Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Broadband quasi-PT Symmetry Sustained by Inhomogeneous Broadening of The Spectral Line
Broadband quasi-PT Symmetry Sustained by Inhomogeneous Broadening of The Spectral Line
Spectral Line
D. M. Tsvetkov1, V. A. Bushuev1 , V. V. Konotop2 , B. I. Mantsyzov1
1
Department of Physics, M. V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow 119991, Russia
2
Departamento de Fı́sica and Centro de Fı́sica Teórica e Computacional, Faculdade de Ciências,
Universidade de Lisboa, Campo Grande, Ed. C8, Lisboa 1749-016, Portugal
(Dated: November 20, 2018)
It is shown that inhomogeneous broadening of the spectral line of active impurities may sustain
simultaneously parity (P) and time (T ) symmetries of a medium, in a finite range of field frequencies,
arXiv:1811.07324v1 [physics.optics] 18 Nov 2018
what is forbidden by the causality principle in media without broadening. If a spectral width of a
propagating pulse is less than the inhomogeneous broadening, the medium for such a pulse becomes
quasi-PT -symmetric. The effect of the broadband quasi-PT symmetry in a finite frequency domain,
is illustrated on examples of unidirectional diffraction of pulses in Bragg and Laue geometries,
propagating in photonic crystals.
PT -symmetric medium are described in Sec. III. In sec- For the assumed odd distribution of the inversion w(ξ),
tions IV and V we consider examples of the diffraction in the terms involving g0 and g1 represent PT -symmetric
Bragg and in Laue geometries, respectively. The results and anti-PT -symmetric parts of the dielectric permittiv-
as summarized in Conclusion. Some technical details of ity εres (ξ, ω), respectively. Hence, for the model to obey
calculations are given in Appendixes. PT symmetry, one has to require |g1 | ≪ |g0 |. To study
the conditions when it happens we explore the Doppler-
Maxwellian distribution [17]
II. EFFECT OF INHOMOGENEOUS T∗ 2 ∗ 2
BROADENING g(∆ − ∆0 ) = √ 2 e−(∆−∆0 ) (T2 ) /2 , (3)
2π
To describe the physics of the phenomenon we consider which is the most used one and in which 1/T2∗ is the
a photonic crystal (the host medium) with real dielectric standard deviation from the central detuning ∆0 . In the
permittivity, εhm (ξ), having period d in ξ-direction (be- limit of zero inhomogeneous broadening 1/T2∗ → 0, when
low ξ will be either x or z), i.e., εhm (ξ + d) = εhm (ξ). g(∆ − ∆0 ) → δ(∆ − ∆0 ), we obtain that the medium is
The host medium is doped by active impurities, which PT -symmetric for a monochromatic wave at the central
are two-level atoms, resulting in gain and absorption de- frequency ω0 (g1 = 0 at ∆ = ∆0 ) and does not possess
scribed by the permittivity component, εres (ξ, ω). Since any symmetry for all other frequencies from the spectrum
active media are highly dispersive we account for the fre- of a pulse-spectrum.
