Etabs Report Sample

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 43

STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS AND

DESIGN REPORT

FOR
Residential Building of
MR.. CHOLESHWOR SHARMA KHANAL

ER. Laxman Shrestha (NEC Reg. No: 7350 Civil “A”

Kartik, 2077
TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................................................. 3

1.1 ABOUT THIS REPORT ........................................................................................................................... 3


1.2 ABOUT THE STRUCTURE ......................................................................................................................... 3
1.3 ANALYSIS PROCEDURE ........................................................................................................................... 3

2. DETAILED PARAMETERS OF THE BUILDING ........................................................................................ 4

2.1 GENERAL PARAMETERS.......................................................................................................................... 4


2.2 STRUCTURAL PARAMETERS ..................................................................................................................... 4
2.3 SOIL PARAMETERS ................................................................................................................................ 4
2.4 MATERIAL PROPERTIES .......................................................................................................................... 5
2.5 DESIGN BASIS ...................................................................................................................................... 5

3. LOADING ............................................................................................................................................ 6

3.1 DEAD LOADS (DL) ................................................................................................................................ 6


3.2 LIVE LOADS (LL) ................................................................................................................................... 6
3.3 EARTHQUAKE LOADS (EL) ...................................................................................................................... 6
3.4 LOAD COMBINATIONS ........................................................................................................................... 7

4. DESIGN CRITERIA ............................................................................................................................... 8

4.1 LIMIT STATE METHOD ........................................................................................................................... 8


5. MODELLING OF THE STRUCTURE ........................................................................................................ 9

5.1 GRIDS AND NODE NUMBERS ................................................................................................................ 10


5.2 COLUMN AND FOOTING LAYOUT PLAN .................................................................................................... 11
5.3 COLUMNS AND BEAMS SECTIONS .......................................................................................................... 11
5.1 LOADING ON THE STRUCTURE ................................................................................................................ 13

6. ANALYSIS OF THE STRUCTURE.......................................................................................................... 16

6.1 SUPPORT REACTIONS .......................................................................................................................... 16


6.2 BENDING MOMENT AND SHEAR FORCE DIAGRAMS ................................................................................... 17

7. DESIGN OF THE STRUCTURE ............................................................................................................. 19

7.1 DESIGN OF COLUMNS AND BEAMS ......................................................................................................... 19

8. DESIGN SUMMARY .......................................................................................................................... 29

8.1 COLUMN DESIGN ............................................................................................................................... 29


8.2 BEAM DESIGN ................................................................................................................................... 31
8.3 SLAB DESIGN ..................................................................................................................................... 32
8.4 STAIRCASE DESIGN ............................................................................................................................. 34
8.5 FOOTING DESIGN ............................................................................................................................... 35

9. CONCLUSIONS .................................................................................................................................. 42
1. INTRODUCTION

1.1 About this REPORT


This report deals with methodology of the structural analysis and design of a residential building and its results. This
report includes different parameters for the analysis and design of the structure. The design results are shown in a
very convenient tabular format.

The principal aim of the structural design is to prepare necessary construction detail of structural system so as to
possess adequate strength, stiffness and stability during the action of all possible loads in its life span. Accordingly,
the structural design data are presented in the report.

1.2 About the Structure


The structure which is analysed and design is a four storied residential building. It is going to be constructed at palpa.
It is a RCC-Framed structure.

1.3 Analysis procedure


The structure has been modelled, analysed and designed in a computer software “ETABS non linear version 16.2.1”.
The software has very good analysis and design capability which are verified in the verification problems included in
the package. It is a Finite Element Method (FEM) based software and requires modelling of the structure by finite-
elements. Beams and columns are modelled with line (or frame) elements, while the slabs and roofs are modelled
with area-elements.

3
2. DETAILED PARAMETERS OF THE BUILDING

Different parameters are listed below.

