Change Management Tool: Project Information

CHANGE MANAGEMENT TOOL
PROJECT INFORMATION
PROJECT TITLE TRANSFORMASI PLN PUSLITBANG 2019-2033
PROJECT ID PLN/CMO/2019-001
PROJECT OWNER GM
PROJECT PHASE I DATE 1 MAY 2018 - 20 OCTOBER 2018
PROJECT PHASE II DATE 30 OCT 2018 - 31 DECEMBER 2019
PROJECT PHASE III DATE NOT DEFINED
ORGANIZATION INFORMATION
NUMBER OF STAFF
VALUE OF ASSET
TURNOVER VALUE/ REVENUE
YEARLY OPERATIONAL BUDGET
YEARLY INVESTMENT BUDGET
VISION
5 YEARS TARGET
1 YEAR TARGET
MAIN CUSTOMER
CHANGE INFORMATION
CHANGE TYPE INCREMENTAL
NEED FOR CHANGE (CURRENT
PROBLEM)
CAUSES OF CURRENT PROBLEM
RISK OF NOT CHANGE
RISK OF CHANGE
BENEFIT OF CHANGE
GOAL OF CHANGE
WHAT TO BE CHANGED
WHEN CHANGE TO BE STARTED
CHANGE TRIGER PHRASE
PEOPPLE SUPPORT FOR CHANGE

PERSON INITIATED CHANGE CUSTOMER
DEFINE CHANGE TARGET, PROVIDE ACTIVITY

AND BUDGET FOR CHANGE, MOBILIZE STAFF
AND ASSET, EDUCATE STAFF FOR CHANGE,
ALLIGN ORGANIZATION, CREATE SOP AND
ORGANIZATION LEADER GUIDELINE FOR CHANGE, ADJUST SYSTEM FOR
COMMITMENT CHANGE
PERCENTAGE OF STAFF
SUPPORTING CHANGE MAJOR (>50%-90%)
ENSURE ALLIGNMENT,ONGOING
COMMUNICATION,GAIN COMMITMENT,
ARRANGE RESOURCES, FACILITATE PROBLEM
SOLVING,PROVIDE SUPPORT, BUILD
BOD COMMITMENT SUSTAINABILITY
STAKEHOLDER SUPPORT 80%
CHANGE TYPE INCREMENTAL

ROUTINE
TRANSFORMATIONAL
FUNDAMENTAL
PERSON INITIATED CHANGE ORG LEADER

STAFF
BOD
CMO
SHAREHOLDER
STAKEHOLDER
CUSTOMER
PEOPLE
PERCENTAGE OF STAFF
SUPPORTING CHANGE MOST (>90%)
MAJOR (>50%-90%)
MINOR (<50%-10%)
LESS (<10%)
CHANGE PREPARATION REPORT
PROJECT INFORMATION
PROJECT OWNER GM
PROJECT PHASE I DATE 1 MAY 2018 - 20 OCTOBER 2018
CHANGE PROPOSAL / BLUE PRINT / ROADMAP

CETAK BIRU TRANSFORMASI PLN PUSLITBANG
PROPOSAL TITLE 2019-2033
PROPOSAL OWNER GM
PROPOSAL SUBMITTED ON 19-Sep-18
PROPOSAL REVIEWED BY CMO-VP
PROPOSAL REVIEWED ON 29-Sep-18
PROPOSAL PRESENTED TO BOD
BY CMO-VP
PROPOSAL PRESENTED TO BOD
ON 4-Oct-18
PROPOSAL SUPPORTED BY
SHAREHOLDER ON (IF
REQUIRED) NOT REQUIRED
PROPOSAL APPROVED BY BOD
ON 18-Oct-18
PHASE I CLOSED ON 20-Oct-18
PROPOSAL REVIEW, SUPPORT, AND APPROVAL REPORT
PARAMETER COMPLETENESS QUALITY WEIGHTAGE

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 100% 100% 5%
PREFACE 100% 80% 5%
INTRODUCTION 100% 60% 5%
CURRENT SITUATION & SWOT 100% 100% 15%
ANALYSIS
TARGET, GAP ANALYSIS & 100% 100% 15%
ROADMAP
ORGANIZATION, HUMAN 80% 80% 15%
CAPITAL & 7S ANALYSIS
FINANCIAL PLAN & 100% 60% 15%
COSTBENEFIT ANALYSIS
OTHER PLAN: ASSET, IT
SYSTEM, REGULATION, & 100% 60% 10%
COLLABORATION
METHOD ANALYSIS 100% 80%
RISK ANALYSIS 100% 80% 15%
TOTAL SCORE 98% 100%
CHANGE READINESS REPORT

PROJECT OWNER
AVERAGE
PARAMETER NUMBER OF PARTICIPANT WEIGHTAGE
MARK
AWARENESS 1 90% 10%
DESIRE 1 80% 20%
KNOWLEDGE 1 70% 20%
ABILITY 1 60% 20%
REINFORCEMENT 1 60% 30%
TOTAL 100%
STAFF
AVERAGE
MARK
AWARENESS 40 90% 10%
DESIRE 40 80% 20%
KNOWLEDGE 40 70% 20%
ABILITY 40 60% 20%
TOTAL 40 100%
SHAREHOLDER
AVERAGE
MARK
AWARENESS 0 0% 10%
DESIRE 0 0% 20%
KNOWLEDGE 0 0% 20%
ABILITY 0 0% 20%
TOTAL 0 100%
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
AVERAGE WEIGHTAGE
PARAMETER NUMBER OF PARTICIPANT
MARK
AWARENESS 5 90% 10%
DESIRE 5 80% 20%
KNOWLEDGE 5 70% 20%
ABILITY 5 60% 20%
TOTAL 5 100%
SUMMARY
AVERAGE
MARK
AWARENESS 46 90% 10%
DESIRE 46 80% 20%
KNOWLEDGE 46 70% 20%
ABILITY 46 60% 20%
TOTAL 46 100%
STAGE I KOTTER ANALYSIS REPORT