quency dependence of εres (ξ, ω), while the dispersion of Now we show that presence of sufficiently large inho-
the host medium is neglected [εhm (ξ) does not depend on mogeneous broadening, 1/T2∗ ≫ 0, sustains PT symme-
ω]. We assume that spatial distribution of inversion of try for a finite spectral domain centered at ω0 . Indeed,
the excited atoms is described by a periodic odd function using expressions (2) and (3) we compute in the leading
w(ξ) with zero average and having the period of the host order of the limit T2∗ /T2 , T2∗ ∆0 ≪ 1 the estimates (see
medium: w(ξ) = −w(−ξ) = w(ξ + d). Appendix A)
Let the impurity atoms have resonant frequencies ω0′
g0 ∼ T2∗ , g1 ∼ (T2∗ )2 ∆0 (4)
which deviate from a central frequency ω0 . The distribu-
tion of these deviations g(ω0′ − ω0 ) determines the reso- Thus we indeed obtain the required condition g1 /g0 ∼
nant component of the dielectric permittivity, εres (ξ, ω). T2∗ ∆0 ≪ 1 allowing for neglecting the anti-PT symmetric
The two-level quantum oscillator model (see e.g. [16, 17]) part of the dielectric permittivity. We emphasize, that
allows one to represent εres (ξ, ω) = −iw(ξ)ε̃(ω), where the above estimates are not restricted to model (3). The
ˆ ∞ essential requirement used in their derivation [see (A3)
g(∆ − ∆0 ) and (A6)] is the sufficiently fast (Gaussian in our case)
ε̃(ω) = iβ d∆, (1)
−∞ ∆ + i/T2 decay of the distribution g(∆) at ∆ → ∞. Thus, any
distribution of the type g(∆)f (∆) where g(∆) is given
β = 4πN µ2 /~, N is the concentration of resonant atoms, by (3) and f (∆) is any function decaying at ∆ → ∞,
µ is the dipole moment, T2 is the homogeneous transverse will lead to (4).
relaxation time of a single atom, ∆ = ω−ω0′ and by ∆0 = The described system can be experimentally realized
ω − ω0 (we use the commonly accepted notations [16]). by doping a periodic Bragg grating (see e.g. [18]) or a lay-
We assume that the time of the inhomogeneous trans- ered medium of transparent materials, by resonant ions
verse relaxation, T2∗ , which characterizes the distribution like Nd3+ , Er3+ , or Ti3+ , which are characterized by suf-
g(∆ − ∆0 ), is much less than the relaxation time of a ficiently large inhomogeneous line broadening, typically
single atom: T2∗ ≪ T2 . Then, the deviations of the res- of about 1013 Hz [19]. The periodic inversion of excited
onant frequencies ω0′ from the central frequency ω0 are ions having the required symmetry, can be achieved, for
constrained by |ω0′ − ω0 | . 1/T2∗. Furthermore, we as- example, by means of a periodic mask whose symmetry
sume that the detuning of the field frequency from ω0 is axis is shifted by a quarter of the period of the host ma-
much smaller than the line width of the inhomogeneous terial [20].
broadening, i.e., |∆0 | ≪ 1/T2∗. Let us assume that the spectral width of the inci-
Now we show that, subject to the imposed conditions dent pulse, δω = 2/τ , coincides with the resonant fre-
on the resonant medium, the odd distribution of the in- quency ω0 . Then ∆0 . 2/τ and the relation between the
version w(ξ) assures, with high accuracy, the PT sym- anti-PT -symmetric and PT -symmetric parts is rewrit-
metry of the dielectric permittivity for pulses of a finite ten as g1 /g0 ∼ T2∗ /τ ≪ 1. Thus, the photonic crystal is
duration τ satisfying τ ≫ T2 ≫ T2∗ . Indeed, the reso- an effectively PT -symmetric medium for pulses with of
nant component of the dielectric permittivity (1) can be the duration τ ≫ T2∗ in a similarity with a monochro-
expressed as a sum (j = 0, 1) matic wave which corresponds the infinite duration. The
∞
above conditions can be achieved in solid-state media.
g(∆ − ∆0 )∆j
ˆ
ε̃ = β (g0 + ig1 ) , gj = (T2 )j−1 d∆. For instance, all the requirements are satisfied for pi-
−∞ ∆2 + 1/T22 cosecond pulses, τ > 10−12 s in neodymium glass where
(2) T2∗ . 10−13 s and T2 ∼ 10−12 s [21].
