Professional Documents
Culture Documents
PLN Strategic Plan
PLN Strategic Plan
PLN Strategic Plan
STRATEGIC PLAN
para los niños
strategic plan 2010 – 2015
table of contents
executive summary
iv. closing the achievement gap: the para los niños educational model
Implications of the Achievement Gap on Traditional Education
The Para Los Niños Educational Model
The Para Los Niños Change Framework
The Integrated Model and the Integration of Mental Health in Charter Schools
Child and Family Wellness Centers
Moving Toward Integration at School Sites
One-Stop Shopping/Co-location Concept
Partnerships in the Community
Focused Services and Core Geography
2010-2015 Strategic Goals
Evaluation
Leading Research
2010-2015 Strategic Goals
v. implementation timeline
vi. conclusion
appendices:
m. references
For the past thirty years, Para Los Niños has worked tirelessly to give children living in the
poorest communities of Los Angeles and San Bernardino Counties the education, skills and
resources required to build a future beyond poverty. Child by child, we have succeeded in
achieving this goal, and in the course of teaching, we ourselves have learned. While we are in-
finitely proud of the work we’ve done and believe passionately that we have made a difference,
our past efforts are simply not enough to change the future.
The reality today is that children are falling through the cracks faster than we can save them.
Their potential, and the safety and success of our communities, are at risk on a larger scale than
perhaps ever before in our history. Public education no longer serves all children equally and
our state and federal system of social services is underfunded and overburdened. Our previous
approach to ending the cycle of poverty may have worked well yesterday, but it is not the battle
cry of tomorrow.
The devastating effects of a litany of social problems like unequal access to quality education,
poverty, homelessness, gang violence, joblessness, domestic abuse, substance abuse, mental
health issues, and illiteracy affect thousands of children in our communities every day. The
reality of the recent economic climate and the adverse effects of federal and state spending cuts
add to these problems and worsen the conditions faced by children living in low income areas
throughout Southern California.
We can make a greater impact, and we must. Incremental change is no longer the remedy by
which to affect real and sustainable, long-term success. Three decades of experience tell us that
significant, sweeping change is necessary to close the achievement gap and help more children,
better and faster than ever before.
We have long known that while children may have unlimited potential, their ultimate success
is greatly tied to family circumstance. Therefore, educating only the child is a strategy that
addresses only one, albeit important, factor in the overall challenge to succeed. In order to
eliminate barriers and help children achieve their true potential, we must better address their
needs in the context of the family, while providing more complete support for the family itself.
The factors that contribute to a continuous cycle of poverty are complex and interrelated, and
our service model should reflect this integration of issues accordingly.
The fact is this: in this time of hard choices, more children need to have the kind of compre-
hensive education, mental health and family support services we provide, and yet, due to cuts
in government spending, fewer of them will. Without bold change and private funders who
support this work, the cycle of poverty and its associated problems will continue.
Our past strategy has relied heavily on state and federal funding, but our future sustainability
requires us to compel more private foundations, corporations, and individual donors to sup-
port our work. With guidance from our Board of Directors, we have created a courageous
new Strategic Plan for Para Los Niños that continues to put education at the forefront and
more formally recognizes the importance of psychological, emotional and physical health on
a child’s ability to achieve.
We have long known that the basis for achieving success in school begins at home; children
who live in fear of abuse, who suffer from neglect, who are hungry or homeless struggle to
thrive in school, regardless of their potential or intellect. We are now transforming that knowl-
edge into action by creating a more seamless and integrated delivery of education, mental
health and family support services that better support lifelong success for all those we serve.
It is my greatest hope that you will read this plan and be not only inspired, but compelled, to
support our efforts in helping children achieve real success in school and in life.
Sincerely,
Gisselle Acevedo
president & ceo
Para Los Niños
In 2009, the Para Los Niños Board of Directors and staff embarked on an in-depth planning
process to design a roadmap for growth and development from 2010 to 2015. With this plan,
Para Los Niños is committing to a powerful new vision: To be the model of excellence in
integrated urban education, leading to sustainable success in the communities we serve.
With three decades of experience in working with at-risk children in low income areas, Para
Los Niños (PLN) has gained a powerful regional reputation as a leader in our field. We under-
stand the complexity of serving children and families living in poverty, and have built upon
this knowledge to successfully educate children whose potential is hindered only by their
economic circumstances. We have pioneered this work in communities surrounding Los An-
geles with a model of education that works amid the challenges and barriers of urban sprawl,
a condition unique to this area of the United States. We are poised to build on our past and
create a stronger future by better and more formally integrating educational programs with
mental health and family support services in a place-based model to more effectively close the
achievement gap, better demonstrate the powerful impact of our work, and achieve national
recognition – and broader funding – for our efforts.
strategic priorities: To achieve this vision, Para Los Niños will pursue three broad stra-
tegic priorities, which will underpin our overarching goal. The achievement of these efforts
will comprise the scope of a $25 million fundraising campaign to occur over the next five
years:
1. Deepen Programmatic Quality: Recognizing the crucial link between success
in school and healthy home environments, our model will now more fully integrate
education and mental health and family support services in school environments.
This change will allow us to better and more deeply, support children and their
families in their quest to achieve success in life.
Increase
Organizational
Sustainability
Our focus on quality, impact, and sustainability will lead to much needed services that prepare
children and their families for a future of fulfilled potential. These priorities are fundamen-
tal to the agency’s success as a leader in the field of urban education, and will serve to shape
management accountability and drive acquisition of investments necessary to meet the goals.
priority #1: deepen programmatic quality. Para Los Niños is investing in strength-
ening high-quality educational programs and complementary mental health and family sup-
port services that have a demonstrated positive impact on the way children and young ado-
lescents learn, grow, and succeed. Implementing an integrated model will ensure that the
children who are served through our early childhood centers, schools, and educational sites
are supported holistically through coordinated mental health and family support services.
Para Los Niños will strive to set an industry gold standard in urban education and serve as a
national leader in this regard. Highlights of this priority include:
• Developing an Integrated Model of Urban Education, Mental Health and Family
Support Services
• Establishing integrated Para Los Niños Child and Family Wellness Centers
• Achieving improved outcomes for children and families served
• Ensuring agency re-accreditation through the Council on Accreditation
The Para Los Niños Fundraising Campaign. To continue addressing the extensive needs of
underserved children and families in Los Angeles and San Bernardino counties and to meet
our three strategic priorities, Para Los Niños is launching a comprehensive five-year develop-
ment campaign with the goal of raising $25 million to fund our strategic efforts.
Para Los Niños will generate funds from a combination of government and private sector
sources: government grants, representing approximately 16% of campaign revenue, will in-
clude contracts for enrollment, per capita case management and service delivery, as well as new
Para Los Niños will employ new and diverse strategies that build on the strength and success
of our fundraising capacity and develop a broader community of supporters. A campaign
steering committee, comprised of both Board members and non-Board members, will lead the
fundraising effort, making their own gifts and rallying others to invest in the organization’s
future. Additionally, Para Los Niños will develop multi-faceted fundraising methods to protect
our annual fund.
A Refined Mission and Focus. To better reflect the evolution of our vision, Para Los Niños’
mission has been expanded from “Helping children succeed” to “Helping children and their fami-
lies succeed in school and in life.” Para Los Niños is committed to serving not only children, but
also their families, without whom success would be significantly more difficult to attain.
Education remains at the heart of our refined focus, providing educational services for chil-
dren 0-14 through early childhood programs, charter elementary and middle schools, and
after-school programs. Comprehensive family support and mental health service systems are
coupled with education in order to address the complete needs of children and their families
and break down barriers to success. The Para Los Niños approach seeks to provide safe and
engaging environments before, during, and after school. This newly integrated model will
offer coordinated systems of culturally-relevant support, with community partnerships and
professional communities of invested stakeholders.
The Journey Forward. With this Strategic Plan, Para Los Niños is leading the way in defining
an innovative and replicable model of success for improving the psychological and physical
health and academic and economic well-being of the most vulnerable children and families
in Los Angeles and San Bernardino counties. It is our greatest hope that this pioneering
evolution of our thirty-year success will lead to sustainable achievement for the children and
families we are so privileged to serve; not just through a particular grade level, but for a lifetime.
The remainder of the plan document describes in more detail our 2010-2015 strategies and
implementation timelines. Upon reading this, we hope you are compelled to join us as we
create a unique and innovative model of change.
This new statement more than acknowledges our belief that children are influenced by
the family and environment in which they live, and accurately reflects our methodology
of focusing on the development of children, and support systems for their families and
communities. It also reflects our perspective of promoting the educational advancement, and
the healthy development, of the whole child, including his/her psychological, social, cognitive,
and physical growth.
Being the model of excellence (as opposed to a model of excellence) in our field is intention-
ally bold and purposeful language. It asserts that our work is both exceptional and pioneering,
that our practices have been proven successful and are worthy of emulation by others– and
potentially being replicated beyond our current service areas.
To amplify the new mission and vision statements and communicate the focus of our day-to-
day work, Para Los Niños has a new purpose statement:
Para Los Niños exists to close the achievement gap created by poverty
by partnering with children and families in urban communities to support
academic achievement and social wellbeing.
Para Los Niños has broadened the scope of its organizational values to include the role of
families in supporting children and to emphasize the role of convening and empowering com-
munities to attain stronger outcomes. The enhanced value statements are:
guiding principles
Para Los Niños developed agency-wide guiding principles to capture the organizational phi-
losophy by which we operate. Prior to the strategic planning process, guiding principles ex-
isted for separate divisions and programs within the agency. From this point forward, Para Los
Niños will operate with one universal set of guiding principles at its core:
1. Every child and family has the right and potential to reach high standards
of achievement.
2. Every child and family has the right to be respected.
3. Every child and family has the right to be responded to as individuals with
different academic, socio-emotional, physical, psychological and cultural needs.
4. Every child and family has the right to safe environments that facilitate healthy
development and learning.
5. Every child and family deserves opportunities to engage with and impact the local
community and global society.
6. Every child and family deserves access to culturally appropriate practices.
7. Every child and family has the right to receive integrated services.
Since our founding in 1980, Para Los Niños has played a pivotal role in supporting children
and families in some of Los Angeles and San Bernardino counties’ most underserved commu-
nities through high-quality education and comprehensive mental health and family support
services.
Throughout 2009, the Para Los Niños staff and Board leadership engaged in creating this five-
year Strategic Plan. The Plan serves as a roadmap to achieving our vision of becoming a nation-
ally recognized leader in the field of Urban Education through the development and execution
of three strategic priorities:
1. Deepen Programmatic Quality
2. Demonstrate Impact on Children and Families
3. Strengthen Organizational Sustainability
The focus on quality, impact, and sustainability are fundamental to the future success of
Para Los Niños as a demonstrated model of excellence in closing the achievement gap among
low-income, minority children, and leading to long-term independence and success. These
priorities will shape organizational management and accountability, and drive the acquisition
of investments necessary to meet our goals.
The remaining document describes in detail these strategic priorities and the plan of action to
achieve them.
Para Los Niños presently serves children and families located in some of the most impover-
ished areas of Los Angeles and San Bernardino counties, including: Wilshire La Brea, East
Hollywood, Pico Union, Boyle Heights, Echo Park, Downtown, Skid Row, Highland Park, USC
North, and West Adams. While these areas comprise the core focus of our five-year Plan, we
have significant commitments in South and East Los Angeles, as well as Ontario.
The families we serve have an average annual income of $15-20K, are low-income, working
families, single mothers, or extended families living together with children being raised by
grandparents or other family members. Over 95% of our charter and after-school students are
eligible for a free or reduced lunch, a key poverty indicator.
In terms of ethnic demographics, Para Los Niños serves over 7,000 children and adults, 75%
of whom are of Hispanic or Latino origin; another 16% are African American, 3% are Native
American, 3% are White, 2% are Asian American and 1% represent a multi-ethnic minority.
