Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Kikuchi 2012
Kikuchi 2012
a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t
Available online 26 May 2012 A topographic multiplier is widely used to evaluate the effect of topography on the design wind speed.
Keywords: The maximum value of directional topographic multipliers has been used as the topographic multiplier
Topographic multiplier in many design codes. However, this simplified method is conservative and overestimates the speedup
Monte Carlo simulation of tropical cyclones effect in some cases. In this paper a topographic multiplier considering wind directionality is proposed
Reduction factors by using Monte Carlo simulation, and investigated at two typical meteorological stations. Then a
Terrain complexity reduction factor is proposed as the ratio of the topographic multiplier estimated by Monte Carlo
simulation to that obtained by the simplified method. A topographic variation coefficient is proposed as
the deviation of directional topographic multipliers and investigated systematically by using terrain
models. As a result, the reduction factor decreased as the topographic variation increased. An empirical
formula is proposed to improve the simplified method.
& 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
0167-6105/$ - see front matter & 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2012.04.008
Y. Kikuchi, T. Ishihara / J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 104–106 (2012) 558–564 559
!
the site x is evaluated by @rk @ruj k @ mt @k @u
þ ¼ mþ ru0i u0j i re, ð10Þ
sffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi @t @xj @xj sk @xj @xj
2
! C sin ðfyÞf r C sinðfyÞf r r @p
ug ð x Þ ¼ þ þ ð1Þ
2 2 r @r @re @ruj e @ mt @e e @u re2
þ ¼ mþ C e1 ru0i u0j i C e2 : ð11Þ
@t @xj @xj se @xj k @xj k
where C is the translation velocity; y and f are the approach
angle and gradient wind direction measured counterclockwise In these equations, r is the fluid density and m is the laminar
positive from East, respectively; f is the Coriolis parameter; r is viscosity. The constants (Cm, Ce1, Ce2, and sk) are assigned to
the distance from the tropical cyclone center; r is the air density; standard values (1.44, 1.92, 1.0, and 1.3; Jones and Lauder, 1972).
and p is the tropical cyclone pressure. The wind direction The turbulent viscosity mt is defined as a function of turbulence
yg corresponding to this gradient velocity is given by kinetic energy and dissipation:
! 2
yg ð x Þ ¼ pf ð2Þ k
mt ¼ C m r
e
The tropical cyclone pressure model used here was proposed
by Schloemer (1954), which was expressed as a function of r: The fluctuating velocity components are identified by the
turbulent Reynolds stress tensor. In this study, the standard k–e
pðrÞpc Rm model is used to approximate the Reynolds stress:
¼ exp ð3Þ
p1 pc r
2 @ui @uj
where pc is the center pressure, pN is the surrounding pressure
ru0i u0j ¼ rkdij mt þ ð12Þ
3 @xj @xi
and Rm is the radius at maximum wind speed, which can be
identified by the least squares method using the measured sea To suit the computation of complex flow, an arbitrary non-
surface pressure at the meteorological stations; pN can be assumed orthogonal collocated grid system is used. The governing equations
to be 1013 hPa or identified simultaneously. are rewritten in the curvilinear coordinate system and solved using
The effect of topography can be separated from that of tropical a common discrete method. In this program, the finite volume
cyclones0 pressure fields since the scale of topography is smaller method and the SIMPLE algorithm are adopted. The QUICK scheme
(Ishihara et al., 2005). Surface wind speeds uT and directions yT on is employed for convection terms in the equation of k and e and the
real terrains of tropical cyclones are obtained as follows: second order central difference for the order terms. Rhie and Chow’s
PWIM (pressure weighted interpolation method) is used to avoid
! ! !
uT ð x , yf Þ ¼ uf ð x ÞSt ð x , yf Þ, ð4Þ pressure–velocity decoupling. For detailed information, refer to
Ishihara and Hibi (2002).