PARAMETER COMPLETENESS QUALITY WEIGHTAGE
80% 60% 30%
NEED
VISION 100% 70% 40%
TEAM 100% 100% 30%
TOTAL 100% 100% 100%
HUMAN CAPITAL PROFILE REPORT (TEAM CAPABILITY)

TOTAL PARTICIPANT: 40 TOTAL NUMBER OF STAFF: 50
AVERAGE
MARK
EDUCATION 40 65% 10%
EXPERIENCE 40 67% 10%
POSITION 40 78% 10%
PRODUCTIVITY 40 65% 20%
HAPPINESS 40 70% 20%
READINESS 40 68% 30%
TOTAL 5 100%
STAKEHOLDER ANALYSIS REPORT

STAFF
TOTAL PARTICIPANT: 40 PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL PARTICIPANT WEIGHTAGE
ALLIES 50% 100%

OPPONENTS 10% 75%
FELLOW TRAVELERS 10% 75%
NEUTRALS 10% 50%
ADVERSARIES 20% 0%
TOTAL 100%
CUSTOMER
TOTAL PARTICIPANT : 100 PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL PARTICIPANT WEIGHTAGE
ALLIES 40% 100%

OPPONENTS 20% 75%
NEUTRALS 0% 50%
ADVERSARIES 30% 0%
TOTAL 100%
RELATED UNIT
TOTAL PARTICIPAMT : 50 PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL PARTICIPANT WEIGHTAGE
ALLIES 30% 100%
OPPONENTS 20% 75%
NEUTRALS 0% 50%
ADVERSARIES 30% 0%
TOTAL 100%
BOD
TOTAL PARTICIPANT : 12 PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL PARTICIPANT WEIGHTAGE
ALLIES 80% 100%

OPPONENTS 0% 75%
NEUTRALS 20% 50%
ADVERSARIES 0% 0%
TOTAL 100%
SHAREHOLDER
TOTAL PARTICIPANT: 5 PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL PARTICIPANT WEIGHTAGE
ALLIES 60% 100%

OPPONENTS 20% 75%
NEUTRALS 0% 50%
ADVERSARIES 0% 0%
TOTAL 100%
STAKEHOLDER SUPORT
SUMMARY
METHOD ANALYSIS
QUALITY
PARAMETER WEIGHTAGE
PLAN 100% 5%
REVIEW 100% 10%
SUPPORT 70% 5%
APPROVE 80% 5%
IMPLEMENT 90% 10%
REPORT 60% 20%
MEASURE 80% 15%
EVALUATE 50% 20%
IMPROVE 60% 10%
TOTAL 100%
TOTAL CHANGE PREPARATION SCORE

MODULES MARK WEIGHTAGE
TEAM CAPABILITY (LEADER & 68% 15%
MEMBER)
HIGHER AUTHORITY SUPPORT
(BOD) 80% 15%
STAKEHOLDER SUPPORT 75% 15%
PROPOSAL QUALITY 79% 25%
METHOD ANALYSIS 72% 10%
CHANGE READINESS 69% 15%
STAGE-I-KOTTER ANALYSIS 72% 5%
CONCLUSION 100%
SCORE REVIEWED BY REVIEWED ON SUPPORTED BY SUPPORTED ON SUPPORT NOTE APROVED BY
5% CMO-EDI 10/4/2018 NA NA NA BOD
15%
CMO-EDI 10/4/2018 NA NA NA BOD
15%
10%
9%
6%

TOTAL
SCORE
9%
16%
14%
12%
18%
69%
TOTAL
SCORE
9%
16%
14%
12%
18%
69%
TOTAL
SCORE
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
TOTAL
SCORE
9%
16%
14%
12%
18%
69%
TOTAL
SCORE
9%
16%
14%
12%
18%
69%
14%
TOTAL
NOTE
SCORE
7% SD=10%, SMP=20%,SMA=30%,D3=50%,S1=60%,S2=80%,S3=100%
7% <5=30%,5-10=50%,11-15=60%,16-20=70%,20-25=90%,>25=100%
8% T=60%,E=70%,M=80%,SM=90%, GM=100%
13% DEPEND ON : AGE, EXPERIENCE IN PLN, POSITION, ACHIEVED KPI, CURRENT SALARY
14% DEPEND ON: PHYSICAL HEALTH, MENTAL HEALTH, EDUCATION, CAREER, SALARY, SOCIAL LIFE, CONTRIBUTION
20% ADKAR
68%
TOTAL
SCORE
50%
8%
8%
5%
0%
70%
TOTAL
SCORE
40%
15%
8%
0%
0%
63%
TOTAL
SCORE
30%
15%
15%
0%
0%
60%
TOTAL
SCORE
80%
0%
0%
10%
0%
90%
TOTAL
SCORE
60%
15%
15%
0%
0%
90%
75%
TOTAL
SCORE
5%
10%
4%
4%
9%
12%
12%
10%
6%
72%