“If the achievement gap between black and Latino student performance and white student
performance had been closed in recent years, the U.S. GDP in 2008 would have been between
$310 billion and $525 billion higher.” 2009 McKinsey report: “The Economic Impact of the Achieve-
ment Gap in America’s Schools.”
what is the achievement gap? The Achievement Gap is defined as the difference in
academic performance between students from different economic backgrounds and racial/
ethnic backgrounds. These two factors: economic circumstances, and racial/ethnic make-up,
have been identified by researchers as the most consistent differentiators among students who
fail - and those who succeed - academically.
Research and pioneering efforts by innovative educators indicate that a purposeful, compre-
hensive and integrated system of education, mental health and family support services must be
adopted in educational settings if students are to succeed – particularly those living in pov-
erty. Practitioners, policy makers, and school administrators know that while highly qualified
teachers are critical to student success, teachers alone cannot ensure all students have equal
opportunities to succeed academically.
Based on this research, and three decades of experience, we at Para Los Niños have arrived at a
clear understanding that in order to close the achievement gap in underserved communities,
children must be viewed from a systematic perspective so that the academic, psychological,
cultural, social, emotional and physical aspects are addressed in context.
the para los niños educational pedagogy. Our approach to educating children
in urban communities is driven by the belief in the potential of each child, regardless of
socio-economic circumstance. Inspired by schools for young children in Reggio Emilia,
Italy*, the Para Los Niños Educational Approach is influenced by the latest in cognitive
research from the National Research Council: How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and
School (Bransford et al, eds., National Research Council, 1999); and How People Learn: Bridging
Research and Practice (Bransford et al, eds., National Research Council, 2000), and the education-
al philosophies of Vygotsky and John Dewey, who propose that education programs should
be based on respect, responsibility, relationships and community, and that children must be
active participants in their own learning. Additionally, the approach at Para Los Niños in-
cludes instructional methods which satisfy the needs of a predominantly English Language
Learner (ELL) population.
our educational beliefs. We are moving to further develop more effective, coordinated,
and comprehensive integrated systems to directly and deeply address the barriers that prevent
too many of our children and their families from excelling in school and life. Our beliefs serve
as the foundation that informs our evolving approach to education.
WE BELIEVE…that children learn best when they are offered an approach to learning that
develops from a range of first-hand experiences that provide relevance to learning, and through
which inquiry, investigation, problem solving and conceptual understanding emerge.
WE BELIEVE…that learning opportunities are maximized when children are in a safe and
engaging environment, where they are valued for who they are and what they bring to the
learning context, and where questioning and inquiry are not only encouraged, but expected.
WE BELIEVE...that children learn best when they can express, interpret and demonstrate their
knowledge in many different ways.
WE BELIEVE…that children are dynamic and complex individuals who exist within a family
construct. To be successful, education must consider the child’s “whole self”—the academic,
psychological, cultural, social, emotional and physical—in the context of the family.
the para los niños change framework. In order to provide rich learning experiences
in underserved urban areas, our integrated model of education, mental health, and family
support services aims to create a sustainable, comprehensive, and coordinated system of
support to benefit children, their families, and the communities in which they live. Our inte-
grated model achieves this objective by decreasing risk factors and barriers to learning, while
increasing protective factors and learning supports. For more detailed information about
this framework and the associated underlying research, please see Appendix H.
i n p u t s activities outputs
Evaluation 3. decrease
learning barriers
- Deficiencies in basic living resources
Quality Assurance and opportunities for development
- General stressors and underlying
Culturally Competent psychological problems
Practices - Crises and emergencies
- Psychosocial problems
Community
Partnerships 4. d
ecrease risk factors
- Special needs
- Parent psycho-emotional status
- Community factors
- Societal factors
Academic
Achievement
School and
Work Readiness
Sustainable Success
Community
ch ild succeeds in scho ol and in life
Leadership
Socio-cultural
Stability
Socio-emotional
Stability
Child Abuse
Reduction
Healthy
Development
Baby, Toddler
and Family Friendly
Environments
Strategic Priority I describes the actions necessary to develop the Para Los Niños Integrated
Model of Education. An integrated approach to education formally recognizes that in order
to close the educational achievement gap and achieve long-term success, children and their
families must have access to comprehensive and coordinated mental health and family sup-
port services that are co-located in educational environments.
In addition, it is the vision of Para Los Niños that these co-located and coordinated efforts
will take place at newly created Child and Family Wellness Centers located on our education
campuses. Together with high-quality early childhood education and academic instruction, all
children and their families will have access to coordinated mental health and family support
services, referrals and linkages, psycho-educational classes and support groups, and an array of
prevention and intervention services. We plan to further develop the Child and Family Well-
ness Centers at these sites by staffing them in a manner that strengthens integration. This will
be a three-tiered approach: 1) rotating staff; 2) adding staff; and 3) on-going training for new
and existing staff. The model below illustrates the vision for integration of services provided at
the Para Los Niños Child and Family Wellness Centers.
A First Step Moving Toward Integration: The Integration of Mental Health and Family
Support Services in our Charter Schools.
During the past eighteen months, Para Los Niños initiated the development of this model
through a grant from The California Endowment, which has supported the creation of a concrete
framework for effectively integrating mental health and family support services in our charter
schools and other education settings. This project facilitated the formation of an Integration
Team (comprised of the mental health and family services directors, charter school principals,
and other key executive and program staff) to develop a more comprehensive understanding
of the mental health and family support needs in the populations served. We are demonstrat-
ing ongoing progress through an assessment of needs identified by students, parents, experts,
clients, community residents and Para Los Niños staff through surveys and interviews. These
findings will be used to enhance integration of mental health and family support services into
our charter schools through the adoption of policies, protocols and procedures that guide the
collaboration of school, mental health, and family support staff, as well as guide the provision
of mental health and family support services on campus. Key deliverables include solutions for
funding and long-term sustainability as well as disseminating knowledge and lessons learned
to the wider community.
In addition, the practice of integrating education, mental health and family support services
has already begun at several PLN education sites, where staff from current Mental Health and
Enhancing infrastructure through diversified funding and the co-location of Child and Fam-
ily Wellness Centers will improve child, family, and community access to, and participation
in, critical services, improve student connection to their school, increase attendance, academic
achievement and behavior, and improve family involvement in scholastic success more gener-
ally (Blank, Melaville & Shah, 2003). The creation of a single, education-based location where
services can be accessed can help parents, who have traditionally felt alienated from their
children’s school sites, become more connected and involved with the school and with their
children’s educational experiences (Buttery & Anderson, 1997; Blank, Melaville & Shah, 2003).
“one stop shopping”/co -location: As part of the planning of these centers, we exam-
ined best practices in the field and identified two key models that have informed our thinking:
the “One Stop Shopping” and the Integrated Service Delivery Model (ISDM) as approaches to
service provision.
“One-Stop Shopping” or “place-based” services refers to the general concept that services
can be made more accessible and service delivery made more efficient by coordinating
and co-locating services that are normally provided by more than one agency or pro-
gram. Federal efforts to promote this idea have included the One-Stop Program of the
Employment and Training Administration (ETA) at the U.S. Department of Labor. ETA
has funded the planning and implementation of centers that provide an array of em-
ployment and training services and information in central locations. In addition, the
Administration for Children and Families at the U.S. Department of Health and Human
Services is collecting examples of co-location in delivering welfare and child support
services. The advantages to co-location are generally perceived as: improved access to
services for clients; better case management for each client; stronger inter-agency com-
munication; and greater efficiency of service delivery through less duplication, identifica-
tion of service “gaps”, and the potential for decreased overhead costs (Employment and
Training Administration, 1996; Interstate Conference of Employment Security Agencies
(ICESA), 1997; National Performance Review, November 1997).
Integrated Service Delivery Model. Another model we will look at to develop Child
and Family Wellness Centers at our educational sites is the Integrated Service Delivery
Model (ISDM). The core of the ISDM is a team-based, client-focused primary care ap-
proach to providing social, health, child development, education, family support, and
other services. This model increases the focus on prevention. Over time, increased use
of providers will occur, including social workers, mental health workers, etc. Integration
and true collaboration must be developed among service providers with expertise in edu-
The ISDM model will benefit our organization, and the children and families we serve,
by:
1. Coordinating service delivery, which results in more efficient and consistent stan-
dards of practice and use of resources.
2. Making access to various Para Los Niños services easier.
3. Providing a consistent set of standards, policies, and procedures across programs.
4. Increasing levels of communication among service providers from different programs,
resulting in a more complementary and holistic service plan for individual clients.
5. Providing a seamless array of services for students and their families in our charter
schools.
focused services and core geography. Because of our reputation as a trusted and
caring community partner, through the years Para Los Niños has been asked to address addi-
tional community needs, including the plight of emancipating foster youth, the dearth of job
training and job opportunities for youth, and other community needs necessitating enhanced
service provision. Through the strategic planning process, we reflected on this programmatic
expansion and concluded that refining our focus will enable greater opportunities to integrate
complementary services and maximize impact on children, families, and our communities.
family and mental health support services (for child and his/her family)
collaborative partnerships
focused services. As a result of this deliberative analysis, one of our objectives for the
Downtown/Skid Row (SPA 4) community will be to make available a continuum of educa-
tion, mental health, and family support services from birth through 14 years of age. This will
involve serving children during infancy and early childhood, middle childhood, and early
adolescence in addition to providing support services to the families of the children in our
education centers.
core geographic focus and significant commitments. Para Los Niños provides
services in high poverty communities located throughout Los Angeles and San Bernardino
counties. Upon examination of costs, benefits, and fit with the Para Los Niños Integrated
Model of Urban Education, it has become clear that focusing on core communities is essential
to enabling more effective coordination and integration of services.
The core geographic focus of the five-year Strategic Plan is Service Planning Area 4. This com-
munity encompasses the following areas: Skid Row, Downtown, Wilshire La Brea, Wilshire
Center, Westlake, Temple-Beaudry, Mid-City, Chinatown, Hollywood, Pico-Union and Boyle
Heights, Echo Park, Downtown, Filipinotown, Boyle Heights, Lincoln Heights, Highland Park,
USC North West Adams, and West Hollywood.
In addition, Para Los Niños has significant commitments in South Los Angeles and East Los
Angeles, which fall into SPAs 3, 6 and 7. SPA 6 communities include: USC South, Figueroa
Corridor, Leimert Park, Hyde Park, Harbor Gateway North, Florence Graham, Athens, Willow-
brook, Rosewood, Baldwin Hills South, Hancock Park North, USC East, Watts, Florence-Fire-
stone, Lynwood, Paramount, and Compton. SPAs 3 and 7 include: East LA, Downey, Norwalk,
Whittier, Montebello, Huntington Park, South Gate, Bell, La Habra, Pico Rivera, Bellflower,
Signal Hill, Lakewood-Cerritos-Artesia-Hawaiian Gardens, La Mirada-Santa Fe Springs, and
* lo c at i o n s a n d p ro g r a m s a r e c u r r e n t a s o f au g u s t 2 0 1 0 .
Historically, we at Para Los Niños have had a long-standing commitment to quality and the
ongoing pursuit of excellence. Now more than ever, as the economic and political landscape
has changed, this commitment remains vitally important. To that end, our Five-Year Plan calls
for an innovative and effective evaluation plan that will more deeply demonstrate the positive
impact of our work, by supporting continuous quality improvement, effective resource alloca-
tion, and accountability.
leading research. As a leader in our field, we view research both as an opportunity and a
responsibility. The next five years will provide a particularly unique opportunity to participate
in the advancement of knowledge in the field of Urban Education, through the identification
of strategic areas of opportunity to close the achievement gap experienced by low-income
and/or minority children in urban areas. Among other best practices, our research objectives
include an exhaustive literature review of relevant evaluation efforts, focusing on methods,
outcomes, and the effectiveness of current approaches.
As our plan is implemented, accreditation, best practices and evidence-based programs, con-
tinuous quality improvement processes, evaluation, and data management will become in-
creasingly relevant in our practices, culture, and investments. These will be key areas of focus
and growth within the next five years. For more information on Continuous Quality Improve-
ment (CQI), Data Management (including Social Solutions’ Efforts-to-Outcomes agency-wide
• Develop an evaluation methodology to: (1) assess the Integrated Model of Urban
Education, Mental Health and Family Support Services, and (2) determine impact on
clients served across the agency.
