Def
yes!
No solid scientific explanation exists as to how or why Rh- blood cameAbout. It is presumed to be
the result of a random mutation. Have VouleVerfelt you weft weird Or different? it may be due to
your DNA ... 85% of humans have the monkey gene (RH+) and 15% do not (RH-) and maybe have an
alien gene instead. RH- people are characterized by higher IQs, sensitive vision, lower body
temperatures, sensitivity to heat and sunlight, psychic power, ability to stop watches and electrical
appliances and having extra vertebrae. This film explores the possibility that we were bred as a slave
race for labor, since 97% of our genetic code is disabled, with only 3% left for us to survive. RH
negative blood group is from ANNUNAKI heritage Of the human blood types, 0 is the most common.
It isa universal blood type. Blood types are further broken down into two groups, negative and
Positive. This is called the RH factor. The RH factor is the Rhesus (rhesus as in monkey) blood factor.
If your blood tests positive for this, you have the factor in your blood. If you test negative, you do
not have the factor in your blood. The RH factor is a protein found in the human blood that is
directly linked to the Rhesus Monkey.When blood type is inherited from your parents, it is known.
that this factor element of the blood is the most consistent human or animal characteristic passed
‘on to the off spring. There are VERY few aberrations. It rarely chang
Most people, about 85%, have RH-positive blood. That could support the idea that humans evolved
or were derived from Primates. 15 % of humans have RH-negative blood. if blood type is one of least
mutable human characteristic, where did the RH negative come from? This question has puzzled
scientists for years. There is some evidence that suggests the RH-negative blood group may have
appeared about 35,000 years ago. And the appearance was regional and seemed to, originally, be
connected with certain groups/tribes of people. (VN: the author has this wrong. Its should read that
“15% of humans have the RH negative designation and 85% have the RH positive designation.” The
fact is of the 85% Positive, many, as much as 60% have one allel from at least one parent. In other
words, there are those “designated RH positive” who have all the traits of Negative, because they
hhave one allel from one parent which makes them RH neg in reality, but they also have RH + traits
for the same reason. Northern Spain and Southern France is where you can find some of the highest
concentration of the RH-negative factor in the Basque people. Another original group were the
Eastern/Oriental Jews. In general, about 40 ~ 45% of Europeans have the RH-negative group. Only
about 3% of African descendent and about 1% of Asian or Native American descendent has the
RHnegative group. Due to the larger European numbers, itis a safe bet that was where it was
introduced into the human genetic code. Could this also be where the Caucasian was introduced? Is
the introduction of Caucasian related to the RH-blood factor. lf the RH-negative factor is a ‘normal’
presentation of blood, then why is there a problem j 36K q 1Kh 51 b 828 s 238.4160 whena
mother of the RH-negative blood group gives birth to an RH-positive blood group baby. This
Hemolytic disease, actually an allergic reaction, can cause death when the two different blood
groups are mingled during pregnancy. When the antigenic substances attack the negative blood
group it can destroy the blood cells. So why does the human body produce antigens to this blood
type? Is the blood group alien? The only other time this occurs in nature is, as an example, when
donkeys and horses are crossed to produce mules, This is not ‘natural’ because left alone in the wild,
these animals would never cross breed. Only with intervention would this happen. Was there a cross
breeding of two human like beings, similar but genetically different?People with RH-negative blood
group have certain characteristics that seem to be common among the majority. Here isa brief list
of the most common.” Extra vertebra. “Higher than avera6® |.” More sensitive vision and other
senses. “ Lower body temperature “Higher biood pressure "increased occurrence of
.psychic/intuitive abilities ” Predominantly blue, green, or Hazel eyes ~ Red or reddish hair “ Has
increased sensitivity to heat and sunlight “ Cannot be cloned “ Alien Abduction and other
unexplained phenomenonSo what does this mean? what can be concluded?The appearance of RH-
negative blood did not follow the usual evolutionary path. In fact, evolution would seem to be ruled
out as a possible cause of the anomaly. It has been proven that blood is the least likely to mutate.