! ! ! Using this model, wind speeds and directions on flat and real
yT ð x , yf Þ ¼ yf ð x Þ þ Dt ð x , yf Þ ð5Þ
terrains are calculated with regard to the wind sector i:
where uf, and yf are wind speeds and directions on flat terrains,
!
respectively, calculated using the following surface wind field ! u ðxÞ
Sti ð x Þ ¼ ti ! , ð13Þ
models: uf i ð x Þ
! !
uf ð x Þ ¼ ug ð x Þðz=zg Þau , ð6Þ ! ! !
Dti ð x Þ ¼ yti ð x Þyf i ð x Þ: ð14Þ
! !
yf ð x Þ ¼ yg ð x Þ þ ys ð1:00:4ðz=zg ÞÞ1:1 ð7Þ St and Dt are obtained by a linear interpolation. St values
computed by MASCOT are compared with wind tunnel test data
where the exponent index au and the gradient height zg are (Ishihara et al., 1999). In the experiment, the turbulent flow over a
expressed as functions of the absolute vorticity and the surface circular hill, having a cosine-squared cross section, was investi-
Rosby number. Inflow angle ys is a function of the homogeneity of gated using split-fiber probes designed for measuring flows with
vorticity and the surface Rosby number (Ishihara et al., 1997). high turbulence and separation. Profiles of the mean and variance
St and Dt are the directional topographic multiplier and deviation for the three velocity components were presented and compared
of wind direction, respectively, which are calculated by Computa- with those in the undisturbed boundary layer. In this study, one-
tional Fluid Dynamics (CFD). thousandth of a mountain model of the wind tunnel test is
prepared for CFD. The analytical domain in horizontal and vertical
2.2. Evaluation of directional topographic multipliers and deviation planes are set to 3500 m and 900 m, respectively, the minimum
of wind directions intervals of mesh in horizontal and vertical are fixed at 10 m and
3 m, and the surface roughness is given as 0.3 m as the wind
A CFD program, MASCOT (Microclimate Analysis System for tunnel test. The topographic multipliers predicted by CFD agree
Complex Terrain) is employed to evaluate the directional topo- favorably with observations at the top of the mountain (Fig. 1).
graphic multiplier St and the deviation of wind direction Dt. Directional topographic multipliers St and deviations of wind
MASCOT is a nonlinear flow simulation model for the predic- directions Dt are evaluated at two meteorological stations located
tion of microscale wind climates on complex and steep terrains with typical complex terrains: Murotomisaki and Nagasaki. Fig. 2
(Ishihara and Hibi, 2002). The Reynolds averaged Navier–Stokes illustrates elevation maps around the stations. The Murotomisaki
equations and turbulence models expressed by the following station is on a cliff at the tip of the peninsula, which leads to
Equations are used, providing information on the mean velocity increased wind speed. In contrast, the Nagasaki station is sur-
components along the directions, the static pressure, turbulence rounded by mountains and forests, which leads to decrease in wind
kinetic energy and its dissipation: speeds. Fig. 3 shows St and Dt computed with meshes and boundary
conditions in Table 1. The number of wind direction sectors is set at
@ruj 16 and the terrain subcategory is fixed to II as specified in AIJ in
¼ 0, ð8Þ
@xj which z0 is 0.01. Wind directions are expressed in degrees progres-
sing clockwise from North. At the Murotomisaki station, directional
@ruj ui @p @ @u topographic multipliers are almost constant, except those around
¼ þ m i ru0i u0j , ð9Þ
@xj @xi @xj @xj 01 corresponding to wind from the land. Meanwhile, at the Nagasaki
560 Y. Kikuchi, T. Ishihara / J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 104–106 (2012) 558–564
station, directional topographic multipliers have a clear peak due to correlations using a modified orthogonal decomposition method.
wind from the bay. The result indicates that topographic effect on Finally, surface wind speeds are predicted and extreme wind
wind speed is significant on complex terrains. distributions of tropical cyclones are estimated.
