ADVANCED WATER

DISTRIBUTION MODELING
AND MANAGEMENT
Authors
Thomas M. Walski
Donald V. Chase
Dragan A. Savic
Walter Grayman
Stephen Beckwith
Edmundo Koelle

Contributing Authors
Scott Cattran, Rick Hammond, Kevin Laptos, Steven G. Lowry,
Robert F. Mankowski, Stan Plante, John Przybyla, Barbara Schmitz

Peer Review Board

Lee Cesario (Denver Water), Robert M. Clark (U.S. EPA),
Jack Dangermond (ESRI), Allen L. Davis (CH2M Hill),
Paul DeBarry (Borton-Lawson), Frank DeFazio (Franklin G. DeFazio Corp.),
Kevin Finnan (Bristol Babcock), Wayne Hartell (Bentley Systems),
Brian Hoefer (ESRI), Bassam Kassab (Santa Clara Valley Water District),
James W. Male (University of Portland), William M. Richards
(WMR Engineering), Zheng Wu (Bentley Systems ),
and E. Benjamin Wylie (University of Michigan)

Click here to visit the Bentley Institute

Press Web page for more information
 A P P E N D I X

E
SCADA Basics

A Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) system is a widely distributed

computerized system primarily used to remotely control and monitor the condition of
field-based assets from a central location. Field-based assets include wells, pump sta-
tions, valves, treatment plants, tanks, and reservoirs.
For a water distribution network, the common objectives of a SCADA system are to
do the following:
• Monitor the system
• Obtain control over the system and ensure that required performance is
always achieved
• Reduce operational staffing levels through automation or by operating a sys-
tem from a single central location
• Store data on the behavior of a system and therefore achieve full compliance
with mandatory reporting requirements for any regulatory agency
• Provide information on the performance of the system and establish effective
asset management procedures for the system
• Establish efficient operation of the system by minimizing the need for rou-
tine visits to remote sites and potentially reduce power consumption during
pumping operations through operational optimization
• Provide a control system that will enable operating objectives to be set and
achieved
• Provide an alarm system that will allow faults to be diagnosed from a central
point, thus allowing field repair trips to be made by suitably qualified staff to
correct the given fault condition and to avoid incidents that may be damaging
to the environment
686 SCADA Basics Appendix E

E.1 COMPONENTS OF A SCADA SYSTEM

SCADA encompasses the transfer of data between a SCADA central host computer
and a number of remote sites (Remote Terminal Units or RTUs), and the central host
and the operator terminals. Figure E.1 shows a generic SCADA system that employs
some form of data multiplexing (MUXs) between the central host and the RTUs.
These multiplexers serve to route data to and from a number of RTUs on a local net-
work, while using one or very few physical links on a Wide Area Network (WAN)
backbone to pass data back to the central host computer.

Figure E.1
Generic SCADA
system network

SCADA systems consist of

• One or more field data interface devices usually called Remote Stations,
Remote Terminal Units (RTUs), or Programmable Logic Controllers (PLCs),
which interface to field sensing devices and local control switchboxes and
valve actuators.
• A communications system used to transfer data between field data interface
devices and control units and the computers in the SCADA central host. The
system can be radio, telephone, cable, satellite, and so on, or any combina-
tion of these.
Section E.1 Components of a SCADA System 687

• A central host computer server or servers (sometimes called a SCADA Cen-

ter, master station, master terminal unit, or MTU).

• A communications system to support the use of operator workstations that

may be geographically remote from the central host computer.

• A collection of standard and/or custom software [sometimes called Human

Machine Interface (HMI) software or Man Machine Interface (MMI) soft-
ware] systems used to provide the SCADA central host and operator termi-
nal application, support the communications system, and monitor and
control remotely located field data interface devices.

Each of the preceding components is described in the following subsections.

Field Data Interface Devices

Field data interface devices form the “eyes and ears” of a SCADA system. Devices
such as reservoir level meters, water flow meters, valve position transmitters, temper-
ature transmitters, power consumption meters, and pressure meters all provide infor-
mation that can tell an experienced operator how well a water distribution system is
performing. In addition, equipment such as electric valve actuators, motor control
switchboards, and electronic chemical dosing facilities can be used to form the
“hands” of the SCADA system and assist in automating the process of distributing
water.

