Sec Vs Gma

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 1

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION V. GMA NETWORK, INC.G.R. No.

164026
8/27/2019
0 COMMENTS

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION V. GMA NETWORK, INC.


G.R. No. 164026
December 23, 2008

Facts:

​ Petitioner Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) assails the Decision dated February 20, 2004 of the Court of
Appeals in CA-G.R. SP No. 68163, which directed that SEC Memorandum Circular No. 1, Series of 1986 should be the
basis for computing the filing fee relative to GMA Network, Inc.’s (GMA’s) application for the amendment of its
articles of incorporation for purposes of extending its corporate term. The petitioner claims that per R.A. No. 3531,
they are entitled to collect and receive for the filing of the amended articles of incorporation the same fees
collectible under existing law as the filing of articles of incorporation. Since these fees are not a form of penalty or
sanction, publication is no longer required, and for them, this made Memorandum Circular No. 2, Series of 1994
effective.

Issue:
Whether or not Memorandum Circular No. 2, Series of 1994 is effective.
Ruling:
No. Memorandum Circular No. 2, Series of 1994 is not effective because it was not published in the Official Gazette,
and the amount that SEC is asking from GMA is not reasonable. Therefore, SEC Memorandum Circular No. 1, Series
of 1986 was the one used in computing the amount of filing fee that the GMA needed to pay.

You might also like