffalo School, a 9–12th grade school that had
been authorized to implement their MYP by IB for 3 years at the time of the study. Buffalo
was selected from among the four cases because it presented us with the most robust data
from humanities teachers while also aligning with district-wide survey responses.
Data collection included interviews with MYP coordinators and school administrators;
focus groups with teachers; classroom observations of teachers, which included mini follow
up interviews; and review of curriculum materials, such as unit and lesson plans. Interview
data were coded according to our research question, which focused on teacher understanding
of the LP, incorporation of the LP into classroom practice and supports and resources for
incorporating the LP. The data were then triangulating with school-level survey responses
and classroom observation data to identify findings.
Figure 1.
International
Baccalaureate middle
years programme
diagram
Familiarity Confidence
3.81 3.79
3.77
3.80 3.62 3.65
3.60
3.40
3.20
rs le rs rs rs d e e
re ab ke to led de
d
rin
g
ke ce tiv ag
qui ge hin ica cip in Ca - Ta lan flec v er
In d n n M a
le T
m
u Pr
i n- Ri
sk B Re A
ow m pe Figure 2.
Kn Co O
Familiarity and
confidence scores of
Learner Profile Attribute learner profile
attributes
was explored more through correlation coefficients between the familiarity and confidence
for the LP attributes.
The results of LP incorporation by subject area (teachers’ main subject) show that the
incorporation mean score for Individuals and Societies teachers was the highest followed by
SSRP Language Acquisition and Physical AND Health Education, although the mean difference
was fairly small across these subject areas (see Table 6). Meanwhile teachers from Design
reported the lowest perception of LP incorporation, with large variation however among
teachers (SD 5 1.65).
The breakdown of teachers’ incorporation scores by subject areas for each LP attribute can
be seen in Table 3. The average mean across the subject area ranged from 2.97 to 4.00, across
the LP attribute ranged from 3.66 to 3.88 and across the subject areas and LP attributes ranged
from 2.71 (Design-Open Minded) to 4.40 (Individuals and Societies-Knowledgeable). It is notable
that some attributes (Thinkers, Open-Minded, Caring and Balanced) had mixed results. For
example, Thinkers was highly incorporated by Science teachers but it was the least
incorporated by Language Acquisition teachers. Perhaps the nature of the subject explains
why different subject area teachers had different incorporation mean scores for the same
attribute. Additionally, a remarkable point is that Communicators was the only attribute that
was moderately incorporated (by all of the teachers across subject areas) meanwhile
Knowledgeable and Principled were consistently moderately and highly incorporated.
We also divided the nine primary subjects into two groups of department areas (i.e. STEM and
Humanities). STEM consisted of Design, Mathematics and Science while Humanities consisted of
Arts, Language Acquisition, Language AND Literature and Individual AND Societies.
Table 4 shows teacher in the Humanities group reported higher incorporation score, with
less variation, than that of STEM group. In total, those 97 Humanities teachers reported a
medium level of incorporation (M 5 3.71). The incorporation levels among teachers across
department areas and by LP attribute is shown in Table 5.
Table 5 shows that the STEM teachers’ incorporation score ranged from 3.27 to 3.70. The
scores for Humanities teachers ranged from 3.68 to 4.03. In all attributes, the Humanities
teachers’ scores were higher than STEM teachers. Knowledgeable appears to be a high
priority attribute for all teachers, regardless of the subject area. Open-Minded and Reflective
appeared to vary the most between the two groups.
Table 6 provides a breakdown of data disaggregated by grade level, (6–8 and 9–10) for
each of the nine subject areas. Table 3 shows that the largest difference between grade 6–8
and grade 9–12 teacher mean scores was found in Arts and Science. This means that
incorporating LP in Art tended to be more conducive for both respondent groups, while
incorporating LP in Science in Grades 9–12 was likely more difficult than in Grades 6–8.