2.1 General Parameters


Building Type : Residential Building

Location :Tansen Municipality- ward no : 01

Owner : MR. Choleshwor Sharma Khanal

Plot no : 650

Site plan area : 20916.4 sq.ft.

Plinth Area : 1304.00 sq.ft.

No of Storey :3

Floor Height : 2.87 m (centre-to-centre)

Wall thickness (brick) : 230mm for outer Walls, 115mm for partition

Parapet Height :1m

Total Ht : 8.61 m

2.2 Structural Parameters


Foundation Type : isolated

Columns : Rectangular (12”x12”)

Beams : 9”x14”& 9’’X12’’

Slabs : Two-way, 5” (127mm)

Staircase : 127 mm slab

Walls : Brick wall non-load bearing

Structural System : RCC Special Moment Resisting Frame (SMRF)

Building Height : 8.61 m

Fundamental Time period : 0.37sec

2.3 Soil Parameters


Soil Type : Clay, medium soil (Type II)

4
Bearing Capacity : 150 KN/m2 at foundation level

2.4 Material Properties


Cement : Ordinary Portland cement (OPC)

Concrete Grade : M20 for all beams, columns, slab and staircase…

Steel Grade (for reinforcement) : Fe500

2.5 Design Basis


The building is designed following the standard codes and norms. The different codes used for the
structural design are

i. IS456:2000 [Code of practice for plain and reinforced concrete] for Design of Concrete
Structures.
ii. IS1893:2002 [Criteria for earthquake resistant design of structure] for Earthquake load
calculation.
iii. IS875:1987 [Code of practice for design loads (other than earthquake) for buildings and
structures] for Other Load calculation.
iv. SP16:1980 [Design aids for reinforced concrete to IS456:1978] for design of the structural
members.
v. IS13920:1993 [Ductile detailing of reinforced concrete structures subjected to seismic forces] for
Ductile Detailing of the structural members.

5
3. LOADING

All loadings are derived bases on different parts of IS875. Earthquake load is calculated based on IS1893:2000.

3.1 Dead Loads (DL)


These are the permanent load which is not supposed to change during the structure’s design life. The dead
loads included in the design are:
a. Self-weight of the structure
i. RCC (beams and columns) : 25 KN/m3
ii. RCC (slab) : 25 KN/m3
iii. Steel: 78.5 KN/m3
b. Wall-loads
i. 2.4m full ht wall
9” wall=11.08kN/m
4” wall=6kN/m
(30% opening is considered wherever necessary)
ii. 1.0m parapet wall
4” wall=2.4kN/m

c. Finishing on floors
i. Floors: 1 KN/m2
ii. Staircase: 1.0KN/m2

3.2 Live Loads (LL)


These are the loads that may vary its intensity and/or position during design life. Live loads for different
rooms and roofs are calculated as per the functional requirement as specified in IS875 code.
a. Live loads on floor
i. Room: 2 KN/m2
ii. Balconies : 3 KN/m2
iii. Staircase: 3 KN/m2
iv. Lavatory (toilet): 2 KN/m2
b. Live loads on roof
i. Accessible roof: 1.5 KN/m2

3.3 Earthquake Loads (EL)


Earthquake load has been calculated based on IS1893:2000. Basically, horizontal seismic forces shall be
considered for the structures that depend on different parameters. Different parameters for generating
earthquake loads are:
a. Seismic Zone : V (as per classification if IS1893)
b. Zone Factor (Z) : 0.36
c. Importance Factor : 1 (for residential building)
d. Reduction Factor (R) : 5 (for SMRF)
e. Soil type : Medium
f. Spectral Acceleration (Sa/g) : depends on time period and soil type.
6
g. Hor. Seismic Coefficient (Ah) : . .
h. Seismic Weight of Bldg (Ws) : DL+0.25LL (for LL≤3) OR DL+0.5LL(for LL>3)
i. Base Shear (VB) : Ah * Ws

3.4 Load Combinations


Different load combinations are generated as per IS1893:2002, since earthquake load is considered from same code.
The load combinations are:

