Criminal Trespass and Its Aggravated Forms Under IPC & Law of Torts

6/1/2021 Criminal Trespass and Its Aggravated Forms under IPC & Law of Torts
Post Views: 7356
Criminal Trespass and Its Aggravated Forms

By Mariya Paliwala - December 7, 2019
Image source - https://bit.ly/2reptO5
This article is written by Mehar Verma, a 3rd-year law student, from Jindal Global Law School.
In this article, the author has discussed the concept of criminal trespass and aggravated forms
of criminal trespass.
Table of Contents 
https://blog.ipleaders.in/criminal-trespass-aggravated-forms/ 1/18
1. Introduction
2. Meaning of Criminal Trespass
2.1. Ingredients of Criminal Trespass
2.1.1. ‘Whoever enters’
2.1.2. Property
2.1.3. Possession of another
2.1.4. Intention
3. Aggravated forms of criminal trespass
3.1. House-trespass
3.2. Lurking house-trespass
3.3. Lurking house-trespass by night
3.4. House-breaking
3.5. Housebreaking by night
4. Dishonestly breaking open receptacle containing property
5. Conclusion
6. References
Introduction
Every individual has a right to the full enjoyment of their property without any disturbance,
this is the reason trespass was made an offence. Even though trespass is ordinarily a civil
wrong for which the defendant can sue for damages, but when such trespass occurs with a
criminal intention it amounts to criminal trespass. If your enjoyment of your property, whether
movable or immovable is disturbed due to criminal activities of any kind, be it theft or assault,
you can seek remedy under the Indian Penal Code (IPC). For instance, X unlawfully and
without Y’s permission enters into Y’s house to steal his grandfather’s antique watch, X would
be liable for theft as well as criminal trespass. Further, the offence of criminal trespass may be
aggravated depending upon the facts of certain cases. Consider the same example, with an
additional fact that X entered Y’s property at night or in order to enter the assaulted Y, then X
would have a greater liability. As the subject of criminal liability is so vast, the Indian Penal
Code (IPC) has discussed criminal trespass in 22 sections, commencing from Section 441, IPC
till Section 462, IPC.
Meaning of Criminal Trespass

According to Section 441 of The Indian Penal Code, whoever enters into property in the
possession of another with the intent to commit an offence or to intimidate, insult or annoy
any person in possession of such property, or having lawfully entered into such property, but
remains there with intent thereby to intimidate, insult or any such person, or with an intent to
commit an offence, is said to commit ‘criminal trespass’. Thus it can be deduced that criminal
trespass occurs when a person unlawfully without any right or an express or implied license
enters into the private property of another person or remains into such property with a
criminal intention. The object of making criminal trespass an offence is to ensure that people
can enjoy their private property without any kind of interruption from outsiders. Punishment
for criminal trespass, as prescribed in Section 447 of IPC is either imprisonment which may
extend to three months, or fine which may extend to INR 500 or both.
Ingredients of Criminal Trespass

Criminal trespass has two limbs, firstly, entering into the property of another with criminal
intent and secondly, entering lawfully but remaining in the property with a criminal intent to
harm or cause annoyance. Thus the essential ingredients for committing Criminal trespass
are:
‘Whoever enters’
To commit the offence of criminal trespass, there must be an actual entry into the property of
another by the accused person. No trespass can occur if there is no physical instrument by the
accused into the private property of the victim. In the State of Calcutta vs Abdul Sukar, the
court held that constructive entry by a servant does not amount to entry, under this Section as
even though there was no possession in law, there was possession in fact. For instance, X
throws garbage outside Y’s house on a daily basis, in this case, X may be liable for nuisance
but he has not committed criminal trespass as there is no entry by X into Y’s property.
Property
The term property under this Section includes both movable and immovable property.
Wrongful entry into one’s car or other movable property would have similar liability as
wrongful entry into one’s house. In Dhannonjoy v Provat Chandra Biswas, the accused drove
away from the boat of the possessor after attacking him. The court held that this would
amount to criminal trespass even though it was a movable property. But the term property
does not include incorporeal property or something which cannot be touched, such as patent
rights.
Possession of another
The possession of the property should be in the possession of the victim and not the
trespasser. Having the ownership of the property is not necessary, mere possession is
sufficient to claim criminal trespass against the trespasser. However, it is not necessary for the
person having possession or the owner of the property to be present at the time when the
trespassing occurred, no presence of owner or possessor would also amount to trespassing as
long as the premises are entered into by the trespasser to annoy. For instance, writing love
letters and delivering them to a girl’s house against her will would also amount to criminal
trespass, even if at the time of delivering such letters, the girl was not at home.
Intention
If it is proved that the intention of the accused parties was not to insult, harm or annoy the
owners or possessors of the property, then it would not amount to criminal trespass. The
Intention is the essence of this crime, and if there is no dominant motive to commit the crime,
no criminal trespass. The test for determining whether the entry was done with an intent to
cause annoyance or any kind of harm is to determine the aim of a trespasser at the time of
such entry.
In Punjab National Bank Ltd v All India Punjab National Bank Employees’ Federation, the court
held that as the employees who were on strike entered the bank with the intention to only put
pressure on the management to concede their demands, and there was no intent to insult,
harm or annoy any of the superior officers, their entrance into the bank cannot amount to
criminal trespass. However, if in the given circumstances, the strikers would have stormed into
the private cubicles or offices of the superior staff with the aim of causing annoyance to such
members, then it would amount to criminal trespass.
Further, it is to be proved that the intention of the accused was not probable but an actual
one, this principle was laid down in Ramjan Misrty v Emperor. It is not sufficient to show that
the person entering into the property of another had the knowledge that his entrance would
cause annoyance, it is to be proved that there was an intention to commit an offence, or
intimidate, insult or annoy any such person for an offence of criminal trespass to take place.
Click here
Aggravated forms of criminal trespass

