Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Hexagonal Microstrip Patch Antenna
Hexagonal Microstrip Patch Antenna
Hajra Farooq, Yousma Izn Khan, Student Member IEEE, Fatimah Majeed
Electrical Engineering Department, National University of Science and Technology (NUST PNEC), Habib Rahmatullah Road, Karachi, Pakistan
The resonant frequency for our hexagonal patch antenna was selected to be
2.45GHz. The initial calculations were done using emtalk microstrip calculator.
( https://www.emtalk.com/mpacalc.php ). Through these parameters, the input
impedance is calculated through the given URL.
The proposed design for the hexagonal patch antenna is shown in the Figure 1.
This antenna consists of a hexagon with the dimensions mentioned and the
patch used to connect with the connector. The top and sideview of antenna are
shown with the dimensions mentioned in Table 2.
Figure 2: Hexagonal Patch design
The ground and polygon are then assigned finite conductivity and material is
chosen to be ‘copper’. The radiation box is kept as radiation medium. Solution
type is chosen as terminal where we will be using ‘SMA’ terminal port after our therefore, goes mostly up and down. The Green portion in the lobe is presented
PCB fabrication. Feed is assigned excitation using ‘lumped port’ and ground is as ‘Near Field area’ while far field is denoted by blue. Therefore, there is no
used as reference. The solution for frequency is kept as 2.45GHz and maximum sharp distinction amongst the two fields.
number of passes are kept as 20 for adaptive solutions. The frequency sweep
for solution1 is kept fast with frequency setup between 1GHz-3GHz.
Figure 2 shows the s11 graph (Reflection coefficient) which has a main role in
designing of an antenna. The s11 graph defines the bandwidth and impedance
matching characteristics. The graph of Figure 2 , shows three peaks. Amongst Figure 5b: PCB fabricated ground Surface of Hexagonal Patch antenna
these three peaks, only two falls in the ISM band. These peaks have frequency
After the successful result of simulation, the design was fabricated on FR4
of 2.45GHz and 4.4GHz. While the one outside the ISM band is 6.6GHz.
double sided copper board. Figure 5 (a,b) shows the front and back side of our
antenna. A Gerber file was created so that a PCB print can be formed and later
the design was etched on the PCB board. An SMA connector was used so that
frequency can be measured of our antenna.
Figure 3 shows the radiation field of our antenna. This plot shows gain and
phase. Gain (-1, -7, -13 and -19). The graph extends from 0 to 180° and 0 to -
180°. This graph shows the signal strength at different points of the peripherals
of the circle. The graph is not uniformly distributed, and the propagation is
neither perfect. The graph is neither linear nor logarithmic. Also, it shows that
the dipole pattern of azimuth for antenna. The azimuth lies purely in x-y plane. Figure 7: PCB Fabricated Antenna s11 graph
As seen from the figure there are two lobes, comprising of minor and major
lobes in a single direction. Therefore, in such situations when a gain is greater Before fabrication the frequency achieved by software is 2.4GHz,4.4GHz and
in one direction there has been a compromise in gain in other direction. 6.6 GHz with gain values as -19.5320, -15.0812 and -20.1943 respectively.
While for the fabricated antenna, the frequency is achieved at 2.69GHz and
6.608GHz with gain achieved at -16.7628dB and-9.5356dB.
III. CONCLUSION
Although, the result of the prototype and simulation are quite close but there is
always space for improvements. The slight change observed in frequency must
be due to smaller width of hexagon which means it will catch lesser number of
radiations. If the fringing field of antenna is increased the result will be a lot
better. Additionally, dielectric losses also play a vital role in difference of
simulation and hardware design. Thus, this factor can be improved if we use a
Figure 5: Antenna Far Field Visualization good quality substrate. Conductor losses can also create dissimilarity in the
results which be refined by using a good quality conductor. Apart from that a
Far field visualization of antenna was also made in order to check that in which slight change in dimension can have a great impact on the result, thus it is
directions the antenna radiates its energy. Figure 4 shows the depiction for our recommended that all dimensions are kept wisely to get optimized result. Also,
it should be noted that while the substrate material is being chosen it should
antenna. Each point on an antenna acts as thought in an isotropic antenna. As
match with the di-electric else it can result inadequate. Apart from this, if the
we add points, we see constructive and destructive interferences, resulting in a quality of PCB is improved better results will be achieved.
wave front away from the dipole with some minor sidelobes. The energy,