3. Monte Carlo simulation of tropical cyclones 3.1. Evaluation of tropical cyclone parameters
In Monte Carlo simulation of tropical cyclones, tropical cyclone Tropical cyclones can be generated by Monte Carlo simulation
parameters are evaluated from a historical track record of past (MCS) based on six tropical cyclone parameters. For each tropical
tropical cyclones. Then synthetic tropical cyclones are generated cyclone, four parameters, namely the central pressure pc, the
for a long period to satisfy probability distributions and their translation velocity C, the approach angle y taken counterclock-
wise positive from East and the minimum approach distance dmin
200 when the cyclone approaches the site of interest most closely, are
obtained from the historical track record of tropical cyclones.
Another parameter is the radius at maximum wind speed Rm,
which can be identified by the pressure field model in Eq. (3).
Hight from the ground (m)
Experiment
CFD
Table 1
Mesh and boundary conditions.
Fig. 2. Elevation maps around two stations: (a) Murotomisaki and (b) Nagasaki.
1.6 30 1.6 30
1.4 1.4
20 20
1.2 1.2
10 10
1 1
Dt (°)
Dt (°)
0.8 0 0.8 0
St
St
0.6 0.6
-10 -10
0.4 0.4
St Dt (°)
-20 -20
0.2 0.2
0 -30 0 -30
0 90 180 270 360 0 90 180 270 360
Wind direction (°) Wind direction (°)
Fig. 3. Directional topographic multipliers Sti and deviations of wind directions Dti at the two stations: (a) Murotomisaki and (b) Nagasaki.
Y. Kikuchi, T. Ishihara / J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 104–106 (2012) 558–564 561
The other parameter is an occurrence rate of the tropical cyclones The independent parameters zi with five components are then
at the specific site, l, which can be defined as the number of generated following the approximated distributions to the intended
tropical cyclones that pass, and is obtained from the track records ones for specified years and the number of the generated vectors
of past tropical cyclones. These six parameters are approximated following the estimated annual occurrence rate. The correlated
by analytical functions. Table 2 shows an example of the prob- parameters xi can be obtained by the following equation:
ability distribution for these parameters estimated at the Mur-
xi ¼ ½Fð1Þ Fð2Þ UUUFð5Þ 1 zi ð17Þ
otomisaki meteorological station. Here, m is the averaged value, s
is the deviation of each parameter, k is the shape factor, c is the These vectors xi should be considered as a set of parameters for
scale factor and a is the mixed paramater, z is the coefficient of tropical cyclones. Although the correlation between each compo-
quadratic function, and lm is the averaged number of tropical nent of xi satisfies the target correlations, their probability distri-
cyclones hit Japan per year. butions do not follow the target ones. The xi should be rearranged
in ascending order and modified so that its probability distribu-
tion follows the target probability distributions. This operation
3.2. Generation of synthetic tropical cyclones
hardly affects the correlations because it does not change the set
of parameters.
Synthetic tropical cyclones are generated for N years to satisfy the
modeled probability distributions and the correlations of tropical
cyclone parameters. The change in pressure field of tropical cyclones 3.3. Evaluation of extreme wind distributions
can be neglected since wind speeds and directions are estimated only
when tropical cyclones are located inside a simulation cycle with a Wind speeds on flat and real terrains are calculated with wind
diameter of 500 km. A modified orthogonal decomposition (MOD) field models expressed by Eqs. (1)–(7). Annual maximum wind
method should be used to satisfy the statistical distribution functions speed ui can be extracted and ranked in ascending order from u1
of tropical cyclone parameters and the correlations between them at to uN (Gumbel, 1958; IEC61400-1, 2005):
the same time, as proposed by Ishihara et al. (2005). The detailed i
procedure of the MOD method is described below. Fðui Þ ¼ 1 ði ¼ 1,. . .,NÞ ð18Þ
Nþ1
Five parameters describing a tropical cyclone are normalized
ui is plotted against a reduced variate yi as follows:
and written in vector form as follows:
yi ¼ lnðlnðFðui ÞÞÞ ð19Þ
xT ¼ flnðDpÞ, lnðRm Þ, lnðCÞ, y,dmin g ð15Þ
The extreme wind distributions predicted by MCS for 10,000
The covariance matrix of x is defined as S. The eigenvalues l(k) years are compared to those by observations at Murotomisaki and
and the eigenvectors F(k) are calculated by solving the following Nagasaki meteorological stations. 10 minutes mean wind speed data
equation: is acquired from Automated Meteorological Data Acquisition System
ðkÞ (AMeDAS) developed by Japanese Meteorological Agency. The data
½Sl EFðkÞ ¼ 0 ð16Þ
is available from 1995 to 2009. With regard to the Murotomisaki
Table 2
Examples of the probability distributions of tropical cyclones parameters.