Load Combination Combination Name

a. 1.5 (DL + LL) : DCON2


b. 1.2 (DL + LL +- EL)
i. 1.2 (DL + LL + ELx) :DCON3
ii. 1.2 (DL + LL - ELx) :DCON4
iii. 1.2 (DL + LL + ELy) :DCON5
iv. 1.2 (DL + LL - ELy) :DCON6
c. 1.5 (DL +- EL)
i. 1.5 (DL + ELx) :DCON7
ii. 1.5 (DL - ELx) :DCON8
iii. 1.5 (DL + ELy) :DCON9
iv. 1.5 (DL - ELy) :DCON10
d. 0.9 DL +- 1.5 EL
i. 0.9 DL + 1.5 ELx :DCON11
ii. 0.9 DL - 1.5 ELx :DCON12
iii. 0.9 DL + 1.5 Ely :DCON13
iv. 0.9 DL - 1.5 Ely :DCON14

where:

DL = Dead Loads

LL = Live Loads

EL = Earthquake load

ELx = Earthquake load in +ve x-direction

ELy = Earthquake load in +ve y-direction

7
4. DESIGN CRITERIA

The concrete structures are designed using Limit State Method which is incorporated in IS456:2000.

4.1 Limit State Method


It is based on safety and serviceability requirements associated with the design loads and design strengths of the
materials. These design loads and design strengths are obtained by applying partial safety factors for characteristic
loads and strengths of the materials as concrete and steels.

The limit state method of design covers different criteria for design. The two major criteria are

a. Limit State of Collapse:

The limit state of collapse of the structure or part of the structure could be assessed from rupture of one or
more critical sections and from buckling due to elastic or plastic instability (including effects of sway where
appropriate) or overturning. The resistance to bending, shear, torsion and axial loads at every section shall
not be less than the appropriate value at that section produced by the probable most unfavourable
combination of loads on the structure using the appropriate partial safety factors.

b. Limit State of Serviceability:


It includes limit for deflection and cracking or local damage. Excessive deflection and cracks adversely affects
the finishes, efficiency and appearance of the structure and it may impair protection to embedded
reinforcements too.
Cracking Limit state: the surface width of the cracks should not, in general, exceed 0.3mm in members
where cracking is not harmful and does not have any serious adverse effects upon the preservation of the
reinforcing steel nor upon the durability of the structure.
Deflection limit states for concrete members are:
i. The final deflection due to all loads including the effects of temperature, creep and shrinkage and
measured from the as-cast level of the supports of floors, roofs and all other horizontal members,
should not normally exceed span/250
ii. The deflection including the effects of temperature, creep and shrinkage occurring after erection of
partitions and the application of finishes should not normally exceed span/350 or 20mm whichever
is less.

8
5. MODELLING OF THE STRUCTURE

The structure is modelled in ETABS non linear version 16.2.1.

Three Dimensional Views

Figure 3-D view of building


5.1 Grids and Node Numbers
5.2 Column and footing layout plan

5.3 Columns and Beams Sections


All column are of 12”x12”
5.1 Loading on the structure

Wall load
Live load
6. ANALYSIS OF THE STRUCTURE

The structure is analysed in ETABS


TABS non linear version 16.2.1. Different analysis outputs are shown.

6.1 Support Reactions


Joint reactions at Footing Level
6.2 Bending Moment and Shear Force Diagrams

Shear force diagram, view (dead load)


Bending moment diagram, view (dead load)
7. DESIGN OF THE STRUCTURE

7.1 Design of Columns and Beams


Analysis and design of the structure is done by ETABS non linear version 16.2.1.. The required longitudinal
reinforcement of the column and beam are as follows:

Column:

View 1
View 2
View 3
View 4

Beam:
Base
At FF lvl
At SF lvl
At TF lvl
Summary Report
Model File: PALPA, Revision 0
10/29/2020
2.3 Modal Results

