Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Flaw in Ayodhya Judgement - SC Rejected Division of Disputed Site But Based Decision On Divisions
Flaw in Ayodhya Judgement - SC Rejected Division of Disputed Site But Based Decision On Divisions
Home Hard Times Video The Latest The Reel The Field Magazine Trending
Sections
Kolkata to
from Rs4
Search
AYODHYA VERDICT
Sruthisagar Yamunan
14 hours ago
https://scroll.in/article/943271/supreme-court-rejected-division-of-ayodhya-site-but-based-its-decision-on-such-divisions 1/16
11/11/2019 Flaw in Ayodhya judgement: SC rejected division of disputed site but based decision on divisions
Home Hard Times Video The Latest The Reel The Field Magazine Trending
Sections
14 hours ago
Sruthisagar Yamunan
Share
Tweet
Comments
What tilted the scales in favour of the Hindu side in the Ayodhya case was the
Supreme Court’s willingness to consider “exclusive possession” by the Hindus of
just one part of the disputed site as valid grounds for awarding a title over the
entire site. Its decision was not based on the case made by the Muslim side for
“adverse possession” as reported by sections of the media.
https://scroll.in/article/943271/supreme-court-rejected-division-of-ayodhya-site-but-based-its-decision-on-such-divisions 2/16
11/11/2019 Flaw in Ayodhya judgement: SC rejected division of disputed site but based decision on divisions
In this piece,Hard
Home weTimes
explain both The
Video these aspects
Latest as well
The Reel Theas the flaws
Field in theTrending
Magazine court’s
reasoning.
Sections
Ahmedabad
Hotel Search
From ₹ 2,759
The Ecotel
Bangkok
Search
In its judgement delivered on Saturday, the Supreme Court held the Hindus were
able to show they held exclusive possession of the outer courtyard before 1857,
whereas the Muslims were not able to show similar exclusive possession of the
inner courtyard before 1857.
Using the civil law tenet of “preponderance of probabilities”, the court declared
that since the Hindus had possession of the outer courtyard and were in contest
with the Muslims over the inner courtyard, the disputed site should be assumed to
https://scroll.in/article/943271/supreme-court-rejected-division-of-ayodhya-site-but-based-its-decision-on-such-divisions 3/16
11/11/2019 Flaw in Ayodhya judgement: SC rejected division of disputed site but based decision on divisions
be inHome
possession of the Video
Hard Times Hindus. InLatest
The other words,
The Reel the
Theprobability
Field that the
Magazine Hindus
Trending may
have been in possession of the entire land originally is higher.
Sections
Kolkata to London
from Rs41,336 Search
However, if the inner courtyard was always under contest, why should the land
title not be divided between Hindus and Muslims as the Allahabad High Court had
ruled in 2010? Rejecting the High Court’s judgement, the Supreme Court said that
the land could not be divided because it is a composite entity. The suits filed by
both sides were not for partition of the site. The five-judge bench said:
“In the absence of historical records with respect to ownership or title, the court
has to determine the nature and use of the disputed premises as a whole by
either of the parties.”
“The grill-brick wall did not constitute either a subdivision of the disputed site
which was one composite property, nor did it amount to a determination of title
by the colonial administration.”
But here is the problem: while awarding title over the land, the court took the view
that it was a composite entity that could not be divided, but in its analysis to
determine possession, it looked at the land as two different parts. That is, the
possession claims of Hindus and Muslims are determined individually over the
inner and outer courtyards of the disputed land. The court said:
https://scroll.in/article/943271/supreme-court-rejected-division-of-ayodhya-site-but-based-its-decision-on-such-divisions 4/16
11/11/2019 Flaw in Ayodhya judgement: SC rejected division of disputed site but based decision on divisions
“(iv) Despite
Home Hardthe existence
Times Video of the
The railing,
Latest The the
Reel exclusion
The Field ofMagazine
the Hindus fromthe
Trending
inner courtyard was a matter of contestation and at the very least was not
Sections
absolute;
Exchange The Plus
(v) As regards the outer courtyard it became the focal point of Hindu worship
both on the Ramchabutra as well as other religious structures within the outer
courtyard including Sita Rasoi. Though, the Hindus continued to worship at the
Ramchabutra which was in the outer courtyard, by the consistent pattern of
their worship including the making of offerings to the ‗Garbh Grih‘ while
standing at the railing, there can be no manner of doubt that this was in
furtherance of their belief that the birth-place of Lord Ram was within the
precincts of and under the central dome of the mosque; and
(vi) The riots of 1934 and the events which led up to 22/23 December 1949
indicate that possession over the inner courtyard was a matter of serious
contestation often leading to violence by both parties and the Muslims did not
have exclusive possession over the inner courtyard. From the above
documentary evidence, it cannot be said that the Muslims have been able to
establish their possessory title to the disputed site as a composite whole.”