The offence of criminal trespass may be committed at different occasions having different
magnitudes and penalties. Depending upon the time of the trespass, its purpose and nature of
the property trespassed, the offence may be aggravated and specific punishments are
prescribed for those specific cases. Further, a crime may be aggravated by the way it is
committed and the end for which it is committed.
Trespassing into the property where a man resides and stores his belonging is an aggravated
form of criminal trespassing as the greatest safeguard is required against the habitation of
people. Trespassing against such property is known as house trespass and is governed by
Section 442 of IPC.
House trespass may be further aggravated if it is done in a way to avoid attention, known as
lurking house-trespass and is governed by Section 443 of IPC. House trespass is also
aggravated when it is done violently, knowns as house-breaking and governed by Section 445
of IPC.
House trespass of any form may be aggravated based on the time when it is committed, an
offence taking place at night is more serious than an offence that took place during the day
time. Housebreaking by night is governed by Section 446 of IPC.
House-trespass
Section 442 of IPC, defines house-trespass as committing criminal trespass by entering into or
remaining in any building, tent or vessel used as a human dwelling, place of worship or as a
place for the custody of the property. A place of human dwelling does not always have to be a
permanent resident of the defendant, temporary residents like school or railway platforms also
count as a human dwelling. However for a building to be a human dwelling it must have some
walls or some kind of security and a mere fence cannot amount to a human dwelling. This
offence is an aggravated form of criminal trespass, thus every house-trespass is criminal
trespassing but not vice versa. As house-trespass is against the possession of a property, it
cannot take place if the defendant is not in actual possession of the property.
As per Section 448 of IPC, the defendant guilty of house-trespass may be imprisoned for a
term not exceeding 1 year, fined for INR 1,000 or less or both.
Lurking house-trespass
Section 443 of IPC, deals with a further aggravation of house-trespass, known as lurking
house-trespass. The section defines this offence as committing house trespass and taking
precautions to conceal the offence of house-trespassing from any person who has a right to
exclude or eject the trespasser from the building which is the subject of the trespass. In Prem
Bahadur Rai v State, the court held that unless active steps are taken by the accused to
conceal his presence, no charge under Section 443 can be made. Thus the ingredients of
lurking house-trespass would include:
1. Trespass;
2. House-trespass;
3. Concealing the house-trespass from someone who has the right to exclude to the
trespasser.
Therefore hiding in a porch behind a tree would fall within this section and the trespasser,
under Section 453 of IPC, would be liable to imprisonment for a maximum of 2 years and fine
as may be prescribed by the court.
Lurking house-trespass by night
Section 444 of IPC, talks about an aggravated form of lurking house-trespass, i.e trespass
committed at night. Any lurking house-trespass committed after sunset and before sunrise fall
within the ambit of this section. This offence is punishable with imprisonment not exceeding
three years and fine, according to Section 456 of IPC.
House-breaking
Housebreaking is also an aggravated form of house-trespass and implies forceful entry into
one’s house. Section 445 of IPC lays down 6 ways in which housebreaking can occur, namely:
1. Through passage made by the house breaker himself;

