Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Experiment 8 Complexometric Titration
Experiment 8 Complexometric Titration
CHM130L
EXPERIMENT NO. 8
COMPLEXOMETRIC TITRATION
I. OBJECTIVES
Chemical/ Reagent
0.0100M CaCO3 standard solution
0.0100M Mg-EDTA standard solution
Ammonia-ammonium chloride buffer, pH 10
Eriochrome Black T, 0.5% wt/vol in Ethanol
Unknown water sample
Distilled Water
Introduction
Under the law of infinite probability, it implies that everything might happen or can happen,
even at the lowest of chances. What is interesting is that the things that you don’t know would
happen, is already happening without further analysis of proof. Chemistry and its world always bring
that shock and awe to the people that deepen their knowledge unto it. A good example would be
the formation of complexes, or the bonding of metals to ligands, which are defined as complex
CHM130L
EXPERIMENT NO. 8
COMPLEXOMETRIC TITRATION
forming nonmetal species. They bond without having to transfer an electron pair, but they donate
electrons, like what the principle of covalent bonding follows, instead of ionic bonding. These
complex formations have been regarded into a number of useful applications. One of them would
be determining the hardness of water (The hardness of water comes from the dissolved impurities
that are found on tap water, usually alkaline earth metals precipitated in carbonates) through
complexometric titration. By titrating the ligand into the water sample (usually tap), it will form a
complex on the metal ions around it (the water should be buffered on a correct pH setting, and one
must use an indicator), and by calculation, the hardness of water is determined.
IV. METHODOLOGY
The solution was titrated with the EDTA solution to the sky
blue endpoint.
CHM130L
EXPERIMENT NO. 8
COMPLEXOMETRIC TITRATION
The 25-mL pipet used was rinsed with a small amount of the
water sample.
CHM130L
EXPERIMENT NO. 8
COMPLEXOMETRIC TITRATION
CHM130L
EXPERIMENT NO. 8
COMPLEXOMETRIC TITRATION
A. Table 1
1-25.4
2-24.8
.
MEDTA =
B. Table 2
1-1.9
2-1.8
Trial 1:
= 75.772 ppm (mg/L)
Trial 2:
= 71.784 ppm (mg/L)
The earth’s surface is covered, 7 % with water, and its inhabitants need water to survive their
everyday lives. There are different types of water, though, and some are non-potable. We humans
decide what to drink and sometimes treat water for it to be safe for drinking. Our regular tap water
contains metal ions, like Ca2+, Mg2+, Fe3+, SO42-, and HCO3-, being the reason for it being called hard
water. The Ca2+ ion has the highest concentration of metal, and thus hardness is measured in terms
of CaCO3 concentration, parts per million.
There are two types of water hardness, temporary and permanent. Temporary is when the
metal ions in the water are removable through boiling and permanent is when they can’t be.
Temporary hard water contains only bicarbonate ions and permanent hard water contains Ca2+,
Mg2+, Fe3+ and SO4-. Bicarbonate dissolves from water, as shown in the equation:
HCO3- ⇆ H2O + CO2
thus removing the CO2, while the remaining ions, Ca2+, Mg2+, Fe3+ and SO42- can’t be eliminated, thus
being permanently hard.
CHM130L
EXPERIMENT NO. 8
COMPLEXOMETRIC TITRATION
Hard water does not pose threats to our health—rather, it supplies our calcium and magnesium
requirements, considering that we take supplements for those. It becomes important in the
industrial field because hard water is unsuitable for many uses because it makes the ions leave
insoluble precipitates. This is then where the method of water softening comes in. Industries usually
soften their hard water to improve efficiency. Hard water requires more detergent for washing and
contributes to equipment scaling.
Water hardness can be compared depending on its calcium carbonate content. The table below
shows its rating:
One method of knowing the hardness of water is by making the unknown water sample undergo
complexometric titration. This is usually done with ethylenediaminetetracetic acid (EDTA). EDTA is a
common chelating agent that can make 6 bonds with metal ions, thus forming complexes. The two
nitrogen atoms have two lone pairs each and can
still form two bonds and the four OH- groups can
form four more bonds to the metal.
In the experiment, we tried to determine the hardness of the unknown water sample given to
us. First of was the standardization of the EDTA solution to be used for the titration. When the
molarity of the EDTA was determined, the unknown water sample was treated with NH3-NH4Cl
buffer of pH 10.00 and the Eriochrome black T indicator. The initial color of the solution was red,
indicating its basicity. It was then titrated with the standardized EDTA solution. When enough EDTA
was added to the solution to chelate the divalent ions, the solution turned light blue. The hardness
CHM130L
EXPERIMENT NO. 8
COMPLEXOMETRIC TITRATION
of the water was then determined by knowing first the concentration of Ca2+ ions in the unknown
water sample, and it was reported as ppm (parts per million).
This experiment confirmed the underlying facts and figures behind complex formation and one
of its applications: determining the hardness of water by using complexometric titration. The EDTA
solution, which is needed for complex formation, is standardized to know the exact concentration of
it for future calculations. By getting a tap water sample, it was assessed with the Eriochrome Black T
indicator (wine red) and was put in an ammonia solution that is buffered with ammonium (in the
form of ammonium chloride) to know the endpoint. By using the standardized EDTA solution, the
analyte is titrated complexometrically. After getting all values, by computation the hardness of
water is determined as ppm calcium carbonate. Only the calcium carbonate is considered to be in
the tap water sample, since majority of it is the reason why there are hard deposits on water pipes
(or as referred to as calcium deposits), and since EDTA is in the form MgEDTA, the magnesium
carbonate can be disregarded. Also, calcium carbonate is the majority of the alkaline earth
carbonates present in the solution.
X. REFERENCES
Christian, Gary D. 2004. Analytical chemistry (6th ed.). John Wiley and Sons Inc.
Hage, David S. and James D. Carr. 2011. Analytical chemistry and quantitative analysis. New
Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.
Harris, Daniel C. 2003. Quantitative chemical analysis. (6th ed). New York: W. H. Freeman and
Company.
Madamba, Lilia S.P. 1995. Chemistry 32 Laboratory Instruction Manual (3rd rev). Los Baños:
Analytical and Environmental Chemistry Division, Institute of Chemistry, University of the Philippines
Los Baños.
Skoog, Douglas et. al. 2004. Fundamentals of Analytical Chemistry (8th ed.). Singapore:
Thomson Learning.