Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Sci - MG - Maths General - Science & Math - 4chan
Sci - MG - Maths General - Science & Math - 4chan
jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pw / qst / sci / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Edit]
[Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Formerly >>13183436 →
Reminder it took more than a thousand years for the cartesian plane to be invented
edition.
Discussion Guidelines:
1. Talk maths.
3. You're too old to start a maths degree and you're not getting into that PhD
program. Go fish for pats on the back at >>>/sci/scg
4. If you aren't going to post maths then at least make an attempt to be funny.
>>13217010
It's likely a bad source to learn DG from. Almost certainly a bad choice to start with.
I like that some people do those "infinite napkin" things, although I also find it sad that you
have those 50yo incel guys who would probably appear shizo if you spoke to them. At least I
think Terry Davis was a talented "good old incel shizo". In math, those guys are usually
mediocre and with just too much time on their hand, due to their condition.
There's various of those projects, and I think one trait that signifies that they are not completely cringe is if the
effort becomes open source to some extent at one point. oeis is of course great and groupprops is nice too. I know
many of them.
>>13217288
>>13217288
Quantum Field Theory (Feynman diagrams, etc.) and computation/algorithms comes to mind.
Also graph theory if you don't count that as combinatorics itself.
>>13216886 (OP)
>You're too old to start a maths degree and you're not getting into
that PhD program
Rude. Have fun playing with numbers while I play with my dick.
I'm giving up on maths. I'm just too old already and I realized I'm dumb and low IQ. Not everyone manages to
accomplish their dreams I guess... some people were just born to suffer...
>>13217452
>>13217749
If you mean something more specific within algebra technically probably not. As in most textbooks on say
commutative algebra for instance atiyah macdonald will technically define all the terms they are using like rings
and stuff. But you might find it quite unapproachable if you're seeing the material for the first time even if
technically its possible for you to understand it.
>>13217749
Yes, Algebra and Analysis should be known by everyone regardless of what they choose to specify at in the future.
>>13217765
That's what I meant. There is some appeal in struggling it out with something like Atiyah-Macdonald, instead of
some 600+ page mega-tome.
>>13216886 (OP)
>>13217933
>>13217452
All of them
>>13216886 (OP)
>dont "introduce
variables" for proof
>-1 point
>>13216886 (OP)
>>13218153
How many of you anons read philosophical works and if you do, why and what are they? That other thread on
philosophy prompted this question. While philosophy occasionally interests me, I've never wanted to actually read
a book by a philosopher.
>>13218174
Wittgenstein (young) and Stirner were the most influential non-textbook writers for me, which
is not to say I hold their views. I have a lot more /lit/ memes in my shelf than I read. I read a
few hundred pages of Kan and Kierkegaard, and then Land and Fisher. Maybe others.
As far as epistemology and ontology go, I don't see it separated much from physics and math,
as long as you haven't chosen your formal axioms.
https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/Science+of+Logic
Kant
>they're trying to bully autodidacts while studying dying masturbatory fields filled with do-nothing
pseuds and increasing numbers of chinks and mudslimes
>>13218323
>https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/Science+of+Logic
>>13218332
Ma boy Urs trying to do something more relevant than proving stable homotopy theory theorems
or whatnot.
>>13218330
Go back to discord with the rest of the scum there and never come back.
>>13218342
Yeah I think it's nice that someone knowledgeable is trying something like this. I once even tried to read David
Corfield's "Towards a Philosophy of Real Mathematics" to see what this was all about.
>>13216886 (OP)
*discovered
ftfy
>>13218330
>>13218356
I started reading Corfield latest book, which jumps on the HoTT train. However it discussed too many
basic things to get me hooked. But that guy is, I think, a philosopher first.
And that's far away from Urs' ambitions. The latter in part originate from Lawvere's goal of formulating
fluid dynamics (and other physics I suppose) with categories/topoi logic/math.
I feel what Urs is (or would be, in the best case) achieving, however, is only develop more
mathematical tools to do his physics. And not, in fact, a science of logic. I'm not sure if all this "logic"
reflects on science in an ontological kind of way.
>>13218371
They're all fucking off to that discord, this thread will finally get good again.
>>13218323
>>13218439
>>13218439
It's a basic big glass and the photo was taken with my phone, I don't know what to tell you
>>13218464
Hello. Has anyone come up with some approximation for the Reiman Hypothesis?
>>13218492
I try my best
>>13218494
You could argue that the Weimar Hypothesis gives an improvement of prime distribution laws and, as such, the
previous prime number theorems are approximations to it.
The fact that large segments of the criticial line have been validated is also a sense in which it's approximately
true.
>>13218323
>schwabenbräu
based schwabe
>>13218541
>>13218570
>gaussian symmetry
I don't follow
>>13218330
There was a thread with different rules after the recent tranny- and avatarnigger-shoa, but the avatarniggers are
niggers as usual and posted their aids rules.
