Professional Documents
Culture Documents
UCC Thesis Writing Manual 2019-1-1
UCC Thesis Writing Manual 2019-1-1
Introduction
This manual of rules and guidelines of University of Caloocan City for thesis writing known as
“UCC Thesis Writing Manual (for College Degree Programs)” shall be strictly adhered by all
instructors/advisers assigned to teach Research in the undergraduate level of all programs
offered in the University of Caloocan City. The Research Agenda of Deans and Program Chairs
of respective college and department respectively shall be anchored on the University
Research and Publication Department. They should discuss the full content of this manual to
the instructor assigned to teach Research before the opening of classes for the First and
Second Semesters of the Academic Year.
A. General Guidelines
1. Research 1 (Introduction to Research)
1.1. The Research Instructor shall conform to the Research 1 Syllabus and discuss to the
students the contents stated in “Thesis Writing Format” included herein during the first week
of classes. Then, as a first requirement, the instructor must require the students to write their
research title and statement of the problem.
1.2. The assigned Instructor for Research 1 shall present to the Research Director the
proposed title and statement of the problem for review and enrichment before submission to
the Program Head/Coordinator and College Dean for approval during the second week of
classes.
1.3. No change/s shall be made in the approved title and statement of the problem in
Research 1 even if same or other instructor as adviser was assigned to teach in Research 2.
1.4. Only the reviewed and approved Chapters 1, 2 and 3, research instrument and
bibliography/references shall comprise the Research Proposal due for submission four (4)
weeks before the end of the First Semester for scheduling of the Proposal Defense.
1.5. The respondents of the study shall be selected as much as possible within the
university or within the vicinity of Caloocan City. The administration of research instrument
shall be done two (2) weeks before the final examination week.
2
1.6. In case the need calls for respondents who are selected beyond borders of
Caloocan City, the students shall be required for a waiver duly signed by their
parent/guardian. Then the adviser shall write a letter noted by the Program
Chair/Coordinator and with recommending approval by the College Dean to the Vice
President for Academic Affairs (VPAA) and Vice President for Student Affairs and Services
(VPSAS) that they will conduct a research indicating the “place” where the survey shall be
conducted and the “time frame” of administration and retrieval. It is the duty of the assigned
research instructor to supervise and monitor the students during the progress of their
research.
1.7. The Research 1 instructors shall stay in the classroom or may stay in the faculty
room during their class schedule even if the students are in the library to conduct research
activities for the purpose of consultation.
1.8. It is the duty of the Research Instructor to give grades to the students based from
their written examinations and research proposal as output to be submitted during the final
examination week for grading purpose.
1.9. If the students need to use standardized instruments, the instructor should guide
the students on how to avail of the needed instruments. However, if the students will use
researcher-developed questionnaire based from the literature and studies they have read.
The research instructor should guide them on how to validate their developed instrument.
2.1. The Dean/Program Chair/Coordinator shall assign qualified instructors who will
serve as advisers in the Research 2 subject. Also, they shall choose qualified instructors who
will serve as panelistsin the Thesis Defense. The assigned advisers and panelists must be under
the College they are serving and properly endorsed by the College Dean to the Vice President
for Academic Affairs (VPAA) a week before the scheduled Thesis Defense.
2.2. The Research 2 instructors and their students should stay in the classroom to
supervise and monitor their students in writing Chapter 4 for the statistical analysis,
presentation and interpretation of data and Chapter 5 in writing the summary, findings,
conclusions and recommendations.
2.3. The Research 2 instructor as adviser shall divide the class into groups in which each
member should have minimum of 4 and a maximum of 5 members per group.
3
2.4. In case, there is a need for experts to be included in one of the panelists, the
adviser can recommend noted by the Program Head/Coordinator to the College Dean who
will endorse the request to the Vice President for Academic Affairs for approval.
2.5. It is the duty of the Research 2 Advisers to check the research output of their
students from first to last pages of the thesis.
2.6. Prior to research presentation in the oral defense, the Research Advisers shall
check the readiness of the thesis manuscripts of all the groups in the class and ensure that
the criteria in giving grades were met.