However, before any automation or remote monitoring can be achieved, the informa-
tion that is passed to and from the field data interface devices must be converted to a
form that is compatible with the language of the SCADA system. To achieve this,
some form of electronic field data interface is required.

Remote Terminal Units (RTUs), also know as Remote Telemetry Units, provide this
interface. RTUs are primarily used to convert electronic signals received from (or
required by) field devices into (or from) the language (known as the communication
protocol) used to transmit the data over a communication channel. RTUs appear in the
field as a box in a switchboard with electrical signal wires running to field devices and
a cable link to a communication channel interface, such as a radio (see Figure E.2).

The instructions for the automation of field data interface devices, such as pump con-
trol logic, are usually stored locally. This is largely due to the limited bandwidth typi-
cal of communications links between the SCADA central host computer and the field
data interface devices. Such instructions are traditionally held within local electronic
devices known as Programmable Logic Controllers (PLCs), which have in the past
been physically separate from RTUs (see Figure E.3). PLCs connect directly to field
data interface devices and incorporate programmed intelligence in the form of logical
procedures that will be executed in the event of certain field conditions. However,
many water systems with SCADA systems have no PLCs. In this case, the local con-
trol logic is held within the RTU or in relay logic in the local switchboard.
688 SCADA Basics Appendix E

Figure E.2
RTU cabinet with
RTU (center), radio
(top center), and field
wiring terminations
(left)

Figure E.3
Programmable Logic
Controller (PLC)
performing local
control functions,
physically separated,
but wired to a nearby
Remote Terminal Unit
(RTU)
Section E.1 Components of a SCADA System 689

PLCs have their origins in the automation industry and therefore are often used in
manufacturing and process plant applications. The need for PLCs to connect to com-
munication channels was not great in these applications, as they often were only
required to replace traditional relay logic systems or pneumatic controllers. SCADA
systems, on the other hand, have origins in early telemetry applications, where it was
only necessary to know basic information from a remote source. The RTUs connected
to these systems had no need for control programming because the local control algo-
rithm was held in the relay switching logic.

As PLCs were used more often to replace relay switching logic control systems,
telemetry was used more and more with PLCs at the remote sites. It became desirable
to influence the program within the PLC through the use of a remote signal. This is in
effect the “Supervisory Control” part of the acronym SCADA. Where only a simple
local control program was required, it became possible to store this program within
the RTU and perform the control within that device. At the same time, traditional
PLCs included communications modules that would allow PLCs to report the state of
the control program to a computer plugged into the PLC or to a remote computer via a
telephone line. PLC and RTU manufacturers therefore compete for the same market.

As a result of these developments, the line between PLCs and RTUs has blurred and
the terminology is virtually interchangeable. For the sake of simplicity, the term RTU
will be used to refer to a remote field data interface device; however, such a device
could include automation programming that traditionally would have been classified
as a PLC.

Field Data Communications System

The field data communications system is intended to provide the means by which data
can be transferred between the central host computer servers and the field-based
RTUs.

Bandwidth. An important property of a communications channel is its capacity to

carry data. The term bandwidth is used to describe this capacity. Originally, the term
bandwidth applied to the width, in Hertz, of an analog channel. For example, a tele-
phony voice channel that occupies the nominal band 0.3 to 3.4 kHz has a bandwidth
of 3.1 kHz and a radio channel that occupies the spectrum from 929.88875 to
929.8875 MHz has a channel bandwidth of 12.5 kHz. With digital transmission, the
term bandwidth has been extended to include the data transmission rate in bits per
second (bps).

SCADA Communications Availability and Protocols. The availability

imposed by the communications infrastructure is an important aspect of the SCADA
system. Because SCADA systems are typically deployed over large geographical
areas, links to remote SCADA outstations from the central host computer are often
multilayered, meaning that there may be several physical and logical paths through
which data must be routed before it reaches the intended destination. Such “long-
haul” links may impose a heavy financial consideration on the type of communication
systems used and the bandwidth used on those links.
690 SCADA Basics Appendix E

