1.

What are the highly significant -summary (major

findings of your study? findings), answers
of SOP
2. How consistent are your -alignment of title,
findings with the research title? SOP and findings

3. What are the basis of your -from revealed

recommendations? results and findings

4. Why did you use -utilization of

quanti/quali/mixed-methods? research approach

5. Why you used “sequential- -depth of the study

explanatory”? (cite creswell)

6. How did you gather data? - data gathering

procedure (in the
manuscript)

7. How did you administer the -explain step by

questionnaires? step how you
survey or interview

8. Why did you use survey or -see research

interview questionnaire? design

9. How did you come up with -see research

that number of respondents? respondents

10. Why do you have very few or -see research

many respondents? design (bc. Quanti
or quali)
11. Why did you not include -alignment of scope
other stakeholders? and limitations

12. How did you validate your -process and

questionnaire? experts who
validate

13. Is your instrument adopted -adopted, it’s

or researcher-made? already valid and
reliable.

14. What’s the basis of you -see conceptual

output of the study? framework, and its
based on findings
of the study

15. What’s the implications of -ex. Excellent,

findings in table _____? emergent themes
on quali. Indirectly
stated from the
data.

16. Have you answered all the -yes. Answer each.

SOP?

17. What are the limitations or -type of

weaknesses of the study? respondents, may
include other
stakeholders, new
protocols in data
gathering
procedures
18. What is the contribution of -reason of conduct,
your study to the economy or to -significance of the
the current situation? study
-data/findings
served as basis for
teacher’s training
proposal as output
of the study.
-enrichment of
teaching
pedagogies
-recommendations
-basis for other
studies and
integration for
other fields.