Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Case Analysis of Krispy Kreme Doughnuts
Case Analysis of Krispy Kreme Doughnuts
COMPANY BACKGROUND:
It was in the year 1933 when Vernon Rudolf bought a doughnut shop in Paducah,
Kentucky from Joe Le Beau. His purchase included all the company’s assets, Krispy Kreme
name, and a secret yeast-raised doughnuts recipe that Le Beau had created in New Orleans. The
doughnut shop became popular with their “glazed” doughnuts that are serve fresh and hot.
Several years after, Rudolf and his partner moved their operations to Nashville, Tenesse in order
to look for a larger market. Other members of the Rudolf family joined the enterprise, opening a
In year 1937, Vernon Rudolf quit the family business and left Nashville. He moved to
Winston-Salem, North Carolina where he opened his first Krispy Kreme shop which quickly
became immensely popular with the customers. The business prospered and in 1950’s, over 10
In 1976, Beatrice Foods bought Krispy Kreme and make changes including its recipe.
Beatrice Foods remodel the business, the recipe, and the script. The changes receive a negative
feedback from the consumers which resulted in the business declined. Then in 1982, a group of
franchisees bought the company from Beatrice Foods. They reinstated the original recipe, the
script, also the lettered sign of Krispy Kreme. During these years, revenues began to rise.
Revenues gradually rose to $117 million in 1989 and then stayed the same over the next six
years.
As of 2001, the company has already 181 stores in 28 states which comprises of
franchising “associate” stores and company-owned stores. The company relied mainly on
franchising because it minimized capital requirements, provided an attractive royalty stream and
put responsibility for local store operations in the hands of successful franchisees who knew the
trends of operating multi-unit efficiently. In May 2001, the company had stopped accepting
franchise operations for U.S locations but accepting applications from interested franchisees for
international outlets.
In fiscal year 2001, Krispy Kreme reported sales of $301 million and profits of $14.7
million. Scott Livengood, President and Chief Operating Officer, stated that Krispy Kreme is a
I. TIME CONTEXT
The problem existed in the year 2001, when the company stopped accepting franchise
applications indicating that there were no open territories in U.S locations yet accepting franchise
II. VIEWPOINT
Mr. Scott Livengood, President and Chief Operating Officer of Krispy Kreme Doughnuts
There is a need to improve Krispy Kreme Inc.’s marketing strategy in order for the
company to increase its market share in the doughnut industry in the United States, because of
the flawed or absent marketing research which resulted in store closings, openings and transfers
that are not backed up by market data that such investment would be feasible.
IV. OBJECTIVES
year in order for the company to rise its market sharing and profitability.
WANT- To be able to increase market share and become the market leader in the
V. AREAS OF CONSIDERATIONS
Strength:
substantial fraction of both revenues and earnings as can be seen in its business
grocery stores.
8. The company had a great product which people delighted on. It also has a strong brand
10. The company had a state-of-the-art laboratory that tested all key ingredients and each
Weaknesses:
1. The company only concentrates in the U.S territory and there are no international
market penetration.
2. The company had the model of selling in wholesale channels and less on brand which
5. The company’s organizational structure is so simple, thus they do not have a position
on international development.
8. The company had spent very little on advertising and promoting their products to new
Markets.
Opportunities:
1. The company had potential to develop its products and be competitive with industry
leaders.
2. Krispy Kreme can expand their market in other places/ countries given a proper
marketing plan.
3. Doughnuts were a popular item in supermarket groceries, with many customers finding
5. Company research indicated that Krispy Kreme’s appeal extended across all major
demographic groups.
Threats:
1. Compared to the company’s products, products of industry leader Dunkin Donut put
2. Overall growth in doughnut sales have been quite small in the past 5 years.
3. Competitors were already operating and known internationally and have already
4. People are becoming more health conscious, they prefer foods with less sugar and less
transfat.
5. The company was faced with stiff competition from industry leader Dunkin Donut and
other competitors.
VI. ALTERNATIVE COURSES OF ACTIONS (ACA’s)
Advantages:
Disadvantages:
Advantages:
Disadvantages:
ACA # 3. PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT. Develop a new product that could attract the
Advantages:
2. The company will also have a competitive advantage through lower prices of its
Disadvantages:
1. Large venture to support the marketing and Research and Development program.
2. No assurance of acceptance.
VII. RECOMMENDATION
Development to be use to solve the problem. Through Market Development, it can increase the
market share and profit of the company. They will become more competitive and a market leader
in doughnut industry.
ACTIONS TO BE TAKEN:
2. Train and instruct the team on how to perform the strategy effectively.
ACTIONS TO BE TAKEN:
EXPECTED OUTPUT: Increased in Sales Volume. Profit of not less than 25% per year
ACTIONS TO BE TAKEN:
EXPECTED OUTPUT: Make the required budget available for the operation.
VIII. PLAN OF ACTION
b. Train and instruct the team on how to perform the strategy effectively.
2. The Marketing Department must reassure proper execution of the strategy to increase
3. The Finance Department must provide funds needed for the implementation of the
Strategy and make the required budget available for the operation.