Smoking and Mental Illness - Breaking The Link: Perspective

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 3

PERSPE C T I V E Smoking and Mental Illness — Breaking the Link

Smoking and Mental Illness — Breaking the Link


Judith J. Prochaska, Ph.D., M.P.H.

“M y doctor told me I’m too


stressed out to quit smok-
ing,” remarked a woman hospi-
little-to-no disturbance in pa-
tients’ behavior and time savings
for staff members.
tial social and financial costs to
patients, their families, and soci-
ety. As greater restrictions on ex-
talized with severe depression. Yet even in smoke-free psychi- posure to secondhand smoke are
“Well, 43 years later, I’m still atric settings, treatment of tobac- implemented in many public areas,
stressed and I’m still smoking.” co use remains relatively rare. In tobacco use is further isolating
This woman’s dilemma is all too my group’s recent studies, among an already-marginalized group.
familiar to health care providers 337 smokers recruited from inpa- Five prevailing myths have con-
and patients seeking the ideal time tient psychiatry units, 82% re- tributed to continuing tobacco
to treat tobacco dependence in the ported having attempted to quit, use among people with mental
face of chronic mental illness. and 42% reported having done illness. The first is that tobacco
Since smoking and mental ill- so within the previous year; only is necessary self-medication for
ness commonly occur together, 4% reported receiving assistance the mentally ill. The tobacco in-
many clinicians see them as in- with quitting smoking from a dustry has fostered this belief by
extricably linked and believe that mental health care or general funding research and presenta-
smoking in the mentally ill is health care provider. Moreover, tions on the self-medication hy-
therefore particularly challenging there are still outpatient mental pothesis, supporting opposition
to treat. Little examined are the health programs that provide ciga- to the JCAHO smoking ban, pub-
systemic and treatment factors rettes as an incentive for patients lishing articles in the lay press,
that have contributed to dispari- to comply with treatment. and marketing cigarettes to peo-
ties in tobacco use and tobacco- The devastating consequences ple with mental illness.2
related morbidity and mortality of tobacco use among smokers Nicotine is a powerful rein-
among people with mental illness. with mental illness are evident. forcing drug that transiently en-
Twenty years ago, the Joint Smokers with serious mental ill- hances concentration and atten-
Commission on the Accredita- ness are at increased risk for can- tion, regardless of the smoker’s
tion of Healthcare Organizations cer, lung disease, and cardiovascu- mental health status. But it has
(JCAHO, now the Joint Commis- lar disease, and they die 25 years proved ineffective as an adjunc-
sion) proposed a national ban on sooner, on average, than Ameri- tive treatment for mental disor-
tobacco use in hospitals, noting cans overall. Tobacco use also ders (e.g., depression, schizophre-
the contradiction between hospi- complicates psychiatric treatment. nia, and attention-deficit disorder),
tals’ health care mission and their Components in tobacco smoke possibly because of the rapid de-
exposing of patients, staff mem- accelerate the metabolism of some crease in drug response with re-
bers, and visitors to the harms of antidepressant and antipsychotic peated exposure. The reality is
secondhand smoke. Patient-advo- medications, resulting in lowered that tobacco is another problem,
cacy groups for the mentally ill blood levels and probably reduced not a solution.
strongly opposed the ban, arguing therapeutic benefit. Studies have Myth number two is that peo-
that tobacco’s therapeutic, calm- revealed higher hospitalization ple with mental illness are not
ing effect was valuable and warn- rates, higher medication doses, interested in quitting smoking.
ing that psychiatric patients who and more severe psychiatric symp- Research argues otherwise: stud-
were denied their cigarettes would toms among patients with schizo- ies involving patients recruited
revolt. JCAHO conceded and ex- phrenia who smoke than among from outpatient and inpatient psy-
empted psychiatric and drug- those who do not. Though the chiatric settings suggest that they
treatment units from the smok- mechanism is unclear, tobacco use are about as likely as the general
ing ban. Psychiatric hospitals that also is one of the strongest pre- population to want to quit smok-
voluntarily adopted such bans, dictors of future suicidal behav- ing.1 In the United States, 20 to
however, have documented both ior.1 Smoking results in substan- 25% of smokers report that they

196 n engl j med 365;3  nejm.org  july 21, 2011

The New England Journal of Medicine


Downloaded from nejm.org on April 27, 2016. For personal use only. No other uses without permission.
Copyright © 2011 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.
PERSPECTIVE Smoking and Mental Illness — Breaking the Link

