Samantha May S.

Francis

Data analysis one sample t test

A. Research Question
At a=0.05, does the average family size exceeds the national average?
B. SPSS Results

Notes
Output Created 03-APR-2021 14:05:25
Comments
Input Active Dataset DataSet1
Filter <none>
Weight <none>
Split File <none>
N of Rows in Working
24
Data File
Missing Value Definition of Missing User defined missing values
Handling are treated as missing.
Cases Used Statistics for each analysis
are based on the cases with
no missing or out-of-range
data for any variable in the
analysis.
Syntax T-TEST
/TESTVAL=3.18
/MISSING=ANALYSIS
/VARIABLES=averagefamily
/CRITERIA=CI(.95).
Resources Processor Time 00:00:00.00
Elapsed Time 00:00:00.00
Samantha May S. Francis

One-Sample Statistics
Std.
N Mean Deviation Std. Error Mean
averagefami
24 3.8333 1.43456 .29283
ly

One-Sample Test
Test Value = 3.18
95% Confidence Interval
Sig. (2- Mean of the Difference
t df tailed) Difference Lower Upper
averagefami
2.231 23 .036 .65333 .0476 1.2591
ly

C. APA Format Table

Table 1

One sample t test for the average family size in a particular school district
GROU p-
P n M SD df t value

AF 24 3.83 1.43 23 2.231 0.018

Samantha May S. Francis

D. Interpretation of Results
The national family sizes mean (M=3.18) is significantly lower that the school district average family sizes which is M=3.83, t=2.231, p=0.018, the p-value is
less than 0.5 and significantly lower.
Therefore the random samples of family sizes in a particular school district yield sufficient evidence to infer that average family sizes exceed in the national
average.

Data analysis in Independent sample t-test

a. Research Question
At a=0.05, can it be concluded that there is a significant difference in the
enrollment based from the following data?
b. SPSS Results
T-Test
Notes
Output Created 03-APR-2021 17:04:28
Comments
Input Active Dataset DataSet3
Filter <none>
Weight <none>
Split File <none>
N of Rows in Working
33
Data File
Missing Value Definition of Missing User defined missing values are
Handling treated as missing.
Samantha May S. Francis

Cases Used Statistics for each analysis are

based on the cases with no
missing or out-of-range data for
any variable in the analysis.
Syntax T-TEST GROUPS=Gradscho(1
2)
/MISSING=ANALYSIS
/VARIABLES=Enrollment
/CRITERIA=CI(.95).
Resources Processor Time 00:00:00.02
Elapsed Time 00:00:00.02

Group Statistics
Std. Std. Error
Graduate School N Mean Deviation Mean
Enrollment Research 17 596.2353 163.23623 39.59060
Extension
16 481.5000 179.39565 44.84891
Service

Independent Samples Test

Levene's Test for Equality of
Variances t-test for Equality of Means
95% Confidence Interval of
Mean Std. Error the Difference
F Sig. t df Sig. (2-tailed) Difference Difference Lower Upper
Samantha May S. Francis

Enrollment Equal variances

.077 .783 1.924 31 .064 114.73529 59.64753 -6.91665 236.38724
assumed
Equal variances not
1.918 30.260 .065 114.73529 59.82341 -7.39645 236.86703
assumed

c. APA format table

Table 1

Independent sample T test for graduate school enrollment

p-
GROUPS n M SD df t
value
596.235 163.236
Research 17 31 1.924 0.064
3 2
Extension 179.395
16 481.5 30.26    
Services 7

d. Interpretation of Results
P-value is 0.064, is more significant than the significant level of 0.05. Therefore, there is significant difference on the Graduate School despite of the
program.
Samantha May S. Francis

Data analysis in Paired sample t-test

a. Research Question
At a=0.05, did attending the seminar significantly increase the number of hours the students studied per week?
b. SPSS Results

T-Test

Notes
Output Created 03-APR-2021 18:07:59
Comments
Input Active Dataset DataSet4
Filter <none>
Weight <none>
Split File <none>
N of Rows in Working
9
Data File
Missing Value Definition of Missing User defined missing values are
Handling treated as missing.
Samantha May S. Francis

Cases Used Statistics for each analysis are

based on the cases with no
missing or out-of-range data for
any variable in the analysis.
Syntax T-TEST PAIRS=before WITH
after (PAIRED)
/CRITERIA=CI(.9500)
/MISSING=ANALYSIS.
Resources Processor Time 00:00:00.02
Elapsed Time 00:00:00.01

Paired Samples Statistics

Std. Std. Error
Mean N Deviation Mean
Pair 1 before 10.3333 9 4.69042 1.56347
after 13.4444 9 7.19568 2.39856

Paired Samples Correlations

N Correlation Sig.
Pair 1 before &
9 .928 .000
after
Samantha May S. Francis

Paired Samples Test

Paired Differences
95% Confidence Interval of
Std. Std. Error the Difference Sig. (2-
Mean Deviation Mean Lower Upper t df tailed)
Pair 1 before -
-3.11111 3.33333 1.11111 -5.67334 -.54888 -2.800 8 .023
after
C . APA format table
p-
GROUPS n M SD df t
value
10.333 4.6904
before 9
3 2 8 -2.8 0.023
13.444 7.1956
after 9      
4 8
D. Interpretation of Results
P-value of 0.023, is less than the significant level of 0.05. Therefore, there is a significant development of the number of hours each student studied per
week before and after the seminar.
Samantha May S. Francis

Data analysis in Paired sample t-test

a. Research Question
At a=0.05, is there a difference in the means? If so, perform the appropriate post hoc test to identify the differences.
b. SPSS Results

Oneway
Notes
Output Created 03-APR-2021 19:17:03
Comments
Input Active Dataset DataSet5
Filter <none>
Weight <none>
Split File <none>
N of Rows in Working
18
Data File
Missing Value Definition of Missing User-defined missing values are
Handling treated as missing.
Cases Used Statistics for each analysis are
based on cases with no missing
data for any variable in the
analysis.
Syntax ONEWAY Tuition BY Areas
/MISSING ANALYSIS
/POSTHOC=TUKEY
ALPHA(0.05).
Samantha May S. Francis

Resources Processor Time 00:00:00.05

Elapsed Time 00:00:00.06

ANOVA
Fees
Sum of
Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
Between
25.321 2 12.661 8.064 .004
Groups
Within Groups 23.550 15 1.570
Total 48.871 17

Post Hoc Tests

Multiple Comparisons
Dependent Variable: Fees
Tukey HSD
Mean 95% Confidence Interval
Difference (I-
(I) cities (J) cities J) Std. Error Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound
Area 1 Area 2 -1.133 .723 .290 -3.01 .75
Area 3 1.750 .723 .070 -.13 3.63
Area 2 Area 1 1.133 .723 .290 -.75 3.01
Area 3 2.883* .723 .003 1.00 4.76
Area 3 Area 1 -1.750 .723 .070 -3.63 .13
Samantha May S. Francis

Area 2 -2.883* .723 .003 -4.76 -1.00

*. The mean difference is significant at the 0.05 level.

Homogeneous Subsets

Fees
a
Tukey HSD
Subset for alpha =
0.05
cities N 1 2
Area 3 6 5.23
Area 1 6 6.98 6.98
Area 2 6 8.12
Sig. .070 .290
Means for groups in homogeneous
subsets are displayed.
a. Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size =
6.000.

d.Interpretation of Results

In the final analysis, the Areas 3 and 1 are statistically different, statistically higher tuition fees mean is in Area2 compared to Area 3, but Area 1and 2 do not
significally differ along with Area 3and 1.
Samantha May S. Francis