Process Mineralogy of Low Grade Chrome Ore Beneficiation Plant Tailings

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 8

Process Mineralogy of Low Grade Chrome Ore Beneficiation Plant Tailings

S.K. Das, Ms. R. Mohapatra and R.B. Rao


Institute of Minerals and Materials Technology, Bhubaneswar- 751013
Email: subir@immt.rers.in

Abstract: Mineralogical characterisation and liberation of valuable minerals are primary


concerns in mineral processing industries. A low grade chrome ore beneficiation plant
tailing was characterized by optical microscope and chemical analysis to ascertain the
mineral contents, mineral locking characteristics and grade. The sample was beneficiated
by a combination of routes comprising of hydrocylones to remove slimes, followed by
two stage tabling experiments to obtain marketable grade chromite ore concentrates
(Cr2O3 > 45%). The bulk sample is fine grained ranging from 1.0 mm to less than 0.038
mm size. The sample contains 21.16% Cr2O3, and is constituted of chromite, goethite
(mostly ochreous/limonite), gibbsite, hematite and minor amounts of quartz. The
chromite grains are euhedral to anhedral and the fractures and cavities in the chromite
grains are filled up by goethite and hematite. Quantitative mineralogical studies indicated
that bulk sample contained 29.86% free chromite grains with total chromite values being
37.34%. The degree of chromite liberation is estimated as 89% at less than 0.125 mm
size. The studies suggested recovery of chrome ore particles by concentration processes.
The tabling experiment of hydrocyclone underflow yielded a concentrate with 50.97%
Cr2O3, 84.95% total chromite, and the tailing had 16.89% Cr2O3, 29.61% total chromite.
The concentrate is coarse grained (98.79% is >0.038 mm size) while the tailings is fine
grained (44.69% is <0.038 mm size). The tailing was cleaned in ball mill and treated in
tabling to obtain a concentrate with 51.8% Cr2O3. The bulk rejects in the experiments was
fine grained (50.51% is <0.038 mm size), contained 10.56% Cr2O3 and 16.47% chromite
values out of which 11.10% is distributed in minus 0.038 mm size fractions.