2.7. In Thesis Defense, the role of the panel is to guide and help the students to further
improve their research through constructive comments and suggestions. The panelists shall
comprise the following:
3. Research Fee
Each student shall pay a corresponding Thesis Defense Fee as stated in Section 245 of
“City University Fees”
4. Honoraria
5.1. The final grade of each student in Research 2 shall be based from the following
criteria:
5.1.1. Research Adviser’s Grade – 60%
5.1.2. Defense Panelists Average Grade – 40%
5.2. If disagreement arises among the panelists in giving a grade to the students, the
Dean or Program Chair shall mediate to arrive at a final decision.
4
7. Final Copy
7.2. The final copy of the thesis shall be configured based from the thesis writing
format attached in this Research Manual.
7.1. Upon submission of the final copy, the students shall present the following
certificates:
7.2. The edited final copy of the thesis must be submitted a week before the date set
by the Registrar’s Office for submission of grades of graduating students.
5
________________________________
Signature over Printed Name of Panel
6
Note: The title must contain the subject matter, place of the study, and the population involved.
Avoid using the terms “An analysis of,” ”A Study of,” “An Investigation of,” and the like. All these
terms are understood to have been done or to be done when a research is conducted (Calderon,
1993).
Sample:
1.1.b. After the research title, next are the words in succeeding lines in title case of font Arial
12: “A Thesis” followed by the lines “Presented to the Faculty of” “College of Liberal Arts and
Sciences,” “UNIVERSITY OF CALOOCAN CITY (in uppercase bold letters),” “Biglang Awa St., cor Cattleya
St., Brgy 100, Caloocan City” (for South Campus) or “Congressional Road, Bagumbong, Caloocan City”
(for North Campus) and by pressing “enter key” seven (7) times, the research title will separate the
next lines of words.
A Thesis
Presented to the Faculty of
College of Liberal Arts and Sciences
UNIVERSITY OF CALOOCAN CITY
Biglang Awa St., cor Cattleya St., 12th Avenue East, Caloocan City
1.1.c. After the previous lines, next are the succeeding lines of words in title case of font Arial
12: “In Partial Fulfillment,” “of the Requirements for the Degree,” “DEGREE AND MAJOR (in uppercase
and bold letters)” and by pressing “enter key” seven (7) times, the last line will separate the next lines
of words.
Sample: (space between lines should be 1.5)
7
In Partial Fulfillment
of the Requirements for the Degree
BACHELOR OF SCIENCE IN MATHEMATICS
1.1.d. After the previous lines, next are the succeeding lines of words in title case of font Arial
12: “By (in Title Case),” “COMPLETE RESEARCHER/S, NAME (in uppercase and bold letters),” and
“Year.”
Sample: (space between lines should be 1.5)
By
ROBERT C. TORRECAMPO
2019
1.2. Approval Sheet. This follows immediately after the Title Page. The words ”APPROVAL SHEET” in
single line is centered at the top in uppercase and bold letters of font Arial 12 followed by a statement
as follows in justified form:
This thesis entitled: “TITLE (in uppercase and bold letters),” prepared and submitted by “NAME
OF RESEARCHER/S (in uppercase)” in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of “DEGREE
AND MAJOR (in uppercase)” has been examined and is recommended for acceptance and approval for
Oral Examination.
(provide space here by pressing the enter key once at the end of the paragraph)
NAME OF SIGNATORY (in uppercase and bold letters)
Adviser (at the middle of the signatory’s name)
(provide space here by pressing the enter key once at the end of the previous line)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (The
above line separates the next part by pressing the “enter key” once after the line then press undo and use the
arrow down key in providing space)
PANEL OF EXAMINERS (centered in uppercase and bold letters)
1.3. Acknowledgment. The word ACKNOWLEDGMENT is centered at the top (in uppercase and bold
letters of font Arial 12) followed by justified body of text in which the researcher appreciates the
persons who extended assistance/support and guidance to him/her. The initials of the researcher in
capital letter with no spaces or period between should be placed two double spaces after the body
text. The pronouns “I,” “you,” “we,” “us,” and “our/s “should be omitted.
