Professional Documents
Culture Documents
General Medicine and Surgery For Dental Practitioners. Part 5 - Psychiatry
General Medicine and Surgery For Dental Practitioners. Part 5 - Psychiatry
PRACTICE
• Psychiatric problems may not always be
relevant to a patient’s dental management,
Part 5 – psychiatry •
but a little knowledge may avoid problems.
It is important to presume all patients
have capacity to consent unless proven
otherwise.
S. Brown,1 M. Greenwood2 and J. G. Meechan3 • Mental illness may affect dental
professionals and it is important to know
how to access help.
There are a significant number of patients in society who have some form of psychiatric disorder. It is important that den-
tal practitioners have an awareness of the more common psychiatric disorders and their potential implications as they are
likely to encounter them in clinical practice.
essential it may be useful to try to simplify and these should be taken seriously, with Table 4 Features suggestive of
the environment as much as possible in relevant examination and investigations psychogenic pain
advance. Simple calming measures such undertaken to exclude physical disease. If Inconsistency with known anatomical
as softer lighting and music, or projecting hypochondriasis is suspected, however, it landmarks/nerve distribution
something to capture the child’s attention is advisable to seek psychiatric help at an Bilateral
on the ceiling may prove useful. early stage, as prolonged investigations
Continuous with little fluctuation
and repeated assessments will reinforce the
2. THE DENTIST MAY DETECT illness beliefs and may in fact exacerbate May prevent falling asleep but does not wake
A PSYCHIATRIC ILLNESS the condition.
the patient up
drugs are summarised in Table 5. Mood Objective (practitioner’s view) and subjective (the patient’s view) –
Poor oral hygiene and general self-care elated, depressed, neither?
Reactivity – is there an emotional response to sad or funny material?
may occur in chronic mental illness, result- Is the response as would be expected?
ing in advanced dental caries or infection
with late presentation to the dentist. This Abnormal sensory experiences Hallucinations – do they seem to be responding to sensory stimuli
which cannot be detected? Or are there misperceptions of stimuli?
may also occur in dementia and people
with learning disabilities, occasionally Cognitive functioning Orientation – do they know where they are in time and place
and who they are?
requiring multiple extractions or total Memory – can they recall how they got there? Can they recall their
dental clearance. last appointment, or what advice they received?
Concentration – are they following discussion? Where is their
attention? Poor concentration may make memory seem impaired.
4. PSYCHIATRIC ILLNESS
PRESENT BUT UNRELATED Insight Do they recognise there is a problem? Do they understand it? Are they
TO DENTAL PROBLEMS willing to receive help or treatment?
drink early in the morning to overcome 2. If so, does its presence impair the to speak to their general medical
withdrawal phenomena. The CAGE ques- person’s ability to make a particular practitioner (GMP) about whatever
tionnaire (Table 6) is a simple and useful decision? symptoms have been noticed. It is not
screening tool to detect alcohol depend- necessary to suggest it may be due to
ency. Patients scoring 2 or more are highly A four-stage test adapted from common psychiatric illness
likely to have alcohol problems but a nega- law must then be applied, looking at the • Deterioration of existing illness –
tive CAGE response does not rule out alco- decision-making process itself: these patients should be asked to
hol misuse. ‘A person is unable to make a decision speak to their GMP or existing
for himself if he/she is unable— psychiatric services
CAPACITY AND CONSENT (a) To understand the information • Overt suicidal ideation (either as new
It is easy to assume that patients suffer- relevant to the decision or altered presentation) – such patients
ing from significant psychiatric illnesses, (b) To retain that information (for at should be advised to speak to their
dementia, learning disability or other least long enough to make the GMP or go to A&E, or the on-call
impairments may not have the capacity to decision) psychiatric services or police should be
make their own decisions about treatment (c) To use or weigh that information as contacted directly
or to give consent; indeed dentists may at part of the process of making the • Patient presenting an immediate
times find themselves under pressure from decision, or danger to others – call the police
relatives and carers to accept their deci- (d) To communicate his/her decision • You or a colleague need help – a
sions made on behalf of a patient. (whether by talking, using sign lan- GMP or A&E should be able to help,
The Mental Capacity Act (2005)11 (intro- guage or any other means).’ or contact the confidential Dentists’
duced into practice in 2007) is an impor- Health Support Programme.