3
1
1
(a) (b) with the central frequency ω0 and the wavevector k0 ,
1
k0 = ω0 /c = 2π/λ0 , c being the light speed in vacuum,
−Im(εres),Re(εres)
−Im(εres),Re(εres)
1
0.5 and with slowly varying amplitude Ain (r, t), is applied
0.5
2
2 to a photonic crystal. We explore the diffraction in the
0 Bragg geometry (the left panel of Fig. 2) and in the Laue
0 3
3 geometry (the right panel of Fig. 2). In both cases the
4 4
−0.5
−0.5 propagation direction is z, while the crystal boundary
−2 −1 0 1 2 −10 −5 0 5 10
3
10 ∆0/ω0 103 ∆0/ω0
is along x. Let the dielectric perimittivity of the host
1
medium is periodically modulated: εhm = ε0 + ε′ cos(bξ)
where b = 2π/d is the modulus of the reciprocal lattice
|Re(εres)/Im(εres)|
|Re(εres)/Im(εres)|
0.4
(c) (d)
vector, b, ε′ is the depth of periodic modulation, and
0.3
0.5 hereafter ξ = z in the Bragg geometry and ξ = x in
0.2
the Laue geometry. We also assume that the inversion
0.1
distribution has the form −w(ξ) = sin(bξ). Thus, inside
0 0
−0.5 0 0.5 −2 −1 0 1 2 the crystal, the field E(r, ω) is governed by the Helmholtz
3
10 ∆0/ω0 103 ∆0/ω0 equation
∇2 E + k 2 [ε0 + ε′ cos(bξ) + iε̃(ω) sin(bξ)]E = 0, (6)
FIG. 1. Upper panels: −Im(εres ) (blue lines 1 and 2) and
Re(εres ) (red lines 3 and 4) versus frequency detuning at two where k = ω/c.
different values inhomogeneous broadening plotted for the
point where w(ξ) = 1 for the parameter choice β = 1/T2 .
In (a) γ2∗ = 0.0005 (dashed lines) and γ2∗ = 0.02 (solid lines)
x
compared with the spectrum of 6 ps pulse (dotted line) for x
γ2 = 0.002. In (b) γ2∗ = 0.0002 (dashed lines) and γ2∗ = 0.05
Ar At q(2) At
(solid lines) compared with the spectrum of 1 ps pulse (dotted -b q(1) t
line) for γ2 = 0.005. Lower panels: in (c) and (d) dependences t
qt z q<0 -b z
of |Re(εres )/Im(εres )| on the frequency detuning correspond- qr
q q>0
ing to panels (a) and (b). The left and right panels correspond
to dynamics shown below in Fig. 3 and Fig. 4.
A in k 0 A in k 0 qr
(1)
q(2)
r Ar
Bragg geometry Laue geometry
In Fig. 1 we plot the real and imaginary parts of the
resonant dielectric permittivity for two different choices FIG. 2. Schematic illustration of the Bragg (left panel) and
of the dimensionless parameters γ2 = 2/(ω0 T2 ) and Laue (right panel) diffractions. Solid and dashed arrows show
γ2∗ = 2/(ω0 T2∗ ), compared with the spectra of two pico- the central wave-vectors of the pulses incident from the left
second pulses (dotted lines). One observes the transi- and right (Bragg diffraction) and with positive and negative
tion from the strong frequency dependent εres at small incidence angles (Laue diffraction). Red and blue arrows cor-
γ2∗ (dashed lines) to the suppressed frequency depen- respond to the pulses reflected and transmitted by the pho-
dence for relatively large γ2∗ (solid lines). To characterize tonic cristal. The central wavevectors of resonantly interact-
quantitatively the deviation of the profile of the dielectric ing waves in the photonic crystal, qt and qr are also shown.
permittivity from the PT -symmetric one, in lower pan- In the Laue geometry there are two pairs of such vectors.