2. Through any passage not used by any person other than the intruder;
3. Through any passage opened for committing an offence of housebreaking which was not
intended by the house occupier to be open;
4. By opening any lock;
5. By using criminal force at either entrance or departure;
6. By entering or quitting any passage fastened against such entrance or exit. The word
‘fasteners’ implies something more than being closed, merely pushing of door shutters
would not amount to house-breaking.
The first three ways are the one in which entry is effected by using passage which is not the
ordinary means of entry or exit and the last three ways are the ones in which entry is effected
by use of force. The entry of any part of the human body is sufficient to constitute
housebreaking under Section 445 of IPC if the following ingredients are present:
1. Trespass;
2. House-trespass;
3. The entrance by the trespasser must be done in any of the 6 ways prescribed above.
In Pullabhotla Chinniah case, the court held that the breaking open of a cattle-shed in which
agricultural implements are kept would also amount to house-breaking. Further, making a hole
in the wall to enter a house, using a window to enter a house, assaulting the guard or
doorkeeper to enter a house, all amount to housebreaking and the accused will be liable for
imprisonment not exceeding 2 years and fine under Section 453 of IPC.
Housebreaking by night
When housebreaking is committed after sunset and before sunrise, it is considered an

aggravated form of house-breaking and is governed by Section 446 of IPC. This offence is
punishable with imprisonment not exceeding three years and fine, according to Section 456 of
IPC.
Dishonestly breaking open receptacle containing

property
Meaning and punishment for dishonestly breaking open receptacle containing property are
defined under Section 461 of IPC. The said section punishes whoever dishonestly or with the
intent of committing mischief, breaks or open any receptacle or container used as storing
place. The offence is cognizable, non-bailable and triable by any magistrate and the
punishment for the same may extend up to 2 years, fine, or both. The ingredients of this
offence would be:
1. There was a closed container or receptacle;

2. It contained property or the accused believed it contained property;
3. The accused intentionally broke opened the receptacle;
4. The accused did so dishonestly;
5. The accused did so with the intent to cause mischief.
The term ‘receptacle’ signifies all kinds of vessels and not only includes a safe box, chest or
closed package but also includes a room or a part of a room such as a warehouse, or godown.
The only condition is that such a vessel must be closed by means of chain or bolt or fastened
in any manner. The offence is said to be completed as soon as the receptacle is broken or
unfastened with dishonest attention to steal or cause any other kind of mischief.
Conclusion
If a stranger or for that matter even a known person enters any property in your possession
with an intent to cause harm or injury, then such a person would be liable for committing an
offence of criminal trespass under IPC and remedy can be sought by any court of law. While
determining the offence of criminal trespass it is necessary to have an intention to commit
wrong and mere knowledge would not amount to criminal trespass. Further, the punishment
prescribed for the offence of criminal trespass would depend upon the aggravation that
occurred while the crime was committed. House-trespass is a more serious offence than mere
criminal trespass, lurking house-trespass and house-breaking are aggravated forms of house-
trespass and lastly lurking house-trespass by night and housebreaking by night would attract
the highest kind of punishment.
References
1. The Indian Penal Code
2. State of Calcutta vs Abdul Sukar, AIR 1960 CAL 189
3. Dhannonjoy v Provat Chandra Biswas, AIR 1934 Cal 480
4. Punjab National Bank Ltd v All India Punjab National Bank Employees’ Federation 1953 AIR
296, 1953 SCR 686
5. Ramjan Misrty v Emperor 162 Ind Cas 231
6. Prem Bahadur Rai v State (1978) CR.
7. Pullabhotla Chinniah (1917) 18 CR.
Students of Lawsikho courses regularly produce writing assignments and work on practical
exercises as a part of their coursework and develop themselves in real-life practical skill.
LawSikho has created a telegram group for exchanging legal knowledge, referrals and various
opportunities. You can click on this link and
join: https://t.me/joinchat/J_0YrBa4IBSHdpuTfQO_sA
Follow us on Instagram and subscribe to our YouTube channel for more amazing legal content.
Did you nd this blog post helpful? Subscribe so that you never miss another post! Just complete this form…
Name
Email Address
10-6=?
SUBSCRIBE!
12th - 14th June, 6 - 9p.m
FREE & ONLINE - 3-day bootcamp on How to

kickstart your career as a corporate lawyer
Participants from more than 85 countries have attended our