tant piece of legislation designed to protect Relevant information should be provided
the rights of individuals to make their own in a manner appropriate to the needs of the PSYCHIATRIC ASSESSMENT
decisions and provides guidelines to address patient, involving an interpreter where nec- As with all assessments, the psychiatric his-
this. It sets out guidance for decision-mak- essary, and the patient should be similarly tory focuses on the presenting complaint,
ing on behalf of people who lack decision- aided in communicating his/her decision. followed by detailed contextual informa-
making capacity and applies to all people There is also a requirement to attempt to tion including previous psychiatric prob-
aged 16 and over in England and Wales. determine whether a lasting power of attor- lems, physical health problems, medication
Decision-making capacity is considered ney (LPA) exists, appointing someone to and a detailed developmental, personal
to be task-specific, relevant only to a spe- act on their behalf in relation to health and and social history. A physical examination
cific decision at a given time and should welfare decisions. remains relevant and can reveal many clues
not be generalised to other situations If an individual is found to be lacking as to the source of the psychiatric symptoms
and decisions. the capacity to make a particular decision, (eg hyper- or hypothyroidism, needle-tracks
There are five basic principles: there are two possible courses of action from injection of illicit drugs, neurologi-
• Autonomy: presumption of capacity. – either to defer treatment and reassess, cal abnormalities). The main difference in
People are presumed to have capacity or to act in ‘best interests’. ‘Best interests’ a psychiatric assessment is the mental state
until proven otherwise must be determined on an individual basis, examination, which requires careful obser-
• Decision-making capacity must be taking into account all possible sources of vation of the patient and provides valu-
maximised by all practicable means information and may require the involve- able clues as to which diagnosis should be
• An individual has the right to make an ment of an independent mental capacity reached (Table 7), and the risk assessment.
unwise decision advocate (IMCA). The Act contains guid-
• Best interests: decisions or acts taken ance for doing this. Risk assessment
on behalf of a person who is found to Further information is contained Contrary to what the media would have
lack capacity must be taken in their within the Mental Capacity Act and its us believe, patients with psychiatric illness
best interests Code of Practice, and guidance is freely are rarely a risk to others. Around 5% of
• Least restrictive: the least restrictive available for healthcare professionals all homicides are committed by people
decision or action should be taken, through organisations such as the British with a diagnosis of schizophrenia. Drug
where an individual is found to lack Medical Association.12 or alcohol abuse, however, are thought
decision-making capacity. to contribute to over half of all murders.
WHAT TO DO WHEN Far more likely is the risk to self, either
Capacity should be assessed by the per- PROBLEMS ARISE through self-neglect due to illness, self-
son who is proposing treatment and seek- There are no hard and fast rules about who harm or suicide. While the best predictor
ing consent, using a standard two part should or should not be referred for further of future behaviour is past behaviour, there
question: assessment. A number of scenarios may are also a number of risk factors recog-
1. Is there an impairment of, or a arise in dental practice: nised to increase the likelihood of suicide,
disturbance in the functioning of, the • New presentation of psychiatric illness not all of which may be modified. Some of
mind or brain? – such patients should be encouraged these are summarised in Table 8.
Along with doctors and lawyers, dentists Table 8 High risk characteristics for
J Dent Res 1969; 48: 596.
4. Corah N L, Gale E N, Illig S J. Assessment of a dental
are recognised as a group of professionals suicide anxiety scale. J Am Dent Assoc 1978; 97: 816–819.
at a high risk of mental health problems 5. Dailey Y M, Humphris G M, Lennon M A. Dental
Male > Female anxiety: the use of dental anxiety questionnaires:
including drug and alcohol misuse and a survey of UK dental practitioners. Br Dent J 2001;
suicide. Recognising and understanding Age >40 years (increasing in young men) 190: 450–453.
6. Russo L L, Campisi G, Di Fede O, Panzarella V, Muzio
problems in oneself or in colleagues may L L. Oral manifestations of eating disorders: a criti-
Evidence of planning
be just as important as recognising and cal review. Oral Dis 2008; 14: 479–484.
Social classes I and V 7. Newbury-Birch D, Lowry R J, Kamali F. The changing
understanding them in our patients. patterns of drinking, illicit drug use, stress, anxiety
Certain occupations: dentists, and depression in dental students in a UK dental
CONCLUSION doctors, vets, lawyers school: a longitudinal study. Br Dent J 2002;
192: 646–649.
Psychiatric problems are common and are Unemployed 8. Meechan J G. Drug abuse and dentistry. Dent
Update 1999; 26: 182-190.
likely to be encountered in routine den- 9. McGrath C, Chan B. Oral health sensations associ-
Living alone
tal practice. Many disorders have com- ated with illicit drug abuse. Br Dent J 2005;
198: 159–162.
mon symptoms that may be managed Not married 10. Knapp M, Prince M, Albanese E et al. Dementia
using the same general guiding prin- UK. The full report. London: The Alzheimer’s
Loss events: relationships, housing, finance Society, 2007.
ciples, aiming to alleviate distress and 11. Office of Public Sector Information. The Mental
anxiety, and respecting the individual’s Capacity Act 2005. Available online at http://www.
1. Crisp A H (ed). Every family in the land. London: opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts2005/20050009.htm.
autonomy. Communication with carers Royal Society of Medicine Press, 2005. 12. BMA Ethics. The Mental Capacity Act 2005.
may be important, as well as liaising with 2. Boyle C A, Newton T, Milgrom P. Who is referred Guidance for health professionals. London:
for sedation for dentistry and why? Br Dent J 2009; British Medical Association, 2009.
the patient’s GMP or psychiatric services 206: E12. http://www.bma.org.uk/ethics/consent_and_
when necessary. 3. Corah N L. Development of a dental anxiety scale. capacity/mencapact05.jsp.