The body text should be typed to acknowledge persons in the following sequence:
1.3.1. Researcher’s Adviser
1.3.2. Researcher’s Program Head/ Coordinator and Dean
1.3.3. Panel of examiners (chairman first followed by the members)
1.3.4. Persons who extended their assistance and guidance
1.3.5. Persons who approved/granted the permission to conduct the study
1.3.6. Respondents
1.3.7. Relatives and friends of the researcher
1.3.8. Almighty God
1.4. Abstract. A brief summary of the study. The word ABSTRACT is centered at the top (in uppercase
and bold letters of font Arial 12) followed by an introductory in the following format:
Sample of an ABSTRACT:
ABSTRACT
1.5. Table of Contents. A listing of chapter numbers, titles and subtitles with indications of page
number after the dotted line.
Chapter Title and SubTitles (in Title Case) Page Title
Page……………………………………………………………………………………… i
Approval Sheet………………………………………………………………………………ii
Acknowledgment…………………………………………………………………………. iii
Abstract……………………………………………………………………………………..... v
Table of Contents……………………………………………………………………..….. ix
List of Tables…………………………………………………………………………..……..xiv
List of Figures…………………………………………………………………………………xv
1.6. List of Tables. It is a listing of all tables presented in Chapters 3 and 4 with indications of page
number after the dotted line. The words in single line “LIST OF TABLES” is centered at the top (in
uppercase and bold letters of font Arial 14) followed by this format (Arial 12 as font):
Sample:
1.7. List of Figures. A listing of all figures presented in all chapters including the Research Paradigm.
The words in a single line “LIST OF FIGURES” is centered at the top (in uppercase and bold letters of font
Arial 12) followed by this format (Arial 12 as font):
10
Sample:
Sample:
Chapter 1
2.1.1. Introduction
A discussion about the subject matter, existence of unsatisfactory condition, reasons why
there is a need to conduct a study, desire to have a clear understanding of a phenomenon, a desire to
improve something and a desire to discover something.
2.1.4. Hypothesis/Hypotheses
A null statement(s) of an inferential question (if any), presented in the statement of the
problem for statistical significance test. State the level of significance (e.g. the null hypothesis that
there is no significant difference/relationship among/between___________________ was tested at
0.05 alpha level of significance). The usual alpha level of significance used by statisticians are 0.05 and
0.01.
Sample:
Chapter 2
RESEARCH FRAMEWORK
Note: Calderon (1993) suggested the following number of literature based from his
observations: Undergraduate Thesis: 5 to 10 related literatures
2.2.3. Synthesis
A consolidation of the results of previous studies to the present study. It is a statement
emphasizing the relevance of the established theories as theoretical framework that inspired a
researcher in formulating another theory/concept through the present study.
A statement of the investigator’s own point of view on the present study supported by a
paradigm. According to Calderon (1993), the conceptual framework becomes the central theme, the
focus, the main thrust of the study and it serves as a guide in conducting the investigation.
2.2.5. Paradigm
A diagram of a conceptual framework usually presented through the input-process-output
(IPO) model. However, modern presentations are acceptable.
Sample:
Chapter 3
METHODOLOGY
A discussion of how the researcher sought permission to conduct study and how the copies of
the questionnaires were finalized, reproduced, distributed and retrieved in a descriptive research. The
researcher also discussed the preparation of pretest and posttest and formation of the experimental
and control groups in an experimental research.
Sample:
Chapter 4
The subtopics were presented based on the statement of the problem through tables, graphs,
charts and textual presentation. The highest weighted mean, lowest weighted mean and significant
difference or relationship/association are usually emphasized in the analysis. The similarities or
differences with the work of others stated in the related literature and studies were cited as
interpretations.
Sample:
Chapter 5
2.5.1. Summary
14
2.5.2. Findings
A concise enumeration of the important data presented in Chapter 4. No deductions,
inferences nor interpretations should be made.
2.5.3. Conclusions
A concise enumeration of deductions, inferences, interpretations, abstractions and
generalizations based from the findings.
2.5.4. Recommendations
A concise enumeration of logical, valid, feasible, practical and attainable appeals to concerned
people to help solve the problems discovered in the investigation based from the findings and
conclusions of the study. The researcher/s may recommend to the future researchers to conduct
similar studies in a broader aspect.
3. Bibliography
All statements, citations, references or endnotes should be included in the bibliography. The
surnames of the authors or entries were arranged alphabetically, in hanging indent and single spaced.