Table 2.5 - Modal Participating Mass Ratios (Part 1 of 2)


Period
Case Mode UX UY UZ Sum UX Sum UY Sum UZ
sec
Modal 1 0.541 0.6365 0.0896 0 0.6365 0.0896 0
Modal 2 0.512 0.1305 0.704 0 0.767 0.7936 0
Modal 3 0.42 0.0721 0.0624 0 0.8391 0.856 0
Modal 4 0.203 0.1208 0.0022 0 0.9599 0.8582 0
Modal 5 0.193 0.0067 0.1081 0 0.9666 0.9662 0
Modal 6 0.174 0.0063 0.0085 0 0.9729 0.9748 0
Modal 7 0.132 0.0246 0 0 0.9975 0.9748 0
Modal 8 0.131 1.196E-05 0.0247 0 0.9975 0.9994 0
Modal 9 0.123 0.0025 0.0006 0 1 1 0
Modal 10 0.006 0 0 0 1 1 0
Modal 11 0.005 0 0 0 1 1 0
Modal 12 0.005 0 0 0 1 1 0

Table 2.5 - Modal Participating Mass Ratios (Part 2 of 2)


Case Mode RX RY RZ Sum RX Sum RY Sum RZ
Modal 1 0.0531 0.4603 0.1031 0.0531 0.4603 0.1031
Case Mode RX RY RZ Sum RX Sum RY Sum RZ
Modal 2 0.4243 0.0797 0.0274 0.4774 0.54 0.1305
Modal 3 0.0423 0.0134 0.698 0.5197 0.5534 0.8286
Modal 4 0.0189 0.3675 0.0238 0.5385 0.9209 0.8523
Modal 5 0.4278 0.0235 1.229E-06 0.9663 0.9444 0.8523
Modal 6 0.0136 0.0303 0.1105 0.9799 0.9747 0.9628
Modal 7 0 0.0174 0 0.9799 0.9921 0.9628
Modal 8 0.0199 2.716E-05 0.0003 0.9998 0.9921 0.9631
Modal 9 0.0002 0.0079 0.0369 1 1 1
Modal 10 0 0 0 1 1 1
Modal 11 0 0 0 1 1 1
Modal 12 0 0 0 1 1 1

Table 2.6 - Modal Load Participation Ratios


Static Dynamic
Case Item Type Item
% %
Modal Acceleration UX 100 100
Modal Acceleration UY 100 100
Modal Acceleration UZ 0 0

Table 2.7 - Modal Direction Factors


Period
Case Mode UX UY UZ RZ
sec
Modal 1 0.541 0.784 0.104 0 0.112
Modal 2 0.512 0.154 0.82 0 0.027
Modal 3 0.42 0.086 0.076 0 0.838
Modal 4 0.203 0.853 0.034 0 0.113
Modal 5 0.193 0.053 0.926 0 0.02
Modal 6 0.174 0.071 0.04 0 0.889
Modal 7 0.132 0.959 0 0 0.041
Modal 8 0.131 0 0.999 0 0.001
Modal 9 0.123 0.04 0.002 0 0.959
Modal 10 0.006 0 0 0 1
Modal 11 0.005 0 0 0 1
Modal 12 0.005 0 0 0 1

28
8. DESIGN SUMMARY

The summary of the design with full detail of reinforcement schedule are presented
presented in the following section.

8.1 Column Design


Different Column Sections and required longitudinal reinforcements are tabulated below:

Column Design summary:

ETABS Concrete Frame Design


IS 456:2000 Column Section Design

Column Element Details Type: Ductile Frame (Summary)


Level Element Unique Name Section ID Combo ID Station Loc Length (mm) LLRF
Story2 C9 26 C 12X12 UDCon7 0 2870 0.913

Section Properties
b (mm) h (mm) dc (mm) Cover (Torsion) (mm)
304.8 304.8 60 30

Material Properties
Ec (MPa) fck (MPa) Lt.Wt Factor (Unitless) fy (MPa) fys (MPa)
22360.68 20 1 500 500