els we show the frequency dependence of the parameter
|g1 /g0 | = |Re(εres )/Im(εres )|. The observed improvement We address the simplest nontrivial diffraction patterns
of the PT -symmetry is larger than an order of magnitude of resonantly interacting waves, in Bragg [22] and in
(zero value of this parameter correspond to the ideal fre- Laue [23] geometries, simultaneously. For shallow grating
quency independent PT symmetry). |ε′ |, |ε̃|, ≪ ε0 (7)
the resonance conditions are met if the incidence an-
III. PULSE DIFFRACTION IN A gle θ is close to the Bragg angle, i.e. θB =
QUASI-PT -SYMMETRIC MEDIUM arcsin(ε0 − b2 /4k02 )1/2 for the Bragg geometry and θB =
arcsin(b/2k0 ) for the Laue geometry. Different aspects of
Bragg scattering of monochromatic waves under normal
In order to illustrate effects of the PT symmetry in incidence was studied in earlier publications [10, 24]. The
a finite frequency domain, we note that in an experi- PT -symmetric Laue diffraction of monochromatic waves
ment the easiest parameter to manipulate is the inhomo- was considered in [14, 15, 25].
geneous broadening γ2∗ . Therefore we consider the effect In the two mode approximation [23] (see also Ap-
of γ2∗ on unidirectional diffraction of pico-second pulses pendixes B and C) the field in the photonic crystal is
incident on a periodic medium. Let an s-polarized pulse searched in the form
E(r, t) = At (r, t)eiqt r + Ar (r, t)eiqr r e−iω0 t (8)
Ein = Ain (r, t) exp (ik0 r − iω0 t) (5)
4
where r = (x, z), qt is the central wavevector of the wave where Ain (x, t) is a slowly varying amplitude.
transmitted by the first boundary of the crystal, At (r, t) Let Âin,t,r (Ω) be the frequency spectra of the incident
is a slowly varying envelope of the trasmitted pulse, while (”in”), transmitted (”t”), and diffractionally reflected
Ar (r, t) is an envelope of either reflected (in Bragg geome- (”r”) waves, where Ω = ω − ω0 . Taking into account
try) or diffractionally reflected (in Laue geometry) pulses. the continuity of the tangential components of the wave
The relation between wavevectors of the resonant modes, vectors qtx = k0x + Ω sin θ/c on the photonic crystal sur-
sb = qt − qr , where s = +1 (s = −1) for left (right) in- faces z = 0 (if s = 1) and z = l (if s = −1), we have
cidence in the Bragg geometry or for positive (negative)
angle of incidence in the Laue geometry, depends on the ˆ ∞
case: b = (0, 0, b) and b = (b, 0, 0) for the Bragg and Ain (x, t) = Âin (Ω)e−iΩ(t−x sin θ/c) dΩ, (12)
Laue geometries, respectively (see Fig. 2). −∞
Subject to the above assumptions, the Fourier trans- ˆ ∞
forms of the pulse amplitudes Ât,r , combined in a vector- At,r (r, t) = Ât,r (Ω)e−iΩ(t−τt,r ) dΩ, (13)
−∞
column  = (Ât , Âr )T , at a given frequency ω solve the
system (see Appendixes B and C for details): where τt,r = (x sin θ ± sz cos θ)/c.
