My Transmission is the Divine Transmission. My Transmission is the Divine Transmission.

There are all kinds of energies communicatedby various teachers and people who work with energy
altogether. Even scientists work with energy. But in the domain of the Great Tradition, which is a
first six stages of life limited and ego based process--that's what humankind has been involved in up
to now--there are energiestransmitted as part of the process.

Some of those energies are given names--Kundalini, or even Jane's tradition of Wuji.

The energies that are engaged, manipulated, transmitted, or exchanged within the GreatTradition
originate within the cosmic domain and they make use of portals or structures in the body- mind.
You can feel, if you are sensitive to transmitted energies, where they come from, where they
originate in the structure of the body-mind, and therefore, how they are associated with the cosmic
structure.

The "Bright" does not originate in the cosmic domain. The "Bright" comes from beyond. The "Bright"
does not originate in the cosmic domain. It doesn't originate in the body. My Divine Avataric Self-
Transmission is Divine Revelation of Person, of Teaching, of intrinsic Egolessness, but of Conscious
Light, the Divine Conscious Light.

People may notice who have been in the Transmission circumstance approaching Me,compared to
other energy phenomena they may be familiar with.

“Jane, for instance, works with an energy that originates in the Cerebellum and
the Brain Stem. You could feel it happen there. It happens in the back of the
head. It's a useful force transmission, a useful energy work.”
There is no more body culture in Adidam.

That's what I used to like about going to Therma 2000 in Europe, that body-positive domain is just
assumed, and naturally and straightforwardly assumed. People weren't playing games around it.

People liked looking at one another or not, as the case may be, because of what people look like.But
nonetheless, it was body openness, body positive. And by having that there, even in the larger social
domain, there is something regenerative and life positive about it.

At the Mountain Of Attention, we used to go down to the baths together, even though they were
not necessarily intimate with one another otherwise. It is just a body culture.There is no body
culture anymore in Adidam. It's been completely shut down, along with My being shut down. It's a
kind of attack on that that has been going on, a control game. Of course, you open it up and then
people are starting to play games because of their immaturity. Among Europeans, particularly the
Dutch, it is not strange to have a Therma 2000 and go to it. Americans are so double-minded that
there it doesn't really work, except for those who have a particular disposition and maturity and so
forth that makes it work.

Should be a body positive dimension to larger society, There isn't any kind of open recommendation
I can make, other than to say, in principle, that is a good idea for there to be a body positive
dimension to even the larger social circumstance. But it's not possible when people don't have the
maturity to participate in it rightly.So to just have open nudity in baths would be misused in America,
generally speaking.

Otherwise, you can do it in Holland, because it's already a feature of their common understanding
and it is no problem. In other places in Europe, it would be a problem for the general population.

So I don't know what to say about it, except, like I said in My description of Yogic Conductivity
Massage, in a body positive circumstance, the participants needn't wear clothing. So where would
that be? Well, it would be in a private situation perhaps, or it would be in a place like Therma 2000.

Where is a body-positive environment? Well, that's for people to work out. There is no generalized
rule about it.

I was always looking to see that people could understand themselves in these terms and practice in
that kind of situation. It's not ego culture. It's not conventional pair-bonding world. It's not a social
ego culture. It's got nothing to do with all that.

But nobody got past all that. It didn't become anything. It just went back to being the standards of
ordinary life in the mummery world of egos. And that's what Adidam became. It doesn't have
anything to do with Me because of that.

This applies not just to Me; it applies to devotees. That's why I wrote it. But, nonetheless, there are
requirements. It's not casual. It's not a part of conventional ego culture. It's about non-ego culture,
zero-point culture. And it requires that kind of understanding and maturity and discipline.

It's a discipline, not merely an allowance. Deal with the roots of ego culture to have body positive
life.

So how do you introduce the body positive circumstance and have it be right? Well, you have to deal
with the roots of ego culture first. And people have to be right in their practice. In some areas of the
world, body positive culture is ordinary. On the other hand, it's also, in some sense, perfectly
ordinary--as in Holland, Therma 2000.

Everybody went there. There aren't any immense requirements, except for the fact that Dutch
culture is compatible with it. So everybody, Europeans who choose to go there also have a
disposition that allows them to, in a very ordinary, straightforward manner, be in such an
environment. And people understand what to do that.