70 70
60 60
Wind speed (m/s)
50 50
40 40
30 Flat.(z0=0.01) 30
Real.
20 Obs. 20
10 10 50 500 10 10 50 500
0 Return period (years) 0 Return period (years)
-4 -2 0 2 4 6 8 10 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 8 10
Reduced variate -LN(-LN(F)) Reduced variate -LN(-LN(F))
Fig. 4. Extreme wind distributions at the two stations: (a) Murotomisaki and (b) Nagasaki.
562 Y. Kikuchi, T. Ishihara / J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 104–106 (2012) 558–564
station, data until 2005 are used since the station was relocated in multipliers:
2006. Tropical cyclone data is collected from cyclones passing within St,max ¼ maxðSt Þ ð20Þ
500 km from the site with the center pressure less than 985 hPa.
In Fig. 4, the predicted distributions considering topographical This simplified method is practical, but has a possibility of
effect (lines) show a good agreement with those by observations overestimation since wind directions are out of consideration. A
(plots), whereas the distributions without consideration of topo- topographic multiplier considering wind directions by MCS StR is
graphic effect (dot lines) underestimate wind speeds at Murotomi- proposed as
saki and overestimate it at Nagasaki. This indicates the importance StR ¼ U tR =U fR ð21Þ
of considering speedup effect by complex terrains to evaluate
extreme wind speeds and proves the accuracy of MCS. where UtR is R-year-recurrence wind speed on real terrains and
UfR is that on flat terrains evaluated by MCS. This index considers
the probability of occurrence of wind direction. Fig. 5 summarizes
a flow for obtaining StR with wind field models and MCS of
4. Study of topographic multiplier
tropical cyclones.
To evaluate the new topographic multiplier, a reduction factor
In this section, a topographic multiplier considering wind
rR is proposed as the ratio of the topographic multiplier by MCS to
directions with Monte Carlo simulation is proposed. A reduction
that by the simplified method:
factor is proposed as the ratio of the new multiplier to the
conventional one and investigated using typical terrain models. r R ¼ StR =St,max ð22Þ
Here, the smaller value of rR means that the new topographic
4.1. Definition of topographic multiplier considering wind directions multiplier shows a lower value against the conventional one. It
of tropical cyclones expresses the effect of taking wind directions into account.
The topographic multipliers are investigated at Murotomisaki
In a conventional way, a topographic multiplier (St,max) and Nagasaki meteorological stations to see the effect of return
is defined as the maximum value of directional topographical period. Fig. 6 shows variations of topographic multipliers with
return periods. For short return periods, StR shows a small value
because the occurrence rate of wind directions with a large
Input parameters directional topographic multiplier is relatively low. For long
return periods, StR increases, but does not reach St,max, since the
Tropical cyclone Estimation of probability of wind directions with St,max is lower than 100%. In
data base tropical cyclones parameters this study, 50-year-recurrence period is considered following the
international standard for the design of wind turbine (IEC61400-
Generation of 1, 2005).
synthetic tropical cyclones
4.2. Relationship between reduction factors and complex terrains
Directional topographic multipliers Estimation of
Deviation of wind directions gradient winds Topographic multipliers and reduction factors at the two
stations are summarized in Table 3. The reduction factor is larger
Estimation of at Murotomisaki than that at Nagasaki. This difference in reduc-
surface winds
tion factor is probably related to the distribution of directional
topographic multipliers (Fig. 3). If all directional topographic
Years multipliers are the same, the proposed topographic multiplier
NO
YES
Table 3
Extreme wind distributions Topographic multipliers by the simplified method St,max and MCS St50, reduction
factors r50, and topographic variation coefficients st, at the two stations.