• Create the infrastructure required for effective data collection and analysis to support
ongoing assessment of Para Los Niños’ programs and outcomes.
• Use more sophisticated and informative evaluation data to drive programmatic
quality improvement and to shape organizational decision-making.
• Contribute to the field of urban education and community development and play a
key role in informing and shaping educational policy.
• Provide demonstrated, increased accountability to families, funders, and other
stakeholders.
• Provide evidence of a high-quality model that can be replicated in other communities.
To make real and measurable progress in closing the educational achievement gap and re-
ducing urban poverty in Los Angeles and San Bernardino counties, small scale, “steady-state”
change is no longer enough. We aim to achieve major change by developing an Integrated
Model of Urban Education that is based on evidence and best practices, is informed by stake-
holders, is responsive to ongoing community needs, and provides experiences in which our
children can learn, succeed, and thrive. Achieving large-scale results requires a sustainable
organization, poised to weather changes in political and economic climates, and able to com-
mit a major investment of resources toward the realization of a bold goal. In the case of Para
Los Niños, where children are at the heart of our work, the achievement of our vision also
requires a sound and reliable infrastructure that assures the safety and success of all those we
are honored to serve.
We estimate that the visionary and necessary work we propose to undertake will require an
investment of $25 million to achieve. Without this level of investment, goals will need to be
pared down and impact will be reduced.
Over the years, Para Los Niños has been over-dependent upon government contracts, whose
reliability changes based on shifting political and economic climates. To meet the objectives
of the Plan, diversify funding streams, and become less dependent upon government contracts,
Para Los Niños will mount a major development campaign, including enhanced private sector
fundraising, identification of potential private sector leadership gifts, and early cultivation of
prospects. The fundraising plan will identify various funding streams and actions to secure
these funds, and is the cornerstone of the Plan’s success.
1 gift of
$3 million
2 gifts of
$2.5 million
5 gifts of $1 million
7 gifts of $500,000
6 gifts of $250,000
10 gifts of $100,000
20 gifts of $50,000
40 gifts of $25,000
Public sources will contribute $4 million, or about 16% of income generated over the five-year
plan period, and will come from contracts for enrollment, per capita case management and
service delivery; new family support and mental health grants, and new federal contracts and
grants.
The safety and well-being of the children and families seeking education and assistance at
our facilities is of paramount importance to our organization and our Board of Directors.
Likewise, the successful implementation of the Plan relies on a high-quality technology infra-
structure for financial management and reporting, as well as data collection, program quality
assurance and evaluation of success. The Strategic Plan calls for a thorough review of the
facilities asset portfolio including a schedule to address deferred maintenance and maintain
the complex physical infrastructure, the implementation of new financial management and
human resource technology tools as well as securitization of information and data, and a
comprehensive emergency preparedness and disaster recovery plan for all Para Los Niños sites.
The following timeline is designed to give an overview of the implementation process accord-
ing to the strategic priority framework. The timeline provides specific benchmarks, and will
be used by the Board and staff to ensure that Para Los Niños achieves the desired outcomes, or
to guide course correction, as needed.
VI. CONCLUSION
In an ideal world where no child experiences hunger, neglect, illiteracy or fear, and every family
has the tools to succeed, the relevance of Para Los Niños would – happily – cease to exist. Until
that day, we remain focused on addressing the inequalities that form the underlying causes of
the educational achievement gap in the United States today. To that end, Para Los Niños will
dedicate the next five years to the successful implementation of the strategic priorities that
we believe will lead to the development of an innovative and replicable model of integrated
education. Achieving these priorities will make meaningful progress toward eliminating the
achievement gap and enabling children and their families to achieve sustainable success in the
classroom and beyond.
appendices:
a. strategic planning methodology and acknowledgements
m. references
In March 2009, Para Los Niños embarked on a year-long strategic planning process to guide
the organization’s development through 2015. The goal of the project was to develop a com-
prehensive strategic plan that will result in a clear, compelling vision of the agency’s future and
a realistic roadmap to guide future program and administrative growth, along with the corre-
sponding resource development. We contracted Draper Consulting Group (DCG), a capacity
building consulting firm, to assist in this effort by helping to design and facilitate the planning
process. An organization-wide strategic planning process was developed to address critical op-
portunities and challenges and to lead staff and Board leadership through the creation of the
strategic vision.
Over the course of twelve months, the staff and Board of Directors of Para Los Niños worked to
develop and analyze questionnaires and interviews, and guided numerous strategic planning
sessions. Additionally, the Para Los Niños staff participated in internal work groups, meetings,
research, and material development, all in support of the development of the strategic plan.
The planning process included the full participation of all the Directors, Principals, and Ex-
ecutive Team members in crafting the Integrated Model of Urban Education, Mental Health
and Family Support Services. Consensus and commitment to a common, unifying vision was
an important and inspiring outcome which required the diligence and commitment of the
agency’s Board and staff, especially the Executive Management Team, Principals, and Directors,
and the members of the Strategic Planning Committee of the Board. We acknowledge the
contributions and insights from each of the following members of Para Los Niños’ leadership:
board of directors:
Ronny Bensimon, Dearden’s
Robin Bieker, Bieker & Co., Inc.
Roger Carrick, Carrick Law Group, P.C
Laura Fox
Zac Guevara, Capital International Research (Retired)
R. Christine Hershey, Hershey|Cause
Cathy Hession, The Carol and James Collins Foundation
Mark Hickey, Capital International Research
Matt Kestian, Microsoft
Pedro Martí, Wells Fargo
Diane G. Medina, KABC-TV
James J. Morrison, The Morrison Company
Right in the midst of all that despair and sorrow stands an anomaly, a place of vigor to counterbal-
ance, even if it is to a small degree, the dreadfulness of the vicinity. It’s called Para Los Niños, and it is
a fountain of hope, or life itself, in a wasteland of humanity.
In 1979, a Los Angeles Times reporter named Grahame Jones wrote an in-depth investigative
story about the plight of children living on Skid Row, a part of downtown Los Angeles best
described as “hell on earth.” The article entitled, “The Children of Skid Row,” captured the es-
sence of impoverished children living in the shadows of society exposed to environments with
which children should never have contact. Energized by the Times article, Tanya Tull, an expe-
rienced social worker and teacher, was moved to act. Her vision was to create the first children’s
social service agency on Skid Row, to be called Para Los Niños/For the Children. Designed to
be an oasis in the middle of the squalor, stench, and sadness of Skid Row, Para Los Niños was
to provide hope and state-of-the-art services to children from many races, ethnicities, and de-
velopmental backgrounds.
With the help of Joel Simon, a local attorney providing his services pro bono, and the support
of Nina van Pallandt, an actress who would become the first board chair of the new non-profit,
Ms. Tull incorporated Para Los Niños on December 7, 1979. In January of 1980, when Tom
Bradley was mid-way through his second term as Mayor of Los Angeles and an estimated
10,000 people lived on Skid Row, Para Los Niños secured an initial $5,000 grant and leased
an old 5,000 square foot eyelash factory at 845 East 6th Street, in the heart of Skid Row. The
space was soon thereafter renovated and licensed to operate as a childcare facility to serve 51
children. Para Los Niños opened its doors and began serving children on January 5, 1981.
From Skid Row’s debilitating urban playing fields, Para Los Niños emerged as a safe and nur-
turing environment for the poorest children in Los Angeles and their families. The county’s
geographic distribution, its population’s racial, ethnic, socioeconomic, and linguistic diversity,
and an influx of immigration, makes it a unique environment requiring careful consideration
of elements such as transportation, culture, community resources, and potential partnerships
when developing and implementing service models. Because of its size and population, Los
Angeles County is divided into eight Service Planning Areas (SPA’s). The SPAs 3, 4, 6, and 7
include the greatest concentrations of poverty in the city of Los Angeles. SPA 4 includes Los
Angeles’ Skid Row, a 50 block area of downtown which encompasses the largest homeless
population in the United States. These high-poverty communities face particular challenges
such as overcrowded schools, high teacher turnover rates, and low academic achievement.
Direct correlations have been found between high-poverty neighborhoods and low-quality
public schools. Other factors associated with living in poverty have also been shown to nega-
Para Los Niños’ roster of services now includes educational services at seven early childhood
development centers, a charter elementary and charter middle school, and after-school pro-
grams across. Our family services program has grown to service a spectrum of needs from basic
supplies such as food and diapers, to family preservation through in-home counseling and par-
ent education. We provide clinical and mental health services and have strong partnerships
with agencies expert in providing critical services outside our spectrum. In the past five years,
programs have been added to specifically address the challenges of youth entering the work-
force, prepare foster youth for independent living, and create demonstration communities that
support the growth and development of young children and their families. Throughout time,
Para Los Niños has always kept its core focus – helping to empower poor children and their
families to rise up out of poverty and succeed.
Since 1980, Para Los Niños has grown to serve over 7,000 children, youth, and families each
year. As the needs of its constituencies have changed, Para Los Niños has grown into a com-
plex, multi-faceted organization providing comprehensive family services that help mitigate
the challenges faced by low-income families living and working in urban environments. To
respond to these needs, Para Los Niños has expanded geographically and programmatically,
with sites throughout the region, each of which provides a continuum of learning through sig-
nificant educational components, including an elementary school and most recently, a middle
school. This impressive expansion has required developing new areas of expertise and skill
sets, recruiting a broad range of professionals, and obtaining diverse accreditations and licens-
es. It has meant developing the infrastructure to manage organizational and programmatic
complexity as well as multi-site operations and public accountability.
In the past 10 years, Para Los Niños’ budget has grown from $5.7 million to over $25 million,
and income generation has expanded to include a host of local, regional, and state govern-
ment grants and contracts. Private sector resources have also expanded and Para Los Niños
now enjoys a strong reputation among foundations, corporations, and donors. Funding has
been immediately directed toward expanding our programming to meet critical community
needs, but financial reserves have not kept pace. Despite growing sources of income the cost
to maintain facilities and to meet the increasing needs of clients has made it difficult to main-
tain or build reserves.
the para los niños educational guiding philosophy. The following guiding
principles were developed to support our educational approach:
1. Every child has the right to develop the skills to ask deep questions and to
think critically.
2. Every child has the right to a school and classroom environment that
continuously changes to stimulate and deepen learning.
3. Every child has the right to use his or her primary language as a building
block for literacy.
4. Every child has the right to be an active participant in his or her own
thinking and learning.
5. Every child has the right to learn through rich firsthand experiences that
provoke thinking and language development.
6. Every child has the right to express, interpret and demonstrate knowledge
in many different ways.
the para los niños educational approach and the reggio emilia approach
to education The educational approach at Para Los Niños is informed and inspired by
various philosophies, approaches and research. The Reggio Emilia approach to education is
one of the most salient sources of consideration and inspiration for us. The following provides
a simple summary of that approach and some of the main elements we have considered and
adapted to fit our context. The Reggio Emilia approach to education was developed for mu-
nicipal child-care and education programs serving children six and under. It was started after
WWII by pedagogista and psychologist Loris Malaguzzi and the parents of the villages around
Reggio Emilia, Italy, all of whom were trying to create schools that would foster the critical
thinking and collaborative skills necessary to rebuild a democratic society.
These parents and educators believed that the ultimate individuality of a child is most greatly
formed during his/her early years of development. This led to the creation of the Reggio Emilia
Approach, which is based on values of respect, responsibility, and community through explora-
tion and discovery. Key to the Reggio Emilia approach is a supportive and enriching learning
environment which is grounded in the following principles:
• Children should be envisioned as competent, and full of potential.
• Children have an ability to learn through different kinds of experiences.
• Children have relationships with other children, with adults, with the environment
and the materials found in the environment.
