Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Company Law Q & A
Company Law Q & A
ONE SENTENCES
1. What is the meaning of company?
2. What is meant by ‘Limited Liability’?
3. Who is a proxy?
4. What is meant by ‘Perpetual succession”?
5. What is an authorized capital of a company?
6. What do you mean by ‘Compounding of offences’?
7. State the difference between merger and amalgamation.
8. What is a producer company?
9. Who are First Director of a company?
10. What is the restriction laid down on the private company?
11. Who can form a OPC?
12. What is meant by company limited by shares?
13. What is the legal position of a promoter?
14. Is issue of a prospectus compulsory on the part of a company?
15. What is the golden rule or golden legacy?
16. Write the meaning of amalgamation?
17. What are dividends?
18. What is MOA?
19. Define member?
20. 2 powers of director?
21. What is mean by promoter?
22. Types of company?
23. What do u mean by Reconstruction of company?
24. What is Mis Statement?
25. Mention 2 types of Debentures?
26. What is Debenture stock?
27. What is Subsidiary Company?
28. What do u mean by Novation of contract?
29. What do u mean by charge?
30. What is an authorized capital of company?
31. What is Share Warrant?
32. What is Illegal association?
33. What do u mean by comprise and arrangement?
34. What is limited laid down on Private Company?
35. What class of company shall appoint Women Director?
36. Define Debenture
37. What is remuneration of director?
38. Who is registrar?
39. Define foreign Company.
40. When did company act, 2013 came into force?
41. Define sweat equity shares.
42. List of kinds of director.
43. Define office liquidator
44. What do u mean by winding of company?
45. Give 2 difference between company and partnership firm
46. What is pre – incorporation contract?
47. What is doctrine of ultra-virus?
48. Who is shareholder?
49. What are the qualification of shares?
50. What do u mean by forfeiture of shares?
51. What is buy back of shares?
52. What is fix and floating charges
53. What is majority rule?
54. Who is director?
55. Define the term proxy.
56. What is doctrine of constructive notice?
57. 2 types of winding up company.
58. What is One Person Company?
59. What is ordinary resolution?
60. Who can be appointed as the director?
61. Define holding and subsidiary company
62. What do u mean by special resolution and ordinary resolution?
63. Explain lien on shares
64. How many minimum director to be there in private company must have?
65. Explain Foreign Exchange?
66. What is the quorum?
67. What are the cumulative and non - cumulative preference share?
68. What is call on shares?
69. What do you mean by uncalled capital?
70. Define Contributory.
71. Define ‘Intra – Virus’
72. What do you mean by ‘redemption of shares’.
SHORT NOTES
1. Who is Promoter? What is the legal position of Promoter?
2. Doctrine of ultra- virus.
3. Pre- Incorporations Contracts
4. Bonus Shares.
5. Difference between Sole Proprietorship and OPC.
6. Further issue of Shares.
7. Vacation of office of director.
8. Corporate Social Responsibility.
9. Articles of Association
10. Types of Shares.
11. Company Secretary.
12. Kinds of Debentures.
13. Shares with Differential Voting Rights
14. Independent directors.
15. Winding up of Companies
16. Corporate personality.
17. One person Company
18. Promoters
19. Voting Rights
20. Prospectus
21. Lifting of corporate veil
22. Notice of Meeting
23. Doctrine of constructive notice
24. Duties of an auditor
25. Foss vs Harbottle
26. Current account transaction under FEMA
27. Prevention of oppression and mismanagement.
Apart from provisions in the Act, active role is also been played by Judiciary in
mandating some guidelines that are requirements for a case of oppression and
mismanagement taking place in a company. [i]Moreover the Courts have helped in
distinguishing between acts of oppression and mismanagement and the ones which
are not. For instance, in case of ‘Sidhartha Gupta and Ors Vs. Getit Infoservices
Private Limited and Ors’[ii]it was held that only violation of rules and articles of
the company is not act of oppression and management.
The Act and Courts try to strike a balance between right of majority rule and right
of shareholders who are in minority as laid down in Foss v. Harbottle[iii].
Section 241and 242 of the Act provides for relief in cases of oppression which is
done by making application to the tribunal. [vii]The Act provides that under
section 241 of the Act an application can be made to the tribunal in case one of the
following conditions is fulfilled[viii]:
If a member complains that affairs of the company are being conducted
in manner prejudicial to public interest or interests of a particular
member of the country.