Key words: Mineralogy, Beneficiation, Chromite, Sukinda

INTRODUCTION friable ores and during mining


considerable quantities of low grade ores
The estimated reserve of chromite (Cr2O3 < 40%) are also handled. The low
in India is of the order 187 million tones. grade ores are beneficiated in chrome ore
The bulk of reserves (about 98%) are beneficiation plants to obtain high grade
located in the Sukinda valley (21o00’- ores (>45% Cr2O3). Efficient design and
21o04’N:85o40’-86o00’E) of Orissa. The control of mineral treatment plants to
main criteria for classifying the chromite minimize the target mineral loss require
ores into different industrial grades, viz., information on size distribution, mineral
metallurgical (low and high carbon quantities, mineral chemistry, bulk
ferrochrome, silico-ferrochrome and chemical analysis and degree of liberation
charge chrome), refractory and chemical of target mineral. This paper reports the
are the Cr2O3 content, Cr:Fe ratio and findings on mineralogical and chemical
friable/compact nature of the ore. More characteristics of the tailings (Cr2O3=
than eighty percent of the production from 21.16%) of a chrome ore beneficiation
Sukinda valley constitutes powdery and plant of Sukinda and the different
beneficiated products obtained by 97.88% of sample between 350 and 38 µm
laboratory experiments. sizes. (c) Both tailing (R-2 and R-4)
samples are fine grained; R-2 and R-4
MATERIALS AND METHODS samples contain 50.51% and 44.69%
particles of less than 38 µm size.
In the laboratory, the flow sheet
adopted for beneficiation of chromite Microscopic studies
tailings (R-1) is: (a) two stage
hydrocyclone to remove the slimes as The mineralogical, textural and
overflows, (b) tabling of hydrocyclone chemical characteristics of hard lumpy and
underflow to obtain concentrate (R-3) and friable chromite ores of Sukinda have been
coarse tailings (R-4) and (c) coarse tailings published by a number of authors (Sahoo,
was cleaned in ball mill and treated in 1974; Chakraborty and Chakraborty,
table to obtain concentrate and tailings. 1984). In the bulk ores and concentrate
The final tailing (R-2) is a mixtures of samples, chromite is the major constituent
hydrocyclone overflows and tailings of with accessory minerals of goethite,
tabling experiments. The different samples hematite, gibbsite and quartz. Chromite
were wet sieved into size fractions occurs as euhedral and subhedral grains
(micrometre), viz., -1000+700, -700+500, (Figs. 1 and 2). The chromite grains are
-500+350, -350+250, 250+125, -125+63, occasionally fractured exhibiting
63+38 and -38 µm. Each size fraction was cataclastic texture. Angular and elongated
cold mounted in epoxy resin and polished grains of chromite are formed due to
by standard polish section preparation granulation of the large chromite grains.
methods. The polished sections were Rarely chromite exhibits zonal alteration
studied under reflected light microscope. to ferrit chromit. Chromite grains also
Minerals were quantified by counting the exhibit irregular and corroded grain
particles which were grouped into boundaries developed during
following categories: free chromite, free serpentinisation and /or by partial
hematite+goethite, free quartz and locked dissolution during weathering processes
chromite particles. Liberation percent (see Fig. 2). Frequently chromite grains
(wt.) of chromite was calculated by the occur as inclusions within goethite
formula: free chromiteX100/total forming locked grains (Fig. 3).
chromite. Chemical analyses of the Goethite is the major constituent of
samples were obtained by making pressed tailing samples. Goethite is of two types
pellets and using Philips XRF unit pre- viz., vitreous and ochreous (limonite) and
calibrated with appropriate standards. the later is more abundant (Fig. 4).
Vitreous goethite is grey to dark grey in
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION colour, occurs as massive mass, colloform
bands, botroids and fibrous aggregates.
Granulometric studies: Size analysis Earthy goethite (limonite) is friable,
data (Tables 1 to 4) indicated the clayey and constituted of ultrafine
following results: (a) Feed (Sample- R-1): crystallites. Often vitreous and ochreous
59.87% of the particles are between 350 goethites are intimately admixed. Hematite
and 38 µm sizes and 27.66% particles are occurs as irregular masses, colloform
less than 38 µm size. (b) Concentrate: The bands, streaks, needles and laths intimately
concentrate sample is coarse grained with associated with goethite. Goethite and
hematite occur as narrow fracture filling 10.56% and 16.89% Cr2O3 respectively.
veins and partly replace chromite. Fig. 5 shows the plots of size fractions vs.
Occasionally small needles and rounded wt.% retained and total chromite
silicates grains (serpentine) occur as distribution patterns in the tailing
inclusions in chromite grains. Gibbsite samples.. The final tailings sample (R2) is
grains are also noticed and often fine grained (50.51% is <38 µm size and
intimately associated with ochreous the bulk of chromite particles (11.10%) are
goethite. Quartz is fine as well coarse present in <38 µm size (Table 4).
grained. Compared to final tailings, the tabling
tailing sample is relatively coarse grained
Quantitative mineralogical studies (44.69% is <38 µm size) with 14.65% of
chromite in <38 µm size (Table 3). The
(a) Bulk/feed sample (sample- R-1): The high amounts of chromite particles in
feed sample has 37.34% (wt.) total Tabling tailing sample (R-3) necessitated
chromite; 29.86% free chromite particles, further beneficiation. The sample was
Cr2O3 and Fe2O3 contents of 21.16% and cleaned in ball mill followed by second
39.25% respectively (Table 1). Fig. 5 stage tabling experiment to obtain
shows the plots of size fractions vs. wt.% chromite ore concentrate with high Cr2O3
retained and total chromite distribution content (51.8%). The final tailings (R-2)
patterns. The bulk/feed ore contains (Table 4) is rejected as it contains ultrafine
considerable amounts of fine particles chromite grains and the grade is low.
(27.66 wt.% is < 38 µm size). Chromite
particles (both free and locked) are mostly CONCLUSIONS
concentrated within the size range between
350 and 38 µm and small amount (6.82%) 1. The chrome ore beneficiation plant
is distributed in <38 µm size. Degree of tailings is a low grade ferrugeneous
liberation of chromite is about 89% below chromite ore having 37.34% chromite,
125 µm size. The data indicate that the 21.16% Cr2O3 and Cr:Fe ratio of 0.53. The
free chromite grains and finer locked mineralogical studies indicated high
particles with high chromite percents can amounts of free chromite particles at
be separated by suitable concentration coarse sizes.
processes. 2. Tabling of the hydrocyclone underflow
(b) Concentrates (Sample- R-3): The gave a products of high quality chromite
concentrate sample was obtained by ores with 50.97% Cr2O3 and Cr:Fe ratio
tabling experiment of hydrocyclone of 2.18.
underflow. The chromite concentrate is 3. The final tailing is fine grained (50.51%
coarse grained with negligible amounts of <38 micron size), low grade (Cr2O3 =
fines (1.21% is <38 µm), contains 84.95% 10.65) and chromite particles are
chromite, 50.97% Cr2O3, 22.96% Fe2O3 distributed in fine size suggesting rejection
(Table 2; Fig. 5). The mineralogical and of the sample.
chemical data indicate that chromite 4. The entire flow sheet gave following
concentrate is high grade and is suitable results for concentrates: Yield- 26%,
for use in metallurgical industries. Grade – 49% and Recovery - 63%).
(c) Tailings: The Tailings R2 and R4
contain 16.47 and 29.61% chromite and
Acknowledgements: The authors thank Prof. B.K. Mishra, Director, Institute of Minerals
and Materials Technology, Bhubaneswar for kind permission to publish this paper.

