Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Mcelroy 1967
Mcelroy 1967
Author(s): F. W. McElroy
Source: Econometrica, Vol. 35, No. 1 (Jan., 1967), pp. 154-156
Published by: The Econometric Society
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1909390 .
Accessed: 06/01/2015 20:52
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at .
http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of
content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms
of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
The Econometric Society is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Econometrica.
http://www.jstor.org
By F. W. MCELROY
IN A RECENT issue of Econornetrica [2] T. Yasui stated the following: "Every production
function, f, in a and b with a constant elasticity of substitution a is of the form
f =F[((l - 6)a1-1I0 + 6b1-1hf)e/(6-1)I
where F is any (differentiable) function and 6 is a constant." The present note shows that
the class of functions of the above form is coextensive with the class of functions which
have linear expansion paths and constant elasticity of substitution but demonstrates the
existence of constant elasticity of substitution production functions which do not belong
to this class.
The term production function is used to denote a function f(a, b) with the properties:
(I) f(0,0)= 0;
(1I) f and its partial derivatives of the first and second order are continuous for
a>O, b>O;
(III) f, fa, fb >0 for a,b>0;
(IV) fa/fb is a strictly decreasing function of a/b along any contour f(a, b) = k
(k > 0), where subscripts denote partial differentiation.
For a general production function a relationship of the form a/b = G(f,fa/fb) holds
at all points (a, b,f) on the production surface. The elasticity of substitution at (a, b,f) is
given by
a log (a/b) a log G(fjfa!fb)
alog (falfb) 0log ( a/fb)
for all a, b,f > 0 where t is a positive constant. This condition implies that log G = log
C(f) - (l/t) log(fa/fb) or G = C(f) (fa/fb)-1/t where C is an arbitrary function of f
alone. Therefore the general CES production function satisfies the differential equation
(1) a/b = C(f) (fa/fb)-11 t.
Yasui considered the case where C(f) is a constant. In this case, and only in this case,
is a/b a function of fa/fb alone. One consequence of this is that the elasticity of substitution
can be written - dlog(a/b)/dlog(fa/fb) and the restriction to movements along an
isoquant loses its significance. It is because in this case elasticity of substitution is constant
along each ray (a/b = constant) that requiring it to be constant along any one isoquant,
as Yasui did, ensures that it has the same value everywhere.
154
positive values as f varies from 0 to infinity; therefore for any fixed a, b >0, there is a
unique f > 0 such that
(A(f)al-t + bl-t)1I(1-t) = B(f)
Denoting tLis unique f by g(a, b) an application of the implicit function theorem proves
that g has the (local) properties of continuity and possession of first and second order
partial derivatives. Moreover if R(a, b,f) is defined by
R(a,b,f) = (A(f)al-t + bl-t)I(1t) - B(`)
ga= -Ra/Rf
[(A(f)a' t +b'-t)tI(I-t)A(f)a-t]
[1j(1-t) (A(f)al -t +bl-t)tl(l -t) A'(f al-t _B'(f)]
and is positive for a, b > 0 under these restrictions. Similarly it can be shown that gb > 0
for a, b >0 and that ga/gb = A (f) (a/b)-t or ga/gb = A[g(a, b)](a!b)-t which shows that
ga/gb is a decreasing function of a/b along any contour g(a, b) = constant, and that g has
elasticity of substitution l/t for all a, b > 0.
The isoquants of this production function g are indeed of the form (in Yasui's notation):
(1 - 6)a1-11G + W-11G = constant, but 6 varies from isoquant to isoquant.1
Georgetown University
REFERENCES
[11 INCE, E. L.: Ordinary Differential Equations, New York: Dover, 1956, pp. 47-52.
[21 YASUI, T.: "The C.E.S. Production Function: A Note." Econornetrica, Vol. 33, July 1965,
pp. 646-648.
1 The authoris indebtedto the refereesfor this way of looking at the matterand also for valuable
suggestionson simplifyingthe exposition.