Double spacing should be observed between references. The entries are categorized according to A.
Books; B. Journals, Magazines and Newspapers; C. Unpublished Theses/Dissertations and D.
Websites/Multimedia.
The word “Bibliography” is typed and centered in sentence case below the top margin after
pressing the “enter key” once (in bold letters of font Arial 12).
Sample:
Bibliography
A. Books
Calderon, Jose F. (1998) Principles and Practices of Teaching. Quezon City: Great
Books Trading.
Chua, Queena L (2001). “The Third International Math and Science Study.” The Philippine Journal of
Education. Vol LXXX, No.2, July.
C. Unpublished Theses/Dissertations
D. Websites/Multimedia
https://_______________
en.wikipeidia.org/wiki/Math
Microsoft Encarta CD Encylopedia
Britanica CD Encylopedia
4. Appendices
Materials that supplement the body of thesis/dissertation such as permit to conduct study,
copy of research instruments (questionnaire and inventory form), cross reference tables or some
tables which are not included in Chapter 4 and sample computations in the hypothesis testing.
The word “Appendix A” is typed and centered in sentence case below the top margin after
pressing the “enter key” once (in bold letters of font Arial 12).
5. Curriculum Vitae
Presentation of the researcher’s personal and educational backgrounds, work experiences,
honors/awards received, achievements and seminars attended.
The line of words “Curriculum Vitae” is typed and centered in Title Case below the top margin
after pressing the “enter key” once (in bold letters of font Arial 12).
6. Others
6.3. Margins
Top : 2 inches Bottom : 1 inch
Left : 1.25 inches Right : 1 inch
6.6. Indention
Indent the first line of paragraphs at 0.5” tab throughout the manuscript except for the
following:
6.6.1. Block quotations – use 1 inch indention to both left and right margins.
6.7. Pagination
Page number should be visible (except for title page and chapter pages) above the top right
margin throughout the manuscript.
The following format should be observed:
6.7.1. Preliminary Pages – lower case Roman numerals in bold font style
6.7.2. Chapters 1 to 5, Bibliography, Appendices and Curriculum Vitae – Arabic numerals in
bold font style.
6.8. Alignment
Justified alignment is a must throughout the entire manuscript.
of 1 pt style for sectioning. No vertical lines should be drawn for every column and to the sides of the
table. The bottom horizontal line should be a 2¼ pt thick single line.
6.9.5. Don’t allow the table to cross over pages. Cut it and make another table with next
number and title.
6.9.6. If the tables are too many to present in Chapter 4, include some in the Appendices as
cross reference tables.
6.9.7 Each figure should be numbered by an Arabic Numeral centered and typed in one line as
“Figure (number)” e.g. Figure 1. This should be placed below the figure.
6.9.8. The title of the figure in sentence case and single line spacing should be typed after the
figure number (eg. Figure 1. Paradigm of the Study).
Table 1
PROFILE f %
Age
51 – 60 41 – 50 31 – 40 Total Table 2 36.67 63.33 100.00
21 – 30 3 11 14 2 30
13.33 86.67 100.00
Sex 11 19 30
Male Total
Female 4 26 30
10.00 36.67 46.67 6.66
Civil Status Single 100.00
Married Total
x = 40.1 years old
1. Inductive
4.00
OU
4.00
OU
4.75
AU
4.04
OU
4.20
OU
2. 4. Explorat 4.60 3.75SoU OU AU AU 4.25 4.50OU AU OU OU 4.14 3.12 3.95
Deductiv Exposito ory 4.40 4.25 3.87 3.83 OU OU
e ry Average 3.00 3.75
3.93 OU OU 4.25 OU OU 4.26
3. 5. OU OU 4.00 3.75 OU AU 4.17 3.61 AU OU
Problem Lecture Authore
SoU OU SoU OU 3.90
Solving d by: 3.00 3.75 4.50 2.74 4.05 SoU OU
6. 4.20 4.00AU OU 3.90 AU AU 3.71
RAMONA A. PRADO, Ed.D. SHIRLEY V. SARAGCON, DEM BERNADETTE B. ENRIQUEZ, CESE Dean,
College of Education Dean, College of Business and Dean, College of Liberal Arts and Accountancy
and DTHIM Sciences