10%
CMO-VP 10/4/2018 NA NA NA NA
12% CMO-VP 10/4/2018 NA NA NA NA
4% CMO-VP 10/4/2018 NA NA NA BOD
74%
APPROVED ON APPROVAL MARK APPROVAL NOTE
10/18/2018 80% GOOD app/not appro
10/18/2018 80% GOOD
10/18/2018 80% PROBLEM CLEAR
10/18/2018 70% ADD EXTERNAL FACTOR Based on Internal (BSC) and External Factors
10/18/2018 80% TARGET ACCEPTABLE Based on PLN Vision, Change Direction, and SOLI
10/18/2018 60% NEED TO OPTIMIZE Based on PLN new Structure and SOLID
10/18/2018 80% GOOD Based on Business Plan but also Ministry Regulati
10/18/2018 80% GOOD Based on Good Governance Principle
10/18/2018 70% TIME RISK QUESTIONABLE

10/18/2018 76% APPROVED
FINANCIAL NEED NOT
10/18/2018 60% STRONG
10/18/2018 80% GOOD
10/18/2018 70% TEAM TO BE ADDED
10/18/2018 70% APPROVED
L LIFE, CONTRIBUTION
NA NA NA
NA NA NA
NA NA NA
NA NA NA
NA NA NA
NA NA NA
CLEAR NEED, GOOD
10/18/2018 #DIV/0! VISION, EXCELLENT TEAM
APPROVED
SC) and External Factors
Change Direction, and SOLID
tructure and SOLID
an but also Ministry Regulation
ernance Principle
CHANGE TRANSITION REPORT
PROJECT INFORMATION
PROJECT OWNER GM
PROJECT PHASE II DATE 30 OCT 2018 - 31 DECEMBER 2019
YEARLY ACTIVITY AND BUDGET PROPOSAL (YABP)

RENCANA KEGIATAN DAN ANGGARAN
PROPOSAL TITLE PERUSAHAAN 2018
PROPOSAL OWNER GM
PROPOSAL SUBMITTED ON 30-Oct-18
PROPOSAL REVIEWED ON 5-Nov-18
PROPOSAL PRESENTED TO
BOD BY CMO-VP
BOD ON 11-Nov-18
SHAREHOLDER ON (IF
PROPOSAL APPROVED BY BOD
ON 18-Nov-18
PHASE I CLOSED ON NA
YABP REVIEW, SUPPORT, AND APPROVAL REPORT
PARAMETER COMPLETENESS QUALITY

TARGET ACCORDING TO 100% 100%
BLUEPRINT
TARGET VARIATION NOT 100% 80%
ACCORDING TO BLUEPRINT
100% 60%
JUSTIFICATION OF VARIATION
GANNCHART 100% 100%
MILESTONE 100% 100%
DELIVERABLE 80% 80%
TEAM 100% 60%
SOP 80% 80%
REGULATION REQUIRED 100% 60%
IT SYSTEM REQUIRED 100% 100%
ASSET REQUIRED 100% 100%
COLLABORATION REQUIRED 100% 80%
CONSULTANCY REQUIRED 100% 60%
INVESTMENT REQUIRED 100% 100%
OPERATIONAL COST 100% 100%
REQUIRED
INCOME PROJECTION 80% 80%
PROFIT PROJECTION 100% 60%
COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS 80% 80%
RISK ANALYSIS 100% 60%
TOTAL
NORMALIZED TOTAL
ACTIVITY AND ACHIEVEMENT PROGRESS REPORT

PARAMETER MONTH-N COMPLETENESS
GANNCHART 3 40%
MILESTONE 3 20%
DELIVERABLE 3 50%
TOTAL
FINANCE EXPENDITURE PROGRESS REPORT

INVESTMENT 3 100%
OPERATIONAL 3 30%
INCOME 3 30%
PROFIT 3 30%
TOTAL
RISK ANALYSIS AND REVIEW

ANALYSIS BY PROJECT OWNER
RISK DESCRIPTION RISK CATEGORY RISK APPROACH
COMPLIANCE ACCEPT
EFFICIENCY MITIGATE
FINANCIAL AVOID
HEALTH&SAFETY
INFORMATION
OPERATIONAL
BRANDING
HUMAN CAPITAL
ASSET
TOTAL

PROJECT OWNER
PARAMETER NUMBER OF PARTICIPANT AVERAGE MARK
AWARENESS 1 90%
DESIRE 1 80%
KNOWLEDGE 1 70%
ABILITY 1 60%
REINFORCEMENT 1 60%
TOTAL
STAFF
AWARENESS 40 90%
DESIRE 40 80%
KNOWLEDGE 40 70%
ABILITY 40 60%
REINFORCEMENT 40 60%
TOTAL 40
SHAREHOLDER
AWARENESS 0 0%
DESIRE 0 0%
KNOWLEDGE 0 0%
ABILITY 0 0%
REINFORCEMENT 0 0%
TOTAL 0
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
AWARENESS 5 90%
DESIRE 5 80%
KNOWLEDGE 5 70%
ABILITY 5 60%
REINFORCEMENT 5 60%
TOTAL 5
SUMMARY
AWARENESS 46 90%
DESIRE 46 80%
KNOWLEDGE 46 70%
ABILITY 46 60%
TOTAL 46