Design Code Parameters


ɣC ɣS
1.5 1.15

Axial Force and Biaxial Moment Design For Pu , Mu2 , Mu3


Design Pu Design Mu2 Design Mu3 Minimum M2 Minimum M3 Rebar Area Rebar %
kN kN-m kN-m kN-m kN-m mm² %
243.7882 -7.8566 74.8531 4.8758 4.8758 2313 2.49

Axial Force and Biaxial Moment Factors


K Factor Length Initial Moment Additional Moment Minimum Moment
Unitless mm kN-m kN-m kN-m
Major Bend(M3) 0.741306 2514.4 29.9412 0 4.8758
Minor Bend(M2) 0.781983 2514.4 -3.1426 0 4.8758

Shear Design for Vu2 , Vu3


Shear Vu Shear Vc Shear Vs Shear Vp Rebar Asv /s
kN kN kN kN mm²/m
Major, Vu2 48.2114 75.4926 29.8462 48.2114 337.85
Minor, Vu3 29.7715 75.4926 29.8462 29.7715 337.85

Joint Shear Check/Design


Joint Shear Shear Shear Shear Joint Shear
Force VTop Vu,Tot Vc Area Ratio
kN kN kN kN cm² Unitless
Major Shear, Vu2 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Minor Shear, Vu3 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

(1.4) Beam/Column Capacity Ratio


Major Ratio Minor Ratio
N/A N/A

Additional Moment Reduction Factor k (IS 39.7.1.1)


Ag Asc Puz Pb Pu k
cm² cm² kN kN kN Unitless
929 23.1 1703.4938 280.9498 243.7882 1

Additional Moment (IS 39.7.1)


Consider Length Section KL/Depth KL/Depth KL/Depth Ma
Ma Factor Depth (mm) Ratio Limit Exceeded Moment (kN-m)
Major Bending (M3 ) Yes 0.876 304.8 6.115 12 No 0
Minor Bending (M2 ) Yes 0.876 304.8 6.451 12 No 0

Notes:

N/A: Not Applicable

N/C: Not Calculated

N/N: Not Needed

30
8.2 Beam Design
Two different beam sections used in the building are tabulated below. The reinforcement shall be as specified in the
drawings.

ETABS Concrete Frame Design


IS 456:2000 Beam Section Design

Beam Element Details Type: Ductile Frame (Summary)


Level Element Unique Name Section ID Combo ID Station Loc Length (mm) LLRF
Story1 B23 120 B 9X14 UDCon10 152.4 2743.2 1

Section Properties
b (mm) h (mm) bf (mm) ds (mm) dct (mm) dcb (mm)
228.6 355.6 228.6 0 33 33

Material Properties
Ec (MPa) fck (MPa) Lt.Wt Factor (Unitless) fy (MPa) fys (MPa)
22360.68 20 1 500 500

Design Code Parameters


ɣC ɣS
1.5 1.15

Factored Forces and Moments


Factored Factored Factored Factored
Mu3 Tu Vu2 Pu
kN-mm kN-m kN kN
-53.5766
53.5766 0.5765 54.3999 0.1831

Design Moments, Mu3 & Mt


Factored Factored Positive Negative
Moment Mt Moment Moment
kN-mm kN-m kN-m kN-m
-53.5766
53.5766 0.8667 0 -54.4432

Design Moment and Flexural Reinforcement for Moment, Mu3 & Tu


Design Design -Moment +Moment Minimum Required
-Moment +Moment Rebar Rebar Rebar Rebar
kN-m kN-m mm² mm² mm² mm
mm²
Top (+2 Axis) -54.4432 430 0 430 125
Bottom (-2 Axis) 0 215 0 0 215

Shear Force and Reinforcement for Shear, Vu2 & Tu


Shear Ve Shear Vc Shear Vs Shear Vp Rebar Asv /s
kN kN kN kN mm²/m
74.8856 0 78.9208 55.9956 677.92

