The document provides a rubric for evaluating social network conversations. It assesses performance in five areas - register, grammar, vocabulary, cohesion/coherence, and spelling/punctuation. For each area, it defines criteria for excellent, good, almost, needs work, and no credit levels of performance. It notes that work completely off-topic or involving plagiarism will receive a score of zero.
The document provides a rubric for evaluating social network conversations. It assesses performance in five areas - register, grammar, vocabulary, cohesion/coherence, and spelling/punctuation. For each area, it defines criteria for excellent, good, almost, needs work, and no credit levels of performance. It notes that work completely off-topic or involving plagiarism will receive a score of zero.
The document provides a rubric for evaluating social network conversations. It assesses performance in five areas - register, grammar, vocabulary, cohesion/coherence, and spelling/punctuation. For each area, it defines criteria for excellent, good, almost, needs work, and no credit levels of performance. It notes that work completely off-topic or involving plagiarism will receive a score of zero.
EXCELLENT □ GOOD □ ALMOST □ NEEDS WORK □ NO CREDIT □
Register Replies fully to each piece Replies well to at least two of Replies to at least two of the Does not reply to more than No evidence of of input. the input texts. input texts. one input. awareness of register.
EXCELLENT □ GOOD □ ALMOST □ NEEDS WORK □ NO CREDIT □
The grammar is appropriate An adequate range of grammar Many errors, which make There is little language with A very limited range Grammar to B1 and is mostly accurate. used with no major errors which the text sometimes difficult to such poor control as to make of grammatical forms impact on understanding. follow. the text almost impossible to used and full of follow without considerable errors. effort.
EXCELLENT □ GOOD □ ALMOST □ NEEDS WORK □ NO CREDIT □
There is a good range of There is a good control of Narrow lexical repertoire Very basic everyday A very limited Vocabulary vocabulary on general topics. elementary vocabulary, though with frequent errors making vocabulary. range of evidence of some major errors the message difficult to vocabulary used. when expressing unfamiliar or follow. complex topics.
EXCELLENT □ GOOD □ ALMOST □ NEEDS WORK □ NO CREDIT □
Cohesion & Coherence Cohesive and coherent text Cohesive and coherent text using Some effort to use connecting Lacks cohesion and/or uses No linguistic devices using an appropriate range an adequate range of linguistic devices though not always linguistic devices used. of linguistic devices. devices. consistent. inappropriately.
EXCELLENT □ GOOD □ ALMOST □ NEEDS WORK □ NO CREDIT □
Spelling & Few, if any, punctuation or Spelling and/or punctuation Errors, including punctuation Spelling and punctuation Full of spelling and Punctuation spelling errors. errors evident do not impede and spelling, make the text errors make the text almost punctuation errors, OR communication. difficult to follow. impossible to follow. writing does not meet the required number of words.
If work is completely off-topic, the score is zero.
If being found being guilty of plagiarism, score for the writing is zero. Notes on plagiarism: - Copying words or ideas from someone else or from a source (similarity ≥ 20%) - Giving or receiving the plagiarized text (similarity ≥ 20%) - Turning in someone else’s work as your own (similarity ≥ 20%)