Recommended Treatments for Tobacco Dependence and the Evidence Base for Use in Smokers with Mental Illness.*

Treatment Strategy Findings in Smokers with Mental Illness

Clinician advice to quit and referral In one trial in clinically depressed smokers, yielded abstinence rate of 19% at 18 months
of follow-up.1
Individual cessation counseling At 18 months of follow-up, individual counseling with access to cessation pharmaco‑
therapy achieved abstinence in 18% of smokers with PTSD3 and 25% of those with
depression.1
Group cessation counseling Group counseling plus nicotine replacement achieved 19 to 21% abstinence at 12
months of follow-up in outpatients with serious mental illness; tailoring content for
smokers with schizophrenia was equally effective.
Quit-lines The nearly 25% of callers to the California quit-line who had major depression were sig‑
nificantly less likely than nondepressed callers to have quit smoking at 2 months of
follow-up.
Nicotine replacement: patch, gum, One trial found nicotine gum particularly helpful among depressed (as compared with
lozenge, inhaler, nasal spray nondepressed) smokers (36% abstinence at 3 months). In acute care settings, nico‑
tine replacement reduced agitation in smokers with schizophrenia and was associat‑
ed with lower rates of leaving inpatient psychiatric settings against medical advice.
Ex­tended use of a nicotine patch reduced relapse risk among smokers with schizo‑
phrenia. A case series documented that nicotine nasal spray was used appropriately
by smokers with schizophrenia and supported cessation.
Bupropion An effective cessation aid in smokers with or without current or past depression. A meta-
analysis of 7 trials in 260 smokers with schizophrenia showed significant effects at
6 months of follow-up.4 According to a case study, two smokers with bipolar disorder
quit smoking with no adverse effects on mood.
Varenicline Three case series involving medically stable outpatients with schizophrenia reported
significant smoking reduction, 8-to-75% quit rates, improvements on some cogni‑
tive tests, and no serious adverse effects; individual case reports reveal mixed effects
in smokers with schizophrenia or bipolar disorder. Three randomized, controlled trials
in smokers with schizophrenia or depression are in process.
Nortriptyline Demonstrated efficacy in the general population and among smokers with a history of
depression; no data on smokers with current mental illness.
Clonidine Demonstrated efficacy in the general population; no data on smokers with mental
­illness.

* Information on recommended treatments for tobacco dependence is from Fiore et al.5 Bupropion and varenicline ­include an
FDA-mandated black-box warning highlighting the risk of serious neuropsychiatric symptoms, including changes in behavior,
hostility, agitation, depressed mood, suicidal thoughts and behavior, and attempted suicide. Nortriptyline and clonidine are
second-line cessation pharmacotherapies that have been identified as efficacious in the general population but are not FDA-
approved. PTSD denotes post-traumatic stress disorder.

intend to quit smoking in the dependence is challenging, sev- for help doing so) and similar to
next 30 days, and another 40% eral randomized treatment trials cessation rates in the general pop-
say they intend to do so in the and systematic reviews involving ulation.1 A cessation intervention
next 6 months. Furthermore, smokers with mental illness have integrated into treatment for post-
among smokers with mental ill- documented that success is pos- traumatic stress disorder (PTSD)
ness, readiness to quit appears to sible. With a stepped-care inter- doubled patients’ odds of quit-
be unrelated to the psychiatric vention tailored to depressed ting.3 And a meta-analysis of sev-
diagnosis, the severity of symp- smokers’ readiness to quit, a 25% en randomized controlled trials
toms, or the coexistence of sub- abstinence rate at 18-month fol- involving smokers with schizo-
stance use. low-up was achieved — a rate phrenia revealed a nearly three-
The third myth is that men- significantly higher than that in fold increase in abstinence rates
tally ill people cannot quit smok- the group that received usual 6 months after treatment among
ing. Although treating tobacco care (advice to quit and referrals those who used bupropion.4

n engl j med 365;3  nejm.org  july 21, 2011 197


The New England Journal of Medicine
Downloaded from nejm.org on April 27, 2016. For personal use only. No other uses without permission.
Copyright © 2011 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.
PERSPE C T I V E Smoking and Mental Illness — Breaking the Link

