Professional Documents
Culture Documents
RCT Keto Foam 1% Vs Keto Cream 2% in PV
RCT Keto Foam 1% Vs Keto Cream 2% in PV
RCT Keto Foam 1% Vs Keto Cream 2% in PV
Summary Ketomousse (K), a new thermophobic formulation (ketoconazole 1%), has proven its
efficacy in the treatment of dandruff, caused by the same agent as pityriasis versicolor
(PV). The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy and tolerability of K
thermophobic foam vs. ketoconazole cream 2% (N) in the treatment of PV. Forty-six
patients (22 in K and 24 in N group) with PV involving no more than 15% of the total
trunk surface were randomly assigned for treatment either with K or N once daily for
14 days. Three weeks after the completion of treatment, improvement rate and side-
effects were evaluated by clinical and mycological examination (WoodÕs light). Follow-
up was available for 81% of subjects. Complete resolution was observed in five patients
(29%) in K group and in nine (47%) in N group (P = 0.291). One patient in the N
group reported urticaria while no adverse events were reported for K. Both products
were cosmetically acceptable with respect to feasibility of application and formulation
with a preference for K. Ketomousse (1% ketoconazole) provides an equal efficacy and
tolerability compared to ketoconazole cream 2%. Therefore, Ketomousse could be
considered an excellent therapeutic option in the treatment of PV.
a significantly shorter evaporation time. Experimental The clinical evaluation of the disease severity was
studies have shown that the thermophobic mousse performed by a global assessment of clinical severity
allows a sixfold transcutaneous penetration of the (GACS score).
active compound in comparison to lotions. This A patient was considered to have obtained complete
improved pharmacokinetics induces a significantly resolution if all visual evidence ⁄ symptoms of fungal
higher clinical efficacy when compared with lotion disease have disappeared by a global clinical score (GAS
formulations. score) = 0 and negative WoodÕs light and mycological
Ketomousse is a white, soft foam. This compound examination.
has proven to be significantly more effective than The GAS score ranged as follows: 0 = complete
ketoconazole 2% scalp fluid (a medicated antifungal resolution; 1 = resolution with residual hypo-pigmen-
shampoo) in a randomised, single-blind study in the tation and negative mycological examination; 2 = stea-
treatment of moderate-to-severe dandruff, caused by the dy lesions (still scaling); 3 = worsening.
same aetiological agent responsible for PV.9 Patients were asked to report any adverse event and
In addition, in a pilot study of 15 patients affected by cosmetically evaluate the study medications through a
PV, Ketomousse when applied once daily for 7 days questionnaire using a graded quantitative score.
caused complete resolution in 60% of the patients while Patients who interrupted the treatment for reasons
for the others a second therapeutic cycle of 7 days had not related to study medications were considered as
to be repeated to obtain the same optimal result (A. drop-outs.
Bigardi, personal communication). The protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee
Therefore, the aim of the present study was to of each participating centre and all patients gave their
evaluate whether Ketomousse is as effective and safe written informed consent.
as the standard treatment (ketoconazole 2% cream) in A statistical analysis between the two groups was
patients affected by PV. performed using Mann–Whitney non-parametric test
for continuous variables and v2 test for nominal
variables. All patients were evaluated for efficacy
Patients and methods
analysis on an intention-to-treat basis. Statistical sig-
The present study was prospective, multicentre, rando- nificance was set at P < 0.05.
mised 1 : 1, parallel group over a 5-week period to Analysis have been performed using the statistical
assess efficacy, tolerability and cosmetic acceptability of software STATA (StataCorp., 2006 Stata Statistical Soft-
Ketomousse, compared with ketoconazole 2% cream. ware: release 9.0, College station, TX, USA).
Patients were eligible for randomisation if aged
between 18 and 70, affected by PV confirmed by
Results
microscopic and WoodÕs light examinations and involv-
ing no more than 15% of the total surface of trunk Between October 2005 and February 2007, 46 consec-
(thorax and dorsum). Exclusion criteria were the utive patients were enrolled in two Italian sites, 22
following: hypersensitivity to trial medications, preg- assigned to K and 24 to N treatment.
