Part A:: History of DNA

You might also like

Download as doc, pdf, or txt
Download as doc, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 4

Name ___________________________________ Date __________ Block ____________

Discovering DNA’s Structure


Introduction: Even though DNA is considered large when it comes to molecules, it is still very tiny in size. The most
powerful microscopes that we have are still unable to see what the molecule looks like. If we can’t see it, then how are
scientists so sure that it looks the way it’s drawn?

The purpose of this activity is to take you through some of the data scientists used to figure out DNA’s structure.

Part A: History of DNA – briefly examine some of the scientific discoveries that led to Watson and Crick
discovering DNA’s structure. Fill in the missing info in the table below

Name Event in DNA History Year


Gregor Mendel

1878

Showed that chromosomes carry the cell’s units of inheritance

Phoebus Levene

1928

Determined the molecule that Griffith discovered was DNA

1950

Rosalind Franklin

1953

1. What is one thing that surprised you, or that you found interesting from the timeline above? Explain why it
surprised you. – “Nothing surprised me, or interested me” is NOT a valid answer.

2. Looking at the timeline as a whole, how many scientists were involved in figuring out DNA’s structure (it wasn’t
just Watson and Crick)?

3. Based on the timeline as a whole, how many different experiments were involved in building the knowledge
Watson and Crick needed to figure out the structure of DNA?
4. Do you think Watson and Crick could have figured out DNA’s structure if Gregor Mendel (or any other scientist)
hadn’t discovered the field of genetics by studying pea plants in his monastery’s gardens? Explain.

5. Based on the timeline, why do you think it is important for scientists to publish/share the findings of their
experiments with other scientists?

Part B: Ewin Chargaff’s Data – Chargaff discovered two rules that played a major role in the discovery of DNA’s
structure. Interpret the data below to come up with Chargaff’s rules:

Table 1: Relative Composition (mole %) of Bases in DNA

Organism Adenine (A) Thymine (T) Guanine (G) Cytosine (C) 6. According to what we learned from the
Human 30.9 29.4 19.9 19.8 3D DNA Questions worksheet, how do the
Chicken 28.8 29.2 20.5 21.5 bases in DNA pair with each other?
Grasshopper 29.3 29.3 20.5 20.7
Sea Urchin 32.8 32.1 17.7 17.3
Wheat 27.3 27.1 22.7 22.8
Yeast 31.3 32.9 18.7 17.1
E. coli 24.7 23.6 26.0 25.7

7. Look at Chargaff’s Data for humans. Calculate the ratio of A to T and G to C? Show your work

A to T ratio: _______________

What does this ratio tell you?

G to C ratio: _________________

What does this ratio tell you?

8. Quickly review the data for the other organisms in the table. Do the ratio findings only occur for human DNA?
Explain.
9. If you were Chargaff, what conclusion would you draw based on the data comparison?

10. Chargaff also compared the base pairing ratios of different organisms. Compare the human DNA base
composition to the other organisms. Do any of the other organisms have the same percentage distribution as
human DNA? Explain.

Which organism has the closest base composition to the human’s? ______________

Which organism’s base composition is furthest from the human’s? _______________

11. If you were Chargaff, what conclusion would you draw based on this data comparison?

Part 3: Rosalind Franklin’s Data – Franklin was a rarity in her day because, not many females went into science
and those that did were often not respected as much as their male counterparts. Rosalind took meticulous pictures
(pictures so to speak) of DNA and was able to determine a couple of important details that helped Watson and Crick.
The pictures Rosalind took were X-ray diffractions of DNA. See below:

A. This X-ray crystallographic pic of DNA told


Franklin that DNA was a double helix.

B. It was already know by scientists that DNA


was a double helix, but because Franklin’s pics
were so clear, she was able to calculate the
diameter of DNA: 20 Angstroms

C. The diameters of A, T, C and G had been


measured as well:

T and C – 8 Angstroms
G and A – 12 Angstroms

12. Based on the data above, which two bases could Adenine (A) bond with? Why these two bases (explain using
the data)?

13. How can we use Chargaff’s data to help us figure out which of these two bases Adenine actually bonds with?
Read this: Rosalind Franklin did not herself discover the structure of DNA despite her major contribution. Instead two
young scientists looking for fame, James Watson and Francis Crick figure it out by using Chargaff’s data, which had been
published, and Rosalind Franklin’s data, which she had yet to publish. Some say they ‘stole’ Franklin’s data because she
had yet to publish it, and did not knowingly share it with them. Once a scientist’s data has been published, it is
considered public property, but before then it is that scientist’s sole academic property.

14. Could Watson and Crick have definitively concluded that Adenine bonds to Thymine and Guanine to Cytosine,
using Chargaff’s data only? (Hint: think of all possible combinations) Explain.

Read this: Watson and Crick used other data to help them determine the structure of DNA, but Chargaff’s and Franklin’s
data were some of the most important that they needed.

15. Based on this diagram, what are two other pieces


of data that Watson and Crick needed to know in
order to get DNA’s structure correct?

You might also like