There are no other blood mutations. The introduction of the RH-negative blood type was not a
naturally occurring part of human evolution. This would lend credence that the RHnegative factor
was introduced from an outside source. Could the source be from human like beings from another
planet? Or maybe we are just as alien as they are, in that, we are a product of their manipulation
and interference. Could they have come here and manipulated life forms already present on earth to
create modern man? Many ancient texts, including, the Bible, do support this theory. Many stories
in the ancient texts, especially pre-Christian texts, do tell about a race that from the Heavens to the
Earth Came. And they created man in their image. Man saw them as gods, living long lives and
performing miracles. Flying about in the sky ships and shooting fire and creating ear-shattering
booms. The humans watched as these gods built massive and glorious houses and created beautiful
cities for themselves. From man’s primitive point of view, they were gods. But that was early man’s
point of view. Who were the gods? The ancient stories tell us a lot about these gods. They obviously
had advanced technology capable of space travel and air travel. They knew about aviation,
metallurgy, the universe, the cosmic progression, medicine and evidently genetics. They knew about
atomic energy and weapons and used them. Evidence of this can be found on Earth. They knew
about agriculture and how to create more nutritious grains and other food staples. All of the basic
grains that humans rely on for food have been determined to have all appeared at the same time
spanning roughly a 10,000 year period. A very short time, geologically speaking. And no new grain
has since been developed. Our ancient texts tell us they began to take humans for their spouses. The
Bible says, and the gods looked upon woman and found her pleasant to behold and took her as their
wives. They had children, many children. But not all humans were a result of interbreeding. The first
human was a result of scientific research combining primates with the gods’ genes. The first humans
were not a product of interbreeding. But small portions of humans are a result of this interbreeding
and their blood type can support this. In the first part of this article, | described to you what happens
when two species who similar but genetically different interbreed. They produce hybrids. The
example | gave was about horses, donkeys, and mules, Mules are the hybrid, the product of a union
between a horse and a donkey. However, mules are born sterile because there is no genetic
relationship between the horse and the donkey. When humans were first created, they were a
product of two genetically similar but not related species. The combination of the DNA of the
primates and the gods was produced ‘artificially’ in a lab. If the gods have the technology to create a
new species, they would have no problem overcoming the problem of the hybrids being sterile. A
little genetic manipulation and it would no longer be an issue. Three proto types of humans were
created. Each one successively more advanced, Two types by design and the last by chance.
Neanderthal Man is suspected of being an early humanoid created by the gods but Cro-magnon was
definitely a product of their intervention. The next type is whom we call pre-human and then we
have modern man. Modern man was a result of interbreeding between the gods and pre-humans
This interbreeding for the most part created no problems in the resulting offspring, except for a line
that inherited, from their godly parents, the Ri-negative blood type. This is supported by the fact
that these humans did not inherit the protein found in the blood that is directly linked to the RhesusMonkey. They did not inherit it because one of their parents did not have the monkey protein. This
protein is present only because combining primate DNA with DNA from the gods created the original
human proto-type that carried the monkey protein, So in conclusion, | suggest that man is a creation
of a highly technological race of human like beings that From the Heavens to the Earth came. |
suggest that these advanced beings are still among us today and are stil very active in the affairs of
‘man. To what end, | can only suggest. Global Blood suppliers managed to infect or kill 90% of
Hemophiliacs in world by providing them with tainted blood. if Hemophiliac is the “Royal Disease”,
woe to generations of boys, who could not be king. Worldwide, over 120,000 men, women and
boys..a true “genetic holocaust”...are now infected with HIV world wide...due to tainted blood