There is a material change in interests of creditors, debentures, or any
shareholders of the company by action of board of directors which is
likely to be arbitrary and prejudiced. One of the landmark cases which
expanded the scope of rights of shareholders who are oppressed by
other shareholders was Vikram Bakshi and Ors. Vs. Connaught Plaza
Restaurants Limited and Ors[ix].it was one of the major cases involving
oppression and mismanagement in companies.
The central government believes that the interest of general public is
thwarted by the conduct of company.
These conditions are necessary to be fulfilled to prove oppression and
mismanagement.[x]
Powers of tribunal
The tribunal has been granted with powers under section 242 of the act to act and
solve matters on its own discretion if it thinks that company affairs are prejudiced
in any manner. [xi]. The reliefs are only provided depending on exigencies of the
situation.[xii]
1. The company has to file a certified copy of the order given by tribunal with the
registrar within 30 days of the order.
2. If the order of the tribunal makes an alteration in rules of the company than the
company cannot make any alteration inconsistent with the order given without
seeking permission of tribunal.
3. The alteration made by tribunal in memorandum and rules shall have same force
and effect as made by the company and has to compulsorily follow.
4. The order altering the companies’ memorandum should be registered with the
registrar within thirty days.
5. If the company alters without the permission, than it is likely to be penalised for
its conduct extending from 1 lakh to 25 lakh. Also the officer responsible is likely
to be imprisoned or penalised with a fine or might face both.
Consequences of order given under section 242(2)
After the tribunal grants these orders there are some consequences of the same
which the company has to strictly adhere to[xvi] –
The order set aside has no claims against the company or whatsoever by
a person who has lost his office or severely affected by it.
The MD or director who has been terminated from his position does not
have any claim and cannot be appointed back to the position before 5
years.
But if the central government claim any right to be heard related to
order given, then it is granted the permission for the same.
If the directors contravene with the order given and continue to hold
position, then they and other people involved are punishable with
imprisonment or fine whatever is suitable.
Apart from all these the tribunal may also make an interim order in order to
regulate the affairs of the company which it may deem fit. [xvii]
The Act specifies on who can apply under section 241 individually against the
oppression and mismanagement of the company[xviii]:
Not less than one hundred or not less than 1/10 of total members
whichever of two is less.
The members having share in the capital of company not less than 1/10
of issued share capital.
The members have paid their dues and calls on their shares obediently.
If the company does not have share capital, than –
Tribunal waves off the requirements mentioned earlier to apply for the
application.
Class action
The Act provides that all the members may appoint their representative who on the
behalf of others makes application for the benefit of all.[xix]
Restraining the company from committing act which is ultra vires to the
articles or memorandum of company
Restraining the company from breaching the rules in memorandum of
the company
If any alteration in articles of the company is made by suppression of
facts or mis-statement, such amendment is said to be declared void
Refrainment on the action by the company and its directors.
Members in case of company does not have share capital- not less than
1/5 of total members
Depositors – not less than 100 or not less than such percentage of
depositors as may be prescribed
Any depositors to whom the company owes such percentage of total
deposits of the company.
Similar applications shall be taken as one and the class members have to
select a representative who would be the lead applicant. If no decision
can be made than the tribunal may appoint one.
If there is same cause of action, there cannot be more than one
application.
The cost is to be borne by company or the person responsible for
committing oppression and mismanagement.
All orders passed by tribunal are enforceable and binding. If a company
fails to comply it is punishable with a fine or imprisonment.
This section is not applicable to banking companies.
Important aspects to be considered by tribunal[xxiii]–
The tribunals are required to keep in mind some aspects while admission
complaints of class action:
Closing note
Oppression and misconduct are bound to occur and are part and parcel of business.
It is not uncommon in corporate world. In order to prevent the same and facilitate
smooth functioning of the companies, the provisions have been made in the Act to
save the members from oppression and mismanagement. The provisions are
powerful tool to prevent and punish for the same.
Reference
[i]S. P. Jain vs. Kalinga Tubes Ltd[1965], AIR 1535, 1965 SCR (2) 720
[ii]Sidhartha Gupta and Ors vs. Getit Infoservices Private [2014], CA. No. 128/C-II of 2014 &
CP. No. 64(ND) of 2014
[iii]Foss v. Harbottle(1843) , 67 ER 18
[iv] Available at https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/oppression, (last visited on 24
January, 2020)
[viii] Supra, note 7
[ix] [2017]140CLA142, [2017]143SCL37
[x]Shanti Prasad Vs. Kalinga Tubes Ltd[1965], AIR 1535, 1965 SCR (2) 720
[xiv]Cyrus Investments Pvt. Ltd. v. Tata Sons Ltd[2016],C.P. Nos. 82/241, 242,244/NCLT