References

CHAKRABORTY, K.L. and of Fines and Its Technology,


CHAKRABORTY, T.L. (1984) Organised by TATA STEEL and
Geological features and origin of IIME, Jamshedpur Chapter, Dec.,
the chromite deposits of Sukinda 2007. pp.49-55
Valley, Orissa, India. Min. Dep., REDDY, P.S.R., RAO, R.B. and MISRA,
v.219, pp.256-265. V.N. (2004). Utilisation of low
DAS, B., RAO, R.B. and grade chromite ores of Orissa.
NARASIMHAN, K.S. (1989) Sem. Mineral Processing
Beneficiation of low grade chrome Technology (MPT), Feb., pp 497-
ores for use in charge chrome 507.
industry. Proc. Nat. Sem. SAHOO, R.K. (1974) Mineralogical and
Ferroalloys Making, Organized by ore deposit studies of the Sukinda
IIM and RRL, Feb., pp 73-78. ultramafic belt, Orissa, India with
KUMAR, R.C., SINGH, V. and RAO, special reference to the assocated
S.M. (2007) Beneficiation of chromite and nickeliferous
ferrugeneous chromite fines at laterites. Unpublisjhed Ph.D.
TATA STEEL: Problems and Thesis. Univ. of Heidelberg. 167 p.
Prospects. Int. Conf. Beneficiation
Table 1. Quantitative mineralogy of the bulk sample. Sample: R-1. Loc. –Locked. Ditn.-
Distribution. F.-Free. Lib.- Liberation

Minerals 1000X700 700X500 500X350 350X250 250X125 125X63 63X38 -38 Total
Free chromite 0.95 2.85 3.48 10.78 32.43 48.89 52.08 24.67 29.86
Free goethite 38.6 40.32 37.54 49.71 46.77 42.66 43.92 75.33 52.80
Free quartz 0.00 0.00 0.27 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02
Loc. Chromite 60.45 56.83 58.71 39.52 20.80 8.44 4.00 0.00 17.33
Total 100 100 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00
Wt.% 2.59 3.46 6.41 10.37 18.11 20.39 11.00 27.66 100.00
Total chromite 13.04 19.9 21.09 30.54 42.83 54.80 54.88 24.67
Chromite ditn. 0.34 0.69 1.35 3.17 7.76 11.17 6.04 6.82 37.34
F. Chromite 0.02 0.10 0.22 1.12 5.87 9.97 5.73 6.82 29.86
ditn.
Lib. Chromite % 7.29 14.32 16.48 35.29 75.22 89.22 94.96 100
Chemical Analysis (Wt. %)
Cr2O3 8.16 12.32 11.14 14.66 22.99 32.16 32.55 14.31 21.16
Fe2O3 ND ND 35.09 35.31 31.65 29.15 30.46 55.22 39.25
Cr:Fe ----- ----- 0.31 0.41 0.71 1.08 1.04 0.25 0.53