STAFF
TOTAL PARTICIPANT: 40 PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL PARTICIPANT
ALLIES 50%
OPPONENTS 10%
FELLOW TRAVELERS 10%
NEUTRALS 10%
ADVERSARIES 20%
TOTAL 100%
CUSTOMER
TOTAL PARTICIPANT : 100 PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL PARTICIPANT
ALLIES 40%
OPPONENTS 20%
NEUTRALS 0%
ADVERSARIES 30%
TOTAL 100%
RELATED UNIT
TOTAL PARTICIPAMT : 50 PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL PARTICIPANT
ALLIES 30%
OPPONENTS 30%
NEUTRALS 0%
ADVERSARIES 10%
TOTAL 100%
BOD
ALLIES 80%
OPPONENTS 20%
FELLOW TRAVELERS 0%
NEUTRALS 0%
ADVERSARIES 0%
TOTAL 100%
SHAREHOLDER
ALLIES 80%
OPPONENTS 20%
FELLOW TRAVELERS 0%
NEUTRALS 0%
ADVERSARIES 0%
TOTAL 100%
STAKEHOLDER SUPORT
SUMMARY
PSYCHOLOGICAL RESPONSE REPORT

STAFF
DENIAL 5
ANGER 2
BARGAINING 2
DEPRESSION 3
TESTING 8
ACCEPTANCE 20
TOTAL 40
ORGANIZATION CHANGE (6S) REVIEW REPORT

PARAMETER QUALITY
STRUCTURE 70%
SYSTEM 60%
STRATEGY 70%
SOP 80%
SHARED VALUE 60%
STYLE 60%
TOTAL
HUMAN CAPITAL PROFILE AND CHANGE BEHAVIOR REPORT

PROFILE
EDUCATION 40 65%
EXPERIENCE 40 67%
POSITION 40 78%
PRODUCTIVITY 40 65%
HAPPINESS 40 70%
SKILL 40 68%
CHANGE BEHAVIOR
PLANNING 40 65%
TRAINING 40 56%
SUPERVISION 40 78%
COUNSELING 40 99%
PUNISHMENT& REWARD 40 12%
TOTAL 5
NORMALIZED
ASSET PROFILE REPORT

TOTAL ASSET: 100
PARAMETER NUMBER OF ASSET AVERAGE MARK
SAFETY 100 80%
SECURITY 100 70%
PRODUCTIVITY 100 65%
VALUE 100 75%
TOTAL 5
BALANCE SCORE CARD ASSESMENT REPORT

PARAMETER TARGET & STRATEGIC INISIATIF VALUE
CUSTOMER PERSPECTIVE 80%
FINANCIAL PERSPECTIVE 90%
INTERNAL PROCESS 78%
LEARNING AND GROWTH 76%
TOTAL
DICE ASSESMENT REPORT

PARAMETER VALUE SCORE
DURATION <1 YEAR 1
INTEGRITY GOOD 2
COMMITMENT (BOD/TM) NEUTRAL 3
COMMITMENT (STAFF) RELUCTANT 3
EFFORT 10% ADDITIONAL 2
TOTAL
DATA C4 ASSESMENT REPORT

PROCESS SYSTEM MARK METHOD MARK
DATA COLLECTION 80% 70%
DATA COMPUTING 90% 80%
DATA CONCLUSION 80% 90%
DATA COMMUNICATION 90% 60%
TOTAL
STAGE II-KOTTER ASSESMENT REPORT

BUY IN 80%
EMPOWER ACTION 90%
QUICK WIN 70%
COMMUNICATION 70%
TOTAL
SUCCESS CELEBRATION REPORT

PERCENTAGE OF AWARD
RECEIVER TO AVAILABLE
CATEGORY NUMBER OF STAFF AWARDS
CUSTOMER SATISFATION 3 60%
FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE 4 80%
OPERATIONAL PERFORMANCE 5 100%
PRODUCT/SERVICE QUALITY 6 60%

PUBLIC OUTREACH 2 50%
SUPPLIER PERFORMANCE 1 50%
HUMAN CAPITAL PRODUCTIVY 1 50%

TOTAL 22 64%
TOTAL CHANGE TRANSITION SCORE

MODULES MARK WEIGHTAGE (START)
ACTIVITY AND BUDGET PLAN 79% 40%
ASSESMENT REPORT
ACTVITY AND ACHIEVEMENT 31% 0%
PROGRESS REPORT
FINANCE PROGRESS REPORT 30% 0%
CHANGE READINESS REPORT 69% 10%
STAKEHOLDER ANALYSIS 80% 10%
REPORT
PSYCHOLOGICAL RESPONSE 70% 0%
REPORT
ORGANIZATION CHANGE (6S) 69% 0%
PROGRESS REPORT
HUMAN CAPITAL PROFILE 136% 5%
REPORT
ASSET PROFILE REPORT 72% 5%
81% 10%
BALANCE SCORECARD REPORT
DICE REPORT 44% 0%
DATA C4 REPORT 60% 0%
STAGE-II KOTTER REPORT 78% 0%
RISK ANALYSIS REPORT 66% 20%
SUCCESS CELEBRATION 64% 0%
REPORT
CONCLUSION 100%
WEIGHTAGE SCORE REVIEWED BY REVIEWED ON SUPPORTED BY
10% 10%
CMO-VP 10/4/2018 NA
5% 4%
CMO-VP 10/4/2018 NA
10% 6%
CMO-VP 10/4/2018 NA
15% 15% CMO-VP 10/4/2018 NA
15% 15% CMO-VP 10/4/2018 NA
10% 6% CMO-VP 10/4/2018 NA
10% 6% CMO-VP 10/4/2018 NA
10% 6% CMO-VP 10/4/2018 NA
10% 6% CMO-VP 10/4/2018 NA
5% 5% CMO-VP 10/4/2018 NA
5% 5% CMO-VP 10/4/2018 NA
5% 4% CMO-VP
10% 6% CMO-VP
15% 15% CMO-VP
15% 15%
CMO-VP
10% 6% CMO-VP
10% 6% CMO-VP
10% 6% CMO-VP
10% 6% CMO-VP
190% 150%
100% 79%
QUALITY WEIGHTAGE TOTAL SCORE

