Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Criminal Law Book 1: Kurios
Criminal Law Book 1: Kurios
Criminal Law Book 1: Kurios
NAME:
YEAR:
BSCRIM – 2
PROFESSOR:
KURIOS
CHRISTIAN COLLEGES FOUNDATION, INC.
Magallanes, Cavite
kccf_97@ymail.com
MODULE 1
Learning Activities/Assessment:
1. What is Act No. 3815? When did it take effect?
This law shall be known as “The Revised Penal Code” this code shall take
effect on the first day of January, Nineteen hundred and thirty-two.
g. Negligence
Negligence is a failure to take reasonable care to avoid causing injury
or loss another person.
h. Mala in se
is a Latin phrase meaning wrong or evil in itself. The phrase is used to
refer to conduct assessed as sinful or inherently wrong by nature,
independent of regulations governing the conduct.
i. Mala prohibita
Those things which are prohibited by law, and therefore unlawful.
j. Motive
something (such as a need or desire) that causes a person to act
Revenge was the murderer's motive.
k. Impossible crime
An Impossible Crime is committed by any person performing an act
which would be an offense against persons or property, were it not for
the inherent impossibility of its accomplishment or an account of the
employment of inadequate or ineffectual means.
l. Conspiracy
Conspiracy occurs when two or more persons agree to commit a
crime-an essential feature for committing organized crime. One
purpose of the conspiracy offence is to extend liability "backwards" by
criminalizing the planning (or agreement) stage of a criminal offence.
m. Error in personae
Error in personae or mistake in identity is injuring one person who is
mistaken for another. The intended victim is not at the scene of the
crime. It is the actual victim upon whom the blow was directed, but he
is not really the intended victim.
n. Aberration ictus
Aberratio ictus is a Latin term that refers to the accidental harm that
occurs to someone when a criminal act is misdirected against him or
her when he or she was otherwise an innocent bystander in the course
of the crime.
o. Praeter intentionim
“Praeter intentionem” is defined as having an injurious result that is
greater than that intended. The Revised Penal Code describes it as no
intention to commit so grave a wrong.
KURIOS
CHRISTIAN COLLEGES FOUNDATION, INC.
Magallanes, Cavite
kccf_97@ymail.com
the appreciation of such evidence calls for tilting of the scales in favor
of the accused.
a.2. void-for-vagueness doctrine
In criminal law, a declaration that a law is invalid because it is not
sufficiently clear. Laws are usually found void for vagueness if, after
setting some requirement or punishment, the law does not specify what
is required or what conduct is punishable.
a.3. doctrine of pro reo
Intimately intertwined with the in dubio pro reo principle is the rule of
lenity. It is the doctrine that "a court, in construing an ambiguous
criminal statute that sets out multiple or inconsistent punishments,
should resolve the ambiguity in favor of the more lenient punishment."
b.1. generality
The idea of the law is that of generality. People can only be equal
before a general law. The generalizing rule guarantees freedom. It
satisfies the principle of the separation of powers because it clearly
distinguishes the mandate of parliament from that of the administration.
b.2. territoriality
Territoriality is a type of intraspecific or interspecific competition that
results from the behavioral exclusion of others from a specific space
that is defended as territory. This well-defined behavior is exhibited
through songs and calls, intimidation behavior, attack and chase, and
marking with scents.
b.3. prospectivity
Prospectivity in criminal law means that penal laws can only punish
an act committed after its effectivity. It cannot penalize an act that was
not punishable at the time of its commission. It cannot be given
retroactive effect UNLESS favorable to the accused who is not a
habitual deliquent.
unimpaired, so that if one lacks free will and intelligence, he should not
be held criminally liable. This philosophy is so basic it is implied so
often in bar exams.
c.2. positivist or realistic theory
Positivist or Realistic Theory which provides that man is inherently
good but his acts or behavior may be conditioned by his environment.
Because of his upbringing, social environment and associations he
may become socially ill or an offender. Thus, under this philosophy
penal laws are meant to “reform” and the penalties are considered
“corrective or curative.” Jails are reformatories and penalties are
imposed after an examination of the circumstances of the offender.