Examining subject area, Physical and Health Education teachers scored the highest
across the attributes especially on Communicators and Risk-Takers attributes while Design
teachers scored the lowest especially on Open-Minded attribute. However, in general,
Knowledgeable was the highest incorporated and Risk Takers was the lowest incorporated
attribute. Interestingly, while Risk-Takers was the highest incorporated in Physical and
Health Education, it was the lowest incorporated in overall subject areas. On the contrary,
Inquirers 3.34 1.32 3.86 0.67 3.72 0.85 3.00 1.67 3.86 0.91 3.70 0.94 3.93 0.58 3.69 0.79 3.70 0.67 3.70 0.91
Knowledgeable 3.75 1.41 4.00 0.95 3.94 0.79 2.96 1.68 3.95 0.81 3.65 1.10 4.40 0.51 3.86 0.75 3.92 0.55 3.88 0.93
Thinkers 3.25 1.31 3.57 0.95 3.92 0.67 2.88 1.63 3.95 0.72 3.74 0.89 3.96 0.59 3.89 0.65 3.83 0.56 3.77 0.86
Communicators 3.58 1.37 4.32 0.51 4.03 0.68 3.08 1.71 3.99 0.92 3.57 1.04 3.98 0.61 3.88 0.80 3.95 0.53 3.86 0.92
Principled 3.00 1.40 3.71 0.67 3.94 0.76 2.96 1.58 3.95 0.87 3.43 0.98 4.23 0.70 3.49 0.82 4.04 0.56 3.70 0.96
Open-Minded 3.33 1.30 4.39 0.43 4.00 0.73 2.71 1.62 4.03 0.77 3.32 1.01 4.23 0.62 3.40 0.87 3.76 0.70 3.72 0.96
Caring 3.08 1.38 3.89 0.59 4.06 0.67 3.21 1.71 4.00 0.91 3.43 1.04 3.83 0.79 3.64 0.83 3.86 0.60 3.71 0.96
Risk-Takers 3.28 1.35 3.68 0.49 4.00 0.80 2.92 1.68 3.77 0.84 3.43 0.97 3.83 0.66 3.80 0.82 3.65 0.59 3.66 0.91
Balanced 3.18 1.29 3.96 0.55 3.89 0.64 3.13 1.69 3.86 0.92 3.51 0.99 3.71 0.77 3.81 0.67 3.65 0.58 3.68 0.89
Reflective 3.43 1.38 4.21 0.60 3.86 0.65 2.83 1.66 3.91 0.99 3.32 1.02 3.85 0.68 3.76 0.71 3.50 0.70 3.68 0.95
Average 3.32 1.35 3.96 0.63 3.94 0.72 2.97 1.66 3.93 0.86 3.51 0.99 4.00 0.64 3.72 0.76 3.79 0.60 3.74 0.92
International
Schools
Chicago Public
mindedness in
subject areas
SSRP Knowledgeable became the highest incorporated as it was also highly scored in Arts, Science
and Individual AND Societies. Specifically, at Grades 6–8, Knowledgeable, Thinkers,
Communicators and Caring were imperative as they appeared in more than one subject areas
as the highest implemented while Open-Minded and Reflective were the lowest integrated. At
grades 9–10, attributes that were highly incorporated by more than one subject area teachers
were Knowledgeable, Open-Minded and Principled. However, Principled and Open-Minded
were also reported as the lowest incorporated by teachers from other subject areas. Reflective
was the attribute that appeared as the lowest incorporated by teachers from Sciences.
Generally, Grade 6–8 teachers had higher incorporation scores than Grade 9–10 teachers
particularly in Physical AND Health Education, Language AND Literature, Sciences and
Individuals AND Societies that scored above 4 in all LP attributes.
Subject
STEM (n 5 42) Humanities (n 5 55) Total (N 5 97)
LP attributes Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD
Discussion
Teacher understanding summary
Our research reveals that MYP humanities teachers, programme coordinators, and
administrators see the LP as a central component of the programme, but they were
somewhat varied in how they understood that role and how it should function. Teachers did
convey that they are very familiar with the LP and each of the attributes. They also have
confidence in their ability to incorporate the LP attributes and report doing so extensively.