Table 2. Quantitative mineralogy of the concentrate sample. Sample: R-3

Minerals 500X350 350X250 250X125 125x63 63x38 -38 Total


Free chromite 53.96 64.86 79.54 85.46 92.08 60.64 83.13
Free goethite 18.45 15.76 14.68 12.67 7.92 39.36 13.24
Free quartz 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Locked Chromite 27.59 19.38 5.78 1.87 0.00 0.00 3.63
Total 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00
Wt.% 0.91 3.39 29.39 54.54 10.57 1.21 100
Total chromite 67.76 74.55 82.43 86.40 92.08 60.64
Chromite distribution 0.61 2.53 24.22 47.12 9.73 0.73 84.95
Free Chromite 0.49 2.20 23.37 46.61 9.73 0.73 83.13
Liberation hromite% 79.63 87.00 96.49 98.91 100.00 100.00

Chemical analysis (wt.%)


Cr2O3 40.51 45.32 50.18 51.65 55.14 35.17 50.97
Fe2O3 ND ND 22.04 22.89 22.76 31.82 22.86
Cr:Fe ------ ------- 2.23 2.21 2.37 1.08 2.18
Table 3. Quantitative mineralogy of the sand tabling tail sample. Sample: R-4

700X500 500x350 350X250 250x125 125X63 63X38 -38 Total


Free chromite 0.58 1.52 2.06 4.79 15.22 43.30 32.79 28.37
Free goethite 78.86 72.8 77.10 84.62 79.45 52.70 67.21 67.25
Free quartz 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Locked Chromite 20.56 25.68 20.84 10.60 5.34 4.00 0.00 4.38
Total 100 100 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00
Wt.% 1.13 2.95 4.72 4.92 16.67 24.92 44.69 100.00
Total chromite 2.63 4.08 4.14 6.91 17.89 45.30 32.79
Chromite distribution 0.03 0.12 0.20 0.34 2.98 11.29 14.65 29.61
Free Chromite 0.01 0.04 0.10 0.24 2.54 10.79 14.65 28.37
Liberation Chromite 22.05 37.25 49.76 69.26 85.06 95.58 100.00

Chemical analysis, Wt.%


Cr2O3 2.54 2.84 1.88 2.24 9.56 25.76 19.02 16.89
Fe2O3 ND 32.41 34.01 34.34 34.42 32.75 47.56 41.67
Cr:Fe ‘--------- 0.09 0.05 0.06 0.27 0.77 0.39 0.40

Table 4. Quantitative mineralogy of the final (composite) tail sample. Sample: R-2

350X250 250X125 125X63 63X38 -38 Total


Free chromite 1.20 2.78 5.16 26.77 21.97 15.77
Free goethite 80.39 81.91 90.54 71.23 78.03 79.31
Free quartz 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Locked Chromite 18.41 15.31 4.30 2.00 0.00 4.92
Total 100 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00
Wt.% 15.17 8.73 12.05 13.54 50.51 100.00
Total chromite 3.04 4.31 6.45 27.77 21.97
Chromite distribution 0.46 0.38 0.78 3.76 11.10 16.47
Free Chromite 0.18 0.24 0.62 3.62 11.10 15.77
Liberation Chromite% 39.47 64.42 80.04 96.38 100.00

Chemical analysis (wt.%)


Cr2O3 2.21 3.74 5.45 14.72 12.74 10.56
Fe2O3 ND 34.78 37.07 36.65 52.05 47.17
Cr:Fe ‘------ 0.11 0.14 0.39 0.24 0.22
O-G

O-G

1 2

C
O-G

3 4

Fig. 1: Euhedral and anhedral chromite grains as inclusion within ochreous goethite (O-
G) mass forming locked grain. Feed ore. Fig. 2: Chromite grain is intensely
fractured showing cataclastic texture. The fractures are filled up by goethite.
Chromite is also partly replaced by goethite. Feed ore. Fig. 3: Euhedral free
chromite grains with smooth and irregular outlines. Concentrate. Fig. 4: The final
tailings are composed of mostly ochreous goethite (O-G) particles with hematite
strings and patches and minor amounts of free euhedral chromite grains (C).
60

50

40
Wt.%

30

20

10

0
-1000+700 -700+500 -500+350 -350+250 -250+125 -125+63 -63+38 -38
Size, micrometre

Fig. 5. Diagram showing the variations of size vs. wt.% retained (filled symbols) and
total chromite distribution (open symbols) in feed, concentrate and tailings.
Rhombus shaped symbol – Feed/bulk ore; Square – Chromite concentrate; Circle
– Tailings of tabling experiment; Triangle – Final tailings/rejects.

You might also like