Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Oil 6
Oil 6
~--~Z-__.-
0 SGR 200 . I LLS 100 I . 65 RHOB 2. 65 E: L:'S"~'-~L-'E-::
Ii:!:!:!~.e~.:.~:!:!:!:!:
2. 5 Br i dged CORE RHO6 3 . I MSFL 100 . 57 NPHI -. ~3 3 PHIT 0 ~ . ~ ~
WATER-PH]E
2. 5 CORE RHOG :3 _o~ . 01 CORE PERM 10000 . 6 CORE PHI 0 .s coRE ~Hz o o CORE UCL~ ,
[] [] [] [] [] [] []
MD
!..'~ __~
ii
i i i :~ Z
4 =
__L_ .
~.~
. i i
~' ~
• ' ~ .T
I', 4'
:l
- i
r -
#
:1
~ i ' ' -
~--F
O~:J ---
°:C ,
l
~--'- 2'2
- - . ..._ ~ A
- - ~ ~ ~x ~%io j . ~ 0 '-':':':':':':':':':':':':'"'
- - .~_k.._....._..._~, A
0
- ~ ~
-
AA
A .
I i
!
:
I3 q
_ _ A '.~ "~ :: An
'i
1
-
_
,ET I U
:
_
! ~
)
2
~
_
x:)_% i_i_
",.i
~
=
4 ~
(
~c o
o
o
~iiiiiiii!iii!iii!i!!iiii
===========================
::::::::::::::::::::::::::
"'!!iiii!iiiiii!i!!!iiiiii:
~o ~i:i:i:i:i:i:i:i:i:i:i:i!
• ~::::::~:~:~: .
F i g u r e 4. Data and results. Porosity PHIT computed from the density log RHOB, with a mean grain density of
2.676 g/cc, correction for variable fluid density, and subsequent calibration to core porosity.
12
S P W L A 42 "~ Annual Logging Symposium, June 17-20, 2001
B
I . 65 RHQGDC 2. 65
i . . . . . . . . . . . . .
8 CRLI 18 • I LLD I00
R H O G D C ~ ~ RHOB .---_~--_
0 SGR 200 • I LLS I00 I .65 RHOB 2. 65 • "'S1--tf~L'E- ""
>..., .......:.....:.........:.;...;!
::::::::::::::::::::::::
2.5 Br i dged CORE RHOG ::3 • I MSFL 100 . 57 NPHI -. 1~3 .3 PHIT 0
NATER-PHIE
2 . 5 CORE RHOG 9 ~.~_~,,~ CORE PERn ~ ~ . 6 CORE PHi 0 • 3 CORE P H I ~ ~ CORE UCLAY I
[] rrl [] [] El [] F! ,'_=~z.
°_~,.~ ,, ~ ~ ~ ,, ~ ~ o o o o o o o o o o ~ ~ ~
MD
I ; ~
)
r'--
? i ,i
925
i
~ "
4, ,/?
I
~>~ oO :..~
i.~ ----4~' -1
-
..TARBERT_
- d
,-~
;,
~!~
t - _ )
~________~ '1
"i-i. . . . . . t ".---
zx~4
["
~-~..
° ,
,~: ! c o
i} -
• !
~.~~
i i '
h'
I
I-'--" ' ' ' ~
- 5 .g ,t i ~, ,.~
- h
~IESS_ - ' ~ ,,'J ~i io o
' A "~ :: ~'o o
A
AA :~ . i ~ . ~g
50"~" ..
i ' - ?
- _
NN : '
~1~I~) ' !
- - ,~ "~ i A^
! i c
_
_
_
_ i "%?
,
-> (
~i ~ ~iiiiiii!iiiiiiiiiiiiiii!i
_
TIU ~
,,.d...-.s A A
2.---4----
i iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii
"----.4,.
Figure 5. Data and results. Porosity PHIT computed from the grain density corrected density log RHOGDC, with
a grain density of 2.65, correction for variable fluid density, and subsequent calibration to core porosity.
13
SPWLA 42 "~ Annual Logging Symposium, June 17-20, 2001
8 CALl 18
i . 65 RHOGDC 2. 65 3 PHIT 0
0 SGR 2~8 i:_=_~----
!
i
RHO(DDC ~.~ RHOB
0 SWT I • 2 5 BU H ~ L- _ s H . ~ L,,.E. _
! ;-.-:-:-:':-:-:':':':-;':':':-:-: ":':
2.5 Bridged CORE RHOG I • 65 RHOB 2. 65 • 3 PHIT El
RHOODC e-'~>,
A'-'X-~2"- RHD~ P H I E
2. S CORE RHOG :9 I -29~ • 57 NPH l • ~3 . ~ CORE PHf 0 ~ SNT I • 25 BUH ~ ~ CORE VCLAY I
[] [] [] [] [] [] [] o 0 o
METRES
MD
i~ '~ <- i-----L-S
T-T-
lii
!
~:
.. ~ .
-
, ,~s-
i
,L__¢__ o__~ ,
I 15 _ _
t
~:
I' ~i~
t',,; JARBERT_
i i i~ i- -
~ - _
~ L~ - -
i!iI - _
i
-4- ,: ~ , ~<~
~$4 ' ' i ir
i ~ ~ _ _ 1 : :
/
-
~ - _ , !
, , •
-:-:~
; . . i ~ ---'.
!~ i i : i - -
b,
i '~ - -I 6
~ • ~
- ~
_ ---4--
:
q
!
- -4
Figure 6. Results comparison showing the impact of the grain density corrected density log methodology on
porosity (PHIT), saturation (SWT), and bulk volume hydrocarbons (BVH).
14