bootcamps so far
Ramanuj Mukherjee CEO & CO-founder,

LawSikho
Abhyuday Agarwal COO & Co-Founder,

LawSikho
Register now
Name
Your Name
Email
Your Email
Country code Phone
Country Code
Your Phone
Country Code
+91 - IN (India)
Country Code
+376 - AD (Andorra)
+971 - AE (United Arab Emirates)
+93 - AF (Afghanistan)
+1268 - AG (Antigua And Barbuda)
+1264 - AI (Anguilla)
+355 - AL (Albania)
+374 - AM (Armenia)
+599 - AN (Netherlands Antilles)
+244 - AO (Angola)
+672 - AQ (Antarctica)
+54 - AR (Argentina)
+1684 - AS (American Samoa)
+43 - AT (Austria)
+61 - AU (Australia)
+297 - AW (Aruba)
+994 - AZ (Azerbaijan)
+387 - BA (Bosnia And
Herzegovina)
+1246 - BB (Barbados)
+880 - BD (Bangladesh)
+32 - BE (Belgium)
+226 - BF (Burkina Faso)
+359 - BG (Bulgaria)
+973 - BH (Bahrain)
+257 - BI (Burundi)
+229 - BJ (Benin)
+590 - BL (Saint Barthelemy)
+1441 - BM (Bermuda)
+673 - BN (Brunei Darussalam)
+591 - BO (Bolivia)
+55 - BR (Brazil)
+1242 - BS (Bahamas)
+975 - BT (Bhutan)
+267 - BW (Botswana)
+375 - BY (Belarus)
+501 - BZ (Belize)
+1 - CA (Canada)
+61 - CC (Cocos (keeling) Islands)
+243 - CD (Congo, The Democratic