The last sentence in the quote above is significant because its purpose is to show
that Muslims have not established possession of the site as a “composite whole”
even after 1857. But if the land is treated as a composite whole, neither can the
Hindus establish their possessory title after 1857.
https://scroll.in/article/943271/supreme-court-rejected-division-of-ayodhya-site-but-based-its-decision-on-such-divisions 5/16
11/11/2019 Flaw in Ayodhya judgement: SC rejected division of disputed site but based decision on divisions
Home Hard Times Video The Latest The Reel The Field Magazine Trending
Sections
The Babri Masjid being demolished on December 6, 1992, by Hindutva activists. Credit: Douglas
E.Curran/AFP
This is because post-1857, there is clear evidence that the inner courtyard was used
by the Muslims to offer prayers in the mosque, with the Hindus trying to assert
their claims through both violent and non-violent means. Since the inner courtyard
was clearly contested after 1857 by the court’s own admission, when the land is
treated as a composite, even Hindus fail to establish exclusive possession of the
disputed site after 1857.
ADVERTISEMENT
Kolkata to London
from Rs41,336 Search
Mumbai to London
RELATED from Rs22,884 Search
*
TRENDING
https://scroll.in/article/943271/supreme-court-rejected-division-of-ayodhya-site-but-based-its-decision-on-such-divisions 6/16
11/11/2019 Flaw in Ayodhya judgement: SC rejected division of disputed site but based decision on divisions
In itsHome
title suit,
Hardthe Sunni
Times WaqfThe
Video Board
Latest indeed made
The Reel TheaField
case of adverse Trending
Magazine possession,
which is essentially occupation of a land for a particular period without challenge
Sections
from the actual owner. But it set this up as a secondary claim. The disclaimer was
Exchange The Plus
that it would seek adverse possession if it was established that a temple was
demolished to build the mosque in 1528.
Adverse possession can be claimed only after acknowledging that the land title
belonged to someone else. There should also be a record of unimpeded and
exclusive adverse possession. Did this legal necessity derail the board’s claim?
The Supreme Court said there was no clear evidence that a Hindu structure
Hard
beneath theTimes: This family
mosque in Delhi
had been has not replaced
demolished its toothbrushes
to pave the way forbecause of an income of
the construction
squeeze
the Babri Masjid on the orders of the Mughal emperor Babur. This rules out the
possibility of the Sunni Waqf Board’s adverse possession claim to manifest. The
court, in fact, dismissed the claim of adverse possession for multiple reasons,
stating:
“The plaintiffs have failed to adopt a clear stand evidently because they are
conscious of the fact that in pleading adverse possession, they must necessarily
carry the burden of acknowledging the title of the person or the entity against
whom the plea of adverse possession has not been adequately set up in the
pleadings and as noted above, has not been put-forth with any certitude in the
course of the submissions. Above all, it is impossible for the plaintiffs to set up a
case of being in peaceful, open and continuous possession of the entire
property.”
This shows that the decision of the court to award the land to the Hindus was not
based on an adverse possession claim by the Muslim side, which was dismissed.
ADVERTISEMENT
Watch: Maharashtra farmer breaks down after selling his onion crop at just Rs 8 per kg
https://scroll.in/article/943271/supreme-court-rejected-division-of-ayodhya-site-but-based-its-decision-on-such-divisions 7/16
11/11/2019 Flaw in Ayodhya judgement: SC rejected division of disputed site but based decision on divisions
Home Hard Times Video The Latest The Reel The Field Magazine Trending
Sections
Flawed logic
The court’s decision was based on a contested right over the disputed land. It
No, the Supreme Court did not uphold the claim that Babri Masjid was built by
looked demolishing
for elements of exclusive possession because when there are two claimants
a temple
The problem with the court’s order is not that it sought evidence for exclusive
possession, but that it put this burden on the Muslim side alone. Even though the
Hindus were not able to show exclusive possession of the inner courtyard, they
were still awarded title over the entire disputed site using the concept of
preponderance of probabilities.
The court may have invoked the concept of a composite site, but its reasoning
rested on a divided site.
READ COMMENTS
Babur in India: An emperor who loved the monsoon breeze but wasn’t impressed by the
https://scroll.in/article/943271/supreme-court-rejected-division-of-ayodhya-site-but-based-its-decision-on-such-divisions 8/16
11/11/2019 Flaw in Ayodhya judgement: SC rejected division of disputed site but based decision on divisions
melons or grapes
Home Hard Times Video The Latest The Reel The Field Magazine Trending
Sections
Share
Tweet
Email
Reddit
Print
Print
Scientists looked at sea levels 125,000 years ago. The results were terrifying
Comments
IN PARTNERSHIP with
Oct 31, 2019
https://scroll.in/article/943271/supreme-court-rejected-division-of-ayodhya-site-but-based-its-decision-on-such-divisions 9/16
11/11/2019 Flaw in Ayodhya judgement: SC rejected division of disputed site but based decision on divisions
Home Hard Times Video The Latest The Reel The Field Magazine Trending
Sections
IN PARTNERSHIP with
Share
Tweet
A lot changes in the journey to becoming a grown-up. Some changes are inevitable
— school uniforms to formal wear, steaming hot breakfast to breakfast bars on the
go, last-minute homework to last-minute presentations etc. — while others take
place without us really realising. As we become more responsible and discerning,
our tastes also evolve with us. Have you ever paused and looked at how this
phenomenon has played out in your life?
https://scroll.in/article/943271/supreme-court-rejected-division-of-ayodhya-site-but-based-its-decision-on-such-divisions 10/16
11/11/2019 Flaw in Ayodhya judgement: SC rejected division of disputed site but based decision on divisions
From a glass
Home of milk
Hard Times Videoto a
Thespot
Latest ofThe
milk
Reel in
Thecoffee
Field Magazine Trending
Sections
Remember how you once scrunched up your nose as you gulped down your glass
of milk every evening? Admit it, now as you slowly sip on your morning cup of
coffee with just a dash of milk, or none at all, it feels good to leave those days
behind, doesn’t it? Stressful meetings, café hangouts, reading hours or sleepy
mornings…you can count on coffee to be with you through it all.