80% 30% 10%
90% 20% 4%
70% 50% 18%
240% 100% 31%

70% 20% 14%
90% 10% 3%
70% 30% 6%
60% 40% 7%
100% 30%
REVIEW BY CMO
RISK PLAN COMPLETENESS QUALITY WEIGHTAGE SCORE
80 76 10% 6%
90 88 10% 8%
80 77 10% 6%
90 90 10% 8%
80 67 10% 5%
70 87 10% 6%
80 90 10% 7%
90 78 10% 7%
89 67 10% 6%
89 67 10% 6%
100% 66%
WEIGHTAGE TOTAL SCORE

10% 9%
20% 16%
20% 14%
20% 12%
30% 18%
100% 69%

10% 9%
20% 16%
20% 14%
20% 12%
30% 18%
100% 69%

10% 0%
20% 0%
20% 0%
20% 0%
30% 0%
100% 0%

10% 9%
20% 16%
20% 14%
20% 12%
30% 18%
100% 69%

10% 9%
20% 16%
20% 14%
20% 12%
30% 18%
100% 69%
100% 50%
75% 8%
75% 8%
50% 5%
0% 0%
70%
100% 40%
75% 15%
75% 8%
50% 0%
0% 0%
63%
100% 30%
75% 23%
75% 23%
50% 0%
0% 0%
75%
100% 80%
75% 15%
75% 0%
50% 0%
0% 0%
95%
100% 80%
75% 15%
75% 0%
50% 0%
0% 0%
95%
80%

0% 0%
15% 30%
30% 60%
50% 150%
70% 560%
100% 2000%
70%

15% 11%
25% 15%
15% 11%
30% 24%
10% 6%
5% 3%
100% 69%
WEIGHTAGE TOTAL SCORE NOTE
10% 7% SD=10%, SMP=20%,SMA=30%,D3=50%,S1=60%,S2=80%,S3=100%

10% 7% <5=30%,5-10=50%,11-15=60%,16-20=70%,20-25=90%,>25=100%
10% 8% T=60%,E=70%,M=80%,SM=90%, GM=100%
30% 20% DEPEND ON : AGE, EXPERIENCE IN PLN, POSITION, ACHIEVED KPI, CURRENT S
20% 14% DEPEND ON: PHYSICAL HEALTH, MENTAL HEALTH, EDUCATION, CAREER, SAL
20% 14% TECHNICAL SKILL (ASSESMENT)
10% 7%
30% 17%
30% 23%
20% 20%
10% 1%
200% 136%
100% 68%

20% 16% AGE, MAINTENANCE
20% 14% ASET MOBILITI AND VISIBILITI
30% 20% USAGE AND INCOME GENERATED
30% 23% RATIO TO NEW VALUE
0%
0%
100% 72%
25% 20%
25% 23%
25% 20%
25% 19%
0%
0%
100% 81%
TOTAL SCORE PERCENTAGE NOTE

1 1
2 4
3 6
3 3
2 2
0
16 44% WORRY
7 100
28 0

30% 17%
20% 14%
10% 7%
40% 22%
0%
0%
100% 60%

25% 20%
25% 23%
25% 18%
25% 18%
0%
0%
100% 78%
WEIGHTAGE (MIDDLE) SCORE (START) REVIEWED BY REVIEWED ON SUPPORTED BY
0% 31%
CMO-VP 10/4/2018 NA
15% 0%
CMO-VP 10/4/2018 NA
15% 0% CMO-VP 10/4/2018 NA
5% 7%
5% 8%
5% 0%
5% 0%
5% 7%
5% 4%
5% 8%
CMO-VP 10/4/2018 NA
15% 0% CMO-VP 10/4/2018 NA
5% 0%
5% 0%
5% 13%
5%
100% 78%
SUPPORTED ON SUPPORT NOTE APROVED BY APPROVED ON APPROVAL MARK
NA NA BOD 10/18/2018 80%
NA NA BOD 10/18/2018 80%
NA NA BOD 10/18/2018 80%

NA NA BOD 10/18/2018 70%
NA NA BOD 10/18/2018 80%
NA NA BOD 10/18/2018 60%
NA NA BOD 10/18/2018 80%
NA NA BOD 10/18/2018 80%
NA NA BOD 10/18/2018 80%
NA NA BOD 10/18/2018 70%
NA NA BOD 10/18/2018 76%
0%,S1=60%,S2=80%,S3=100%
0=70%,20-25=90%,>25=100%
LN, POSITION, ACHIEVED KPI, CURRENT SALARY

NTAL HEALTH, EDUCATION, CAREER, SALARY, SOCIAL LIFE, CONTRIBUTION
NA NA NA NA NA
NA NA NA NA NA
NA NA NA NA NA
NA NA NA NA NA
NA NA NA NA NA
APPROVAL NOTE
GOOD
GOOD
PROBLEM CLEAR
ADD EXTERNAL FACTOR
TARGET ACCEPTABLE
NEED TO OPTIMIZE
GOOD
GOOD
GOOD
TIME RISK QUESTIONABLE
APPROVED
APPROVAL NOTE
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
APPROVED
CHANGE SUSTAINABILITY REPORT
PROJECT INFORMATION
PROJECT OWNER GM
PROJECT PHASE II DATE NOT DEFINED
YEARLY ACTIVITY AND BUDGET PROPOSAL (YABP)