• Children have endless ways and opportunities to express themselves.
parents play a vital role. Parents are viewed as partners, collaborators and advocates
for their children. Teachers include parents in the activities of the school and involve them
in many ongoing experiences. It is common to see parents collaborating within classrooms
throughout the school and this philosophy does not end when the child leaves the classroom.
Most parents who choose to send their children to a Reggio Emilia program modify their own
image of the child within their parenting and life at home.
Parents are also included in discussions about school policy, child development concerns, and
in the planning and development of the children’s own experiences.
teachers get inspired too. The role of the teacher is to be that of a learner alongside
the children. Educators carefully listen, observe, interpret and document children’s work and the
growth of community in their classroom. They provoke, co-construct, and stimulate individual
thinking, as well as children’s collaboration with peers. Teachers are committed to reflection
about their own teaching and learning.
Teachers learn about each child, not just what is typical of children in general. The teacher in
Reggio Emilia is the researcher, the learner, and the strategic contributor to the child’s capacity
to learn.
When observing a teacher who has been schooled in the Reggio Emilia approach, you may
hear sentences such as the following being said: “The child is worthy of being listened to.”
“Listen, observe, interact, and learn from the child.” “Do not place the child in adult-designed
or arbitrary time slots of adult management systems.” “If the child is misbehaving, find out
why, find out what the child is trying to communicate, find out how you can interact with the
child.” “The teacher’s job as an adult is to encourage the child to communicate his feelings and
support the child toward a positive resolution of the problem.”
To summarize, under the Reggio Emilia approach, the primary role of a teacher is:
• To co-explore the learning experience with students.
• To provoke critical thinking, and to stimulate ideas, problem solving, and conflict
resolution.
• To take ideas from the children and return them for further exploration.
• To organize aesthetically pleasing materials and those which support thoughtful
decisions about educational experiences, in collaboration with parents.
Teachers and children often work on projects in small groups. The types of projects that
teachers and their classes may work on can differ in a number of ways. For example, the topic
of investigation may derive directly from teacher observations of children’s spontaneous play
and exploration. Project topics can also be selected on the basis of academic learning, social
learning, or a concern on the part of teachers or parents. Or, they can come from serendipitous
events that capture the attention of the children and teachers. Projects are often conducted as
a support, or overlay, to a curriculum.
In short, projects:
• Can emerge from the ideas and/or interests of children and their teachers.
• Can be introduced by teachers after observing children in action in different contexts.
• Should be developed over time, should provide context so new ideas can emerge,
should invite different points of view, should have potential for negotiation and agree-
ments, should be able to be revisited to see progress and analyze learning processes.
Reggio Emilia teachers place a high value on building a positive attitude and responding to
children’s predisposition to enjoying the unexpected. Projects often begin with teachers ob-
Projects may last one week, one month or could continue throughout the school year. Through-
out a project, children and teachers make decisions about the direction of study, the ways in
which the group will research the topic, the medium that will best demonstrate and showcase
the topic, and the selection of materials needed to represent the work.
the classroom environment. In the Reggio Emilia approach great attention is given to
the look and feel of the classroom because the classroom or school environment is considered
the “third teacher.” Space is organized for small and large group work and also small intimate
spaces for one, two or three children. Documentation of the work is displayed at eye level for
both children and adults. Common space available to all children in the school may include
dramatic play areas, block areas, dress-up areas, puppetry theaters, music areas, and worktables
for children from different classrooms to come together.
representational development. The Reggio Emilia approach calls for the integration
of the graphic arts as tools for cognitive, creative, linguistic, and social development. Presenta-
tion of concepts and hypotheses in multiple forms of representation – print, art, construction,
drama, music, puppetry, and shadow play – are viewed as essential to children’s understanding
of experience.
The aspects described above are some of the most influential Reggio Emilia elements which
have been adapted in our own educational approach. We have included such elements in our
own approach at the early childhood, elementary, and middle school levels. We strongly be-
lieve that children who live in poverty need education which addresses and incorporat es these
elements in a culturally and linguistically relevant manner, to ensure the early and continuous
development of critical thinking skills, creativity, and the confidence required to succeed and
move out of poverty.
language development and literacy. In our Early Childhood programs, we use the
child’s primary language (most often Spanish) as a vehicle for developing communication skills
in English. In context and through a systematic and developmental approach, Early Literacy
methodology introduces transferable letter sounds in Spanish and English- and thus, builds
capacity for two literacy options in elementary school - English only or Bilingual Literacy. The
Para Los Niños Elementary Charter School builds upon the strength of the student’s language
when entering Kindergarten and offers parents either program for literacy learning. At the
Para Los Niños Middle School, students continue the process of English acquisition. Here,
all instruction is delivered in English. Each faculty member holds either a special Bilingual,
Crosscultural, Language and Academic Development (BCLAD) credential or a Crosscultural
Language and Academic Development (CLAD) certificate and is supported in the classroom
with a bilingual colleague in order to support the mastery of English Language Development
(ELD) standards for all students.
content areas of study. Our Science, Social Studies and Mathematics curricula seam-
lessly bridge Pre-Kindergarten to Kindergarten and Elementary to Middle School by organiz-
ing learning around overarching concepts and big ideas while focusing on the development of
Academic Language within these domains. Children actively engage in student driven inquiry
projects and are provided with opportunities to demonstrate their conceptual understanding
using representation through “a hundred languages” (the many different modes and means of
expression – music, movement, words, art media, etc.) that children use to demonstrate their
thinking, a practice essential for English Language Learners.
Through Social Solution’s Efforts-to-Outcomes, the data-system utilized throughout the agency
to track services and client outcomes, teachers have access to a longitudinal and holistic per-
spective of a child’s development in the context of their family while also providing opportuni-
ties to evaluate success of our educational strategies.
safe school guidelines. Our schools are committed to providing all children with a safe,
nurturing and respectful environment. Our Safe School Guidelines set expectations based on
values of respect, equity and fairness. Students participate in Safe School activities that are de-
signed to help children understand and practice such concepts as integrity, self-reliance, kind-
ness, fairness and responsibility. The Safe School curriculum includes the use of “Cool Tools’,
which gives children a common language for resolving conflicts and methods to cope with
bullying, peer taunting, exclusion and other socialization issues. [The Safe School curriculum
was designed by the UCLA Lab School (www.labschool.ucla.edu/ - ) ].
wellness. Health, wellness, and safety for all individuals at our schools are an ongoing
priority. Multifaceted guidance and support services are a part of the fabric of school life.
We strive to build resiliency in children and young people by creating an environment in
which peaceful and safe interactions are expected and supported not only by written policies,
professional development, and student-focused experiences but by providing students special-
ized professionals, such as Family Advocates and School Counselors, who are readily available
to offer assistance. Family Advocates provide a trusted resource on the campuses by provid-
ing direct assistance to students and their families. Students whose success is challenged by
poverty, lack of parental educational attainment, family conflict, emotional difficulties, gangs,
substance abuse, early sexual activity, or any of the other risks that confront inner-city youth
can work with their Family Advocate to identify workable solutions to their problems. The
school staff also includes mental health clinician, and therapists, who can provide critical
one-on-one therapy to students in need of support, and who can facilitate therapeutic groups
which help students develop positive peer relationships. Family Advocates and School
Counselors also maintain close collaborations with many other community organizations to
which we refer students and families often.
The educational services provided by Para Los Niños include early childhood development
and preschool education, elementary and middle school education, as well as after-school en-
richment.
Grounded in the principles of respect, responsibility and community, the overarching theo-
retical and philosophical approach to early childhood education is student-centered, engages
families as partners, and encourages exploration and discovery based on the interests and de-
velopmental levels of young children.
The Early Childhood Education Services are made up of the following components:
continuity of care. The Para Los Niños Early Childhood program is grounded in the
belief that infants and toddlers do best when they receive continuous care by the same child
development professional. This continuity of care is reinforced by placing each child in a
small group and allowing them to interact with a primary caregiver each day. Trust is one
of the most important building blocks to future learning, and is encouraged by the primary
caregiver who learns the signals and cues of infants in his/her care, and responds accordingly.
parent education and involvement. All parent involvement practices are inspired by
the principles, values, and goals of the Reggio Emilia approach. Consistent with our goal to
provide family centered educational services, we incorporate elements of the Reggio Emilia
approach, which encourages the ongoing exchange of ideas between parents and teachers as
an essential means of developing innovative strategies for educating young children. The ap-
The parent education within the Early Childhood Services curriculum serves to enhance
parents’ ability to identify and capitalize on learning opportunities that nurture their child’s
growth in a variety of developmental domains. It also encourages parents to communicate
with teachers about their child’s developmental progress and provides opportunities to rein-
force that progress at school and at home.
The educational program in the Para Los Niños Charter School includes a strong concentra-
tion on literacy and is made up of the following components:
literacy development and english language development. The Para Los Niños
Charter Elementary School offers an educational option for parents: Dual Literacy or English-
only instruction. Through the Dual Literacy program, literacy skills are developed in Spanish
while the skills to develop English literacy are scaffolded (supported based on child’s ability
and performance at each level). Transferable skills are taught in English through the content
areas of Mathematics, Science and Social Studies, using our constructivist approach tailored
for English Language Learners. Teachers are trained to create educational environments that
provide experiences which develop language and conceptual knowledge. Teachers use the
Standards Side By Side developed by the San Diego Office of Education to link the California
Standards to our Dual Literacy program.
Students who are not in the Dual Language Program can participate in the Structured English
Language Development Program, which is geared toward students who are not necessarily
fluent in English, but have been exposed to English and come to school with English as their
dominant language. These students begin their literacy learning in English and learn aca-
demic English in science, social studies and math along with their peers. English Language
reading and writing. Our language arts curriculum is primarily based on research from
Teachers College at Columbia University and The Reading and Writing Institutes. The Read-
ing and Writing Institute program, developed at Columbia University, includes key elements
such as: Reading Aloud with Accountable Talk; Guided Reading; Shared Reading; Indepen-
dent Writing; and Independent Reading. Children practice reading through decodable books
aligned with Words Their Way in the early grades, and then chapter and non-fiction books as
they progress. In daily reading “workshops,” students are explicitly taught the strategies and
habits of effective reading; they learn to talk, think and write well about their reading, and to
live richly literate lives. Literature Circles and Research Circles are added in the fourth grade
to support the understanding of expository text.
Writing is developed from the earliest stages alongside reading. Children use their knowledge
of sounds and symbols to communicate their ideas. They learn to organize and structure ideas,
to write in a variety of genres, and to use the conventions of print appropriately (Calkins, The
Art of Teaching Writing). In writing “workshops,” students learn to observe their lives and the
world around them, and to collect, draft, revise, and publish well-crafted narrative and exposi-
tory texts.
In addition to being taught as specific curricula, reading and writing are integrated into each
content area. For example, students keep journals in their science classes, where they record
what they have learned and their reactions to the material. In this way, they learn to effectively
synthesize and communicate the subject matter.
As part of the school’s experiential approach, art is incorporated into many facets of the cur-
riculum and is well integrated with subjects such as science or social studies. For example,
students may study a science concept and then provide a visual interpretation of that concept
through clay or painting. Alternatively, students may study a civilization in social studies, and
then learn traditional songs or dances associated with it. This serves to engage students on
broader levels and deepens their knowledge of and connection with the subject matter.
technology. Students use technology as a tool for inquiry and creativity. Students learn
keyboard skills, word-processing and online research skills. They use computer graphics and
multimedia programs for larger projects. Students also have opportunities to study applica-
tions of the computer in the real world through interaction with business professionals and
use of the Internet.