>>13218342
Have you actually met that dude? I legitly never met another man who unironically doesn't give any sort of fucks
and just does what he wants in such a focused manner. I in general do not think that formulating everything in cats
is a good idea, in fact I think it's pretty retarded and will only lead to obfuscation instead of insight, but holy shit the
only reason I have any respect category-insanies and higher-structure-schizos is because of this dude.
>>13218728
I'm honestly a bit baffled why he doesn't have a "proper" professorship yet. I'm starting to suspect that he's either
too based for the normie profs or simply doesn't care.
>>13218799
I think it's just a numbers game, there's not many positions and in that general corner, what's seen as mainstream
real math is homotopy theory (and he doesn't even do math as per his own presentation)
>>13218439
Also most people here I assume are at Uni, do you guys not drink
>>13219138
>>13217200
>>13216886 (OP)
>mfw the jock who used to make fun of me and acts as if I don't exist begs me for the Calc 2
homework that might save his gpa but I just left him on read
>>13218362
hello fellow platonist! I tip my hat to you good sir! have this 4chan gold!
>>13219330
whats a website that will show the steps involved in solved partial
derivatives for free?
>>13222036
Don't you like slow threads? It's better this way than when there were several avatarfags fighting for attention
making 10 posts every hour.
Test
>>13222068
I think 10 posts every hour is more than fine, that would end up in about a new thread ever 2 days.
Is there an introduction to p-adic geometry for non-algebro geometers? I work in DG and alggeo-lingo confuses
me...
>>13216886 (OP)
>>13223454
Pic in rel
Mathematical symbol shunting seems like such a mechanical thing that I can only be impressed by the ability to
memorize and apply rules.
Is there anything more to math than the encoding of ideas and then shunting along until you find neat things?
>>13218494
*Riemann
Also probably not, because if they did and they were right they’d probably be worth a lot of money
>>13218494
for the Riemann Zeta function (and not for the hypothesis, ofc) you could use the Euler alternating formula. there's
also a bunch of other approximations that use gamma function and it's alternated forms.
And for the hypothesis, you could use that brujin function-thing that approximates the hypothesis using it's upper
and lower bound.
>>13223716
Yup.
>>13223736
elaborate
>>13223695
Yeah, and I have trouble with the language used by the algebro-geometers. Maybe there is no simple introduction
to p-adic geometry for people coming from a different field. Or maybe I simply have the wrong picture of what it
could be and my question doesn't even make sense in the first place.
>>13223742
For any hypothesis, there could exist two equally "true" statements saying that the hypothesis is true and false, and
both of them can be proven using the same Axioms.
>>13218408
kek
The cope is real. /mg/ has been on a slide through various degrees of shit for the past 2 years and it's had nothing
to do with discord, trannies or some other bogeyman, and everything to do with the fact that /mg/ posters are
fucking stupid
>>13222248
>>13223925
give example
>>13220000
What current research is being done in calculus? It's always been my favourite part of maths
and wonder if there's any ongoing big questions or if it's mostly well understood.
>>13223864
>>13224871
There's a lot of research into differential equations and some pretty big unsolved problems (see for example
Navier-Stokes). There's also lots of unsolved problems in differential geometry, particularly in mathematical
physics.
It's kind of a meme field still but there are some pretty big questions to be answered in theoretical machine learning
which essentially are analysis problems.
>>13224956
differential geometry sounds interesting, could you explain how it's related to physics?
>>13224871
me on the left
>>13225160
Differential geometry is basically essential for physics though and a lot of it comes from physics. General relativity
is defined in differential geometry terms. Spacetime is a four dimensional manifold whose curvature is described by
the Einstein field equations. There's also a relationship between string theory and Calabi-Yau manifolds but I don't
understand it.
Can I do comp science if I've only got a general level math from HS.
>>13223716
That's a bit of a red herring type in that one may consider "math" more than the collection of theorems - because
it's also an activity that we might not want to treat separately, from the aforementioned.
>>13225334
Depends on what you mean by "do", but you can certainly start learning it
>>13225334
>Can I do comp science if I've only got a general level math from HS.
No, please leave Computer Science alone if you plan to be a code monkey elsewhere
I'm really not dumb though. Ive got straight HDs in every subject 94% average and I've still got time to switch to
comp sci from bachelor of IT.
I'm not looking for gatekeeping by kids who got lucky with their class placements the first stay of highschool and
who's mummy and daddy payed for tutoring. I'm asking for people who have done it how realistic are my chances,
how difficult is the math etc
>>13225438
>degree
uni will make you take basic math classes, and if you are not a turbo brainlet you will be fine
I cracked open a linear algebra book and fell in love with Math again
>>13224566
/mg/ got a lot better recently though. the stupid people are going to discord.
>>13225440
>>13223864
That's the thing, I get the impression you're asking something like "Is there an introduction to Galois theory for
people who don't know any algebra" or "is there an intro do differential geometry for people who don't know
calculus".
>>13225443
Tell me, Natalie, how do you make a vector space from a topological space?
[a / c / g / k / m / o / p / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w] [vip / qa] [cm / lgbt] [3 / adv / an / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / his / int /
jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pw / qst / sci / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Edit]
[Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
About • Feedback • Legal • Contact