RENCANA KEGIATAN DAN ANGGARAN
PROPOSAL TITLE PERUSAHAAN 2018
PROPOSAL OWNER GM
PROPOSAL SUBMITTED ON 30-Oct-18
PROPOSAL REVIEWED ON 5-Nov-18
BOD BY CMO-VP
BOD ON 11-Nov-18
SHAREHOLDER ON (IF
PROPOSAL APPROVED BY
BOD ON 18-Nov-18
PHASE I CLOSED ON NA
YABP REVIEW, SUPPORT, AND APPROVAL REPORT

TARGET ACCORDING TO 100% 100%
BLUEPRINT
TARGET VARIATION NOT
ACCORDING TO 100% 80%
BLUEPRINT
JUSTIFICATION OF 100% 60%
VARIATION
GANNCHART 100% 100%
MILESTONE 100% 100%
DELIVERABLE 80% 80%
TEAM 100% 60%
SOP 80% 80%
REGULATION REQUIRED 100% 60%
IT SYSTEM REQUIRED 100% 100%
ASSET REQUIRED 100% 100%
COLLABORATION 100% 80%
REQUIRED
100% 60%
CONSULTANCY REQUIRED
INVESTMENT REQUIRED 100% 100%
OPERATIONAL COST 100% 100%
REQUIRED
INCOME PROJECTION 80% 80%
PROFIT PROJECTION 100% 60%
COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS 80% 80%
RISK ANALYSIS 100% 60%
TOTAL
NORMALIZED TOTAL
ACTIVITY AND ACHIEVEMENT PROGRESS REPORT

GANNCHART 3 40%
MILESTONE 3 20%
DELIVERABLE 3 50%
TOTAL
FINANCE EXPENDITURE PROGRESS REPORT

INVESTMENT 3 100%
OPERATIONAL 3 30%
INCOME 3 30%
PROFIT 3 30%
TOTAL
RISK ANALYSIS AND REVIEW

ANALYSIS BY PROJECT OWNER
RISK DESCRIPTION RISK CATEGORY RISK APPROACH
COMPLIANCE ACCEPT
EFFICIENCY MITIGATE
FINANCIAL AVOID
HEALTH&SAFETY
INFORMATION
OPERATIONAL
BRANDING
HUMAN CAPITAL
ASSET
TOTAL

PROJECT OWNER
AWARENESS 1 90%
DESIRE 1 80%
KNOWLEDGE 1 70%
ABILITY 1 60%
REINFORCEMENT 1 60%
TOTAL
STAFF
AWARENESS 40 90%
DESIRE 40 80%
KNOWLEDGE 40 70%
ABILITY 40 60%
TOTAL 40
SHAREHOLDER
AWARENESS 0 0%
DESIRE 0 0%
KNOWLEDGE 0 0%
ABILITY 0 0%
REINFORCEMENT 0 0%
TOTAL 0
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
AWARENESS 5 90%
DESIRE 5 80%
KNOWLEDGE 5 70%
ABILITY 5 60%
REINFORCEMENT 5 60%
TOTAL 5
SUMMARY
AWARENESS 46 90%
DESIRE 46 80%
KNOWLEDGE 46 70%
ABILITY 46 60%
TOTAL 46

STAFF
ALLIES 50%
OPPONENTS 10%
NEUTRALS 10%
ADVERSARIES 20%
TOTAL 100%
CUSTOMER
ALLIES 40%
OPPONENTS 20%
NEUTRALS 0%
ADVERSARIES 30%
TOTAL 100%
RELATED UNIT
TOTAL PARTICIPAMT : 50 PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL PARTICIPANT
ALLIES 30%
OPPONENTS 30%
NEUTRALS 0%
ADVERSARIES 10%
TOTAL 100%
BOD
ALLIES 80%
OPPONENTS 20%
FELLOW TRAVELERS 0%
NEUTRALS 0%
ADVERSARIES 0%
TOTAL 100%
SHAREHOLDER
ALLIES 80%
OPPONENTS 20%
FELLOW TRAVELERS 0%
NEUTRALS 0%
ADVERSARIES 0%
TOTAL 100%
STAKEHOLDER SUPORT
SUMMARY
PSYCHOLOGICAL RESPONSE REPORT

STAFF
DENIAL 5
ANGER 2
BARGAINING 2
DEPRESSION 3
TESTING 8
ACCEPTANCE 20
TOTAL 40
ORGANIZATION CHANGE (6S) REVIEW REPORT

PARAMETER QUALITY
STRUCTURE 70%
SYSTEM 60%
STRATEGY 70%
SOP 80%
SHARED VALUE 60%
STYLE 60%
TOTAL
HUMAN CAPITAL PROFILE AND CHANGE BEHAVIOUR REPORT

EDUCATION 40 65%
EXPERIENCE 40 67%
POSITION 40 78%
PRODUCTIVITY 40 65%
HAPPINESS 40 70%
SKILL 40 68%
CHANGE BEHAVIOR
PLANNING 40 87%
TRAINING 40 56%
SUPERVISION 40 77%
COUNSELING 40 89%
PUNISHMENT& REWARD 40 80%
TOTAL
NORMALIZED
ASSET PROFILE REPORT

TOTAL ASSET: 100
PARAMETER NUMBER OF ASSET AVERAGE MARK
SAFETY 100 80%
SECURITY 100 70%
PRODUCTIVITY 100 65%
VALUE 100 75%
TOTAL 5
BALANCE SCORE CARD ASSESMENT REPORT
CUSTOMER PERSPECTIVE 80%
FINANCIAL PERSPECTIVE 90%
INTERNAL PROCESS 78%
LEARNING AND GROWTH 76%
TOTAL
DICE ASSESMENT REPORT

