Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Rock Fragmentation - Goldsearch
Rock Fragmentation - Goldsearch
INTRODUCTION
1
The oldies rock formations around the mine are gneisses, which date up to 3.6 billion years
Bulawayan age (circa 2.7 billion years old) greenstones, comprising sedimentary rock,
basalts and ultramafic were then deposited . The rocks were then subjected to deformation
resulting in the formation of slips, faults, folds, and shear zones. This structural
deformation enabled the precipitation of chrysotile asbestos from hydrothermal fluids.
The Shabanie mine ultramafic sill extends 14km in strike, is 3km wide and 1.6km thick.
The sill dips 30º towards the south west. The ultramafic rocks are composed of gabbros
pyroxinites harzburgites, peridotites and dunites. Chrysotile asbestos occurs within partially
serpentinised dunites as parallel and stock work fibre seams. The ore bodies are footwall
talc rock, carbonated serpentinised dunite.
Geological structures indicate a high compressive stress regime which acted in a N24º East
orientation, which resulted in thrusting and down falling of the ultramafic sill.
The carbonated serpentinised dunites occur at the base of the silky ore bodies. This rock
type may contain brittle rock. Silky ore bodies are distinguished from the hanging wall
dunites by the abundance of fibre seams.
Waste
capping
Pre-drilled
holes
Slot
Area under
development
3
Currently at Shabanie Mine, we are not meeting targets. A close analysis revealed that this
stems mainly from poor fragmentation in development and production.
1.7 Justification
Poor fragmentation causes delays in loading and hauling operations. Big boulders have to
be blasted again (secondary blasting). This causes an increase in costs in the form of
explosives used and lost time for production. Fines also cause caking in coco pans and
locomotives. Big boulders also cause hang ups in ore passes which blocks ore flow and
again distracts the efficient flow of ore at the bins. Big boulders would need to be
hammered down to small sizes before the next loco can trip. Thus disrupting efficient flow
of ore. Therefore this project seeks to come up with solutions to rectify the present
problems.
The purpose of blasting is to convert rock from one solid piece of material to smaller pieces
capable of being moved or excavated by available equipment or manageable to be
manipulated, or to be converted to a visible tangible mineral. To accomplish this there are
two major factors to consider. These factors are fragmentation and movement or throw
Both of these must match the requirements of the individual rock project. Underground
blasting, for example, require greater fragmentation than surface blasting because of the
size of equipment that can be used and the difficulty of access. If the blast is too small, the
blasting has accomplished more than necessary and therefore the cost is higher than it
could be. If the blast creates insufficient movement the blasted rock will be in such a
position that it is broken but not moved enough to excavate easily.
To achieve the fragmentation and movement one must be acquainted with the theory of
rock breakage in order to design the blast that will produce the desired results at a
minimum cost. The breaking of rock involves two basic process, radial and cracking and
flexural rapture. Rock is stronger in compression than in tension. Considering this fact it
would seem reasonable that the easiest way to break rock is to subject it to a tensile stress
greater than its ultimate strength in tension.
Proper fragmentation results when there is enough force in the compressive wave travels to
the face and back, overcoming the strengths of the medium through which the wave travels.
It has been estimated that only 3% of the explosive energy is used in compressive wave in
the burden area. Along the face the outermost edge is stretched in tension which causes
cracks. If the energy released is not high enough to travel to the face and return to the
source, the boulders will be found in the muckpile around the blast hole. However if there
5
is excessive energy, it will cause additional throw and over break. Boulders on the surface
of the muck pile can be caused when the stress wave is reflected because of density
changes or seams or over break from previous blast. Instead of being fragmented by the
blast, these portions are simply pushed or rolled out of the face. An explosive is a
compound or a mixture of compounds, which is capable of undergoing an extreme rapid
decomposition; thereby releasing substantial ultimate amounts of heat and gases therefore
exert a great pressure on the surroundings.
An explosion can be broken down into four phases, which includes release of gasses,
intense heat, extreme gas, then explosion. An understanding of these phases can be benefit
in understanding the theory of breakage for blasting rock.
When an explosive is denoted, gas is released and as the temperature of the gas increases.
Therefore when an explosive is detonated in a blast hole, the pressure exerted against the
walls of the blast hole (if great enough) will move and break the rock.