Torsion Force and Torsion Reinforcement for Torsion, Tu & VU2


Tu Vu Core b1 Core d1 Rebar Asvt /s
kN-m kN mm mm mm²/m
0.5765 54.3999 182.6 309.6 223.02

Table 8-1: Beam Sections

Sn Designation Size
1 BEAM-PRIMARY (BP) 9”X114”(including slab)
2 TIE BEAM 9”x12”

8.3 Slab Design


The final output of the slab is presented below
below.. The construction shall follow the details provided in slab drawing.

DESIGN OF FLOOR SLAB


Design Data
N/mm
Dimensions of the slab (c/c distance b/w supports), fck = 20 2

3.3 50 N/mm
Length of short span, Lx = m fy = 2
5 0
4.4
Length of long span, Ly = m
1
Width of the supporting beam, = 230 mm
Clear cover to main reinforcement = 15 mm
Assume dia. of reinforcement steel = 8 mm

Calculations
Assume the thickness of slab as 127 mm ; Effective depth, d = 108 mm
l
Effective span, = 3.35 m (or) 3.228 m whichever is less; d = 3.228 m
x
l
= 4.41 m (or) 4.288 m whichever is less; d = 4.288 m
y
1.3 2
(ly / lx) = < Here, (ly / lx) is less than 2, Hence design the slab as two way slab
3 ;

Load Calculations
0.127 x 3.1 KN/m
Dead Load of slab = = KN/m2 Dust Load on slab = 0 2
25 8
1.0 KN/m
Finishes load on slab = KN/m2 Other load on slab = 0 2
0
Live Load on slab = 3.0 KN/m2
Total Dead load acting on the 4.1
= KN/m2
Structure 8
Total live load acting on the Structure = 3.0 KN/m2
Factored Design Load w = 10.77 KN/m2
Support Condition (Type of panel according to support condition)
Two Adjacent Edges Discontinuous For this support condition,
1.3 Long span
Short span coefficient for (ly / lx) =
3, coefficient,
a a
For negative moment, = 0.0668 For negative moment, = 0.047
x y
a a
For positive moment, = 0.0502 For positive moment, = 0.035
x y

Moment Calculation
Max. BM per unit width, Mx = ax w lx2 & My = ay w lx2

A
st
Mu / (0.12/100) m
Mu pt , Ast , min = = 152
bd2 bD m2
re
q
N/mm
KNm 2 % mm2
For Short
Reinforcement
Span,
details
At mid span, 5.63 0.48 0.1369 148
Provi
At supports, 7.50 0.64 0.1844 199 Y 8 @ 150 mm c/c at midspan &
de
(Ast pro. 33 mm2
For Long span, supports for short span
= 5 )
Provi
At mid span, 3.93 0.39 0.1106 119 Y 8 @ 150 mm c/c at midspan &
de
supports for long (Ast pro. 33 mm2
At supports, 5.27 0.53 0.1516 164
span = 5 )

Check for Deflection


Percentage of tension reinforcement = 0.31 %
f
= 0.58 fy (Ast req / Ast pro) = 128
s
Refer Fig. 4 of IS 456,
Modification factor = 2
(L/
Allowable (Span / deff ) ratio = 52 31
D=
Effective depth required = 62 mm
< d prov.
Hence OK

Table 8-2: Slab basic data

Slab Thickness 125 mm


Main bars (bottom): 8@150mm c/c
Main bars (top): 8@150mm c/c (x-dir)
8@150mm c/c (y-dir)
Dist. bars: 8@150mm c/c
8.4 Staircase Design
The output of the design of staircase is presented below. The construction shall follow the detail-drawing of the
staircase.

