Check the appropriate blank:

___ Annual Target

___ As of 1st Semester (Jan-Jun)
___ As of 2nd Semester (Jul-Dec)

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW (IPCR)

(for Faculty Member Designated as College Dean)

(Note: This portion is to be signed by the concerned employee/officials during the target-setting. Signature box is provided at the last page of this form for the accomplishment report.)

I, _________________, commit to deliver and agree to be rated on the attainment of the following targets in accordance with the indicated measures for the period January - December, _____.

____________________
Ratee
Targets Approved by:

___________________________
Ratee Immediate Supervisor Head of Delivery Unit

Rating scale:
5- Outstanding/Best 4 - Very Satisfactory/Better 3 - Satisfactory/Good 2 - Unsatisfactory/Fair 1 - Poor

January to June July to December

Functions Performance Indicator Performance Measures Performance Actual Rating Performance Actual Rating
Target Performance Target Performance
Rate/PM Ave. Rate/PM Ave.
Part I.A.1- Designation OPCR Rating (60%) - see attached OPCR
Part I.A.2- Designation Functions (40%)
Unique Functions (from the KRA's)

IFSU-HRD-PMT-F047
Rev.00(Mar.17,2021)
 January to June July to December

Functions Performance Indicator Performance Measures Performance Actual Rating Performance Actual Rating
Target Performance Target Performance
Rate/PM Ave. Rate/PM Ave.
Managerial Functions

Supervisory Functions

Routinary Functions

Part I.B- Faculty Functions

IFSU-HRD-PMT-F047
Rev.00(Mar.17,2021)
Common Functions
1. Attendance to annual University and Campus events as scheduled
Quantity
5-100% attendance as required
1 - no attendance
1.1. Foundation Day
Quality
5 - with appropriate dress code
1-not in appropriate dress code

January to June July to December

Functions Performance Indicator Performance Measures Performance Actual Rating Performance Actual Rating
Target Performance Target Performance
Rate/PM Ave. Rate/PM Ave.
Quantity
5-100% attendance as required
1 - no attendance
1.4. CSC Anniversary Celebration
Quality
5 - with appropriate dress code
1-not in appropriate dress code
1.6. Campus events/ activities and Quantity
other outside activities as per invite 5 - 100% attendance
4 - 90% to 99% attendance
3 - 80%-89% attendance
2 - 70 - 79% attendance
1- 69% and below attendance
Quality
5 - with appropriate dress code
1-not in appropriate dress code
2. Adherence to established rules and guidelines
2.2. Flag ceremony Quantity
5 - 100% attendance
4 - 90% to 99% attendance
3 - 80%-89% attendance
2 - 70 - 79% attendance
1- 69% and below attendance
Quality
IFSU-HRD-PMT-F047
Rev.00(Mar.17,2021)
 5 - with prescribed uniform
1-not in prescribed uniform
Timeliness
5-arrived prior to flag ceremony
3-arrived in the middle of the flag
ceremony
1-arrived after the flag ceremony
3. Submission of CSC mandated employee records/reports as scheduled
3.2. SALN Timeliness
5-3 or more days before the
deadline
4 - 1 to 2 days before the
deadline
3 - on deadline
2 - 1 to 2 days after deadline
1 - 3 or more days after the
deadline
January to June July to December

Functions Performance Indicator Performance Measures Performance Actual Rating Performance Actual Rating
Target Performance Target Performance
Rate/PM Ave. Rate/PM Ave.
3.3. PDS via the Online Employees Quality
Profiling System 5 - complete and updated
1 - incomplete and no update/ not
registered
Timeliness
5-3 or more days before the
deadline
4 - 1 to 2 days before the
deadline
3 - on deadline
2 - 1 to 2 days after deadline
1 - 3 or more days after the
deadline
3.4. IPCR Quality
5 - IPCR submitted is without
correction
3 - IPCR submitted returned for
correction
1 - IPCR submitted returned for
further corrections

IFSU-HRD-PMT-F047
Rev.00(Mar.17,2021)
 Timeliness
5-3 or more days before the
deadline
4 - 1 to 2 days before the
deadline
3 - on deadline
2 - 1 to 2 days after deadline
1 - 3 or more days after the
deadline
Part II - Behavioral Indicators (10%)
Consistent manifestation of the following core values: Quality
5 - Excellently manifests the core
1. Excellence value in his/her behavior and
actions through consistency
2. Faith 4 - Very satisfactory
3. Integrity 3 - Satisfactory
4. Service 2 - Poor
5. Creativity 1- Very Poor
6. Cultural-Sensitivity
Semi-Annual Assessment
Comments and Recommendations for Individual Development Purposes:
January to June July to December
For January to June Weight Weight
Functions Rating ed Functions Rating ed
Rating Rating
I. Functions (90%) I. Functions (90%)
I.A. Designation I.A. Designation
a.1. OPCR (60%) a.1. OPCR (60%)
a.2. Functions (Managerial/ a.2. Functions (Managerial/
Supervisory/ Routinary) (40%) Supervisory/ Routinary) (40%)

I.B. as Faculty/ Employee I.B. as Faculty/ Employee

For July to December b.1. Faculty/Common Functions b.1. Faculty/Common Functions
(70%) (70%)
b.2. Student Evaluation (30%) b.2. Student Evaluation (30%)

II. Behavioral Indicators (10%) II. Behavioral Indicators (10%)

Total Score/ # of PI's Total Score/ # of PI's
IPCR Rating (90% of I.A + I.B) + (10% IPCR Rating (90% of I.A + I.B) + (10%
of II) of II)
Adjectival Rating Adjectival Rating
Discussed rating with: Discussed rating with:
Rating Scale for the Final Score:
4.51 - 5.00 ----- Outstanding (Extraordinary level of achievement)
3.51 - 4.50 ----- Very Satisfactory (Performance exceeded expectation)
2:51 - 3.50 ----- Satisfactory (Performance met expectation)
IFSU-HRD-PMT-F047
1.51 - 2.50 ----- Fair (Performance failed to meet expectation)
Rev.00(Mar.17,2021)
1.00 - 1.50 ----- Poor (Performance was consistently below expectation)
 Rating Scale for the Final Score:
4.51 - 5.00 ----- Outstanding (Extraordinary level of achievement)
3.51 - 4.50 ----- Very Satisfactory (Performance exceeded expectation)
2:51 - 3.50 ----- Satisfactory (Performance met expectation) ____________________ _____________________
1.51 - 2.50 ----- Fair (Performance failed to meet expectation) Employee Employee
1.00 - 1.50 ----- Poor (Performance was consistently below expectation)
Assessed by: Assessed by:
Note: % weight allocation for the functions of faculty members shall be based on the existing I certify that I discussed my assessment I certify that I discussed my assessment
policies on faculty workload. of the performance with the employee. of the performance with the employee.

I. % weight allocation for faculty members:

Instructor Asst. Prof. Asso. Prof. Prof. Univ. Prof. ______________________ ________________________
1. Instruction 80% 70% 50% 35% 30% Immediate Supervisor Immediate Supervisor
2. Research 10% 10% 20% 40% 45%
3. Extension 5%* 10%* 10%* 10%* 10%*
4. Production - 5%* 10%* 5%* 5%* Final rating by: Final rating by:
5. Others 5%* 5%* 10%* 10%* 10%*

II. For faculty members with designation, % weight allocation shall be pro-rated based on approved workload.
__________________________ ____________________
Head of Delivery Unit Head of Delivery Unit

IFSU-HRD-PMT-F047
Rev.00(Mar.17,2021)