Requires a non-puritanical disposition So it requires not something extraordinary merely. But it does
require a fundamental disposition that is not double-minded and puritanical and yes-no-ing itself
about the body and sex and all the rest of it.

Cultures like in America are sex paranoid. Not everybody is that way, but as a culture it is. Other
parts of the world are more liberal, perhaps, but still sex paranoid. So sex paranoia and intrinsic
double-mindedness about the body, and sex rules of a paranoid or puritanical kind, where all that is
absent, then there can be a body positive dimension to culture and even extends to basically
everybody. It's not a big deal.

Requirements to engage Yogic conductivity massage practice Otherwise, the potential of practice of
Yogic conductivity massage, different modes of that that have to do with the specifics of what must
be there to justify one or another variant approach to it--just as also in the context of the sexual
disciplines I've described otherwise that take place in the context of intimate relations, but relations
that are supposed to be transcending ego culture and conventions of pair-bonding and double-
mindedness--that's another kind of discipline that applies to people who are engaged in intimacies,
which in Adidam are supposed to be intimate Yogicfriendships, not conventional pair bonding
relationships. So people have to outgrow the conventional pair-bonding mind with its double-
mindedness altogether to practice that discipline and grow in it.

So also, Yogic conductivity massage--at least beyond fully clothed and non-touch--anything beyond
that, there are requirements. It's not a casual matter. How renunciates would engage Yogic
conductivity massage And how would renunciates practice? Well, obviously, this is something that
has to becarefully measured based on people's signs. Again, it's not casual. It's not a way out of the
disciplines associated with renunciation. It's something that should be completely compatible with
it. But to be compatible, it's got to be right, rightly managed, rightly engaged. And then it supports
everything about renunciate practice rather than working against it.

Not just professional massage or patient situation enlarge its language, because people aren't
understanding what it's really all about, to understand that it's not something merely that's done in
a kind of formalistic, professional manner by a masseuse on a passive patient kind of a thing. That is
simply the model ofconventional, professional patient-doctor relationships. That's got nothing to do
with Yogic conductivity massage.

Both participants are involved in conductivity process Both participants are fully to be involved in
this conductivity process. The particulars of how it is being done have to do with what they are
mutually prepared to be doing there and rightly could be doing there. But nonetheless, it's both, not
just the recipient, but both must be involved in the full conductivity process.So in what manner they
can be practicing it depends on the factors that have to do withtouch sensitivity, energy sensitivity,
and the nature of their relationship, otherwise. But it is both. It is conductivity participation by
both.It's thought of this sort of maybe even hands off, that it's strictly about this recipient there who
is supposed to be completely passive, just receiving a treatment. No, it's not a treatment. It is an
exercise not only in touch, but in relationship. It is a mutual participation.How it can be done, as I
said, depends on the nature of the relationship between people and their sensitivity to one another.
But nonetheless, it's a practice in relationship, and it is in the context of a body positive
understanding of life. So those are fundamentals to it.Then what is appropriate depends on other
factors additionally.Those who administer the massage are responsible for the energy processPeople
who administer this have to understand they are fully to be engaged in the energy process. That's
part of their responsibility.

“Examples of Jane and Paul's healing work.

For instance, Jane, when she does her treatment work with Me, she is fully
participating in the energy. She is aware of the energy. She experiences effects
in herself. And Paul is there to assist her because she is experiencing energy
changes in her own body, so he helps to clear that. Yes, that is how it should be
done. It is full participation, not merely professional detachment.
What kind of touching of the body is involved depends again on the
relationship between them and so forth. Jane practices her non-touch
approach--in fact, that is generally what her discipline is about anyway. There
is not a lot of physical touching. It is mainly hands above the body, some
touching here and there. But it is not what you would call intimate touching. It
doesn't touch genitals with people generally.
That is right discipline with people, generally. If she were massaging Paul,
maybe she would touch him more intimately--that would be for them to work
out. But it is nonetheless about full energy participation by both.
So she is an example of how that is the case. She is not merely the doctor style
individual in an office with the professional room and all that kind of stuff,
where there is the practice of dissociation.”