This incorporation can be characterized generally as seeking opportunities within regular
classroom practice to integrate attributes. Teachers do believe they can influence students’
development of attributes, but their ability to do so is perceived to be related to students’ age
and living environment. Where teachers differed were about the extent to which the LP
should be incorporated in implicit or explicit ways as well as how they viewed students in
relation to the attributes. There was variation among teachers about the extent to which
students bring assets into the classroom that can be used to develop LP attributes and the
extent to which “international mindedness” is a concept that students had little experience
with prior to attending an IB school.
Conclusion
The literature review revealed three recurring themes aligned our research. These include a
need for additional guidelines, additional training and additional supports for teachers sense-
making related to the LP attributes and international mindedness. Yet, local context plays an
outsized role in how IB, international mindedness, and the LP are interpreted and
implemented in schools (Quaynor, 2015). We encourage the IB to offer guidance on how IB
schools can foster development of LP attributes in students that build on their intellectual
capabilities and cultural assets within their local context and that connect to a global context.
Within the guidance for incorporating the LP, we recommend that the IB be even more
deliberate in its message that the LP is a framework intended to develop international
mindedness. We found that to be a clear outcome in our review of the literature and review of
some IB materials, but that was not a key finding in our research with schools. The absence of
teacher connecting LP attributes with international mindedness despite IB’s explicit and
intentional alignment between them indicates a crucial breakdown in how schools
SSRP understand and implement the programme. We believe that more scholarship on how these
two core program elements relate, both in theory and in teaching practice, would be of great
benefit to IB programmes and the organization.
The LP is not designed as educative curriculum material (Ball and Cohen, 1996; Davis and
Krajcik, 2005). It is a goal statement, and the lack of supporting curriculum materials and
robust professional development around it leaves a significant gap that teachers are asked to
bridge. The particular difficulty is that the LP is trans-disciplinary, creating the challenge of
simultaneously drawing on teachers’ subject matter knowledge (Davis and Krajcik, 2005)
while also seeking coherence across classrooms. In such cases where curriculum materials are
not educative and teachers’ subject knowledge may be low, problematic instruction can result
(Charalambos et al., 2012). To begin remedying this, the IB can position teachers as learners
when developing curriculum (Akkers, 1988) to support LP incorporation. The IB can also
draw on technology to connect teachers with targeted professional development, such as
narrated videos of practice, online professional learning communities and livestreams from
classrooms around the world (Loper et al., 2017) focused on LP incorporation.
One of the principles that the IB emphasizes is local autonomy. This is a critically
important element of IB’s success. It has allowed an international curriculum framework to
adapt to a range of local contexts. However, as a result this also creates a situation where local
autonomy rests on local resources for implementation. In our research, we found that teachers
articulated a preference for local professional development and resources. They often
identified coordinator, teacher, and school-based LP resources as more effective. This raises a
question about whether local resources are adequate to support the implementation of the LP
or other aspects of the IB. Further, this points to a need to research about what is effective
teaching of the LP attributes. Even with initial, provisional research about effective
instructional practices that promote students’ LP trait development, the IB might commence a
virtuous cycle in which replication and evaluation studies can better refine and define what
good practice looks like in this area.
Taken together, teachers not drawing connections between international mindedness and
the LP along with the heavy influence of local school context suggests to us that a top-down,
standardized approach to global education is a fraught approach. The IB, as one of the most
established and well-developed global education programs, struggles to support its teachers
in part because its conceptualization of international mindedness as developed through ten
attributes is at once complicated and ambiguous. It is not fully realized and detailed within
the curriculum, so teachers have great latitude in how and even if they take up the idea. But
international mindedness could be operationalized in a different fashion, one that works up
from the students instead of down from an organizational standard. As a programme
distributed across the globe, IB has the potential to generate a wide variety of views about
what international mindedness is from students growing up in myriad cultural contexts. And
these ideas can be shared, discussed, and debated between students around the world. What
would come from conversations between Buffalo High School students and Japanese IB
students about creating a better and more peaceful world? This would be both the practice of
and learning about international mindedness.