Unlike the classical theory which emphasizes on the offense itself,
positivistic theory emphasizes on the offender and not on the offense.
c.3. eclectic of mixed theory
Eclectic (or mixed) Philosophy which combines good features of
classical and positivist theories. As contended by many legal theorists,
the classical theory should be applied to heinous crimes, whereas the
positivist should be applied to socio-economic crimes. The Philippines
generally adapts the eclectic philosophy
d. Classification of felonies
f. Gravity of felonies
5. Enumeration:
a. Limitations on the power of the law-making body to enact penal legislation
under 1987 Constitution
a.1. The law must not be an ex post facto law or it should not be given a
retroactive effect.
a.2. The law must not be a bill of attainder, meaning it cannot provide
punishment without judicial proceedings.
a.3. The law must not impose cruel, unusual or degrading punishment.
d.1. Freedom
d.2. Intelligence
d.3. Intent
e.1. By any person committing a felony (delito) although the wrongful act done
be different from that which he intended.
e.2. By any person performing an act which would be an offense against
persons or property, were it not for the inherent impossibility of its
accomplishment or an account of the employment of inadequate or
ineffectual means.
6. The two rules as the jurisdiction over crime committed board foreign merchant
vessels are French Rule and English Rule.
MODULE 2
Learning Activities/Assessment:
1. The following are persons criminally liable for felonies. Discuss who are:
a. Principals
b. Accomplices
c. Accessories
5. Who are the accessories exempt from criminal liability and what are the
grounds for exemption?
MODULE 3
“PENALTIES”
(Revised Penal Code Article 21-88)
Learning Activities/Assessment:
1. Define the following theories of penalty:
a. Penalty
b. Principal penalties
c. Accessory penalties
d. Subsidiary penalty
e. Ex post facto law
f. Bill of attainder
g. Preventive imprisonment
h. Pecuniary liability
a. Prevention
b. Self-defense
c. Reformation
d. Exemplarity
e. Justice
4. Enumeration:
Divisible Indivisible
KURIOS
CHRISTIAN COLLEGES FOUNDATION, INC.
Magallanes, Cavite
kccf_97@ymail.com
a.1. a.1.
a.2. a.2.
a.3. a.3.
a.4.
c.1.
c.2.
c.3.
c.4.
d.1.
d.2.
d.3.
e. Accessory penalties
e.1.
e.2.
e.3.
e.4.
e.5.
5. The general rule is to give criminal laws prospective effect. When shall penal
laws have retroactive effect?
Penalties Duration
Reclusion Perpetua
Reclusion temporal
Prison Mayor/temporary
Disqualification
Prison correctional, Suspension and
Destierro
Arresto Mayor
Arresto Menor
Bond to keep the peace
10. Briefly discuss the general rule on when and how aa penalty is to be
executed.
KURIOS
CHRISTIAN COLLEGES FOUNDATION, INC.
Magallanes, Cavite
kccf_97@ymail.com
MODULE 4
Learning Activities/Assessment:
1. Definition:
a. Amnesty
b. Pardon
c. Parole
d. Probation
e. Prescription of crime
f. Prescription of penalty
g. Good conduct allowance
h. Evasion of service of sentence
i. Civil liability/obligation
Penalty Prescription
Death, Reclusion Perpetua
Other Afflictive Penalties
Correctional Penalties (Except
Arresto Mayor)
Arresto Mayor
Light Penalties
MODULE 5
“Civil Liability”
(Revised Penal Code Article 100-113)
Learning Activities/Assessment:
a. Social injury
b. Personal injury
a. Innkeepers
b. Tavern keepers
c. Proprietors of establishments
a. Restitution
b. Reparation for damages
c. Indemnification for consequential damages
5. Differentiate:
a. Adjsfalksdf
b. Ahsdjkada
c. Asdjhasjkda
d. Kcvjxv
e. Sjdfhskjfdh
f. Jsfdjhsdfnjmsff