Fourth, many people believe assess their readiness to quit, apply to all hospitalized smok-
that quitting smoking interferes tailor assistance accordingly, and ers, regardless of mental health
with recovery from mental illness, arrange for follow-up. Key strate- status. More generally, we need
eliminating a coping strategy and gies for smokers who are not greater advocacy for smoke-free
leading to decompensation in ready to quit include focusing on environments for mental health
mental health functioning. Five the benefits of change and the treatment; training for clinicians
randomized tobacco-treatment tri- risks associated with tobacco use, in cessation treatment; and sys-
als in patients concurrently receiv- as well as addressing key barriers tems for routinely identifying pa-
ing mental health treatment have to cessation (e.g., stress, fear of tients who smoke, advising ces-
found that smoking cessation did weight gain, and nicotine with- sation, and providing treatment
not exacerbate depression or PTSD drawal). Smokers who are ready to or referral.
symptoms or lead to psychiatric quit should be encouraged to set a The history of tobacco use in
hospitalization or increased use quit date in the next 2 weeks, the mental health field is long
of alcohol or illicit drugs.1 given a prescription for pharma- and troubling. It is time to make
Finally, some argue that smok- cologic cessation treatment (un- effective cessation treatments
ing, which is perceived as having less it is contraindicated), and readily available to all smokers.
distal effects, is the lowest-prior- linked with counseling support. Disclosure forms provided by the author
ity concern for patients with Mood-management strategies may are available with the full text of this arti-
cle at NEJM.org.
acute psychiatric symptoms. Yet also be helpful for smokers with
people with psychiatric disorders current or past mental illness. In- From the Department of Psychiatry, Univer‑
are far more likely to die from tegrating cessation treatment into sity of California, San Francisco, San Fran‑
cisco.
tobacco-related diseases than from existing care results in greater
mental illness. Smokers know to- engagement, greater use of ces- 1. Hall SM, Prochaska JJ. Treatment of
bacco use has deadly consequences sation pharmacotherapy, and in- smokers with co-occurring disorders: em‑
phasis on integration in mental health and
and expect health care profession- creased likelihood of abstinence.3 addiction treatment settings. Annu Rev Clin
als to intervene. Indeed, raising Ongoing contact allows clinicians Psychol 2009;5:409-31.
the issue of tobacco use with pa- to monitor and address any chang- 2. Prochaska JJ, Hall SM, Bero LA. Tobacco
use among individuals with schizophrenia:
tients enhances the rapport be- es in psychiatric symptoms dur- what role has the tobacco industry played?
tween patients and clinicians. ing quitting attempts. Relapse Schizophr Bull 2008;34:555-67.
There is growing evidence that rates may be high, and combined 3. McFall M, Saxon AJ, Malte CA, et al. Inte‑
grating tobacco cessation into mental health
smokers with mental illness are and extended use of cessation care for posttraumatic stress disorder: a ran‑
as ready to quit as other smokers medications may be warranted. domized controlled trial. JAMA 2010;304:
and can do so without any threat There is a critical need to en- 2485-93.
4. Tsoi DT, Porwal M, Webster AC. Efficacy
to their mental health recovery. gage health care providers, poli- and safety of bupropion for smoking cessa‑
Evidence supports the use of most cymakers, and mental health ad- tion and reduction in schizophrenia: system‑
recommended cessation treat- vocates in the effort to increase atic review and meta-analysis. Br J Psychiatry
2010;196:346-53.
ments in smokers with mental ill- access to evidence-based tobacco 5. Fiore MC, Jaén CR, Baker TB, et al. Clinical
ness (see table). treatment. The Joint Commission practice guideline: treating tobacco use and
Clinicians are therefore encour- plans to adopt revised hospital dependence: 2008 update. Rockville, MD:
Department of Health and Human Services,
aged to ask all patients about to- standards for tobacco treatment 2008.
bacco use, advise smokers to quit, next January. The standards should Copyright © 2011 Massachusetts Medical Society.

The Clean Air Act and Health — A Clearer View from 2011
Jonathan M. Samet, M.D.

F rom my office, I have views


of downtown Los Angeles
and the San Gabriel Mountains.
these views, and only rarely are
my eyes and throat irritated by
smog when I’m outdoors. The
better than that of the mid-20th
century, when severe oxidant pol-
lution, initially of unknown ori-
Air pollution infrequently obscures Los Angeles air of today is far gins, threatened the health and

198 n engl j med 365;3  nejm.org  july 21, 2011

The New England Journal of Medicine


Downloaded from nejm.org on April 27, 2016. For personal use only. No other uses without permission.
Copyright © 2011 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.

You might also like