6
Flexural Rapture
The second process in breaking rocks is flexural rapture ie bending the rock to the point
where the outside edge, the side in tension breaks. Flexure or bending is caused by the
rapid expansion of gases in the borehole
7
Fig 2.1 Flexural rapture
Stemming
The gas expansion exerts pressure against the cylinder walls (the borehole). The sustained
gas pressure drives the radial cracks through the burden to the free face and then causes the
rock to displace in the direction of the least resistance. This gaseous pressure applies the
force that is necessary to cause flexural rupture of the rock and is responsible for the
fracture of the rock in the direction perpendicular to the borehole axis.
Explosive
gas
pressure
Tensile
stresses
8
Gas is the major component necessary for the flexure and therefore the primary component
of fragmentation. By section of the rock as a concrete beam, with depth equal to the burden
and length equal to the bench height, it is obvious that to break the beam will require
movement or displacement in addition to cracking. When the explosive has been detonated
and the radial cracks have been expanded, the gas starts the movement by putting a
compressive pressure against the wall of the borehole. This as with the beam will have the
least resistance to flexure at the centre of the spun. The action begins at the location of the
primer; therefore the largest movement will favour the primer side of the centre of the
explosive column. The bending of the beam creates tensile stresses at the free face of the
rock, which break the rock at the location of the weakness planes caused by either changes
in material or the radial cracks caused by the initial compression wave.
The principle of flexural rupture explains the relationship of the length of the borehole to
the burden. Burden is the distance from the borehole to the nearest free face. Through the
understanding of the effects of flexural systems and the varying movements it is clear that
the deeper the borehole the greater the permissible burden and borehole spacing to achieve
desired results.
2.2 Stemming
Stemming is a non explosive material that is placed in the borehole between the top of the
explosive column and the collar of the hole. Stemming can consist of sand drill fines or
gravel.
It is important that all the holes be stemmed to help confine or delay the escape of
explosive gases though the top of the borehole so that the explosive’s efficiency is
increased. Increasing the explosive’s efficiency reduces the amount of explosives required.
If the gases are not properly confined the results can be fly rock, increased ground vibration
and air blast. The reduction in efficiency causes poor fragmentation and boulders.
The best type of stemming to use is angular – type stemming because it offers
resistance to the borehole. Angular stemming tends to bridge across the borehole as the gas
expansion pushes against it. This pushing by the explosive gases causes the stemming to
move slightly, wedging itself against the wall of the borehole, restricting further movement.
Generally the amount of stemming required will range from 0.7B to 1B where B= burden.
Boulders can be formed from nature as caused by insufficient breakage during blasting the
later are called secondary.
9
2.3 Burn hole method
10
Back holes
Rib holes
Lifters
11
Fig 2.4
Advantages of burn cuts
1. Because of the direction of throw with a burn cut there tends to be less fly rock
than with the V cut or wedge cut.
2. The burn cut is drilled straight, permitting more drills at the heading. By the same
token a wedge cut restricts advancement because of the inability to get greater
depth and a proper angle.
9 burnofhole
3. One can use one total length steel for all holes.
4. The geometry of hole placement is less critical for the burn cut the for the angle
cut.
When the various burn cut holes are being drilled, care must be taken to drill the holes
straight
Since alignment is so critical, it is important to drill holes to the proper depth and
alignment. A method that can be helpful to maintain hole alignment is to place a loading
pole in the first hole drilled leaving a few centimeters of it extending out of the hole. This
provides a reference line to which the driller can align the other holes.
12
2.4 Loading of charges
Delay caps
To obtain adequate breakage, delay caps must be used. The holes involved in the wedge or
burn cut must be the first detonated, creating a free face. Then the holes surrounding these
holes will detonate in sequence until finally the trim holes detonate.
Firing systems
Delay blasting
Through the use of millisecond delays the amount of explosives fired at one given instant
may be reduced by using a different delay period for different holes.
13
other and from 1m to 2m apart depending on the whole diameter and these are blasted to
widen the slot.
Key
1
3 5
4
2
14
Loading of charges
Loading embraces the complete operation of placing a charge in the desired manner with
one or more primers in readiness for firing.2
Loading charges
Maximum charge density is usually desired, at least at the bottom of the borehole and the
cartridges should be as large as the hole will accommodate for easy and safe loading.
The operation of compacting the charge in the hole is known as tamping. This process is
greatly aided by slitting the cartridge just prior to loading unless the wrapper has already
been perforated in manufacture.
Slitting usually consists of making two longitudinal cuts one on each side, four or five
inches in length, which will allow the cartridge to collapse easily in the hole with a
relatively light blow from the tamping pole.
In many types of blasting, it is important to place the primer well down in the charge and
sometimes in the bottom for most efficient performance.