DESIGN OF DOG LEGGED STAIRCASE


Data
Internal Dimensions
Length = 4.039 m
Width = 2.51 m
Floor Height = 2.87 m
Fck = 20 N/mm2
Fy = 500 N/mm2
Riser = 178 mm
Tread = 254 mm
Landing width = 1143 mm
Effective Span = 4.09 m
Height of each flight = 1.435 m
No. of risers in each flight 8.061798 Nos
No. of Tread in each flight 7.061798 Nos

Design
d = 129 mm Required

D = 150 mm
d = 129 mm

Loads
DL of waist slab = 3.75 kN/m2
DL on horizontal area = 4.58 kN/m2
DL of steps = 2.225 kN/m2
LL = 3 kN/m2
FF = 1.5 kN/m2
Total load = 11.30 kN/m2
(of one
Factored load = 17.0 flight)

BM and SF
Mu = 35 kN-m
Vu = 35 kN

d from BM consideration 113 mm

k = 2.131
pt = 0.572 %
Ast = 738 mm2

34
Main Reinforcement
Dia = 12 mm
Spacing = 153 mm

Distribution Steel
Ast = 155 mm2

Dia of bar = 8 mm
Spacing = 320 mm

Development Length

Ld = Ld = (Ø x σs) / (4 x Tbd)
Therefore, Ld = 760 mm
Provide, Ld = 800 mm

Table 8-3: Staircase basic data

Staircase Thickness 150 mm


Main bars (bottom): 12@150mm c/c
Main bars (top): 12@150mm c/c
Dist. bars: 8@200mm c/c

8.5 Footing Design


The design of footings is presented below. The construction shall follow the detailed drawing of the foundation.

Isolated Footing F1

1 Footing Size Design

Load Pu 710 KN
Design Load P 521 KN

Moment in x dir Mux 0 KN-m


Moment in y dir Muy 0 KN-m

Column size cx 305 mm


cy 305 mm

SBC q 150 KN/sqm

Footing Size required A req 3.47 sqmm

35
L 2.00 meters
Footing Size Provided
B 2.00 meters
Area Provided A prvd 4.00 meters

Zx 1.33
Zx 1.33

Net upward pressure Nup 130 KNm2

Footing Size OK

2 Slab Design
lx 0.848
ly 0.848

Bending Moment in x dir Mx 70 KN-m


Bending Moment in y dir My 70 KN-m

Concrete fck 20 MPa


Steel fy 500 MPa

Minimum Depth Required dmin 163

Depth Provided D 500 mm


Clear Cover c 50 mm
Effective Cover d' 56 mm
Effective Depth d' 444 mm

Spacing c/c in mm
Area of Steel
12# 16# 20#
533 sqmm 212 c/c 377 c/c 590 c/c
533 sqmm 212 c/c 377 c/c 590 c/c
Minimum Ast required across x direcion
Minimum Ast required across y direcion

Ast across x direction 12 mm dia @ 150 mm c/c 754 sqmm


Ast across y direction 12 mm dia @ 150 mm c/c 754 sqmm

3 One Way Shear along x direction

Vu1 158 KN
ζv 0.177 MPa

ζc 0.260 MPa
Vc1 231 KN
36
One Way Shear Check OK

4 One Way Shear along y direction

Vu1 158 KN
ζv 0.177 MPa

ζc 0.260 MPa
Vc1 231 KN

One Way Shear Check OK

5 Two Way Shear


Vu2 671 KN
ζv 0.505 MPa

ks*ζc 1.118 MPa


Vc1 1487 KN

Two Way Shear Check OK

Isolated Footing F2

1 Footing Size Design

Load Pu 580 KN
Design Load P 425 KN

Moment in x dir Mux 0 KN-m


Moment in y dir Muy 0 KN-m

Column size cx 305 mm


cy 305 mm

SBC q 150 KN/sqm

Footing Size required A req 2.84 sqmm

L 1.80 meters
Footing Size Provided
B 1.80 meters
Area Provided A prvd 3.24 meters