Republic Of The)
+236 - CF (Central African
Republic)
+242 - CG (Congo)
+41 - CH (Switzerland)
+225 - CI (Cote D Ivoire)
+682 - CK (Cook Islands)
+56 - CL (Chile)
+237 - CM (Cameroon)
+86 - CN (China)
+57 - CO (Colombia)
+506 - CR (Costa Rica)
+53 - CU (Cuba)
+238 - CV (Cape Verde)
+61 - CX (Christmas Island)
+357 - CY (Cyprus)
+420 - CZ (Czech Republic)
+49 - DE (Germany)
+253 - DJ (Djibouti)
+45 - DK (Denmark)
+1767 - DM (Dominica)
+1809 - DO (Dominican Republic)
+213 - DZ (Algeria)
+593 - EC (Ecuador)
+372 - EE (Estonia)
+20 - EG (Egypt)
+291 - ER (Eritrea)
+34 - ES (Spain)
+251 - ET (Ethiopia)
+358 - FI (Finland)
+679 - FJ (Fiji)
+500 - FK (Falkland Islands
(malvinas))
+691 - FM (Micronesia, Federated
States Of)
+298 - FO (Faroe Islands)
+33 - FR (France)
+241 - GA (Gabon)
+44 - GB (United Kingdom)
+1473 - GD (Grenada)
+995 - GE (Georgia)
+233 - GH (Ghana)
+350 - GI (Gibraltar)
+299 - GL (Greenland)
+220 - GM (Gambia)
+224 - GN (Guinea)
+240 - GQ (Equatorial Guinea)
+30 - GR (Greece)
+502 - GT (Guatemala)
+1671 - GU (Guam)
+245 - GW (Guinea-bissau)
+592 - GY (Guyana)
+852 - HK (Hong Kong)
+504 - HN (Honduras)
+385 - HR (Croatia)
+509 - HT (Haiti)
+36 - HU (Hungary)
+62 - ID (Indonesia)
+353 - IE (Ireland)
+972 - IL (Israel)
+44 - IM (Isle Of Man)
+964 - IQ (Iraq)
+98 - IR (Iran, Islamic Republic Of)
+354 - IS (Iceland)
+39 - IT (Italy)
+1876 - JM (Jamaica)
+962 - JO (Jordan)
+81 - JP (Japan)
+254 - KE (Kenya)
+996 - KG (Kyrgyzstan)
+855 - KH (Cambodia)
+686 - KI (Kiribati)
+269 - KM (Comoros)
+1869 - KN (Saint Kitts And Nevis)
+850 - KP (Korea Democratic
Peoples Republic Of)
+82 - KR (Korea Republic Of)
+965 - KW (Kuwait)
+1345 - KY (Cayman Islands)
+7 - KZ (Kazakstan)
+856 - LA (Lao Peoples Democratic
Republic)
+961 - LB (Lebanon)
+1758 - LC (Saint Lucia)
+423 - LI (Liechtenstein)
+94 - LK (Sri Lanka)
+231 - LR (Liberia)
+266 - LS (Lesotho)
+370 - LT (Lithuania)
+352 - LU (Luxembourg)
+371 - LV (Latvia)
+218 - LY (Libyan Arab Jamahiriya)
+212 - MA (Morocco)
+377 - MC (Monaco)
+373 - MD (Moldova, Republic Of)
+382 - ME (Montenegro)
+1599 - MF (Saint Martin)
+261 - MG (Madagascar)
+692 - MH (Marshall Islands)
+389 - MK (Macedonia, The Former
Yugoslav Republic Of)
+223 - ML (Mali)
+95 - MM (Myanmar)
+976 - MN (Mongolia)
+853 - MO (Macau)
+1670 - MP (Northern Mariana
Islands)
+222 - MR (Mauritania)
+1664 - MS (Montserrat)
+356 - MT (Malta)
+230 - MU (Mauritius)
+960 - MV (Maldives)
+265 - MW (Malawi)
+52 - MX (Mexico)
+60 - MY (Malaysia)
+258 - MZ (Mozambique)
+264 - NA (Namibia)
+687 - NC (New Caledonia)
+227 - NE (Niger)
+234 - NG (Nigeria)
+505 - NI (Nicaragua)
+31 - NL (Netherlands)
+47 - NO (Norway)
+977 - NP (Nepal)
+674 - NR (Nauru)
+683 - NU (Niue)
+64 - NZ (New Zealand)
+968 - OM (Oman)
+507 - PA (Panama)
+51 - PE (Peru)
+689 - PF (French Polynesia)
+675 - PG (Papua New Guinea)
+63 - PH (Philippines)
+92 - PK (Pakistan)
+48 - PL (Poland)
+508 - PM (Saint Pierre And
Miquelon)
+870 - PN (Pitcairn)
+1 - PR (Puerto Rico)
+351 - PT (Portugal)
+680 - PW (Palau)
+595 - PY (Paraguay)
+974 - QA (Qatar)
+40 - RO (Romania)
+381 - RS (Serbia)
+7 - RU (Russian Federation)
+250 - RW (Rwanda)
+966 - SA (Saudi Arabia)
+677 - SB (Solomon Islands)
+248 - SC (Seychelles)
+249 - SD (Sudan)
+46 - SE (Sweden)
+65 - SG (Singapore)
+290 - SH (Saint Helena)
+386 - SI (Slovenia)
+421 - SK (Slovakia)
+232 - SL (Sierra Leone)
+378 - SM (San Marino)
+221 - SN (Senegal)
+252 - SO (Somalia)
+597 - SR (Suriname)
+239 - ST (Sao Tome And Principe)
+503 - SV (El Salvador)
+963 - SY (Syrian Arab Republic)
+268 - SZ (Swaziland)
+1649 - TC (Turks And Caicos
Islands)
+235 - TD (Chad)
+228 - TG (Togo)
+66 - TH (Thailand)
+992 - TJ (Tajikistan)
+690 - TK (Tokelau)
+670 - TL (Timor-leste)
+993 - TM (Turkmenistan)
+216 - TN (Tunisia)
+676 - TO (Tonga)
+90 - TR (Turkey)
+1868 - TT (Trinidad And Tobago)
+688 - TV (Tuvalu)
+886 - TW (Taiwan, Province Of
China)
+255 - TZ (Tanzania, United
Republic Of)
+380 - UA (Ukraine)
+256 - UG (Uganda)
+1 - US (United States)
+598 - UY (Uruguay)
+998 - UZ (Uzbekistan)
+39 - VA (Holy See (vatican City
State))
+1784 - VC (Saint Vincent And The
Grenadines)
+58 - VE (Venezuela)
+1284 - VG (Virgin Islands, British)
+1340 - VI (Virgin Islands, U.s.)
+84 - VN (Viet Nam)
+678 - VU (Vanuatu)
+681 - WF (Wallis And Futuna)
+685 - WS (Samoa)
+381 - XK (Kosovo)
+967 - YE (Yemen)
+262 - YT (Mayotte)
+27 - ZA (South Africa)
+260 - ZM (Zambia)
+263 - ZW (Zimbabwe)
No results
Select Occupation -- Select --

I want to know more about the lawsikho courses
Yes
No
Register now
Bootcamp starting in
10
Days
21
HRS
32
MIN
57
SEC
Ramanuj Mukherjee CEO & CO-founder,

LawSikho
Abhyuday Agarwal COO & Co-Founder,

LawSikho

Criminal Trespass and Its Aggravated Forms Under IPC & Law of Torts

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Criminal Trespass and Its Aggravated Forms Under IPC & Law of Torts

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

6/1/2021 Criminal Trespass and Its Aggravated Forms under IPC & Law of Torts

Post Views: 7356