In every Para Los Niños elementary classroom there are four computers with safe Internet ac-
cess and one printer. Additionally, there is a rolling laboratory of ten laptop computers with
wireless Internet capability. This rolling lab is used by classes throughout the school when
additional computers for certain activities are needed. Teachers and students also have op-
portunities to use the LCD projector for visuals, and for demonstrating knowledge through
PowerPoint presentations. Additionally, the school uses digital cameras for use with presenta-
tions, projects and displays.
safe school. Teachers take time each day to address behavioral issues through Safe School
Circles. For example, if bullying occurs, the teacher may stop the class for a few minutes
to bring attention to the situation and guide students in developing skills to stop the bully-
ing. The Safe School curriculum enables children to develop their individual communication
skills, gives teachers an opportunity to listen, and distributes responsibility to all members of
project work. Social Studies and Science projects emerge through our in-depth studies
of concepts, ideas, and interests which arise within the group. Throughout a project, teachers
help children make decisions about the direction of study, the ways in which the group will
research the topic, the representational medium that will demonstrate and showcase the topic,
and the selection of materials needed to represent the work. At the Para Los Niños Charter
Elementary School, all projects are designed to address state content standards in Science and
Social Studies while literacy and mathematics are infused in a purposeful manner.
The Para Los Niños Charter Middle School implements five core components to ensure that
our students not only graduate from high school, but graduate from college and become lead-
ers and innovators: (1) Academic Excellence, (2) Imagination, (3) Community, (4) Wellness,
We provide the following instructional practices and programs to build academic success for
students in each content area:
Balanced Adolescent Literacy. Our English/ Language Arts curriculum is based on research
from the Columbia University Teachers College Reading and Writing Project, and is supple-
mented by California state adopted language and literature materials.
Mathematics. The Para Los Niños Middle School math curriculum uses California state
adopted materials, which are aligned to the California Standards in mathematics. We supple-
ment these materials with resources and manipulatives that support mathematic concepts,
problem solving and critical thinking. The math curriculum is designed by teachers to involve
students, and stresses thinking, reasoning and applying lessons, while integrating calculators
and computers appropriately. This curriculum focuses on developing language in math by
providing students with opportunities to read, write, and talk about their mathematical learn-
ing in order to further develop their literacy skills. Teachers review monthly math benchmark
assessments to monitor student progress and to provide timely interventions to students who
need support. The goal for our 8th grade students is the completion of Algebra I so that they
will be prepared for college preparatory courses in high school.
Social Studies and Science. Learning in the content areas is guided by cogent, overarching
concepts or big ideas at each grade level that serve as an organizing principle to the academic
subject area. The 6th grade studies “Continuity and Change Over Time” as an organizing
principle for the study of Earth Science and Ancient Cultures. The 7th grade studies “Interde-
pendence” as an organizing principle for Life Science and the Middle Ages to Early Modern
History. Finally, the 8th grade studies “Power” as the organizing principle for Physical Science
and US History. These bigger concepts provide context and connections to the California
Standards and provide a meaningful framework for the courses of study.
technology: 21st century skills. Not only do our students at Para Los Niños face a
sizable academic achievement gap, they also face a widening technology gap. We know that if
students are to succeed in high school and college, they must have sophisticated information
management and media literacy skills. Our middle school integrates technology use into all
curricular areas. Teachers receive focused professional development in using technology tools
such as interactive white boards, social networks, and web 2.0 tools so that they can leverage
technology to support student achievement. Students work on laptop computers and teachers
create electronic portfolios of their work, while collecting, comparing, and analyzing assess-
ment data for each student. This information is captured in a web-based database, through
which parents can access student information and communicate with teachers about their
child’s academic progress.
teacher planning. The middle school educational model requires teachers to collabo-
rate intensely and often. To this end, each teacher has a daily individual preparation period
in common with other grade-level teachers. In addition, each grade level teaching team meets
formally two times per week to plan curriculum, interdisciplinary projects, and review student
assessments. The entire faculty meets once a week for professional development which is
managed and organized by the principal. Systematic and collaborative teacher planning time
supports student academic success. The use of data in developing teaching plans and tracking
progress towards goals is of high importance. Teachers and administrators utilize continuous
assessments and benchmarking for this purpose.
imagination. The middle school also partners with various Art Education partners to pro-
vide a wide variety of arts education experiences for our students as an integral part of their
education. Meaningful arts experiences are essential for low-income, inner-city students be-
cause they facilitate the development of critical thinking and problem-solving skills; provide
opportunities for self-expression, self-confidence, and teamwork; increase motivation to attend
school; and broaden student horizons, helping them to grow beyond the boundaries of the
impoverished communities in which they live to become participatory citizens of the artisti-
cally vibrant, multicultural landscape of Los Angeles and its surrounding communities.
Students and teachers actively participate in the civic life of Los Angeles and its surrounding
communities. Through community partnerships and service learning projects, education be-
comes relevant, authentic, and empowering, and students grow to be resourceful participants
in their world. We believe the purpose of education is to help young people navigate their
own futures, to become agents of change for themselves, their families, and their neighbor-
hoods, and we actively take advantage of the experiences available in downtown Los Angeles.
Our students participate in programs at Colburn School, in the Music Center, the Ketchum
YMCA, and use the resources of the Los Angeles Main Library.
All middle school students are eligible and encouraged to participate in our after-school pro-
gram, which operates year-round, including summer vacations. We know that high-quality
extended school time is key to students’ academic success and well-being at school. Our after
school program provides targeted academic interventions to struggling students and academic
extensions to those students who are ready to move beyond. The teachers articulate the goals
for each individual student with the after-school site supervisor so that tutoring and academic
support for students is systematic, organized, and purposeful.
growth
The Para Los Niños Charter Middle School now serves 6th grade students. In the next years, it
will grow by adding a grade level each year. A new facility will be secured and allow for this
growth.
The My Values Project (MVP) creates a culturally relevant overlay to the after school
programs by asking students to critically and thoughtfully examine their values in the context
of the world in which they live. By seeking our stakeholders’ own answers to the question of
personal values we minimize the possibility of imposing values or cultural agendas of a domi-
nant culture on our students. Our objective is to discuss student values and how this affects
learning in a medium that is culturally relevant. Learning is driven by the culture of the stu-
dents’ families, their histories and communities and through examination and participation in
the creation of stories, art, language, games and project-based experiences that reflect the values
that are important to them.
Road Map to Success (RMS) was built upon the foundations of youth development and
is intended to provide opportunities for our early adolescents to process and develop
the cognitive, social, and emotional skills and abilities required to navigate through life.
This curriculum framework coordinates experiences to reflect six strength/asset-based
core components that have been empirically shown to be highly effective and successful
in supporting academic achievement. These components include:
• Academic Enrichment
• Family Involvement
• Health and Wellness
• Community Awareness and Advocacy
• Leadership
• Arts and Culture
Through the experiences and opportunities that support these components, the program
creates experiences that address the development of social and cognitive skills that the
students will utilize in the future to make healthy and positive choices.
Our schools help children succeed through an instructional program guided by our under-
standing of the three critical components necessary to succeed fully in our global society:
1. The development of general and specific knowledge related to academic disciplines.
2. The development of general skills critical to academic and personal success.
3. The development of character and a sense of community.
knowledge. We expect that all students will be able to articulate and demonstrate their
understanding of key concepts in each content area using a variety of methods and tools.
1. We expect all students to achieve proficiency in the California Content Standards.
2. We expect that all students will develop and be able to appropriately use content
specific vocabulary.
skills. Students enrolled at our schools will participate in classroom, school, and community
based experiences designed to foster the development of general skills critical to academic and
personal success:
1. We expect students to think critically and solve problems.
2. We expect students to work productively as members of a team.
3. We expect students to present their ideas articulately to a variety of audiences.
4. We expect students to utilize a variety of tools, including technology, to solve
problems and communicate ideas.
5. We expect our students to be responsible for their own success and growth.
character and community. Beyond the knowledge and skills necessary to participate
successfully in society, we expect our students to develop a sense of personal integrity within
the context of the communities in which they reside. We understand that it takes a special kind
of resilience for children raised in poverty to avoid the socially destructive activities that are
often prevalent in their homes and neighborhoods, and we strive to provide them with access
to the resources necessary to make strong choices.
1. We expect students to articulate their hopes, dreams, and challenges.
2. We expect students to be leaders as well as team-members.
3. We expect students to develop the ability to constructively resolve conflict.
4. We expect students and their families to be knowledgeable about the resources
available to support the development of a personal sense of safety and well-being.
Our experience in working with infants-8th graders in schools along with an on-going
examination of current research in education and best practices around the country has
informed our understanding of how learning best occurs. We understand that:
• Children learn best when the learning is purposeful and has personal meaning.
• Children learn best when actively involved in the learning process through hands-on
and first-hand experiences.
• Most children perform best in literacy when they have first established fluency in
their primary language.
• Learning to ask questions is fundamental to extending learning that contributes to
becoming life-long learners.
• Learning increases when children are in safe environments where they feel comfort-
able to take risks.
• Children learn best when specific and purposeful attention is paid to the develop-
ment of a relevant and interactive school environment.
research-based. We rely first on research about effective teaching and learning for all
students and then look at how practice and pedagogy applies to the demographic we serve.
Our educational program is founded on contemporary socio-cultural research, in which
knowledge is constructed as students and teachers work together toward common goals
(Tharp, et al, 2000). Rooted in the discourse of L.S. Vygotsky, this constructivist theory of
education believes that development occurs when the learner engages in the use of the tools
of learning (e.g. language and skills) toward a meaningful outcome (Vygotsky, 1978).
With this as the core of our understanding of how all people learn, our curriculum and
instructional practice is strongly influenced by recommendations from the National Research
Council and the schools for young children in Reggio Emilia, Italy.
making learning meaningful. Three major findings from the report How People
Learn (National Research Council, 1999) suggest that curriculum developers and professional
development providers should reference the following principles in order to ensure best
practice in their instructional program:
1. Learners’ preconceptions about how the world works must be engaged so that they
may grasp new concepts and information in a meaningful manner.
2. When knowledge is learned in the context of a conceptual framework, learners will
develop a deep foundation of factual knowledge and they will know how to organize
that information in ways that facilitate retrieval and application.
3. Learners must be in control of their own learning by defining goals and monitoring
their progress in achieving them.
1. Student as Individual. Because students are well-known, teachers are able to draw
both from student personal experience and from common experiences developed in
the context of the school in order to connect new learning to prior understanding of
concepts. Additionally, our emphasis on student voice in the classroom dialogue and
on teachers’ use of guiding questions as an instructional technique allows teachers to
have an ongoing understanding of the evolution of student thinking.
2. Thematic Curricula. Our Scope and Sequence includes the framing of the content
standards with “Big Ideas.” The connections between the content standards and a
larger conceptual framework allow students to create deeper and more meaningful
connections to the material.
instructional framework. All work at Para Los Niños is framed by what we under-
stand about best practice designed to meet the needs of our population of predominantly
economically disadvantaged students and English Language Learners. We know that for most
children, literacy acquisition is most effective when skills and content are initially introduced
in a child’s first language and then transferred in a systematic and supportive fashion into a
second language. For that reason, the Charter Elementary school offers families a choice of a
Dual Literacy Program and an English-Only Program for all students. All students participate
in an English Language Development program.
We believe that children learn best when they are offered a relevant curriculum, where learn-
ing develops from a range of first-hand experiences through which students are able to ask
questions, investigate solutions, solve problems and build conceptual understanding. Ulti-
mately, students will develop the range of skills that successfully prepares them to continue
teaching methodologies. At Para Los Niños we know that how we teach is as impor-
tant as what we teach and that how children learn is powerfully linked to what they are able
to do. Our school teachers list the California Content Standards as content area objectives
in their curriculum and, simultaneously, prioritize the development of higher order thinking
skills, such as the ability to solve problems, generalize ideas and skills, negotiate and compro-
mise as a member of a team, and articulate and represent their ideas to others. Teachers pay
careful attention to the creation of a purposeful environment and the development of relation-
ships and community. Our school teachers employ several targeted methodologies designed
to accomplish the goals of our academic programs.
• Building Relationships. When a student and his or her family are well-known and
able to engage in candid conversations about factors contributing to the success of
the child, education can be personalized. In order to achieve that goal, the structure of
our instructional program encourages the development of deep and sustained rela-
tionships between educational /school staff, family support service staff, and families.
