Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Themes of The Cherry Orchard
Themes of The Cherry Orchard
Themes of The Cherry Orchard
1|Page
The Cherry Orchard by Anton Chekhov
About Author:
Anton Chekhov was a Russian playwright, a writer of short stories, and one of the
port in southern Russia. The third of six children, his family were once serfs, but his
grandfather managed to purchase their freedom. Only a year after Chekhov's birth,
Russian peasants were emancipated and the feudal system was abolished. Still,
Chekhov was weighed down by the class status of his family. His father was a
merchant and was often physically abusive to his family. Eventually, his father went
bankrupt, and Anton became financially responsible for his family. He wrote
vignettes about Russian street life to support himself while also pursuing a medical
degree. At the time, Russia was so socially stratified that there were no successful
writers of his class; Chekhov became the only great Russian writer of the 19th
In 1887, Chekhov was commissioned to write a play, Ivanov. In 1895, he wrote The
Seagull, which was a failure: after it ended, the audience booed, and Chekhov
Moscow Art Theatre, to great critical acclaim. This launched Chekhov's career as a
2|Page
playwright, and Stanislavski would go on to produce Chekhov's Uncle Vanya, Three
In 1901, Chekhov married Russian actress Olga Knipper, who had acted in many of
his plays in Moscow. Their marriage lasted only three years: Chekhov died of
tuberculosis in 1904. That same year, his final play, The Cherry Orchard, premiered
with Tolstoy, who was a friend and admirer. Gradually, Chekhov became popular
elsewhere. In the United States, his popularity is linked to the trend of Stanislavski's
school of method acting becoming more popular in the 20th century. There,
Chekhov's approach to psychology and drama greatly influenced the work of many
theater practitioners, including Clifford Odets, Lee Strasberg, and actors like
3|Page
Themes of The Cherry Orchard
It is among the most highlighted themes of “The Cherry Orchard”. It is not wrong
to say that from start of the play to its end, this theme blows soul in the plot. We
“If only this heavy load could be lifted from my heart; if only I could forget my
past!”.
Meaning thereby that she is expecting a miracle, through which problems of her
life should be solved but that never happens. She herself and her daughter along
with her brother want to do nothing to change their condition and eventually their
condition which becomes miserable with the passage of every single second.
Attitude of Mrs. Ranevsky’s offspring, Leonid Gayev and even her stepdaughter’s
attitude towards life and work is full of passivity as well as indolence. It has become
a routine life for them to do nothing. It is because they have never done anything
in their lives neither when they were teenagers nor when they become young and
grew old.
4|Page
The most prominent lady of the play, on whom the attitude of other characters is
dependent, has intended not to do anything and to stop “The Cherry Orchard” from
being auctioned. In this way, the play ends before climax because of the
Although we feel from her behavior that she is not doing anything to change her
fate yet there is something which she is doing; she willfully and happily goes for
classy dinners, gifts expensive things to her near and dear ones and even lends
money to her neighbors knowingly that she herself is in debt. There is something
further that she does very perfectly; she creates her own imaginary happiness,
spending money on irrelevant things. She does not take precautionary measures
even when her estate is going to collapse. It is another reason due to which she
eventually falls from prosperity to adversity, which gives the play “The Cherry
Orchard” an important theme, which must be added at first in the list of themes of
Resistance to Change:
5|Page
It has been said since long that change is the law of nature. Time has proved that
things do not remain consistent yet this fact does not effect on Ranevsky’s family.
In Russia, people are finding new ways of earning but this stubborn family creates
resistance in change. Lopakhin gives the best idea, through which auction
proceedings might be stopped, however, everyone rejects his idea of cutting The
Cherry Orchard and splitting the land into small plots. Suggestion of this new
business man was ignored which shows that “Resistance to Change” and not to go
with the flow are the most important themes of “The Cherry Orchard”.
It is not the case that Mrs. Ranevsky expresses strong opinion when she rejects the
very idea of Lopakhin. She just considers “The Cherry Orchard” as the most
beautiful thing in Russia, however, at the end neither she could save her estate nor
the orchard. Audience can clearly listen trees cutting noise at the end of play when
Mrs. Ranevsky along with her family leaves her estate. Besides Mrs. Ranevsky
family, many other landowners of Russia could not save their estates and went in
Mrs. Ranevsky and her forefathers were living in the estate of The Cherry Orchard
since long. Apparently it seems to us that they are wealthy as they are still living
6|Page
luxurious lives but it is not true at all, hence, it is one of the major themes of “The
Cherry Orchard” i.e. the appearance and reality. We can see only apparent wealth
of Mrs. Ranevsky but Lopakhin is the one who is the wealthiest person among all
of them. He is no more a serf like his forefathers. Revolution is not only a blessing
Apparent wealthy family, on the other hand, is going to destitute. They are just
existing in that class, which is not further theirs. Maintaining social status in the
vicinity does not give them any benefit. In the dynamic societal conditions of Russia,
in which the “Cherry Orchard” takes place, we found appearance and reality as two
other themes of this play. Wealth is apparent for Ranevsky family whereas in reality
If it is not enough then Freewill and result are two other themes of “The Cherry
Orchard”. Everyone in the play, including Lopakhin, was free to decide what to do.
If estate of Mrs. Ranevsky has been auctioned it is none else but her own fault.
Lopakhin worked hard and becomes at the end wealthy businessman of Russia.
Anton Chekhov though marked this play a pure comedy yet it is more than that. He
has given everyone a message; if one wants success, he must do something to get
7|Page
it. Nothing is free. It is on a person weather he spends his whole life blaming nature
Lopakhin had the option of buying “The Cherry Orchard” and he does so with his
freewill. Mrs. Ranevsky had the freewill to waste her time and money and she also
keep doing so. Both of them though were opposite to each other but they had
Anton Chekhov has portrayed two major classes in this play. One is the elite class
and second is the lower class. Critics are of the view that middle class has also been
portrayed but its depiction is very rare. Mrs. Ranevsky belongs to wealthy class of
landlords and Lopakhin belongs to the lowest class of serfs. However, one major
character in the play is Yasha, and second to his opposite is Firs. Mindsets of both
these persons are conflicting. First wants back old days of his life. He wants life
more stable then Ranevsky family but still the family does not admit him equal.
That was the indifferent attitude of wealthy class towards serfs as a result serfs
8|Page
In addition, some other prominent themes of The Cherry Orchard are disclosed
when Mr. Ranevsky feels that there is no way to get rid of this problem and her
family could not be able to find any path to survive in changing atmosphere of
Russia. New emerging social class of Russia such like Lopakhin finds new ways of
earning profit and always searches for inner satisfaction even from those who once
9|Page