Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2021 Research Proposal
2021 Research Proposal
Justin Almazan
Graduate Studies
Doctoral Research Proposal
January 31, 2021
Abstract
Music is often described as a universal language. Although this term oversimplifies the vast, complex systems of
information which constitute music, there may be a correlation between language acquisition and musical learning. After
all, most knowledge passed from teacher to student is done verbally. To this end, the primary focus of my proposed
doctoral research would be an investigation of the beneficial points of overlap between linguistic and musical aptitudes.
Specifically, through research, experimentation, and guidance from Schulich Research experts, I will seek to understand
how language can be implemented in order to affect and improve delivery of a musical performance, ensemble playing
techniques, practice efficacy, and the teaching of young performers from elementary to college age. By tapping into the
academic resources and expertise available to me over the course of this program, I hope to be able to more effectively act
on my curiosity through proactive research methods. The resultant enhancement of my own performance, private practice,
chamber music abilities, and teaching skills will further advantage my future career as a versatile teacher-performer.
In a more macro-oriented approach to studying the integration of music and language, bilinguality may present a
compelling variable as a component of my proposed research. If learning music can be compared to language
acquisition, perhaps a bilingual element of music education may bolster musical learning. Perhaps existing studies
on the advantages of a bilingual brain can be drawn from or even added to over the course of my research.
Conceivably, the bilingual culture of Montréal could provide an essential environment in which to study these
particular effects of languages on music studies. To start, one can pose the question of how a bilingual lesson
environment affects the rate at which a performance student progresses? Moreover, do bilingual students respond to
verbal stimuli differently depending on the language used by the instructor?
Lastly, I foresee that variation in degree of technical proficiency among potential test subjects (musically and or
terms of language ability) may demand great attention in designing experiments with results worthy of review.
3. Explore how quality (emotional, physical, pictorial etc.) of cue words impacts performance? Example
experiment:
a. Give 3 different control groups 15 minutes to learn an unknown musical excerpt. First group is given an
emotive word to apply in performance, the second a physical command (i.e. breathe or relax), and the third
an image (i.e. lake, sunset). Rate performances in terms of intonation, rhythm, musicality.
4. Pursue lessons in regimented phases of French and English, collecting quantifiable data on the effects. For
example:
a. 3 weeks of consecutive lessons in French VS. 3 weeks in English VS. 4 weeks of alternating language of
instruction.
b. At the end of each specified language regimen, perform in studio class and have studio mates rate
performance out of 10. Ask the instructor to rate musical progress in the same manner.
c. Drawbacks include inability to account for external circumstances within the span of several weeks that can
affect the quality of live performance.
5. Assessing the extent to which the reading of a relevant text can affect a performance. Potential experiments to
gather subjective data include:
a. Assign 3 student string quartets the same passage from Janacek’s “Intimate Letters” quartet to learn over
the course of 1 week. Provide each group with a text to inform their upcoming performance. Ask each
group to keep this information confidential. Group 1 will be given an actual letter written by Janacek.
Group 2 will be given the technical criteria (intonation, ensemble, balance etc) they will be graded on.
Group 3 will only be given the information provided in the score (tempo marking for example). Have an
impartial panel assess and comment on the performances, and try to surmise what texts each group was
given.