At the middle school level each student is assigned an advisor for the duration of his
or her tenure. Advisors are much more than a homeroom or core content area teacher,
although they are those as well. Advisors act as primary contacts facilitating the
integration of a high-quality education program with, when needed, social, and fam-
ily support services. Additionally, advisors are responsible for documenting student
progress and developing evidence-based goals for future achievement with families
and students.
Our middle school model is one in which entire grade level teams of teachers loop
with students through 6th, 7th, and 8th grade. Students, families, and an entire team
of nurturing professionals work together for a three-year period toward the same
objective, building a foundation for academic success. Team looping allows teachers
to track, build on, and celebrate student progress over time; develop relationships
with families where honest conversations can take place; and, in the event of staff
turnover, it allows for continuity in service to students and their families.
Para Los Niños teachers are professional educators at various stages in their profes-
sional careers. We believe that their professional skills should be nurtured and grown
in the same way that our student’s academic skills are attended to. Our teachers are
well known and are given access to the highest degree of professional development
and support we can provide. We recognize the high rate of teacher turnover in many
new, inner-city charter schools, and we combat that statistic by creating an invigorat-
ing atmosphere of respect, support and professionalism leading to the highest stan-
dards in educational practice.
Our curricular program, framed by science inquiry, includes rigorous, standards-based core
programs. All of the state mandated content standards in Mathematics, English-Language
Arts, English Language Development and Social Studies are addressed as we build student ca-
pacity toward the overarching goal. Additionally, technology standards based on the National
Educational Technology Standards (NETS) are included. NETS standards are applied at each
grade level in a manner consistent with grade level appropriate content and expectations. Para
Los Niños charter schools comply with all applicable provisions of the No Child Left Behind
Act and other state and federal mandates.
The barriers to optimal development of children and their families in urban communities
mandates the implementation of an innovative and integrated support model that responds to
the comprehensive circumstances and needs of our families. In this innovative model, mental
health and family support services are integrated into community and education sites, creating
coordinated systems of support. Working collaboratively with community partnerships and
professional communities of invested stakeholders, this type of integrated model addresses
the education, physical health, mental health, safety and economic well-being of children and
their families.
overview: In December 2009, the need and effectiveness of this integrated model was illus-
trated when staff from Para Los Niños, the Family Services division, and teams from the Char-
ter Elementary and Middle schools worked together to prevent an eleven-year-old Charter
Middle school student from being referred to the Department of Children and Family Services
(DCFS) and placed into foster care. Through the integration, coordination and co-location
of mental health and family support services within Para Los Niños school sites, the Para Los
Niños staff involved in this case utilized culturally responsive and strength-based best practices
in working with this child and family in crisis, ultimately facilitating a safe and permanent
connection between the child and his extended family.
background: At the time this situation occurred, Jeffrey was an intelligent, creative and
charming eleven-year-old middle school student who had attended Para Los Niños since
pre-school. Jeffrey’s mother, Karen, was a devoted single mother who worked tirelessly to
provide for her son as a part-time employee with a Para Los Niños After-School program. In
September of 2008, Karen had begun to experience extreme emotional and financial challenges
resulting from abandonment by her ex-husband. Over time, her financial situation worsened,
resulting in her inability to cover living expenses and leading to an imminent eviction. When
the Para Los Niños’ Elementary Charter School Principal became aware of these difficulties,
Karen and Jeffrey were referred to the Family Services Division of Para Los Niños. Immedi-
ately, food vouchers, counseling and support towards acceptance into a temporary housing
assistance program were provided by Family Services. Three months later, Karen and
Jeffrey settled into transitional housing with a local housing program which would help them
obtain permanent, low-income housing, along with complementary and coordinated social
and family support services. Jeffrey was able to continue as a student with Para Los Niños, and
he flourished working with the same teachers, curriculum, and friends he had always known.
a tragic turn: Sadly, in November 2009, just as permanent, low-income housing was fi-
nally granted, Karen became terminally ill. Jeffrey had been taking the bus to school each day
while his mother was rapidly deteriorating, all the while keeping the information to himself.
As reported publicly, the over-burdened foster care system in the United States, where LA
is no exception, presents many obstacles and challenges for children placed within its care.
Throughout the country, young people who have been placed in foster care are at higher risk
for unemployment, poor educational outcomes, health issues, early parenthood, long-term
dependency on public assistance and increased rates of incarceration and homelessness once
they transition out of the foster care system. http://www.cwla.org/programs/fostercare/agingoutre-
sources.htm
• In California, 65% of youth leaving foster care do so without a place to live.
• Over 70% of all California Penitentiary inmates have spent time in the foster
care system.
• In Los Angeles, 50% of transitioning youth will be homeless within eighteen months
of discharge, and research shows that only 1% to 5% of foster youth ever graduate from
college. http://www.ballantinesbiz.com/everychild/emancipatingfosteryouthstatistics.htm.
This grim prognosis for Jeffrey’s future made the search for an alternative living situation an
urgent priority for those involved in his case. Every effort was made to prevent involvement
with the foster care system by maximizing and utilizing the expertise, networks and passion of
the Para Los Niños staff and its relationships with community agencies.
strategies employed: A Para Los Niños Family Services Family Advocate was sent to the
hospital to assess the situation and arrived to face a dire situation; Karen was being sedated
for intubation due to her inability to breathe on her own and had just been told she was not
expected to live. Karen provided information about a distant cousin who lived in New Jersey
and could raise Jeffrey, then became unconscious and remained alive but gravely ill for many
weeks. Family Services acted immediately, ensuring that Jeffrey had temporary placement
with a close friend and neighbor. Staff reviewed the address book Karen had in her purse in
search of the cousin mentioned, and a telephone number was discovered. Together with the
hospital social worker, Karen’s cousin, “Jim,” was located. He and his wife agreed to raise and
love Jeffrey as their own child, and made plans to introduce him to his many relatives.
A Care Planning Team made up of family support, mental health, and other service providers
was created to coordinate and manage the situation. Accommodations were arranged for Jim
to come to Los Angeles and engage in the assessment and planning process, during which
short-and long-term solutions were identified to support Jeffrey following his mother’s death.
For the next two months while Karen remained alive, weekly, coordinated phone meetings
the result: The coordinated work between the Para Los Niños school teams, the Family
Services team, and the mental health and family support service partners with whom Para Los
Niños has strong relationships was integral in facilitating a positive outcome for Jeffrey. Fol-
lowing Karen’s memorial service, Jim returned to New Jersey with Jeffrey in his care.
conclusion: The integration of the comprehensive services and expertise that lie within
the Para Los Niños agency and with its strategic partnerships, coupled with responsive cross-
division coordination, resulted in a positive outcome. This child and his family were identified
in serious crisis, supported throughout the crisis, and responded to in a relevant, appropriate
and productive manner that resulted in a concrete plan to secure safety and long-term stability
for Jeffrey.
learning barriers and learning supports. Progressive schools, like Para Los Niños
Charter Schools, focus on addressing the entire student. Like ours, these schools are moving
from a two-tier approach to a three component framework. In the two-tier approach, the
focus is on improving instruction and school management. The third component is referred
to by various names including “Learning Support Component”, “Enabling Component” or a
“Comprehensive Student Support System” (Center for Mental Health in Schools at UCLA,
2006). This third component serves as the foundation for developing a truly integrated and
comprehensive approach in which learning barriers, mental health, and other bio-psychoso-
cial concerns are embedded in the school’s mission. This pioneering effort recognizes that all
three components are essential, complimentary and overlapping.
The primary goal of this approach is to align processes and ensure the promise of a compre-
hensive, highly effective system for children and their families (Center for Mental Health in
Schools at UCLA, 2006). The focus is on students and families, and the context in which they
live, learn, work and play. A basic assumption underlying this new Learning Support interven-
tion application is that initially, the least restrictive and nonintrusive forms of interventions
are required to address problems and accommodate diversity.
This emerging approach calls for more than simply expanding services to address learning
barriers. It is focused on enhancing strategic collaborations and partnerships to develop com-
prehensive approaches that strengthen students, families, schools and communities to maxi-
mize learning and overall wellbeing. The emphasis on this model is to develop, over time, a
full continuum of systematically interconnected school and community interventions that
encompasses (a) a system for promoting healthy development and preventing problems, (b) a
system for responding to problems as soon after onset as is feasible, (c) a system for providing
intensive care (Center for Mental Health in Schools at UCLA, 2006).
Learning Barriers. As Para Los Niños looks to further integrate our mental health and family
support services into our school environments, a critical issue is defining what we must do to
enable all students to learn and all teachers to teach effectively. This means focusing on those
students who are motivationally ready and able to profit from ‘‘high standards’’ curriculum
and instruction, as well as also addressing the needs of those encountering external and inter-
nal barriers that interfere with their benefiting from improved instruction. These are known
as barriers to learning and include all those factors that make it difficult for teachers to teach
effectively (Center for Mental Health in Schools at UCLA, 2004). School-wide approaches to
addressing learning barriers are especially important where large numbers of students are af-
fected. Although some youngsters have disabilities, it is important to remember how few start
out with internal problems that interfere with learning to read and write. Even those who do
have these problems can benefit from recognition of the assets, strengths, and/or protective
factors that can counter deficits and drive success.
learning
description
barriers
General stressors • External stressors (objective and perceived) and deficits in support systems
and underlying • Competence deficits (low self-efficacy/self-esteem, skill deficits)
psychological • Threats to self-determination/autonomy/control
problems associated • Feeling unrelated to others or perceiving threats to valued relationships
with: • Emotional upsets, personality disorders, mood disorders and other
psychopathology
Learning Supports. Learning supports are resources, strategies, and practices that provide
physical, social, emotional and intellectual assistance intended to address barriers to learn-
ing and teaching in ways that enable all students to have an equal opportunity for success at
school. For schools to be most effective, learning supports need be woven and embedded into
a comprehensive, multifaceted and cohesive system of classroom and school-wide interven-
tions that need to be fully integrated within the instructional environment (Center for Mental
Health in Schools at UCLA, 2004). In short, it is imperative to rebuild supports for learning
as an integral component in enabling all students to have an equal opportunity to learn in
school. The goals of having comprehensive learning supports include: 1) reducing student
dropout; 2) reducing teacher dropout; 3) re-engaging students in classroom learning; 4) nar-
rowing or eliminating the achievement gap.
learning
description
barriers
Classroom-Based • Opening the classroom door to bring available supports in (e.g. peer tutors,
Approaches volunteers, aids trained to work with students-in-need; resource teachers and
student support staff work in the classroom as part of the teaching team)
• Redesigning classroom approaches to enhance teacher capability to
prevent and handle problems and reduce need for out of class referrals (e.g.
personalized instruction; special assistance as necessary; developing small
group and independent learning options; reducing negative interactions
and over-reliance on social control; expanding the range of curricular and
instructional options and choices; systematic use of peripheral interventions)
• Enhancing and personalizing professional development (e.g. creating a
Learning Community for teachers; ensuring opportunities to learn through
co-teaching, team teaching, and mentoring; teaching intrinsic motivation
concepts and their application to schooling)
• Curricular enrichment and adjunct programs (e.g. varied enrichment
activities that are not tied to reinforcement schedules; visiting scholars from
the community)
• Classroom and school-wide approaches used to create and maintain a caring
and supportive climate
• Emphasis at all times is on enhancing feelings of competence, self-
determination, and relatedness to others at school and reducing threats to
such feelings.
Home Involvement • Addressing specific support and learning needs of family (e.g. support
in Schooling services for those in the home to assist in addressing basic survival needs and
obligations to the children; adult education classes to enhance literacy, job
skills, English-as-a-second language, citizenship preparation)
• Improving mechanisms for communication and connecting school and
home (e.g. opportunities at school for family networking and mutual
support, learning, recreation, enrichment, and for family members to receive
special assistance and to volunteer to help; phone calls from teacher and
other staff with good news; frequent and balanced conferences – student-led
when feasible; outreach to attract hard-to-reach families – including student
dropouts)
• Involving homes in student decision making (e.g. families prepared for
involvement in program planning and problem-solving)
• Enhancing home support for learning and development (e.g. family literacy;
family homework projects; family field trips)
• Recruiting families to strengthen school and community (e.g. volunteers to
welcome and support new families and help in various capacities; families
prepared for involvement in school governance)
• Staff/stakeholder development to broaden awareness of and plan programs to
enhance opportunities for home involvement.
