Essay #1

Original: successful sports professionals can earn a great deal more money than people in other
important professions. Some people think this is fully satisfied while other think this is unfair. Discuss
both these views and give your own opinion.

Towards developing free market rules, some professional sports professionals are paid more than the
member of essential professions. It is often considered that this approach is quiet unfairly and some
people suggest that we should oversee our priorities.

Successful sports professionals can earn plenty of money because their product is very demanding and
there is myriad of people who want to see their participation in sport events. Since it seems that free
market rules are sufficient measurement of our lifestyle, we all agree that everyone should be paid for
their talent and skills. It means, that if we want to attend amazing sport events, we would pay more
for that. For example, Lionel Messi is the best footballer and there is great demand for attendance on
his events. The highest prices are the result of his popularity and he has every right to receive profit
of his work.

On the contrary, professionals in other essential field, should be paid considerable amount of money,
because they have been working for years and their ultimate result of work are not often obvious. For
example, scientists who work on the tiny piece of advancement, often remain unfamiliar for the
society and their work at least has the great influence on our health, on technology, etc. more money
would be additional encourage for them and money might also be great aspiration for the younger
generation of scientists.

To summarize, I believe that everyone should be paid for their work and skills. If sportsman obtain
popularity and inspire people to attend and watch the offspring of his works, money would be good
measurement for their success.

Essay #2
Original: the table below gives information about changes in modes of travel in England between
1985 and 2000.

The presented table illustrates details about alteration of travel methods in England, between 1985
and 2000, which is measured by miles, that per person travelled per year.

Firstly, most noticeably trend that can be seen there is that in 1985, 3199 miles was travelled by car
and this measurement rose in 2000, when it was 4806 miles, whereas the average distance which was
travelled by all means, including local bus, train, taxi, bicycle and others, was 4740 in 1985 and 6475
in the last year of the searching period.

On the other hand, another worthy trend throughout the presented table is that the average distance,
which was travelled by taxi prevails between 13 in 1985 and 42 miles in 2000.

To summarize, it can be clearly seen that towards the presence of variety of public transport and
other private means of transportation, people in England tended mostly to private cars and preferably
used them during the presented period.