VIDEO
https://scroll.in/article/943271/supreme-court-rejected-division-of-ayodhya-site-but-based-its-decision-on-such-divisions 11/16
11/11/2019 Flaw in Ayodhya judgement: SC rejected division of disputed site but based decision on divisions
has evolved
Home to keep
Hard Timesup Video
with your taste. To
The Latest Therelish
Reel the grown-up
The Field taste Trending
Magazine of Cadbury
Dark Milk, click here.
Sections
Caught on TV: Yoga guru Ramdev lifts Arnab Goswami off his feet to ‘prove his strength’
Watch: Maharashtra farmer breaks down after selling his onion crop at just Rs 8 per kg
From milkshakes to smoothies
https://scroll.in/article/943271/supreme-court-rejected-division-of-ayodhya-site-but-based-its-decision-on-such-divisions 12/16
11/11/2019 Flaw in Ayodhya judgement: SC rejected division of disputed site but based decision on divisions
Home Hard Times Video The Latest The Reel The Field Magazine Trending
Sections
The one time you didn’t object to milk was when it was presented to you as
milkshake, sufficiently suppressed by sugar and flavour. As you grew up, health
demands took over, so you moved to smoothies. Umpteen recipes later, you’ve
developed a taste
Watch: for them
Kirti Kulhari and too. You
Sobhita may convince
Dhulipala yourself
on Netflix’s that
‘The Brand Newyour sense
Show,’ ofby
hosted
Kusha Kapila
discipline brought you here, but biology may have made the transition easier.
Children crave sweet junk food as evolution ensured they are hardwired to seek
the most energy efficient foods. As a grown-up, complex flavours, and health
wisdom, generally feel more welcome. Plus, in the case of smoothies the
combinations — green, strawberry, berries, oats etc. — are endless, and the guilt
minimal.
Indeed, the transition to adulthood is paved with changes, some of which are not in
our control. It’s good to know that with some things, like Cadbury Dark Milk, we
don’t have to choose between the sweetness of childhood and the flavour of being a
grown-up.
https://scroll.in/article/943271/supreme-court-rejected-division-of-ayodhya-site-but-based-its-decision-on-such-divisions 13/16
11/11/2019 Flaw in Ayodhya judgement: SC rejected division of disputed site but based decision on divisions
This Home
is a partnered post.Video
Hard Times The Latest The Reel The Field Magazine Trending
Sections
Exchange The Plus
Share
Tweet
Email
Camaraderie in the animal kingdom: Watch how an elephant helped a turtle get off the
road
Reddit
Gambia files Rohingya genocide case against Myanmar at International Court of Justice
https://scroll.in/article/943271/supreme-court-rejected-division-of-ayodhya-site-but-based-its-decision-on-such-divisions 14/16
11/11/2019 Flaw in Ayodhya judgement: SC rejected division of disputed site but based decision on divisions
Home Hard Times Video The Latest The Reel The Field Magazine Trending
Sections
An hour ago
Sadhika Tiwari,
HealthCheck.in
Mumbai: Lata Mangeshkar hospitalised, sister says her condition is stable
Share
Tweet
Comments
Two in five infants nationwide did not receive complete immunisation, leaving
them susceptible to disease. An intensified effort focussing on lagging districts is
crucial to improve the lives of millions of children and, consequently, their ability
Industrial output contracts 4.3% in September, falls for second month in a row
to learn and earn as well as their peers and to contribute to the economy.
https://scroll.in/article/943271/supreme-court-rejected-division-of-ayodhya-site-but-based-its-decision-on-such-divisions 15/16
11/11/2019 Flaw in Ayodhya judgement: SC rejected division of disputed site but based decision on divisions
is setHome
to be carried out in
Hard Times 271 districts
Video The Latest across the country
The Reel The Field where fewer
Magazine than 70%
Trending
infants are currently vaccinated.
Sections
To have received all basic vaccinations, a child must receive at least one dose of
BCG vaccine, which protects against tuberculosis; three doses of DPT vaccine,
which protects against diphtheria, pertussis or whooping cough and tetanus; three
doses of the polio vaccine; and one dose of the measles vaccine....
Read More
Print
‘When election commissioners were brave’: Politicians across India mourn TN Seshan’s
demise
https://scroll.in/article/943271/supreme-court-rejected-division-of-ayodhya-site-but-based-its-decision-on-such-divisions 16/16