k2
2ε0 ε′ + sε̃(ω)
Standard algebra, outlined in Appendix B yields
MÂ = qt2 Â, M = ,(9)
2 ε′ − sε̃(ω) 2ε0 + 2α
Âin (Ω) R1 (1)
Ât (Ω) = 1− eisqtz l , (14)
where we introduce the small factor α = b(2sqt − b)/k 2 , 1−P R2
|α| ≪ 1 describing deviation from the exact Bragg con-
R1 Âin (Ω) h (1) (2)
i
dition b(2sqt − b) = 0. Now the conventional dispersion Âr (Ω) = 1 − eis(qtz −qtz )l . (15)
relation, expressing the link among ω, qtx and qtz , and 1−P
obtained from the secular equation where
det(M − qt2 ) =0 (10) (1,2) sb k 2
q
qtz = ∓ α2 − [ε′ 2 − ε̃2 (ω)], (16)
can be recast in the form qt = qt (ω, α). Then for any 2 2b
pair of the fixed parameters ω, α, Eq. (9) is transformed
is obtained from the dispersion relation (10), and
to the standard eigenvalue problem for the matrix M
with qt2 being the eigenvalue. For generic choice of the R1 is(qtz
(1) (2)
−qtz )l
parameters in the plane (ω, α) the matrix M is diagonal- P = e . (17)
R2
izable. If however, for a given frequency, the amplitude
of the gain and losses is chosen to satisfy ε′ = ±ε̃(ω),
In Fig. 3 we show the amplitudes |At,r (t)| illustrating
and simultaneously the exact Bragg condition, α = 0 is
the phenomenon of unidirectional diffraction reflection of
fulfilled, then M becomes defective and the exceptional
an incident Gaussian pulse (11) with
point (EP) emerges. This can be viewed as generaliza-
tion of the EP for the well studied normal incidence in the
" #
2
(ct − x sin θ)
Bragg geometry where qt = sb/2 (i.e. α = 0). Thus, the Ain (x, t) = A exp − , (18)
occurrence of EP depends on both distribution of active c2 τ 2
impurities and on the geometry of incidence.
where τ is the pulse duration, by a layered medium in the
For calculations of the pulse dynamics one can use the
Bragg geometry for the left (upper row) and right (lower
spectral method [23]. It consists of the following steps:
row) incidence. The phenomenon consists in propagation
the field of the incident pulse is represented in a form
of the pulse incident from the left hand side of the layered
of the Fourier integral; the Bragg diffraction problem is
medium [Figs. 3 (a) and (e)] with negligible reflection
solved for a monochromatic plane wave; the Fourier syn-
and strongly enhanced diffractionally reflected signal in
thesis is used to obtain the field at each point of the
the case of right incidence [Figs. 3 (b) and (f)].
photonic crystal at a given time. Two examples are con-
The characteristics of the medium are chosen as in
sidered in the next sections.
Fig. 1 (a), (c). The pulse is chosen such that in the
absence of the active impurities, ε̃ = 0, its frequency
IV. BRAGG GEOMETRY spectrum almost entirely belongs to the forbidden gap,
and thus the pulse is totally reflected. It is also assumed
that the distribution of active impurities and the angle
Starting with the Bragg geometry we define
of incidence correspond to the EP. In presence of weak
k0 = (k0x , k0z ) = k0 (sin θ, sk0 cos θ), inhomogeneous broadening, a wide quasi-monochromatic
nano-second pulse is totally transmitted [reflected] at the
where s = 1 (s = −1) in the case of a pulse is incident left, Fig. 3 (a) [right Fig. 3 (b)] incidence. However for the
on the left (right) surface of the photonic crystal. The same medium but for a short pico-second pulse having
incident wave packet (5) now has the form spectral width δω/ω0 comparable with γ2∗ ∼ δω/ω0 ≪ γ2 ,
Ein (x, t) = Ain (x, t) exp(ik0x x − iω0 t). (11) the PT -symmetric effects are strongly suppressed. Now
5
A A A in A
in t in t R12 R12
0.5 0.5 0.5
Here R12 = R1 − R2 , RS = (kz − fS )/(kz + fS ) is
A
t the diffraction-modified Fresnel reflection coefficient, and
Ar Ar A (2) (1)
r
0 0 0 fS = (qtz R1 − qtz R2 )/R12 .
−10 0 10 −10 0 10 20 30 −10 0 10 20
time (ns) time (ps) time (ps) Strongly asymmetric diffraction of a pulse through a
layered structure in the Laue geometry can be obtained
8 (b) (d) 8
(f)
at exactly Bragg angle of incidence. Now the character-
amplitude (a.u.)
where
2
To find the z-components qtz and qrz , as well as the re-
∞
e−ν sinh(2νν0 )νdν
ˆ
lation between the Fourier amplitudes Ât,r we substitute
F1 (ν0 , α) = , (A2)
−∞ ν 2 + α2 (12) and (13) into Eq. (6). Equating terms with equal
√ √ exponents we obtain
α = T2∗ / 2T2 ≪ 1, and ν0 = T2∗ ∆0 / 2.