PARAMETER VALUE SCORE
DURATION <1 YEAR 1
INTEGRITY GOOD 2
NEUTRAL 3
COMMITMENT (BOD/TM)
COMMITMENT (STAFF) RELUCTANT 3

EFFORT 10% ADDITIONAL 2
TOTAL
DATA C4 ASSESMENT REPORT

PROCESS SYSTEM MARK METHOD MARK
DATA COLLECTION 80% 70%
DATA COMPUTING 90% 80%
DATA CONCLUSION 80% 90%
DATA COMMUNICATION 90% 60%
TOTAL
IMPACT ASSESMENT REPORT

ECONOMY 80% 60%
POLITICS 100% 70%
CULTURE 100% 100%
SOCIAL 100% 68%
ENVIRONMENT 80% 67%
GLOBAL 70% 88%
TOTAL 100% 100%
VISION (TARGET)-ACHIEVEMENT ASSESMENT REPORT

PARAMETER ACHIEVEMENT GAP
INDEPENDENT 90% 10%
FOR PEOPLE 95% 5%
WORLDCLASS 45% 55%
TOTAL 100%
SUSTAINABILITY ASSESMENT REPORT
PARAMETER VALUE
ECONOMY 90%
ENVIRONMENT 95%
SOCIAL 67%
AVERAGE 84%
STAGE III-KOTTER ASSESMENT REPORT

DON’T LET UP 80%
MAKE IT STICK 90%
TOTAL
SUCCESS CELEBRATION REPORT
PERCENTAGE OF
AWARD RECEIVER TO
CATEGORY NUMBER OF STAFF AVAILABLE AWARDS
CUSTOMER SATISFATION 8 80%
FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE 8 80%

OPERATIONAL
PERFORMANCE 6 60%
PRODUCT/SERVICE
QUALITY 8 80%
PUBLIC OUTREACH 12 100%
SUPPLIER PERFORMANCE 4 80%
HUMAN CAPITAL
PRODUCTIVY 4 75%
TOTAL 50 79%
TOTAL CHANGE SUSTAINABILITY SCORE

MODULES MARK WEIGHTAGE (START)
ACTIVITY AND BUDGET 79% 30%

PLAN ASSESMENT REPORT
ACTVITY AND
ACHIEVEMENT PROGRESS 31% 0%
REPORT
FINANCE PROGRESS 30% 0%
REPORT
CHANGE READINESS 69% 5%
REPORT
STAKEHOLDER ANALYSIS 80% 5%
REPORT
PSYCHOLOGICAL 70% 10%
RESPONSE REPORT
ORGANIZATION CHANGE 69% 5%
(6S) PROGRESS REPORT
HUMAN CAPITAL PROFILE
& CHANGE BEHAVIOR 71% 5%
REPORT
ASSET PROFILE REPORT 72% 5%
BALANCE SCORECARD 81% 10%
REPORT
DICE REPORT 44% 10%
DATA C4 REPORT 60% 5%
IMPACT ASSESMENT 30% 0%
REPORT
VISION-ACHIEVEMENT 40% 0%
ANALYSIS REPORT
SUSTAINABILITY 50% 0%
ASSESMENT REPORT
85% 0%
STAGE-III KOTTER REPORT
RISK ANALYSIS REPORT 66% 10%
SUCCESS CELEBRATION 0%
REPORT
CONCLUSION 79% 100%
10% 10%
5% 4%
10% 6%
15% 15%
15% 15%
10% 6%
10% 6%
10% 6%
10% 6%
5% 5%
5% 5%
5% 4%
10% 6%
15% 15%
15% 15%
10% 6%
10% 6%
10% 6%
10% 6%
190% 150%
100% 79%

80% 30% 10%
90% 20% 4%
70% 50% 18%
240% 100% 31%

70% 20% 14%
90% 10% 3%
70% 30% 6%
60% 40% 7%
100% 30%
REVIEW BY CMO
RISK PLAN COMPLETENESS QUALITY WEIGHTAGE SCORE
80 76 10% 6%
90 88 10% 8%
80 77 10% 6%
90 90 10% 8%
80 67 10% 5%
70 87 10% 6%
80 90 10% 7%
90 78 10% 7%
89 67 10% 6%
89 67 10% 6%
100% 66%

10% 9%
20% 16%
20% 14%
20% 12%
30% 18%
100% 69%

10% 9%
20% 16%
20% 14%
20% 12%
30% 18%
100% 69%

10% 0%
20% 0%
20% 0%
20% 0%
30% 0%
100% 0%

10% 9%
20% 16%
20% 14%
20% 12%
30% 18%
100% 69%

10% 9%
20% 16%
20% 14%
20% 12%
30% 18%
100% 69%
100% 50%
75% 8%
75% 8%
50% 5%
0% 0%
70%
100% 40%
75% 15%
75% 8%
50% 0%
0% 0%
63%
100% 30%
75% 23%
75% 23%
50% 0%
0% 0%
75%
100% 80%
75% 15%
75% 0%
50% 0%
0% 0%
95%
100% 80%
75% 15%
75% 0%
50% 0%
0% 0%
95%
80%

0% 0%
15% 30%
30% 60%
50% 150%
70% 560%
100% 2000%
70%

15% 11%
25% 15%
15% 11%
30% 24%
10% 6%
5% 3%
100% 69%

10% 7% SD=10%, SMP=20%,SMA=30%,D3=50%,S1=60%,S2=80%,S3=100%
10% 7% <5=30%,5-10=50%,11-15=60%,16-20=70%,20-25=90%,>25=100%
10% 8% T=60%,E=70%,M=80%,SM=90%, GM=100%
30% 20% DEPEND ON : AGE, EXPERIENCE IN PLN, POSITION, ACHIEVED KPI, CURRENT S
20% 14% DEPEND ON: PHYSICAL HEALTH, MENTAL HEALTH, EDUCATION, CAREER, SAL
20% 14% TECHNICAL SKILL (ASSESMENT)
10% 9%
30% 17%
30% 23%
20% 18%
10% 8%
200% 143%
100% 71%

