Professional Documents
Culture Documents
National University of Science and Technology
National University of Science and Technology
AND TECHNOLOGY
DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL AND
MANUFACTURING ENGINEERING
Although oral communication has many advantages such as quick response, providing room for
further discussions leading to clear conclusions, ability to catch greater audience, it also has
many disadvantages that lead to over communication whereby a lot of unnecessary detail gets
mixed up with important and wanted detail due to repetition of words (Braunmüller, 2013)
According to Mawonera E and Leed (2004), oral communication is the main root and influential
base of grapevine within workplaces. Information ends up being distorted and mixed up in such a
way that formal and informal messages cannot be juxtaposed. Skills and experiences affect oral
communication. A lot of information fed through advertising orally may make intended group of
people fail to make an informed decision. Receiver must listen attentively, audibility is a
challenge as voice projections differ and most of the times a person has to repeat the same
speech twice. In chance encounters, oral communication might cause anger or resentment to the
recipient depending with his or her attitudes as a result; this will also affect the way the message
will be relayed to the next recipient.
Due to over communication, some people end up with “’better things to do’’ than attending
meetings. Thus information may fail to reach its desired destination unless written work such as
handouts, letters, reports and invoices are used. At times, visual aids should be used in
presentations. Visual presentations also have a greater impact than simply oral. Use of body
language, gestures and facial expressions may also improve oral communication skills ( Miles,
2009)
2.0 CONCLUSION
In a nutshell, the disadvantages or weaknesses of oral communication such as the one
discussed of ‘’over communication’’ over weigh the advantages or strengths. It can be
widely used but at times hand in hand with written work.
3.0 REFERENCES
Berko, R.M., Wolvin, A.D. and Wolvin, D.R., 1998. Communicating: A Social and Career Focus,
7tf editio.
Braunmüller, K., 2013. Communication based on receptive multilingualism: advantages and
disadvantages. International Journal of Multilingualism, 10(2), pp.214-223.
Mawonera E and Leed (2004), Communication and Scholarship module CSC 101.The Zimbabwe Open
University Mt Pleasant Harare
Miles, R., 2009. Oral presentations for English proficiency purposes. Reflections on English
Language Teaching, 8(2), pp.103-110.