Using the expansion of the hyperbolic sine in the Tay- (ε0 − qt2 /k 2 )Ât + ε−s Âr = 0,
lor series we have 2
(B1)
εs Ât + [ε0 − (qt − sb) /k 2 ]Âr = 0,
∞ 2
1 ∞
e−ν (2νν0 )2p+1 νdν
ˆ
X [which is system (9) in the Bragg geometry], where
F1 (ν0 , α) =
(2p + 1)! −∞ ν 2 + α2
p=0 ε1 = [ε′ − ε̃ (ω)] /2, ε−1 = [ε′ + ε̃ (ω)] /2. (B2)
∞ 2p+1 ∞ −ν 2
2(p+1)
(2ν0 ) e ν dν
X ˆ
= Thus the amplitudes of the transmitted, Ât (Ω), and
(2p + 1)! −∞ ν 2 + α2
p=0 diffracted, Âr (Ω), waves are related as Âr = RÂt , where
∞ 2p+1 ˆ ∞
α→0
X (2ν0 ) 2
R = − Q2z − qtz2
/ε−s k 2 , (B3)
−−−→ e−ν ν 2p dν =
p=0
(2p + 1)! −∞
1/2
∞ 2p+1 Qz = sQ, Q = (ε0 k 2 − qtx 2
) is the modulus of z-
X (2ν0 ) p! √ component of the wavevector for a homogeneous medium
=2 = 2 πν0 + O(ν02 ). (A3)
p=0
(2p + 1)! with the dielectric constant ε0 .
In limit (7) we represent qtz in the form qtz = Qz + q̃tz ,
2
Thus, in the leading order we obtain where |q̃tz | ≪ Q and approximate qtz ≈ Q2z + 2Qz q̃tz .
T2∗ Then the solvability of Eqs. (B1) takes the form
2
g1 ∼ (T2∗ ) ∆0 at , T2∗ ∆0 → 0. (A4) 2
T2 4Q(b − Q)q̃tz + 2sk 2 Qαq̃tz + ε1 ε−1 k 4 = 0, (B4)
For the PT -symmetric part of the resonant dielectric per- where α = b(2Q − b)/k 2 characterizes the detuning of
mittivity we calculate incident angle θ from the exact Bragg condition. Near
√ ˆ ∞ −(∆−∆0 )2 (T ∗ )2 /2 the exact Bragg condition, the solution of Eq. (B4) takes
2π 1 e d∆ the form of (16), while the partial reflection coefficients
∗ g 0 = 2 2 =
T2 T2 −∞ ∆ + 1/T2 (B3) have the following form
ˆ ∞ −(ν−ν0 )2
T2∗ e dν T2∗ −ν02 q
= √ = √ e F0 (ν0 , α), α ± s α2 − [ε′ 2 − ε̃2 (ω)]
2T2 −∞ ν 2 + α2 2T2 R1,2 = − , (B5)
(A5) 2ε−s
For a pulse incident from the right on the surface z = l [which is Eqs. (10) for the Laue geometry], where ε±1 is
(k0z < 0, s = −1), the boundary conditions have the defined in (B2). From the solvability condition of (C1)
form (1,2)
we obtain two modes with different z-components, qtz :
(1) (2)
Ât1 exp(iqtz l) + Ât2 exp(iqtz l) = Âin (Ω),
(B8) 2 α̃k 2
(1,2)
R1 Ât1 + R2 Ât2 = 0. qtz = ε0 k 2 − ktx
2
+ ∓
2
Thus (j = 1, 2): k2
q
∓ α̃2 + ε′ 2 − ε̃2 (ω), (C2)
2
(−P )j−1 (j)
Âtj = Âin (Ω)e−iqtz l . (B9)
1−P where α̃ = b(2sqtx − b)/k 2 defines the degree of detuning
For wavenumbers deviating from the central one, i.e., from the exact Bragg condition qtx = sb/2. The rela-
k = k0 +Ω/c, while the x-component is defined by that of tions connecting the amplitudes of the transmitted, Âtj ,
the incident pulse, kx = k sin θ, the parameter α is given and diffracted, Ârj , waves are obtained from Eqs. (C1):
by Ârj = Rj Âtj , where
q
b Ω 2