Notes
1. The IB curriculum is generally structured along the lines of British schooling, with the programme
split into the Primary Years Programmes for students aged 3 to 12 (US grades pre-K through 5th), the
Middle Years Programme for students twelve to sixteen (US 6th-10th) and the Diploma Programme
and Career Programme for students 16 to 18 (US 11th-12th).
2. The MYP is a curriculum framework for students aged 12 to 16 and situated after the Primary Years
Programme and before either the Diploma Programme or Career Programme in the IB Continuum.
There are eight subject areas students take courses in: arts; design; individuals and societies; International
language acquisition; language and literature; mathematics; physical and health education and
sciences. Students spend a minimum of 50 hours in each subject area in each of the five years of mindedness in
the MYP. Chicago Public
3. The name of the school and all interviewees have been changed. Schools
References
Akker, J.J.V.D. (1988), “The teacher as learner in curriculum implementation”, Journal of Curriculum
Studies, Vol. 20 No. 1, pp. 47-55.
Ateskan, A., Dulun, O.€ and Lane, J.F. (2016), “MYP implementation in Turkey”, March, available at:
http://www.ibo.org/contentassets/a7bc64e18f3a4a5493d4213f648f8b18/research-myp-in-turkey-
full-report-en.pdf
Ball, D.L. and Cohen, D.K. (1996), “Reform by the book: what is—or might be—the role of curriculum
materials in teacher learning and instructional reform?”, Educational Researcher, Vol. 25 No. 9,
pp. 6-8, 14.
Billig, S.H., Fredericks, L., Swackhamer, L. and Epel, E. (2014), “Case studies of learner profile
implementation and impact in the United States”, July, available at: http://www.ibo.org/
globalassets/publications/ib-research/dp/lpintheusfullreportfinal.pdf
Bryant, D.A., Walker, A. and Lee, M. (2016), “A review of the linkage between student participation in
the IB Continuum and student learning attributes”, Journal of Research in International
Education, Vol. 15 No. 2, pp. 87-105, doi: 10.1177/1475240916658743.
Charalambos, Y., Hill, H. and Mitchell, R. (2012), “Two negatives don’t always make a positive:
exploring how limitations in teacher knowledge and the curriculum contribute to instructional
quality”, Journal of Curriculum Studies, Vol. 44 No. 4, pp. 489-513.
Chatlos, J. (2015), “The relationship of middle years programme (MYP) teachers’ beliefs and practice to
the international Baccalaureate (LP) learner profile”, available at: http://www.ibo.org/
contentassets/4ccc99665bc04f3686957ee197c13855/myp-teachers-and-learner-profile-executive-
summary-en.pdf
Chicago Public Schools (2020), “Stats and facts”, available at: https://www.cps.edu/about/stats-facts/
Davis, E.A. and Krajcik, J.S. (2005), “Designing educative curriculum materials to promote teacher
learning”, Educational Researcher, Vol. 34 No. 3, pp. 3-14, doi: 10.3102/0013189x034003003.
Hacking, E.B., Blackmore, C., Bullock, K., Bunnell, T., Donnelly, M. and Martin, S. (2017), “International
mindedness journey: school practices for developing and assessing international mindedness
across the IB continuum”, available at: http://www.ibo.org/globalassets/publications/ib-research/
continuum/international-mindedness-final-report-2017-en.pdf
Hill, H.C., Charalambous, C.Y. and Kraft, M.A. (2012), “When rater reliability is not enough: teacher
observation systems and a case for the generalizability study”, Educational Researcher, Vol. 41
No. 2, pp. 56-64.
