Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Fact-Checking Judy Mikovits, The Controversial Virologist Attacking Anthony Fauci in A Viral Conspiracy Video - Science - AAAS
Fact-Checking Judy Mikovits, The Controversial Virologist Attacking Anthony Fauci in A Viral Conspiracy Video - Science - AAAS
extensive COVID-
19 coverage is
free to all
readers. To
support our
nonpro t science
journalism,
please make a
tax-deductible
gift today.
Got a tip?
Judy Mikovits (right), seen here at her lab in Reno, Nevada, in 2011 with a graduate student, has made How to contact the
news team
many unfounded claims about the coronavirus that causes COVID-19. DAVID CALVERT FOR AP IMAGES
Unproven herbal remedy against COVID-19 could fuel drug-resistant malaria, scientists warn More Sifter
Former FDA leaders decry emergency authorization of malaria drugs for coronavirus
Mikovits started her career as a lab technician at the National Cancer Institute (NCI) in
1988. She became a scientist and obtained a Ph.D. in biochemistry and molecular
biology from George Washington University in 1991. By 2009, she was research director
at the Whittemore Peterson Institute (WPI), a private research center in Reno, Nevada,
but she remained largely unknown to the scienti c community. That year, however, she
co-authored a paper in Science that suggested an obscure agent named xenotropic
murine leukemia virus-related virus (XMRV) caused chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS).
The cause of CFS, also called myalgic encephalomyelitis, had long remained elusive, and
the disease had been neglected by science. The study created hope that CFS might
become treatable with antivirals. Some patients even began to take antiretroviral drugs
used by HIV-infected people. But the paper also created worries that XMRV might spread
via the blood supply.
Other researchers soon questioned the ndings, and over the next 2 years, the paper’s
claims fell apart. Researchers showed that XMRV was created accidentally in the lab
during mouse experiments; it may never have infected any humans. The authors rst
retracted two gures and a table from the paper in October 2011. Around the same time,
a study by several labs, including WPI itself, showed the ndings couldn’t be replicated.
Two months later, the entire Science paper was retracted. Mikovits refused to sign the
retraction notice, but she took part in another major replication effort. That $2.3 million
study, led by Ian Lipkin of Columbia University and funded by the National Institutes of
Health, was “the de nitive answer,” Mikovits said at a September 2012 press conference
where the results were announced. The rigorous study looked for XMRV in blinded blood
samples from nearly 300 people, half of whom had the disease, and none had the virus.
“There is no evidence that XMRV is a human pathogen,” Mikovits conceded.
Science’s news department, which works independently from its editorial side, followed
the saga closely and published a detailed reconstruction of the asco in September
2011. (The story won a Communications Award from the American Society for
Microbiology.)
Around the same time, Mikovits had an explosive breakup with WPI. The institute led
suit against her in November 2011 for allegedly removing laboratory notebooks and
keeping other proprietary information on her laptop, on ash drives, and in a personal
email account. She was arrested in California on felony charges that she was a fugitive
from justice and jailed for several days. Prosecutors in Washoe county, Nevada,
eventually dropped criminal charges against her in June 2012.
Mikovits has not published anything in the scienti c literature since 2012. But she soon
began to promote the XMRV hypothesis again, and attack the Lipkin study that she
agreed had put the issue to rest. She has weighed in on the autism debate with
controversial theories about causes and treatments. Her discredited work and her legal
travails have made her a martyr in the eyes of some.
Now comes a new book she co-authored, Plague of Corruption: Restoring Faith in the
Promise of Science—billed as “a behind the scenes look at the issues and egos which will
determine the future health of humanity”—and the viral video, which is an extended
interview with Mikovits.
Science asked Mikovits for an interview for this article. She responded by sending an
empty email with, as attachments, a copy of her new book and a PowerPoint of a 2019
presentation titled “Persecution and Coverup.”
Below are some of the video’s main claims and allegations, along with the facts.
Interviewer: Dr. Judy Mikovits has been called one of the most accomplished scientists
of her generation.
Mikovits had authored 40 scienti c papers and wasn’t widely known in the scienti c
community before she published the 2009 Science paper claiming a link between a new
retrovirus and CFS. The paper was later proven erroneous and retracted.
Interviewer: At the height of her career, Dr. Mikovits published a blockbuster article in
the journal Science. The controversial article sent shock waves through the scienti c
community, as it revealed that the common use of animal and human fetal tissues was
unleashing devastating plagues of chronic diseases.
The paper revealed nothing of the sort; it only claimed to show a link between one
condition, CFS, and a mouse retrovirus.
Mikovits: Heads of our entire HHS [Department of Health and Human Services]
colluded and destroyed my reputation and the Department of Justice and the [Federal
Bureau of Investigation] sat on it, and kept that case under seal.