In rough holes, the cartridge should not be slit and only one or two loaded together.
Pointing one end of the cartridge may help to guide it over the rough spots or through a
constricted opening.
Hole placement
2
Blasters’ Handbook 15th Edition .Publisher McGraw Hill Book Company, pages 207-211.
15
The proper location of boreholes involves several factors, one of the most important being
loading density of the charge.
3
Sublevel caving practice at Shabanie mine, Rhodesia , Underground Mining Methods,pg
947
4
Underground Mining Handbook page 732
16
Rock structures are defined using the frequency and orientation of bedding planes, joints
and other naturally occurring features.
Characteristic impedance, which is the product of density and velocity, is useful for
matching an explosive to the intact rock specimen properties.
Knowing the density and the wave velocity of the rock, one selects an explosive with the
same impedance value.
Often such decisions must also consider the effects of fracture frequency defining the
competency of a rock.
If explosives are selected, the orientation of borehole pattern and hole loading
characteristics are important to the blasting requirements.
Hard rocks require additional energy while soft seam intervals may not require loading.
2.10Fan drilling
The burden between fans is designed to give good fragmentation and varies between 1.2m
and 2.7m.5
Drill holes must be carefully aligned and drilled accurately.
Surveyors should mark up the ribs so that the drill rig can be properly aligned to provide
truly parallel fans of holes.
A protractor with a bubble should be provided to check the fan inclination and the angle of
each drill hole.
The loading and blasting of the holes must be performed with great care.
Reliable men should be on this work and any incentive paid them should not be based on
the footage blasted.
It is essential that holes should be well cleaned and loaded right to the top.
If drill holes are not drilled accurately or are not properly loaded and blasted, a solid bridge
or arch is left and only the lower part of the fan is drawn.
5
Underground Mining methods Handbook page 876
6
Drilling and Blasting Technology Section 1
17
Where d = blast hole diameter in mm
C = constant = 25-35
There is also a relationship between hole length and burden in that optimum length
L= +/-3B
Spacing
Spacing= 1.25B-1.35B
2.12 Burden
This is normally defined as the normal distance between the drill hole and fee face. 7 If
burden is increased holes to be drilled are reduced. This may result in inadequate
fragmentation at the face if explosives per blast are not increased. Usually using a large
hole diameter increases explosives per blast. Therefore the choice of burden is a
compromise between these factors and also the rock strength.
2.13 Fragmentation
The success of any mining operation is dependant on fragmentation. 8 It has a direct effect
on the safety of operations, production rates (hang ups in brows ore passes, chutes tipples,
and wear and tear on LHD units), metal recovery (draw control, dilution) and direct
operational costs (secondary fragmentation, mucking, hauling, crushing and hoisting costs).
2.14 Sublevel caving
The sublevel caving method employs the use of fan drilling using long, small diameter
holes between sublevels or drifts to under cut and blast the ore zone.9 Hole diameters
average to 51mm. Burdens and spacing vary from 1.2-1.8m and 1.5-1.8m respectively.
Powder factors range from 0.3-0,4kgs/t.
Powder factor = mass of explosives used
Volume of rock broken
7
Ross-Watt et al, 1990
8
Hulstrulid W. A, 1982
9
SME Mining Engineering Handbook 2nd Edition Volume 1, Howard L. Hartman , Senior
Editor , Sacramento, California , August 1992 pg 725-740
18
Nitro-glycerine based
dry blasting agents
water gels,
emulsions,
permissibles,
primers and
Boosters.
CHAPTER 3
METHODOLOGY
Instruments
Tape measure
Cut director
Drill steels
Clino rule
10
Introductory Mining Engineering, Howard L. Hartman 1987 page 131.
20
Explosives; Emulite 45x560mm; 32x200mm; electric detonators; bulk emulite;
boosters
Charging stick
Paint
S36 GD
Survey plans
30cm rule
Pen
Pencil
Notebook
Plans from planning
Plans from survey
Jack hammer
Step 2
From the findings it is necessary to take the following corrective measures:
Ensure that:
Holes are marked properly.
21
Collaring is done properly (as this is one of the contributing factors to hole
deviation.)
Hole direction and inclination to be monitored. This is done by the use of a clino
rule.
Hole direction and inclination to be monitored so that it would be exactly like the
planned and this is done by the use of the clino rule.
Holes to be drilled to the correct depth. This is achieved through counting the
number of 1m drill steels used and assisted by measuring the hole depth after
drilling by use of a charging stick.