IBO (2008), Towards a Continuum of International Education, International Baccalaureate
Organization, Cardiff, available at: http://www.ibo.org/globalassets/digital-tookit/brochures/ib-
continuum-brochure-en.pdf
IBO (2017), What Is an IB Education?, International Baccalaureate Organization, Cardiff.
Jones, K.S. (2014), Teacher Perceptions of Implementation of the IB Learner Profile, (Unpublished
dissertation), Walden University, Minneapolis, MN.
Lloyd, G.M. and Wilson, M. (1998), “Supporting innovation: the impact of a teacher’s conceptions of
functions on his implementation of a reform curriculum”, Journal of Research in Mathematics
Education, Vol. 29 No. 3, pp. 248-274.
Loper, S., McNeill, K. and Gonzalez-Howard, M. (2017), “Multimedia educative curriculum materials
(MECMs): teachers’ choices in using MECMs designed to support scientific argumentation”,
SSRP Journal of Science Teacher Education, Vol. 28 No. 1, pp. 36-56, doi: 10.1080/1046560X.2016.
1277600.
Quaynor, L. (2015), “Connections and contradictions in teacher practices for preparing globally
minded citizens in two IB public schools”, Teachers College, Vol. 117 No. 9, pp. 1-38, available at:
http://www.tcrecord.org
Remillard, J.T. (2005), “Examining key concepts in research on teachers’ use of mathematics
curricula”, Review of Educational Research, Vol. 75 No. 2, pp. 211-246.
Rizvi, F., Acquaro, D., Quay, J., Sallis, R., Savage, G. and Sobhani, N. (2013), “IB learner profile: a
comparative study of implementation, adaptation and outcomes in India, Australia and Hong
Kong”, available at: http://www.ibo.org/globalassets/publications/ib-research/dp/
lpin3countriesreportfinal.pdf
Roderick, M., Coca, V., Kelly-Kemple, T. and Morange, K. (2012), Working to My Potential: The
Postsecondary Experiences of CPS Students in the International Baccalaureate Diploma
Programme, University of Chicago Consortium on Chicago School Research, Chicago, Illinois.
Roehrig, G., Kruse, R. and Kern, A. (2007), “Teacher and school characteristics and their influence on
curriculum implementation”, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, Vol. 44 No. 7, pp. 883-907.
Stevenson, H., Joseph, S., Bailey, L., Cooker, L., Fox, S. and Bowman, A. (2016), “‘Caring’ across the
international Baccalaureate continuum”, available at: http://www.ibo.org/contentassets/
e61e2e91dc514aa6a05b85ccdafe3c4a/caring-across-the-ib-contiuum-final-report.pdf
Tarr, E.J., Reys, R.E., Reys, B.J., Chavez, O., Shih, J. and Osterlind, S.J. (2008), “The impact of middle-
grades mathematics curricula and the classroom learning environment on student
achievement”, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, Vol. 39 No. 3, pp. 247-280.
Van Oord, L. (2013), “Moral education and the International Baccalaureate learner profile”,
Educational Studies, Vol. 39 No. 2, pp. 208-218, doi: 10.1080/03055698.2012.717260.
Walker, G. (2010), East Is East and West Is West, International Baccalaureate Organization, Cardiff.
Walker, G., Lee, W. and Panjwani, F. (2014b), Reflections and Projections on the IB Learner Profile,
International Baccalaureate Organization, Cardiff.
Weiss, K. (2013), Teachers’ Perspectives on Assessment of the Learner Profile Attributes in the Primary
Years Programme, (Master’s Thesis), Bilkins University, Ankara.
Wells, J. (2011), “International education, values and attitudes: a critical analysis of the International
Baccalaureate (IB) learner profile”, Journal of Research in International Education, Vol. 10 No. 2,
pp. 174-188, doi: 10.1177/1475240911407808.
Corresponding author
Charles Tocci can be contacted at: ctocci@luc.edu
For instructions on how to order reprints of this article, please visit our website:
www.emeraldgrouppublishing.com/licensing/reprints.htm
Or contact us for further details: permissions@emeraldinsight.com