Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Essay TV
Essay TV
Increased television viewing is pushing the poorest of the poor to make consumption choices that are
detrimental to their welfare. Television programmes and advertisements often promote a way of life that
is above the means of the poor. In their attempt to pursue this kind of lifestyle, the poor fall victim to
conspicuous consumption, bringing them short-term happiness by enhancing their sense of status, but
ultimately hurts them because of their limited means. These are the findings of a recent article published
Conspicuous consumption refers to the consumption of goods and services meant to display higher social
status. Often, this display of status is not linked to actual, tangible benefits. For instance, one can use
smartphones other than an iPhone, but plenty of people still prefer the more expensive Apple product.
Television viewing has a direct causal impact on propagating conspicuous consumption, particularly
among lower-income households. For every hour of television viewing, their conspicuous consumption
increases by 4%. Both programmes and advertisements can encourage them to aspire for status goods and
services. For example, watching characters in popular television programmes riding motorcycles or
frequent exposure to commercials that show celebrities riding motorcycles can make them want to buy
whose per capita daily income is between ₹146 and ₹583. Since status goods appear to boost their low
self-esteem and dignity deficits, they can end up choosing status goods over more essential commodities.
For instance, they might be tempted to buy branded clothes instead of generic but good-quality, cheaper
garments. Given their limited income, such choices can have adverse effects on their well-being,
Therefore, BoP families’ television viewing driven conspicuous consumption has major implications for
firms, policymakers, and consumer rights groups. Understanding the impact of television, socially
responsible firms should avoid showcasing conspicuous consumption and should instead focus on
popularising visible but socially beneficial solutions. For instance, a milk product company, instead of
promoting exotic foods like pizzas, milkshakes, or burgers that use their products, can promote eating
Similarly, policymakers need to regulate television content judiciously to avoid undue influence on BoP
families. For example, many television series give a false portrayal of poverty, showing supposedly poor
people dressed in fine clothes and made-up like models. Policymakers can intervene to avoid such
misleading depictions. They can also provide educational and financial services for BoP families to
Finally, consumer rights groups may also have an essential role to play here. They could work on ways to
reduce time spent in television watching by BoP families and spread awareness about the influence of
television programmes and advertisements among BoP consumers. By working together, various
stakeholders can help BoP families from sacrificing their long-term welfare for the sake of short-term
happiness.
Disclaimer: The views expressed here are in the author’s personal capacity and do not represent those of
people, institutions or organisations that the author may be associated with in professional or personal
capacities.