Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Part A:: History of DNA
Part A:: History of DNA
Part A:: History of DNA
The purpose of this activity is to take you through some of the data scientists used to figure out DNA’s structure.
Part A: History of DNA – briefly examine some of the scientific discoveries that led to Watson and Crick
discovering DNA’s structure. Fill in the missing info in the table below
1878
Phoebus Levene
1928
1950
Rosalind Franklin
1953
1. What is one thing that surprised you, or that you found interesting from the timeline above? Explain why it
surprised you. – “Nothing surprised me, or interested me” is NOT a valid answer.
2. Looking at the timeline as a whole, how many scientists were involved in figuring out DNA’s structure (it wasn’t
just Watson and Crick)?
3. Based on the timeline as a whole, how many different experiments were involved in building the knowledge
Watson and Crick needed to figure out the structure of DNA?
4. Do you think Watson and Crick could have figured out DNA’s structure if Gregor Mendel (or any other scientist)
hadn’t discovered the field of genetics by studying pea plants in his monastery’s gardens? Explain.
5. Based on the timeline, why do you think it is important for scientists to publish/share the findings of their
experiments with other scientists?
Part B: Ewin Chargaff’s Data – Chargaff discovered two rules that played a major role in the discovery of DNA’s
structure. Interpret the data below to come up with Chargaff’s rules:
Organism Adenine (A) Thymine (T) Guanine (G) Cytosine (C) 6. According to what we learned from the
Human 30.9 29.4 19.9 19.8 3D DNA Questions worksheet, how do the
Chicken 28.8 29.2 20.5 21.5 bases in DNA pair with each other?
Grasshopper 29.3 29.3 20.5 20.7
Sea Urchin 32.8 32.1 17.7 17.3
Wheat 27.3 27.1 22.7 22.8
Yeast 31.3 32.9 18.7 17.1
E. coli 24.7 23.6 26.0 25.7
7. Look at Chargaff’s Data for humans. Calculate the ratio of A to T and G to C? Show your work
A to T ratio: _______________
G to C ratio: _________________
8. Quickly review the data for the other organisms in the table. Do the ratio findings only occur for human DNA?
Explain.
9. If you were Chargaff, what conclusion would you draw based on the data comparison?
10. Chargaff also compared the base pairing ratios of different organisms. Compare the human DNA base
composition to the other organisms. Do any of the other organisms have the same percentage distribution as
human DNA? Explain.
Which organism has the closest base composition to the human’s? ______________
11. If you were Chargaff, what conclusion would you draw based on this data comparison?
Part 3: Rosalind Franklin’s Data – Franklin was a rarity in her day because, not many females went into science
and those that did were often not respected as much as their male counterparts. Rosalind took meticulous pictures
(pictures so to speak) of DNA and was able to determine a couple of important details that helped Watson and Crick.
The pictures Rosalind took were X-ray diffractions of DNA. See below:
T and C – 8 Angstroms
G and A – 12 Angstroms
12. Based on the data above, which two bases could Adenine (A) bond with? Why these two bases (explain using
the data)?
13. How can we use Chargaff’s data to help us figure out which of these two bases Adenine actually bonds with?
Read this: Rosalind Franklin did not herself discover the structure of DNA despite her major contribution. Instead two
young scientists looking for fame, James Watson and Francis Crick figure it out by using Chargaff’s data, which had been
published, and Rosalind Franklin’s data, which she had yet to publish. Some say they ‘stole’ Franklin’s data because she
had yet to publish it, and did not knowingly share it with them. Once a scientist’s data has been published, it is
considered public property, but before then it is that scientist’s sole academic property.
14. Could Watson and Crick have definitively concluded that Adenine bonds to Thymine and Guanine to Cytosine,
using Chargaff’s data only? (Hint: think of all possible combinations) Explain.
Read this: Watson and Crick used other data to help them determine the structure of DNA, but Chargaff’s and Franklin’s
data were some of the most important that they needed.