20% 16% AGE, MAINTENANCE
20% 14% ASET MOBILITI AND VISIBILITI
30% 20% USAGE AND INCOME GENERATED
30% 23% RATIO TO NEW VALUE
0%
0%
100% 72%
25% 20%
25% 23%
25% 20%
25% 19%
0%
0%
100% 81%
TOTAL SCORE PERCENTAGE NOTE

1 1
2 4
3 6
3 3
2 2
0
16 44% WORRY
7 100
28 0

30% 17%
20% 14%
10% 7%
40% 22%
0%
0%
100% 60%

20% 10%
20% 14%
15% 15%
15% 10%
15% 8%
15% 9%
100% 66%
PREDICTED TIME TO ACHIESCORE REVIEWED BY REVIEWED ON SUPPORTED BY
3 YEARS
2 YEARS
6 YEARS
0%

50% 40%
50% 45%
0%
0%
100% 85%
WEIGHTAGE (MIDDLE) SCORE (MIDDLE) REVIEWED BY REVIEWED ON SUPPORTED BY
0% 0%
20% 6%
20% 6%
0% 0%
0% 0%
0% 0%
5% 3%
5% 4%
5% 4%
5% 4%
10% 4%
2% 1%
5% 2%
5% 2%
5% 3%
5% 4%
3% 2%
5%
100% 45%
0%,S1=60%,S2=80%,S3=100%
0=70%,20-25=90%,>25=100%
LN, POSITION, ACHIEVED KPI, CURRENT SALARY

NTAL HEALTH, EDUCATION, CAREER, SALARY, SOCIAL LIFE, CONTRIBUTION
APPROVAL NOTE
APPROVAL NOTE
APPROVAL NOTE
APPROVAL NOTE

Change Management Tool: Project Information

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Change Management Tool: Project Information

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

CHANGE MANAGEMENT TOOL

PEOPPLE SUPPORT FOR CHANGE

DEFINE CHANGE TARGET, PROVIDE ACTIVITY

CHANGE TYPE INCREMENTAL

PERSON INITIATED CHANGE ORG LEADER

CHANGE PROPOSAL / BLUE PRINT / ROADMAP

PROPOSAL REVIEW, SUPPORT, AND APPROVAL REPORT

PARAMETER COMPLETENESS QUALITY WEIGHTAGE

CHANGE READINESS REPORT

STAGE I KOTTER ANALYSIS REPORT

TOTAL 100% 100% 100%

HUMAN CAPITAL PROFILE REPORT (TEAM CAPABILITY)

STAKEHOLDER ANALYSIS REPORT

ALLIES 50% 100%

ALLIES 40% 100%

ALLIES 80% 100%

ALLIES 60% 100%

TOTAL CHANGE PREPARATION SCORE

12% CMO-EDI 10/4/2018 NA NA NA BOD

72% CMO-EDI 10/4/2018 NA NA NA BOD

SCORE REVIEWED BY REVIEWED ON SUPPORTED BY SUPPORTED ON SUPPORT NOTE APROVED BY

10/18/2018 80% GOOD Based on Good Governance Principle

10/18/2018 70% TIME RISK QUESTIONABLE

10/18/2018 70% APPROVED

Change Direction, and SOLID

tructure and SOLID

an but also Ministry Regulation

YEARLY ACTIVITY AND BUDGET PROPOSAL (YABP)

YABP REVIEW, SUPPORT, AND APPROVAL REPORT

PARAMETER COMPLETENESS QUALITY

ACTIVITY AND ACHIEVEMENT PROGRESS REPORT

FINANCE EXPENDITURE PROGRESS REPORT

RISK ANALYSIS AND REVIEW

CHANGE READINESS REPORT

STAKEHOLDER ANALYSIS REPORT

PSYCHOLOGICAL RESPONSE REPORT

ORGANIZATION CHANGE (6S) REVIEW REPORT

HUMAN CAPITAL PROFILE AND CHANGE BEHAVIOR REPORT

ASSET PROFILE REPORT

BALANCE SCORE CARD ASSESMENT REPORT

DICE ASSESMENT REPORT

DATA C4 ASSESMENT REPORT

STAGE II-KOTTER ASSESMENT REPORT

SUCCESS CELEBRATION REPORT

CUSTOMER SATISFATION 3 60%

FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE 4 80%

OPERATIONAL PERFORMANCE 5 100%

PRODUCT/SERVICE QUALITY 6 60%

SUPPLIER PERFORMANCE 1 50%

HUMAN CAPITAL PRODUCTIVY 1 50%

TOTAL CHANGE TRANSITION SCORE

QUALITY WEIGHTAGE TOTAL SCORE

QUALITY WEIGHTAGE TOTAL SCORE

WEIGHTAGE TOTAL SCORE

WEIGHTAGE TOTAL SCORE

WEIGHTAGE TOTAL SCORE

WEIGHTAGE TOTAL SCORE

WEIGHTAGE TOTAL SCORE

WEIGHTAGE TOTAL SCORE

WEIGHTAGE TOTAL SCORE

WEIGHTAGE TOTAL SCORE

WEIGHTAGE TOTAL SCORE