Professional Documents
Culture Documents
A Study On Energy Audit of A Cold Storage
A Study On Energy Audit of A Cold Storage
A Study On Energy Audit of A Cold Storage
com
ISSN : 2248-9622, Vol. 5, Issue 4, ( Part -7) April 2015, pp.06-10
ABSTRACT
Energy consumption of a cold storage was measured for different storage temperatures. Suction temperature and
pressure temperature of the compressor and working time of the compressor were determined to reach
evaporator set up temperatures. An axial fan located back of the evaporator was used to distribute the cooled air
into the cold store. An electrical heater was used to defrost.
The compressor suction temperatures and discharge temperatures varied between 1.80 C - 070 C and 270 C - 350
C respectively. Condenser output temperature is varies 40 C - 100 C. Compressor suction pressure (p1) = 3.5
Kg/cm2 and discharge pressure (p2) = 10.5 Kg/cm2.
Key words: Energy, Cold Storage, Refrigeration
addition, suction and pressure temperatures of the the positive mismatch cannot be compensated either
compressor, condenser output temperature and by organic way or it might be difficult task.
required time to reach to the each set up temperature This paper deals with different aspects of design
were determined and evaluated. of cold storage and includes all standard refrigeration
Energy auditing is one tool through which principles and heat load factors which are normally
balancing of demand and supply is determined and considered in a cold storage design and various
energy audits.
T1 = 2.5 0 C , T2 = 30 0 C
T3 = 4.5 0 C , T4 = 1 0 C
P1 = 3.5 kg/cm 2 , P2 = 10.5 kg/cm 2
Now , there is also a pump, 336 pieces of fan & 800 lights are running .
Here Q = 55 KW per hour. [ It is calculated from a August 2014 86135 KWH Rs. 5,42,071 /-
journal paper]
𝟓𝟓 𝑻𝟐 −𝑻𝟑 − 𝑻𝟏 −𝑻𝟒 September 60295 KWH Rs. 4,66,395 /-
Then, 𝑾 =
𝑻𝟐 −𝑻𝟑 2014
𝟓𝟓 𝟑𝟎𝟑 − 𝟐𝟕𝟕. 𝟓 – 𝟐𝟕𝟓. 𝟓 − 𝟐𝟕𝟒
𝑾 =
𝟑𝟎𝟑 − 𝟐𝟕𝟕. 𝟓 So, the average
cost of one month =
538972 + 542071 +466395
𝟓𝟓 𝟐𝟓. 𝟓 − 𝟏. 𝟓 = Rs. 5,15,813 /-
𝑾 = 3
𝟐𝟓. 𝟓 Now the excess energy for a month is equal to 2700
𝑾 = 𝟓𝟏. 𝟕𝟔 𝑲𝑾 𝒑𝒆𝒓 𝒉𝒐𝒖𝒓 KWH and for a year is equal to 32400 KWH.
Etheoritical = 51.76 KW per hour So the saving money is = 2700 x 7.5 = Rs. 20,250 /-
Now , the average of this three in a month.
44.09 + 47.8 + 51.76
Etheoritical = = 32400 x 7.5 = Rs. 2,43,000 /- in a year.
3
= 47.88 KW per hour
So, when I take mechanical/electrical energy loss of III. RESULT & DISCUSSION
the compressor then this energy is equal to At first I make a programming for the equation
𝒏−𝟏
𝒏 𝒑𝟐 𝒏
Etheoritical = × 𝟐 × 𝟐𝟒 × 𝐩𝟏 𝐯𝟏 { − 𝟏}
Etheoritical = 50 KW per hour. 𝒏−𝟏 𝒑𝟏
in KW
Where n = 1.4
(b) Energy Gap Analysis – The program is -
There is a huge gap when I calculating the #include<iostream.h>
energy difference. #include<conio.h>
Gap energy = Eactual - Etheoritical #include<math.h>
= 55 − 50 KW per hour = 5 KW per int main( ) {
hour double p1 , p2 , v1 = 0.00221, e , x ;
If I take per month then it becomes :- cout<< “give the value of p1 , p2 / n”;
Gap energy = 5 × 540 KW per hour cin>> p1 >> p2
= 2700 KW per hour x = pow (p2 / p1 , 0.29);
If I take per year it becomes :- e = 3.5 * 2 * 24 *(p1 * v1 * x – p1 * v1);
Gap energy = 2700 × 12 KW per hour cout << e ;
= 32400 KW per hour return 0 ;
(c) Cost Analysis – }
This data is collected from total electricity bill of that This programming is done for the twenty values of p 1
cold storage – , p2 and E which is used for making the graph plotting
Month Unit Cost –
(i) p1 vs E and (ii) p2 vs E (iii) T1 vs E
July 2014 73890 KWH Rs. 5,38,972 /- Where p1 = suction pressure, p2 = discharge pressure,
E = energy and T1 = suction tempera ture.
The graph indicates that energy increases with increase in suction pressure
The graph indicates that energy increases with increase in discharge pressure
The graph indicates that energy increases with increase in discharge pressure
www.ijera.com 10 | P a g e