Holes are not overcharged. This will be achieved through maintaining a charge
density of 2/3 of hole length.
Step 3
Tests carried out:
Blasting without the use of boosters
Introduce 9 hole burn cut in areas where 12 hole burn cut is employed.
Production
Studies of the current rock fragmentation to be carried through observing the drilling and
blasting practices that are in use.
Procedure
Step 1
Observe
Marking of holes
Machine position
Collaring
Hole direction
Hole inclination
Hole depth
Charge density
Timing of the ring.
Size of big boulders from production areas to be measured using a tape measure and
averaged.
22
From the findings it is necessary to take the following corrective measures.
Ensure that
Holes are marked properly as per plan.
The machine is properly positioned during drilling as indicated by A, B and C on
the plan.
A B C
aaaa
Collaring is properly done (as this is one of the contributing factors to whole
deviation).
Hole direction and inclination to be monitored so that it would be exactly like the
planned and this is done by the use of the clino rule.
Holes were drilled to the correct depth. This was achieved through counting the
number of 1m drill steels used and assisted by measuring the hole depth after
drilling by use of a charging stick.
Holes are not overcharged and that the proper uncharged collar was adhered to.
Step 3
In production areas the spacing of 1.8m to be reduced to 1.5m.This is done with the aim of
improving fragmentation. This is achieved through working with the planning department
as well as the survey department and implementing the test in the field.
CHAPTER 4
RESULTS
Current Rock Fragmentation Assessment results
In development, rock fragmentation had a lot of fines but no secondary blasting
necessary.
Shortcomings noted in these areas are:
23
Too fine a muck pile that would stick in trolleys and coco pans this in turn reduces
the capacity of the trolleys (dead load).
Interpretation
Too fine a muck pile emanated from:
Use of pentolite boosters on the face. This is a waste of explosives because Emulite
45x560mm and electric detonators alone can give a good advance and good
fragmentation.
Holes were overcharged.(too much explosive power).
Fly rock was also experienced, this emanated from poor stemming.
Some of the big boulders resulted from the collapse of the bridge that would have
been formed because of short hole length being drilled. These bridges also pose a
danger to the LHD drivers since they sometimes fall during lashing.
Sublevel
Bridge
Sublevel
24
cc
Sublevel
Holes drilled at a shorter length
Poor timing
Use of the same delay element resulted in large boulders since the breaking face is limited
he diagram below shows the timing used in some sections in production blasting. This
diagram shows that poor timing was practiced and resulted in big boulders. The same
number of timing was used throughout the ring instead of using different delays so as to
create a breaking face.
1 1 1 1 1 1
Production Areas
Sublevel caving at Shabanie Mine
Typical ring design
BLOCK 58/790 Level 716 6x/c29.0
Sublevel Sublevel
Drilled holes
27
Sublevel
From the tables above the amount of explosives to be used is clearly indicated as well as
the powder factor, the length of the uncharged collar, the hole depth, machine position and
the angles for the holes but in the field different results came out. Holes were deviating; the
uncharged length was not adhered to. This resulted in a bigger spacing than planned and
hence the formation of boulders. Powder factor from the production rings ranged from
400g/t to 550g/t because the charging crew paid no heed to the uncharged length.
Powder factor for Shabanie Mine ranges from 250g/t to 350g/t but in the field the powder
factor would rise to about 400g/t to 550g/t. This resulted from the ignored uncharged length
by the charging crew. The project research managed to lower down the powder factor to
within the stipulated limits.
28
CHAPTER 5
30
As further development is still in progress, I recommend that vertical distances between
sublevels be reduced to an average of 15 to 20m since the higher the vertical height the
bigger the spacing will result.
REFERENCES
1. Blasting Operations, Gary B. Hemphill 1981, United States of America.pg
2. Ministry of Mines Publication No. 5 Breaking Ground pages 11-12.
3. Blasters’ Handbook 15th Edition .Publisher McGraw Hill Book Company pages
4. Sublevel caving practice at Shabanie Mine, Rhodesia, Underground Mining Methods,
page 947.
5. Underground Mining Handbook page 732.
6. Underground Mining methods Handbook page 876.
7. Drilling and Blasting Technology Section 1 page 23.
8. Ross-Watt et al, 1990.
9. Hulstrulid W. A, 1982.
31
10. SME Mining Engineering Handbook 2nd Edition Volume 1, Howard L. Hartman ,
Senior Editor , Sacramento, California , August 1992 pages 725-740.
11. Introductory Mining Engineering, Howard L. Hartman 198drilling and7 page 131.
32