Mikovits has presented no direct evidence that HHS heads colluded against her.
Mikovits: [Fauci] directed the cover-up. And in fact, everybody else was paid off, and
paid off big time, millions of dollars in funding from Tony Fauci and … the National
Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. These investigators that committed the
fraud, continue to this day to be paid big time by the NIAID.
It’s not clear which fraud and what cover-up Mikovits is talking about exactly. There is no
evidence that Fauci was involved in a cover-up or that anyone was paid off with funding
from him or his institute. No one has been charged with fraud in relation to Mikovits’s
allegations.
Mikovits: It started really when I was 25 years old, and I was part of the team that
isolated HIV from the saliva and blood of the patients from France where [virologist
Luc] Montagnier had originally isolated the virus. … Fauci holds up the publication of
the paper for several months while Robert Gallo writes his own paper and takes all the
credit, and of course patents are involved. This delay of the con rmation, you know,
literally led to spreading the virus around, you know, killing millions.
At the time of HIV’s discovery, Mikovits was a lab technician in Francis Ruscetti’s lab at
NCI and had yet to receive her Ph.D. There is no evidence that she was part of the team
that rst isolated the virus. Her rst published paper, co-authored with Ruscetti, was on
HIV and published in May 1986, 2 years after Science published four landmark papers
that linked HIV (then called HTLV-III by Gallo’s lab) to AIDS. Ruscetti’s rst paper on HIV
appeared in August 1985. There is no evidence that Fauci held up any publications or
that this led to the death of millions.
Mikovits: And they’ll kill millions, as they already have with their vaccines. There is no
vaccine currently on the schedule for any RNA virus that works.
Vaccines have not killed millions; they have saved millions of lives. Many vaccines that
work against RNA viruses are on the market, including for in uenza, measles, mumps,
rubella, rabies, yellow fever, and Ebola.
In another recent video, Mikovits is wearing a hat that says VAXXED II, which is a sequel
to a lm that links the mumps, measles, and rubella vaccine to autism, a debunked
theory. She also repeats several claims made by people who are leading the antivaccine
movement. In the PowerPoint presentation she sent to Science, she calls for an
“immediate moratorium” on all vaccines.
Interviewer: Do you believe that this virus [SARS-CoV-2] was created in the laboratory?
Mikovits: I wouldn’t use the word created. But you can’t say naturally occurring if it was
by way of the laboratory. So it’s very clear this virus was manipulated. This family of
viruses was manipulated and studied in a laboratory where the animals were taken into
the laboratory, and this is what was released, whether deliberate or not. That cannot be
naturally occurring. Somebody didn’t go to a market, get a bat, the virus didn’t jump
directly to humans. That’s not how it works. That’s accelerated viral evolution. If it was a
natural occurrence, it would take up to 800 years to occur.
Scienti c estimates suggest the closest virus to SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes
COVID-19, is a bat coronavirus identi ed by the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV). Its
“distance” in evolutionary time to SARS-CoV-2 is about 20 to 80 years. There is no
evidence this bat virus was manipulated.
Mikovits: Oh yeah, I’m sure it occurred between the North Carolina laboratories, Fort
Detrick, the U.S. Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases, and the
Wuhan laboratory.
There is no evidence that SARS-CoV-2 originated at WIV. NIAID’s funding of a U.S. group
that works with the Wuhan lab has been stopped, which outraged many scientists.
Mikovits: Italy has a very old population. They’re very sick with in ammatory disorders.
They got at the beginning of 2019 an untested new form of in uenza vaccine that had
four different strains of in uenza, including the highly pathogenic H1N1. That vaccine
was grown in a cell line, a dog cell line. Dogs have lots of coronaviruses.
There is no evidence that links any in uenza vaccine, or a dog coronavirus, to Italy’s
COVID-19 epidemic.
Mikovits: Wearing the mask literally activates your own virus. You’re getting sick from
your own reactivated coronavirus expressions, and if it happens to be SARS-CoV-2,
then you’ve got a big problem.
It’s not clear what Mikovits means by “coronavirus expressions.” There is no evidence
that wearing a mask can activate viruses and make people sick.
Mikovits: Why would you close the beach? You’ve got sequences in the soil, in the sand.
You’ve got healing microbes in the ocean in the salt water. That’s insanity.
It’s not clear what Mikovits means by sand or soil “sequences.” There is no evidence that
microbes in the ocean can heal COVID-19 patients.
Martin Enserink
Martin is Science's International news editor. He is based in Amsterdam.
Email Martin Twitter
Jon Cohen
Jon is a staff writer for Science.
Email Jon Twitter
What went wrong with CureVac’s highly anticipated new mRNA vaccine for COVID-19?
‘It’s a tipping point’: Flood of COVID-19 vaccine donations buoys mood at WHO