Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Uwp1 Portfolio Reflection
Uwp1 Portfolio Reflection
Tiffany Lau
Benedetti
UWP1
10 June 2021
Portfolio Reflection
Writing this research article was one of the papers I spent the most time on. Through this
process, I was able to develop new habits in my writing and reading skills. In my past writing
assignments, I would rarely reread my papers, so I would hardly take the time to revise them.
However, the idea of receiving feedback from peers and the instructor from the learning outcome
wrote something that I, the writer, find confusing, the reader must be more confused, making my
paper seem unreliable. The process gave me time to reflect more on my writing and improve the
parts that were lacking. To improve, I needed to make sure the interpretations and analysis I
provided were genuine and understandable. Since my topic is based on influences that affect a
student’s future, I needed to understand my intentions for my research and how I can give
personal insights as a student as well. To provide genuine research, I had to have a clear vision of
my topic, which allowed for the practice of metacognition. Throughout my paper, I structured
everything based on the questions readers would have after reading each paragraph, so in the
end, all their questions would be answered. I wanted to be organized with my thoughts, so I
began with bullet points to have the main ideas I want to get across and build from there. As the
author, I’m in control of what I put in my paper, but I also need to be aware that I am not the only
reader of my paper, so I would need to revise according to the audience’s feedback. Since my
topic is surrounding students, I had to acknowledge that I am also a student, so I can provide my
Lau 2
own perspective. Through this, I was able to practice knowledge of conventions by connecting
my research with other communities. This gave me the opportunity to interview some people and
gain new insights on how they perceive my topic as well. I wanted to have completely different
perspectives, so I took 2 interviews from people who were almost a complete contrast of each
other. One of them is Jonathan Jiang, a 26 year old man who went straight into the workforce
after high school, but recently decided to go to college, and the other is Adrian Dalisay, a 19 year
old man who dropped out of college to pursue dance. They were similar in some areas, such as
growing up in an Asian household and graduating from the same high school, but I found it
interesting how they could go in different directions with their lives through these similar
influences. Jiang is older than Dalisay, so I wanted to understand Jiang’s perspective with the
decisions he made and connect similarities and differences with Dalisay’s experience. Dalisay is
fresh out of high school, while Jiang has been living independently for 7 years, so I was able to
obtain more insight from Jiang’s experience, such as his mindset from when he was 14, 18, and
now 26; whereas in for Dalisay, I was able to gain insight from when he was 14 to 19. After
surrounding topic to help support my argument. I started with secondary research and was able to
gain new information, but my primary research helped further develop my argument and look for
more secondary sources as well. Throughout the process, I was able to create new ideas and add
For the rough drafts, process notes were required, so it gave me some time to reflect on
the intention for my paper. With the process notes, it also lets my peers understand my intentions,
so they can give feedback and provide their perspectives as well. My intention never had a
Lau 3
drastic change, but I would alter it as I continued to revise. Although my topic has not changed,
my drafts improved to help make my intention more apparent through addition and revision.
If I had additional time to revise my final draft, I believe it would have been interesting to
do more research on surrounding topics. Since my topic is about the factors that influence a
student’s decision for their future, I would have liked to do more research that stemmed from the
factors. For example, one of the factors I went in depth for was social media, where I gave
insight on how it can provide a false sense of reality that can affect a student’s future. I would
have liked to go more in depth with the familial influence, such as immigrant relatives.I would
have liked to interview immigrant parents, to understand their perspective of their child’s future
and their environmental influences as well. Perhaps these parents were never in the position of a
Taking this course definitely let me grow at my own pace without feeling pressured to
meet difficult requirements. In the beginning of this quarter, I was introduced to metacognition. I
had never used this technique in writing, but using it gave me time to stop and think before
continuing my writing. Throughout the process of writing the research article, I would take a
moment to think about the point I wanted to make and once I had a clear vision, I would put it
down. My ideas are always clear in my head, but putting them into words was difficult. In the
past, I would put down my idea and hope that the reader would make their own interpretation.
However, in this class, there were many drafts due that gave me time to revise and work on the
process of my paper. These are the two practices I have rarely done before, so applying them in
future writings definitely help develop a mature argument. Reviewing a draft with a clear mind
will help me revise with awareness. Especially with the writing process, I found it easier to start
Lau 4
with bullet points, to make sure I had an idea of what I wanted. So in the future, I could go back
Since I was able to choose a topic I’m interested in, I enjoyed researching it and its
surrounding topics. My reading comprehension has never been the best, so to improve, I would
need to review the research several times before truly understanding it, only then I will be able to
provide a clear analysis. From this class, I was able to practice new and old techniques, which
gave me more confidence in this paper. In future writings, I need to remember that I am the
writer, so I should not depend on the existence of a “correct” interpretation. The writing I
provide should be acceptable as long as I understand my topic and the research I choose to
support it.