transfusions At least 25,000 have died. In some areas, the Rh-Negative blood factor is referred to as
“Blood Royale” or “Royal Blood”. For centuries, European royalty have been inflicted with
Hemophilia or “bleeders disease”. Apparently, Queen Victoria was a “carrier” of Hemophilia and
{gave it to all of her children who then intermarried and infected the bloodlines of very throne in
Europe during the 1800s and 1900s. As a direct result, Hemophilia became known as the “Royal
Disease”. To keep this in perspective, only about 5% of all “royalty” have Rh-Factor negative
blood...which means “less than the general population. That would indicate that the vast majority of
“rulers” and “monarchs” are NOT Rhesus-factor negative. Is this by chance? or by genetic
engineering called “arranged marriages”? For all practical purposes the cultural group with the
highest rates of Rh-negative blood are the “Berbers” of Morocco. In an earlier meme, i indicated that
the highest concentration of Rh-Factor Negative was from Iraq, It seems that the Berbers may
actually have originated thousands of years ago, from the border of Syria and Iraq. If European
royalty are no disposed to intermarriage with Rh-Negs, it may be because they are avoiding the
“arate! bloodline? Let's nat get ahead of ourselves. It appears that the Basque Rh-neg factors come
from ancient Berber sea farers as early as 8,000 BC! Perhaps, many of the “cave paintings” may be
attributed to “strangers” of great artistic ability that migrated into the area. Is “hyper-creativity” a
“symptom” of Rh-Negative Blood? Artists? Entertainers? Who knows...but if European Royalty refuse
‘to marry into the Rh Negative blood line it means one thing..Rh-Neg people are a “competing royal
line”. How do you get rid of it once and for all? Although the British would love for you to think that
Victoria was the world’s first carrier...don’t be confused. It was he Hapsburg’s disease. Was Victoria a
Hapsburg? The unofficial motto of the Hapsburg family was “Bella gerunt ali, tu, felix Austria,
‘nubes!” ("Where others must fight wars, you, fortunate Austria, marry!). It’s curious that “marriage”
can be a “dynastic” undertaking but it can also be a perverse form of “bio-warfare” or “genetic
warfare”. In fact, the disease was much more ancient. The “Father of Surgery” was El Zarhawi or
‘Albucasis, 1013-1106. Albucasis described a family where only males died from blood loss after the
‘most trivial of injury. www.unhas.ac.id/~rhiza/saintis/zahravi-htm| His full name was Abul Qasim
{Khalaf ibn al-Abbas al-Zahravi. He was born and brought up in Zahra (zorro2) the royal suburb of
Cordova (Arabic Qurtuba), the capital of Muslim Spain, As we know from the history, Zahra
competed in grandeur and magnificence with Baghdad, AlZahravi served in the capacity of the court
physician to King Al-Hakam-Il of Spain. After a long and distinguished medical career he died in 1013
CE. As an inventor of many surgical instruments, a).zahraviis famous for developing instruments for
internal examination of the ear, internal inspection of the urethra and for applying or removing
foreign bodies from the throat. He introduced such new procedures as cauterization of wounds,
Crushing stones inside the bladder, the vvisection anq dissection. He applied cauterization
Procedure to as many as 50 different operations. in aqdition, A-Zahravi discussed the preparation of
medicines and the application of such techniques a« cubjimation and decantation. He prescribed theuse of diuretics, sudorifics, purgatives, the absorption of pure wine and hot baths. Al-Zahravi was the
first to give detailed description hemophilia and was the first to use silk thread for stitching wounds.
So, you begin to wonder if the good doctor was treating an “Arab” family in Moorish Spain for the
disease. Then you begin to wonder just where a supposed blue blood like Victoria got her “Arab
Royalty Disease”??? Was it a disease of Spanish Royalty? In other words, was marriage to Victoria’s
daughters a way to kill or weaken future “non-Hapsburg” kings...since mostly males only contract
the disease from their mothers? Still, Hemophilia was in Royalty long before Victoria. Victoria's
daughters passed the disease into the Spanish, German and Russian Royal lines and threatened the
thrones of all of Europes major powers. It would appear that Victoria is actually a direct descendant
of Ferdinand of Castille, who retook he city of Castille in 1236, where the surgeon Abulcasis had
counseled king Hakam I about a family who's sons died easily. What's the connection between
Hemophilia, Rh-Negative, AIDS and Royal Blood?
