Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Principle-Based vs. Rule-Based Accounting
Principle-Based vs. Rule-Based Accounting
Rules-Based Accounting
The fundamental advantage of principles-based accounting is that its broad
guidelines can be practical for a variety of circumstances. Precise requirements can
sometimes compel managers to manipulate the statements to fit what is compulsory.
On the other hand, when there are strict rules that need to be followed, like those in
the U.S. GAAP system, the possibility of lawsuits is diminished. Having a set of rules
can increase accuracy and reduce the ambiguity that can trigger aggressive
reporting decisions by management.
If companies were able to report their financial numbers in any manner they chose,
investors would be open to risk. Without a rules-based accounting system,
companies could report only the numbers that made them appear financially
successful while avoiding reporting any negative news or losses.
Critics of principles-based accounting systems say they can give companies far too
much freedom and do not prescribe transparency. They believe because companies
do not have to follow specific rules that have been set out, their reporting may
provide an inaccurate picture of its financial health.
In the case of rules-based methods like GAAP, complex rules can cause
unnecessary complications in the preparation of financial statements. And having
strict rules means that accountants may try to make their companies more profitable
than they actually are because of the responsibility to their shareholders.
https://www.investopedia.com/ask/answers/06/rulesandpriciplesbasedaccounting.asp