Student and • Providing support as soon as a need is recognized and doing so in the least
Family Assistance disruptive ways (e.g. pre-referral interventions in classrooms; problem solving
conferences with parents; open access to school, district, and community
support programs)
• Referral interventions for students & families with problems (e.g. screening,
referrals, and follow-up – school-based, school-linked)
• Enhancing access to direct interventions for health, mental health, and
economic assistance (e.g. school-based, school-linked, and community-based
programs)
• Follow-up assessment to check whether referrals and services are adequate
and effective
• Mechanisms for resource coordination to avoid duplication of and fill gaps
in services and enhance effectiveness (e.g. school-based and linked, feeder
pattern/family of schools, community-based programs)
• Enhancing stakeholder awareness of programs and services
• Involving community providers to fill gaps and augment school resources
• Staff/stakeholder development to enhance effectiveness of student and family
assistance systems, programs, and services
protective and risk factors. In addition to addressing learning barriers and increas-
ing learning supports, our long history of working with children and their families enables us
to more deeply understand the direct correlation between a child’s well-being and that of the
family’s. As such, our experience, along with research, compels us to examine the complex in-
tersection of risks that our children and families experience, and the strengths and resiliencies
our children and families possess.
To guide our work, we have explored the risk and protective factor literature and its focus on
child and family factors, and strengths in families. The risk and protective factor literature is
a growing body of research in family wellness and maltreatment prevention science that has
Risk Factors. At Para Los Niños, our families present a multitude of risk factors. Risk factors
may be found within the individual (e.g. a temperamental difficulty, a chromosomal abnor-
mality) or the environment (e.g. poverty, family violence). Individual developmental pathways
throughout the life cycle are influenced by interactions among risk factors that impact the
probability of poor outcomes in life in a variety of manifestations (Myers et al, 2002; Thomas
et al, 2003). Risk factors have been found to be highly correlated with both child maltreatment
and poverty (Knitzer, 2000). Para Los Niños will address the following risk factors: 1) poor
child and parent relationship; 2) child and family stressors; 3) child and family crises such as
domestic violence, substance abuse, etc; 4) mental health illness and others.
Protective Factors. To effectively and comprehensively support families toward more sta-
ble and thriving places, risk factors must be addressed as well as protective factors enhanced.
While the cumulative burden of multiple risk factors is associated with greater developmental
vulnerability, the cumulative buffer of multiple protective factors is associated with greater
developmental resilience (Shonkoff & Phillips, 2000).
The Strengthening Families Approach and Protective Factors Framework includes a set of
six interrelated protective factors correlated with maintaining family wellness and reduced
child maltreatment: 1) parental resilience; 2) social connections; 3) knowledge of parenting
and child development; 4) concrete support in times of need; and 5) social and emotional
competence in children 6) nurture and attachment processes. Para Los Niños will continue to
focus on increasing all protective factors through our Integrated Model.
Social Connections Having friends, family members, neighbors, and others who provide
emotional support and concrete assistance to parents.
Concrete Support in Having financial security to cover basic needs and unexpected costs;
Times of Need formal supports like TANF, Medicaid and job training; crisis services
including mental health, domestic violence and substance abuse.
Children’s Social and A child’s ability to interact positively with others and communicate his
Emotional Competence or her emotions effectively.
Nurturing and A child’s ability to develop empathy through nurturing relationships, and
Attachment Processes positively attach with his/her caregivers.
An array of culturally relevant and appropriate mental health and family support services will
be housed at the Child and Family Wellness Centers to provide integrated, coordinated and
comprehensive services that will decrease learning barriers and risk factors, while increasing
protective factors and learning supports for all children and families served by the Centers.
assessment for every child and family. The children and families served by Para
Los Niños are often characterized by multiple factors placing them at-risk for negative future
outcomes including academic failure, juvenile delinquency, poor physical and mental health,
and adult poverty. While we know most of our clients come to us with varying degrees of life
challenges, each individual child and family presents unique needs and strengths. Within our
available resources, Para Los Niños will strategically work towards assessing each child and
family that comes to our educational sites in order to best serve them. We will look to empiri-
cal research for information about best practices in this area. One example is the Response to
Intervention (RtI) strategy for ensuring that each client is directed to the appropriate support
services. Response to Intervention has been in use for decades, often within the context of iden-
tifying and supporting Special Education students. More recently it has been expanded for use
with a general population of students. The RtI model uses a tiered strategy for identifying the
level of preventative intervention appropriate to the needs of an individual client (Materials
created by the IRIS CENTER (http://iris.peabody.vanderbilt.edu/ for the National Association
of State Directors of Special Education’s Idea Partnership, sponsored by the U.S. Department of
Education, Office of Special Education Programs, 2007)). Based on well-articulated outcomes,
the Para Los Niños staff, together with the family and community members when appropriate,
will assess a child’s (along with his/her family) capacity in academic achievement, social skills,
home environment, and mental health. Children will then be linked to appropriate services
in education (e.g. general education program, remedial support program, intense intervention
program) and, if necessary, other mental health, and/or family support services.
centralized services. In line with the vision of more fully and deeply integrating men-
tal health, family support services and education programming, we will provide centralized
services at the Child and Family Wellness Centers where children and families can obtain
needed services including, but not limited to, mental health and family support services, refer-
rals and linkage, and psycho-education classes and support groups. The mental health, crisis
intervention, case management and other mental health and family support services currently
offered within our Mental Health, Family Services Divisions, Youth Development and Youth
Workforce Services, according to specific grants and programs, will be strategically integrated
within Para Los Niños educational settings given available resources and infrastructure. This
co-located model will facilitate the service coordination process more easily as all programs
will have greater access to each other. Thus, this will allow for increased communication and
the ability to work collectively for the holistic treatment of the child and their family.
At Para Los Niños we believe that integrating culturally competent practices into program-
ming must go beyond the typical “culturally sensitive” practices of delivering services in a
participant’s primary language, matching participants and providers on the basis of race and
ethnicity, and incorporating traditional child rearing practices into a program’s curriculum.
We therefore embed culturally competent practices into all of our services.
Most Para Los Niños students are bilingual. Bilingual students often encounter a number
of educational barriers that can influence their performance in schools including prejudicial
racial attitudes, intolerance to linguistic and cultural differences, lower levels of expectations
from school professionals, a lack of access to adequate or higher level educational services due
to tracking, and the implementation of policies and regulations insensitive to the needs of
culturally different students (Cummins, 1989). Consequently, we believe it is critical that these
cultural characteristics and differences must be examined in the context of how they influence
the students’ functioning within assessment and classroom situations, schools, families, and
communities (Tharp, 1989). We will address issues of discrimination, ethnic identity, accul-
turation and acculturative stress in order to avoid any severe negative impact.
In short, Para Los Niños will continue to ensure culturally competent practices by continuous-
ly studying, implementing, and adjusting appropriate practice models, such as the Children
and Adolescent Service System Program (CASSP) cultural competence model. This model
was developed for the field of children’s mental health and appears to have the necessary theo-
retical foundation to lend itself to various service disciplines involving children, families, com-
munities of color, and, at least theoretically, to non-ethnic cultural groups. Its major emphasis
is on behavior in as much as it (a) covers attitudes, practices, policies, and structures and (b) has
implications for both line staff and administrative personnel. In contrast to earlier models, the
principles and elements of the model are more concerned with behavior than awareness and
sensitivity (Lefley & Pederson, 1986).
As with all of our services and past programs, community partnerships will continue to be
an essential component of our practice, allowing additional expertise to be accessible to our
clients through the Child and Family Wellness Centers.
Para Los Niños has multiple educational sites in different locations in Los Angeles County. We
plan to further develop the Child and Family Wellness Centers at these sites by staffing them
in a manner that deepens and strengthens integration to implement all learning supports and
increase protective factors. This will be a three-tiered approach: 1) rotating of staff; 2) adding
additional needed staff; and 3) ongoing training.
rotation of existing staff. Representatives from existing respective mental health and
family support service programs will be assigned to Para Los Niños Child and Family Wellness
Centers on a rotating basis. These sites will serve as both triage and field based service sites for
each program, and facilitate the consultation process by providing greater access to primary
contacts and parents. The rotation of service providers will allow for both increased commu-
nication between education, social, and family support service providers and continued com-
munication within programs.
additional staffing. Preliminary plans to offer fully integrated services at the Child and
Family Wellness Centers include seeking funding opportunities to create the following new
positions and teams:
• Wellness Team/Council- For community agencies, such as Para Los Niños, that have
multiple sites, it is important to create an oversight team that can implement the
distinct phases and steps required for the integration model. This team will consist
of The California Endowment Integration Team, as well as other key constituents,
and build on the work previously conducted by the Integration Team. The Wellness
Management and Council Team will be responsible for on-going, multi-site, resource-
oriented mechanisms that provide leadership, facilitate communication, coordination,
integration and quality improvement of all activities the sites have for addressing
barriers to learning and risk factors. The Council will also be responsible for promot-
ing healthy professional development by increasing learning supports and protective
factors; and, they will be responsible for monitoring, tracking and leading on-going
efforts to make systemic changes to the agency’s capacity and infrastructure to imple-
ment the integration model. In addition, the Council will be responsible for conduct-
ing resource mapping analysis of those school sites identified to have a Child and
Family Wellness Center. Further, they will be responsible for developing and creating
needed project manuals such as crisis response teams, cultural competency practices,
etc. Finally, they will be responsible for engaging established community partners and
creating important formal and informal partnerships in the community.
• Site Collaboration Teams- In the identified Child and Family Wellness Centers,
teams will include service staff, community partners, parents, older students,
demographic profiles for los angeles county’s spa 4, spa 6, and spa 7
Children ages 0-15: (23%) Children ages 0-15: (30%), Age 26 and under:
Downtown community: child 25 years of age or less: (47.9%) (43.1%).
population is 28.7% of total.
Second highest poverty rate in Highest poverty rate in county. Overall poverty rate: (39.5%).
the county. Majority (60.6%) living beneath
Majority (51.3%) living the 200% FPL (higher than the
beneath the countywide percentage).
200% FPL (higher than the
countywide rate: (38.7%)).
Child Abuse and Neglect Base Second highest CAN rate seen Overall CAN Rate: (0.94).
Rates= CAN Rates across service areas. Very close to countywide rate:
Overall CAN Rate: (1.20). Palmdale and Watts: (2.15) (0.96).
Greater than county Rate: highest CAN Rates in county.
(0.96). Hancock N.: (1.66), Florence‐ East LA had highest CAN Rate:
Downtown: (1.92) and USC Firestone: (1.51), and Compton: (1.76), greater than 84% the
N:(1.61) had CAN Rates (1.67) had CAN Rates greater county’s communities.
greater than 84% or more of than 84% or more of the county’s
the county’s communities, communities.
(i.e., greater than 1 standard
deviation from the mean).
High School Graduation High School Graduation Rates High School Graduation
Rates – SPA 4 – SPA 6 Rates – SPA 7
Lowest graduation rates across Lowest graduation rate: (55.7%). Overall graduation rate:
all ethnic groups: (59.4%). (84.8%).
3rd Grade Reading Level – 3rd Grade Reading Level – SPA 6 3rd Grade Reading Level –
SPA 4 SPA 7
Third graders scoring at or above
Third graders scoring at or the 50th percentile: (15.9%). Third graders scoring at or
above the 50th percentile: above the 50th percentile:
(23.3%). (27.7%).
Overall suspension rate: Overall suspension rate: 4.8%. Overall suspension rate: (3.5%).
(2.5%). Above countywide rate: (3.7%). Similar to countywide rate:
Below countywide rate: (3.7%).
(3.7%).