{As you can see the vast majority of RH- people come from the Basque people of France and Spain,
and then Europe has the second highest percentage. We can surmise that the RH- blood type
originates out of Europe and has spread over to other countries that contain European ancestry
heritage. The RH- recessive alleles (+/-) make up approximately 60% of the Basque people and 40%
of the Europeans, so that means that a higher percentage of RH+ people in Europe are carrying the
genetics of the RH- factor in their DNA.
sebeesesaceennesssssssssssssessecaeessnseeecesanaaaaaaanaananans Segeeeeeee My
‘one has tried to explain where the Rh negative people came from. Most, familiar with blood factors,
admit that these people must at least be a mutation if not descendants of a different ancestor. If we
are a mutation, what caused the mutation? Why does it continue with the exact characteristics?
‘Why does it so violently reject the Rh factor, if it was in their own ancestry? Who was this ancestor?
Difficulties in determining ethnology are largely overcome by the use of blood group data, for they
are a single gene characteristic and not affected by the environment. The Basque people of Spain
and France have the highest percentage of Rh negative blood. About 30% have (rr) Rh negative and
about 60% carry one (r) negative gene. The average among most people is only 15%-Rh negative,
while some groups have very little. The Oriental Jews of Israel, also have a high percent Rh negative,
although most other Oriental people have only about 1% Rh negative. The Samaritans and the Black
Cochin Jew also have a high percentage of Rh negative blood, although again the Rh negative blood
is rare among most black people. www-greatdreams.com
sane teaenensseeonsoseesenensen® The Basque people
are also known for having the oldest language in Europe, and the origins of the Basque language are
unknown. The languages in neighboring countries in Europe show no resemblance to the Basque
language, so this has become a real mystery to the linguist-The Celtic people of Ireland and Great
Britain also have high incidences of the RH- factor and it has recently been proven that there is a
genetic link between the Basque and the Celts. Thi research proves that the Celtic people came
from the Basque regions of France and Spain and a group must have migrated over to the islands of
Great Britain. With this research | can surmise that my family got this distinct blood type from our
French and Irish ancestry
roots.*####sestessssssesseseesssse ees,
a sseeeeeeessennnsss¢eee9 link Celts to
BasquesThe Welsh and Irish Celts have been foung tg pe the genetic blood-brothers of Basques,
scientists have revealed. The gene patterns of the three races passed down through the male line
are all “strikingly similar”, researchers concluded, ‘sstsicallyindistinguishable’He and hiscolleagues looked at Ychromosomes, passed from father to son, of Celtic and Norwegian
Populations. They found them to be quite different, “But we also noticed that there’s something
quite striking about the Celtic populations, and that is that there's not a lot of genetic variation on
the Y-chromosome,” he said. To try to work out where the Celtic population originally came from,
the team from UCL, the University of Oxford and the University of California at Davis also looked at
Basques. “On the Y-chromosome the Celtic populations turn out to be statistically indistinguishable
from the Basques,” Professor Goldstein said. Why are people calling RH negatives “blue bloods”?
Well, again a peculiar thing happens between an RH- mother anda second RH+ baby. As you may
remember an RH- mother builds up antibodies against the RH+ baby, and this means that the babies
blood will start to agglutinate. Before the rhoGAM shot, babies were born blue and they needed to
have blood transfusions to survive. Blue blood is an expression from the Spanish phrase “sangre
azul,” indicating noble birth or descent. This is said to derive from the fact that the native Spanish
had fairer skin, which displays veins more prominently, than people of Arab origin. After the Moorish
‘occupation of Spain, intermarriage occurred. The result seems to have been that the aristocracy,
particularly certain families in Castille, who would not mix with the Moors, showed rather bluer
blood vessels (in, for example, the back of the hand) than the ordinary
folk.en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blue_blood So the phrase blue blood came to refer to the blood wt
flowed in the veins of the oldest and most aristocratic families. The phrase was taken over into
English in the 1830s. By the time Anthony Trollope used it in The Duke’s Children in 1880, it had
become common: www.worldwidewords.org,