α = 2 2 k0 + ε0 − sin θ − b . (B10)
q
2 2 2
k0 c R1,2 ′
= α̃ ∓ α̃ + ε − ε̃ (ω) /2ε−s . (C3)
[14] V. V. Konotop and B. I. Mantsyzov, Light propagation [23] A. A. Skorynin, V. A. Bushuev, and B. I. Mantsy-
through a PT -symmetric photonic-crystal. Opt. Expr. zov, Dynamical Bragg Diffraction of Optical Pulses in
24, 26146 (2016). Photonic Crystals in the Laue Geometry: Diffraction-
[15] V. A. Bushuev, L. V. Dergacheva, and B. I. Mantsyzov, Induced Splitting, Selective Compression, and Focusing
Asymmetric pendulum effect and transparency change of of Pulses. J. Experim. Theor. Phys. 115, 56 (2012).
PT -symmetric photonic crystals under dynamical Bragg [24] M. V. Berry, Optical lattices with PT -symmetry are not
diffraction beyond the paraxial approximation. Phys. transparent, J. Phys. A 41, 244007 (2008); S. Longhi,
Rev. A 95, 033843 (2017). Spectral singularities and Bragg scattering in complex
[16] L. Allen and J. H. Eberly, Optical Resonance and Two- crystals, Phys. Rev. A 81, 022102 (2010).
Lewel Atoms (R. Willey & Sons, 1975). [25] P. A. Brandão and S. B. Cavalcanti, Bragg-induced
[17] Handbook of Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics, power oscillations in PT -symmetric periodic photonic
Ed. G. W. F. Drake, Chapter 73 (Spinger, 2006). structures. Phys. Rev. A 96, 053841 (2017).
[18] M. Ams, P. Dekker, S. Gross and M. J. Withford, Fabri- [26] V. V. Konotop, V. S. Shchesnovich, and D. A. Zezyulin,
cating waveguide Bragg gratings (WBGs) in bulk mate- Giant amplification of modes in parity-time symmetric
rials using ultrashort laser pulses, Nanophotonics 6, 743 wavequides. Phys. Lett. A 376, 2750 (2012).
(2017). [27] L. Ge and H. E. Türeci, Antisymmetric PT -photonic
[19] W. T. Silfvast, Laser Fundamentals (Cambridge Univer- structures with balanced positive- and negative-index
sity Press, UK, 2004). materials. Phys. Rev. A 88, 053810 (2013); F. Yang, Y.-
[20] A. Lupu, H. Benisty, and A. V. Lavrinenko, Tayloring C. Liu, and L. You, Anti-PT symmetry in dissipatively
spectral properties of binary PT -symmetric gratings by coupled optical systems. Phys. Rev. A 96, 053845 (2017).
duty-cycle methods. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in [28] P. Peng, W. Cao, C. Shen, W. Qu, J. Wen, L. Jiang, and
Quantum Electronics 22, 7434582 (2016). Y. Xiao, Anti-parity time symmetry with flying atoms.
[21] J. Herrmann and B. Wilhelmi, Lasers for ultrashort light Nature Physics 12, 1139 (2016).
pulses (Elsevier Sciene Pub. Co., 1987).
[22] A. Authier, Dynamical Theory of X-Ray Diffraction (Ox-
ford University Press, 2001).