Zx 0.97
Zx 0.97

Net upward pressure Nup 131 KNm2

Footing Size OK
37
2 Slab Design
lx 0.748
ly 0.748

Bending Moment in x dir Mx 55 KN-m


Bending Moment in y dir My 55 KN-m

Concrete fck 20 MPa


Steel fy 500 MPa

Minimum Depth Required dmin 144

Depth Provided D 450 mm


Clear Cover c 50 mm
Effective Cover d' 56 mm
Effective Depth d' 394 mm

Spacing c/c in mm
Area of Steel
12# 16# 20#
473 sqmm 239 c/c 425 c/c 664 c/c
473 sqmm 239 c/c 425 c/c 664 c/c
Minimum Ast required across x direcion
Minimum Ast required across y direcion

Ast across x direction 12 mm dia @ 150 mm c/c 754 sqmm


Ast across y direction 12 mm dia @ 150 mm c/c 754 sqmm

3 One Way Shear along x direction

Vu1 125 KN
ζv 0.177 MPa

ζc 0.260 MPa
Vc1 185 KN

One Way Shear Check OK

4 One Way Shear along y direction

Vu1 125 KN
ζv 0.177 MPa

ζc 0.260 MPa
Vc1 185 KN

38
One Way Shear Check OK

5 Two Way Shear


Vu2 542 KN
ζv 0.492 MPa

ks*ζc 1.118 MPa


Vc1 1232 KN

Two Way Shear Check OK

Isolated Footing F3

1 Footing Size Design

Load Pu 390 KN
Design Load P 286 KN

Moment in x dir Mux 0 KN-m


Moment in y dir Muy 0 KN-m

Column size cx 305 mm


cy 305 mm

SBC q 150 KN/sqm

Footing Size required A req 1.91 sqmm

L 1.50 meters
Footing Size Provided
B 1.50 meters
Area Provided A prvd 2.25 meters

Zx 0.56
Zx 0.56

Net upward pressure Nup 127 KNm2

Footing Size OK

2 Slab Design
lx 0.598
ly 0.598

Bending Moment in x
dir Mx 34 KN-m
Bending Moment in y My 34 KN-m

39
dir

Concrete fck 20 MPa


Steel fy 500 MPa

Minimum Depth
Required dmin 113

Depth Provided D 350 mm


Clear Cover c 50 mm
Effective Cover d' 56 mm
Effective Depth d' 294 mm

Spacing c/c in mm
Area of Steel
12# 16# 20#
353 sqmm 321 c/c 570 c/c 890 c/c
353 sqmm 321 c/c 570 c/c 890 c/c
Minimum Ast required across x
direcion
Minimum Ast required across y
direcion

@ 150 mm
Ast across x direction 12 mm dia 754 sqmm
c/c
@ 150 mm
Ast across y direction 12 mm dia 754 sqmm
c/c

3 One Way Shear along x direction

Vu1 87 KN
ζv 0.197 MPa

ζc 0.260 MPa
Vc1 115 KN

One Way Shear Check OK

4 One Way Shear along y direction

Vu1 87 KN
ζv 0.197 MPa

ζc 0.260 MPa
Vc1 115 KN

One Way Shear Check OK

5 Two Way Shear


40
Vu2 361 KN
ζv 0.512 MPa

ks*ζc 1.118 MPa


Vc1 788 KN

Two Way Shear Check OK

41
9. CONCLUSIONS

A Residential building has been fully designed using a computer program, ETABS non linear version 16.2.1. All the
required design details has been calculated and presented.

Best-approach has been adopted for most-economical design, yet fulfilling all the requirements for important
building. Due considerations has been given to all room requirements and probable increase in load.

Reinforcements are quite satisfactory and they are so balanced for easier material handling and concreting. Due
attention has been made in reinforcement congestion and size and number of bars are balanced for easiest and
safest construction. In some places, more than required reinforcement is provided for feasibility during construction.

During construction, it is mandatory to follow IS13920, regarding provision of stirrups and ties, development lengths,
splices and other detailing.

42
43

You might also like