nancy or breastfeeding, presence of other active cuta- Table 1 shows patients demographics and duration of
neous inflammatory or infective pathologies in the same the PV disease in the two study groups. There were no
target area, utilisation of other topical or systemic drugs significant clinical differences at baseline between the
which could interfere with patient or experimental drug two groups regarding the diagnostic and clinical eval-
evaluation in the investigatorÕs opinion, treatment with uation, as shown in Table 2. Also signs and symptoms
topical or systemic antifungal therapy in the previous
4 weeks prior to enrolment. Table 1 Demographics and duration of disease in both groups at
Treatment allocation was randomly assigned by a baseline
computer generated randomisation list (Arcus Quick-
stat, Cambridge, UK) to one of the two treatment arms: K (n = 22) N (n = 24) P
Table 2 Clinical evaluations at baseline in both groups Table 4 Clinical evaluations at 5 weeks follow-up in both groups
comparison on intention-to-treat basis
K (n = 22) N (n = 24) P
K (n = 17) N (n = 22) P
GACS Score 1 9 (41) 12 (50) 0.536
Score 2 13 (59) 12 (50) WoodÕs light 0 18 (100) 19 (100)
WoodÕs light 0 3 (14) 0 (0) 0.061 Mycological examination 0 18 (100) 19 (100)
1 19 (86) 24 (100) Complete resolution1 5 (29) 9 (47) 0.291
Mycological examination 0 2 (9) 1 (4) 0.499 Partial resolution1 12 (71) 9 (47)
1 20 (91) 23 (96) No change1 0 1 (6)
1
GACS: score 0 = normal skin, 1 = PV involvement <7% of total Data for one patient in K group is missing.
trunk area, 2 = PV involvement between 8 and 15% of total trunk Comparison done by v2 test.
area. Values in parentheses are percentages.
WoodÕs light: 0 = negative; 1 = positive. WoodÕs light: 0 = negative; 1 = positive.
Mycological examination 0 = negative; 1 = positive. Mycological examination 0 = negative; 1 = positive.
Comparison done by v2 test. Complete resolution: GAS score 0, negative WoodÕs light and
Values in parentheses are percentages. mycological examination.
Partial resolution: GAS score 1, negative WoodÕs light and myco-
logical examination.
in the two groups were similar in respect to scaling
(P = 0.651), itching (P = 0.287), hypo-pigmentation
(P = 0.488) and hyper-pigmentation (P = 0.204).
Table 5 Clinical evaluations at 3 months follow-up in both groups
Five weeks after the initiation of the treatment 18
patients (81%) in K group and 19 (80%) in N group K (n = 11) N (n = 13) P
returned for the follow-up visit. The total drop-out rate Complete resolution 9 (82) 12 (92) 0.439
was 19% (nine of 46: four in K group and five in N Partial resolution 2 (18) 1 (8)
group). No change 0 0
Complete resolution was observed in 29% of the
Complete resolution: GAS score 0, negative WoodÕs light and
patients in K group vs. 47% in N group (P = 0.291) as mycological examination.
reported in Tables 3 and 4. In addition 71% of patients Partial resolution: GAS score 1, negative WoodÕs light and myco-
in K group and 47% in N group had partial resolution, logical examination.
while 6% in the N group showed no change.
Signs of scale were absent in both groups, itching was
observed in 1 ⁄ 19 (6%) in N group, absence or light Ninety-one percent (20 ⁄ 22 patients in K group and
hypo-pigmentation in 10 ⁄ 18 (55%) in K vs. 14 ⁄ 19 21 ⁄ 23 in N group respectively) found the study
(73%) in N and light hyper-pigmentation in 1 ⁄ 18 (5%) medications extremely easy to use, in particular 9 ⁄ 15
in N. patients (60%) in K group vs. 6 ⁄ 12 (50%) in N group
In the N group an adverse event (urticaria) has been reported a higher acceptability compared to other drug
reported at the end of treatment, while no adverse formulations previously used, while 8 ⁄ 15 (53%) in K
events were reported for K group. group vs. 6 ⁄ 12 (50%) in N group found it more effective
(P = 0.863).
As reported in Table 5, at follow-up visit (3 months
Table 3 Clinical evaluations at 5 weeks follow-up in both groups
after treatment initiation), 9 ⁄ 11 patients (82%) in K
comparison on intention-to-treat basis, assigning to drop-outs
patients a GACS score 2 = worsening of disease and 12 ⁄ 13 patients (92%) in N showed persistent
complete resolution while two in K (18%) and one in N
K (n = 22) N (n = 24) P (8%) had a partial resolution (P = 0.439).
GACS Score 0 3 (14) 4 (17) 0.940
Score 1 7 (32) 8 (33)
Score 2 12 (54) 12 (50)
Discussion