1.6 1.6
1.2 1.2
StR
0.8 0.8
St,max
Fig. 6. Topographic multipliers with return period at (a) Murotomisak and (b) Nagasaki.
Y. Kikuchi, T. Ishihara / J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 104–106 (2012) 558–564 563
coincides with the simplified one. When the difference between Fig. 8(a) and (b) depicts directional topographic multipliers
directional topographic multipliers and their maximum value is and normalized ones calculated by CFD. For larger aspect ratios,
large, the reduction factor will decrease. To quantitatively evalu- directional topographic multipliers vary significantly and speedup
ate this difference, a topographic variation coefficient st is effects become smaller at 01 and 1801 because model slopes get
introduced as follows: gradual.
v( ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
) In order to investigate the sensitivity of the effect of terrain
u M
u X orientations on reduction factors, the axes of models are rotated
st ¼ t ð1St =St,max Þ2 =M ð23Þ clockwise from the north at 451, 901, and 1351 as shown in Fig. 9.
i¼1
For 12 cases, the proposed topographic multipliers are com-
where St/St,max is a normalized topographic multiplier and M is puted by conducting MCS for 10,000 years. Terrain models are
the number of wind direction sectors. This factor should be assumed to be located at the same longitude and latitude as those
0 when all topographic multipliers are the same as those of a of the Murotomisaki station for MCS. Topographic variation
symmetric hill, and become larger for complex terrains. st coefficients, topographic multipliers by the simplified method
becomes 0.21 in Murotomisaki and 0.50 in Nagasaki. and MCS and reduction factors for each model are summarized in
In order to investigate the relationship between reduction Table 5. The reduction factor decreases as topographic variation
factors and topographic variation coefficients, topographic multi- coefficient increases, and variations in reduction factors are slight
pliers are systematically examined for terrains modeled using compared with the reduction effect by terrain complexity. The
square cosine on an x–y plane. result indicates that the reduction effect by considering wind
qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi directionality works in combination with terrain complexity. For
z ¼ Hcos2 ðp=2 ðx=Lx Þ2 þ ðy=Ly Þ2 Þ ð24Þ practical purposes, it is found that when topographic variation
coefficient is large, the MCS method is recommended since the
where H is the hill height; Lx and Ly are the radius of short and effect of considering wind direction of tropical cyclones is greater.
long axis of the hill, respectively. The y axis corresponds with the Fig. 10 plots all data including models and real terrains. The
southerly wind. Fig. 7 illustrates a cross-section of the model at relationship between reduction factors and topographic variation
y¼0. The four models have aspect ratios varying from 1 to 8 as coefficients are expressed as follows:
shown in Table 4s. Case 1 is an isolated hill and Case 4 expresses
a ridge. r 50 ¼ 2expðst =3Þ ð25Þ
z, w
300
200
100
H
y,v
0 x,u
-500 -400 -300 -200 -100 0 100 200 300 400 500
2Lx
Table 4
Size for each hill model.
1.6 1.1
topographic multiplier
Topographic multiplier
1.5 1
Normalized
1.4
0.9
1.3
Case 2 0.8
1.2 Case 3
Case 4
1.1 0.7
0 90 180 270 360 0 90 180 270 360
Wind direction (°) Wind direction (°)
Fig. 8. Variation of (a) directional topographic multipliers and (b) normalized ones with wind directions.
564 Y. Kikuchi, T. Ishihara / J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 104–106 (2012) 558–564
Nagasaki
0.9 References