Children and families served by our Ontario programs come from extremely underserved and
high-risk areas of San Bernardino County, where poverty, unemployment, under-education,
and violence are endemic - often to the extent that children’s physical, emotional, social and
cognitive development is impaired. All families participating in our programs in Ontario are
classified as low or very-low income. Recent surveys of the families we serve show that the
average income ranges from $15,000 to $20,000 per family. One-hundred percent of children
at the elementary schools in the area qualify for free or reduced-price lunches.
San Bernardino County ranks 27th out of 58 counties in California in poverty and 29th in
child poverty. 36% of the county’s population was estimated to live under 200% of the Federal
Poverty Level. Other indicators of need: one-eighth of all births in Ontario are to teen moth-
ers, homelessness in San Bernardino County increased 39% between 2005-2008 and nearly
one-quarter of the homeless population is families with children.
education. Educationally, the drop-out rate is lower than in Los Angeles Unified School
District, with 82% of Ontario high school students graduating, and 74% in San Bernardino
County high schools (as opposed to 50% in LA). For black and Latino students, the rate is
higher -- 26.2 and 23.6 percent respectively. Still, according to a 2008 report by the Public
Policy Institute of California, the number of adults with less than a high school diploma (22%)
will exceed the share of jobs available for workers at that education level (17%), even with an
anticipated job growth of 20% between the years 2004-2015.
Historically, Para Los Niños has had a long-standing commitment to quality and the ongoing
pursuit of excellence. Now more than ever, this commitment, along with the related evaluation
and quality improvement activities, is of vital importance. The development of clear objec-
tives, proper implementation, monitoring, and evaluation strategies for our strategic plan will
be critical to our success in the next five years. Accreditation, best practices and evidence-based
programs, continuous quality improvement processes, evaluation, and data management will
therefore become of increased relevance in our practices, culture, and investments and will be
key areas of focus and growth over the next five years.
Quality comes to life at Para Los Niños through the development, implementation, and con-
tinuous adjustments of the following:
• Accreditation and Best Practices
• Continuous Quality Improvement Plan
• Data Management: ETO
• Evaluation plans
• Research collaborations
The Para Los Niños Quality Assurance & Research (QA&R) division oversees the listed areas,
maintaining the organization’s Council on Accreditation’s (COA) accreditation status, imple-
menting the Continuous Quality Improvement program, designing and overseeing program
evaluation, and research collaborations.
para los niños and council on accreditation. Para Los Niños has been accredited
by Council on Accreditation (COA) since 1999, and will continue to maintain accreditation
by successfully completing the rigorous COA re-accreditation process every four years. Main-
taining COA accreditation is a critical component of the agency’s commitment to quality and
excellence, as it ensures our programmatic and administrative practices are aligned with best
practices. COA accreditation also promotes self-evaluation and guides our continuous pursuit
of improvement.
Through the process of accreditation, Para Los Niños is evaluated against best-practice stan-
dards, which are developed by COA using a consensus model with input from a wide range of
service providers, funders, experts, policymakers and consumers. COA sets forth the highest
Standards of Administration & Quality Service, providing guidelines for: effective manage-
ment, accountability, ethical practice, quality service, and continuous improvement at every
level.
The Value of Accreditation. COA accreditation verifies that Para Los Niños is operating with
credibility, integrity, and the highest level of achievement. COA accreditation is very valuable
to all stakeholders and supporters of Para Los Niños. COA accreditation focuses on helping
our organization grow stronger—stronger in terms of its governance, its management and its
services. COA accreditation is an objective and reliable verification that Para Los Niños has
earned the confidence and support of all stakeholders.
COA has the sponsorship and support of over 24 national and international organizations and
is developing a leadership role in the global community through its collaboration with other
countries. As a result, as an accredited organization, Para Los Niños has access to invaluable
resources.
We will continue to rely on the ongoing process of COA Accreditation within the next five
years to positively impact our agency and clients, resulting in improved service delivery, im-
proved internal processes and procedures, improved employee morale, recognition from gov-
ernments, foundations and grant makers, and the COA Community/Network.
The CQI plan for the next five years will ensure the following planning and implementation
processes are areas of focus for our agency:
1. Long-term planning: The Strategic Plan.
2. Short-term planning: Yearly Program Goals, and Yearly Program and Department
Improvement Plans.
3. Internal Quality Monitoring: Case/file Reviews, Performance Improvement Program
Reports, Annual Performance Evaluation Reports, Client Satisfaction Surveys, Staff
Training Evaluations, and Quality Assurance Reports.
4. Feedback Mechanism: Reports to the Board of Directors, Program Directors Meet-
ings, CQI Committee Meetings, Staff Newsletter, and other agency activities and com-
munications media.
data management. The collection and proper utilization of data are essential elements
in the agency’s evaluation, research and CQI efforts. After a comprehensive review of existing
data-system options, Para Los Niños purchased Social Solutions’ Efforts-to-Outcomes (ETO)
Software. In 2007, Para Los Niños began implementation of Social Solutions’ Efforts-to-Out-
comes (ETO) Software. During the next five years we will complete all phases of the system’s
customized development and implementation.
The Social Solutions’ ETO system provides the agency with a flexible and comprehensive plat-
form for improving, measuring and demonstrating impact, providing direct service staff with
a tool to make their jobs easier and improve their effectiveness, providing administrators with
a resource to improve decision-making, and providing funders with a demonstrated return
on investment. The ETO Software is a secure, flexible, comprehensive, web-based Software
for Human Services organizations. This software is being customized based on the program
and administrative needs of our programs, enabling the agency to track information across
In addition to supporting the direct interactions with our clients, this software will enable Para
Los Niños to track and manage each of the key relationships that support our program and or-
ganizational success; track statistics at the individual, family, program, site, and organizational
level and manage volunteer and other outside entity relationships. By capturing the time and
effort put into achieving outcomes within the context of these relationships this data-system
will help us continually improve services delivery. Additionally, it is expected to improve our
understanding of the relationships that underpin our success and as a result be better able to
serve participants, measure outcomes and demonstrate results.
research. The next five years will provide a particularly unique opportunity for us to par-
ticipate in the advancement of knowledge in the areas relevant to our clients and services
by establishing strategic research collaborations. This shall also be an important tool in our
evaluation efforts, and continuous quality improvement processes. We view research both as
an opportunity and a responsibility.
Para Los Niños has at its disposal a valuable resource to advance the knowledge base need-
ed for better understanding of families, children, and individuals of all ages. The agency is
uniquely positioned to provide access to certain client constituencies, (e.g. child development,
after school services or family preservation groups), for research purposes. This, together with
the agency’s professional responsibility to increase knowledge, makes it an attractive milieu
for researchers representing diverse disciplines (e.g. education, child development, social work,
psychology, etc.). As an employer of over 400 staff, research using staff members as subjects
could prove beneficial in reducing work related stress or designing improvements in service
delivery.
The potential volume of research possibilities suggests the need for an organized and struc-
tured research review procedure to ensure that staff, and particularly students who may be as-
signed to the agency, are not unnecessarily distracted from their core service and administrative
functions, and to protect their safety and manage participation that is in their best interests.
A particular research proposal may offer predictable benefits at a cost that is too great for the
organization to absorb. Assessing the ratio between presumed benefit and cost to the orga-
nization is an essential purpose of the agency’s research review process. Ensuring that the
benefits of research significantly outweigh potential risks to individual participants is a key
objective of the research review process.
The Para Los Niños Internal Review Board. The United States Department of Health and
Human Services (HHS) Office for Human Research Protections (OHRP) regulations have em-
powered Internal Review Boards to approve, require modifications in planned research prior
to approval, or disapprove research. Internal Review Boards perform critical oversight func-
tions for research conducted on human subjects that are scientific, ethical, and regulatory.
The Para Los Niños Internal Review Board is the committee that is formally designated to
approve, monitor, and review any research involving agency clients or staff with the aim to
protect the rights and welfare of the research subjects. The role of the Para Los Niños IRB will
be particularly important in the upcoming years, as strategic partnerships are developed and
effective and useful research projects are targeted and monitored.
The Para Los Niños Internal Review Board follows the HHS and OHRP regulations and re-
quirements. It is comprised of a group of internal and external stakeholders who hold exper-
tise in various different areas, including the scientific and academic processes, practitioners,
advocacy and management leaders. The Para Los Niños IRB maintains a Federalwide Assur-
ance Form, which is an OHRP-approved assurance of compliance with the HHS regulations
(45 CFR 46.103) for the protection of human subjects.
The IRB review is designed to assure, both in advance and by periodic review, that appropri-
ate steps are taken to protect the rights and welfare of humans participating as subjects in a
research study or evaluation project. To accomplish this purpose, the IRB reviews research
protocols and related materials (e.g. informed consent documents and investigator brochures)
to ensure protection of the rights and welfare of human subjects of research. Additional ob-
jectives of the IRB protocol review are to assess the ethics of the research and its methods, to
promote fully informed and voluntary participation by prospective subjects who are them-
selves capable of making such choices (or, if that is not possible, informed permission given
by a suitable representative) and to maximize the safety of subjects once they are enrolled in
the project.
evaluation. The development of a comprehensive evaluation plan for the next five years
will provide a structured system to assess the impact our services have on clients, track and
The design, implementation, and tracking of the evaluation will take place as a cooperative
process via the CQI Committee in partnership with relevant stakeholders.
Adelman, H.S., and Taylor, L. “The School Leaders’ Guide to Student Learning Supports:
New Directions for Addressing Barriers to Learning.” Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
2006a.
Adelman, H.S. & Taylor, L. (1993). “Learning Problems and Learning Disabilities:
Moving Forward.” Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
Allensworth, D., Wyche, J., Lawson, E., & Nicholson, L. (Eds.). (1997). “Schools and
Health: Our Nation’s Investment.” Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Blank, M., Melaville, A., and Shah, B. “Making the Difference: Research and Practice in
Community Schools.” Coalition of Community Schools. 2003.
Center for Mental Health in Schools at UCLA [Adelman, H.S. and Taylor, L.]. “Addressing
Barriers to Learning: A Comprehensive Approach to Mental Health in Schools.” 2006. UCLA
Center for Mental Health in Schools, Dept of Psychology, PO Box 951563, Los Angeles, CA
90095 (310)825-3634/fax(310)206-8716 email: smhp@ucla.edu web: smhp.psych.ucla.edu
Center for Mental Health in Schools at UCLA (2004). “Addressing Barriers to Learning: A Set
of Surveys to Map What a School Has and What It Needs (Resource Aid Packet).” UCLA
Center for Mental Health in Schools, Dept of Psychology, PO Box 951563, Los Angeles, CA
90095 (310)825-3634/fax(310)206-8716 email: smhp@ucla.edu web: smhp.psych.ucla.edu
DePanfilis, D., Dubowitz, H. (2005). “Family Connections: A Program for Preventing Child
Neglect.” Child Maltreatment, Vol. 10, No. 2; 108-123
Esquivel, G. (1985). “Best Practices in the Assessment of Limited English Proficient and
Bilingual Children.” In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.) (1995). Best Practices in School
Psychology III. Washington, DC: National Assoc. of School Psychologists
Knitzer, Jane (2000), “Promoting Resiliency: Helping Young Children and Parents Affected
by Substance Abuse, Domestic Violence, and Depression in the Context of Welfare Reform.”
(New York: National Center for Children in Poverty).
Lefley, H.P. & Pederson, P.B. (Eds.) (1986). “Cross-Cultural Training for Mental Health
Professionals.” Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
Myers, John E. B. et al (2002), The APSAC Handbook on Child Maltreatment, 2nd Edition
(Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications).
Sarason, S. B. (1996). “Revisiting ‘The Culture of School and the Problem of Change.’’
New York: Teachers College Press.
Shonkoff, Jack P. and Karen A. Phillips (Eds.) (2000) “From Neurons to Neighborhoods:
The Science of Early Childhood Development” (Washington, DC: National Academy Press).
Tharp, R.G. (1989). “Psychocultural Variables and Constants.” American Psychologist, 44,
349-359.
Wulzyn, F. H. (2008). “Child Well-Being as Human Capitol.” Chicago: Chapin Hall Center
for Children at the University of Chicago.