As a result of cost constraints, SCADA communications links generally offer less

bandwidth and lower reliability than that offered by communications backbones com-
monly used on a process plant, where there are few geographical constraints and high-
speed fiber optic LAN infrastructures may be employed. Process plant communica-
tion backbones may exhibit 99.9 percent availability (less than 9 hours outage per
year) and bit error rates of better than 10-9 (1 error in every 109 bits). Comparatively on
SCADA links, where a combination of data radio, telephone line, and satellite link
technology may be employed, the availability may be as low as 99.0 percent (an aver-
age of approximately 90 hours outage per year) and bit error rates of 10-6 (1 error in
every 106 bits) or greater.
The availability discrepancy can be attributed to the fact that the multilayer SCADA
links traverse a greater number of media conversion and data routing ports as com-
pared to high-speed optic fiber LAN backbones. Therefore, there are many single
points of failure in a diverse SCADA communications network. Communications out-
ages typically result from equipment and power supply failures and human interfer-
ence. Better availability is possible through the use of redundant communications
paths to outstations; however, such designs can contribute significantly to the cost of a
communications system and therefore may not be financially viable if the communi-
cations link is not crucial to operational security.
SCADA communication protocols are designed specifically for the reduced reliability
communications links typically employed with SCADA systems and to provide
secure transmission of data, guaranteeing reliable delivery of data to the intended des-
tination in most circumstances. The protocols employ error detection and message
retry techniques usually by receive/transmit handshaking established through the use
of “headers and footers” attached to the raw data under transmission. Such extra
information introduces an overhead to the transmission of data, resulting in a trade off
between speed of data transmission and the reliability of the communications link. As
a result, the speed of data communications associated with SCADA is regularly
slower than that typical of a communications backbone commonly used on a process
plant, office, or factory floor application. Not only do the latter boast links using
media such as hard wired optic fiber, which usually allows higher speeds of data
transmission than available over radio links, but the communications protocols associ-
ated with SCADA systems introduce data transmission overheads which further slow
the rate of data transfer. Where media such as low bit error rate optic fiber cabling is
available, simple communications protocols may be used which do not require sub-
stantial transmission overheads.
Users of SCADA systems and the resulting data do not need to be aware of the com-
munications protocols used. In fact, the protocols should be transparent to the user.
However, it is important to understand that with the use of communications links such
as radio, there is a possibility, albeit small, that communication errors will occur.
For example, a control command could be sent to the wrong destination. SCADA sys-
tems often request confirmation from an operator to confirm that a control action is
required. This approach provides some level of protection against a control message
being sent to the wrong destination. It is much more likely, however, that the operator
has made the error and the control action has been requested of the incorrect outsta-
tion. The control confirmation check gives the operator another chance to select the
correct outstation for control.
Section E.1 Components of a SCADA System 691

An example of a SCADA communications protocol includes DNP 3.0 (Distributed

Network Protocol), a vendor independent protocol that incorporates multiple layers of
error detection and correction and allows a select/confirm regime for control actions.
Modbus is another widely used protocol for SCADA, but it does not offer the same
level of data transmission security as DNP 3.0. There are also a large variety of proto-
cols that are proprietary to individual SCADA vendors and offer capabilities similar
to those described in this section.

Common Communications Media. The following communications media

are common:
• Licensed radio links (UHF and VHF)
• Unlicensed “spread spectrum” radio links
• Public switched telephone networks
• Mobile telephony
• Microwave
• Cable TV networks
• Dedicated satellite links
• Dedicated cable, including fiber optics (for very short distance communica-
tion)
• Corporate WAN computer communications systems
For highly critical sites, it is not uncommon for combinations of these different media
to be used to ensure high reliability of communications to the site. Selection of the
preferred communications media depends on several important factors:
• The remoteness of the field equipment site
• The required reliability of the communications media (primarily determined
by the perceived operational importance of the remote site)
• Availability of communications options
• Cost of each option for the particular application
• Availability of power (power company, battery, solar, or other)
The communications systems used for SCADA are often split into two distinct parts:
a Wide Area Network backbone (WAN) and numerous Local Area Networks (LANs).
The interface between the two parts is commonly achieved through some form of
multiplexing.

Wide Area Network Backbone. The WAN connects the central host com-
puter to the multiplexers. It may comprise cable, radio, or satellite data communica-
tions links depending on the geographic distribution of the SCADA system. The
WAN links are generally full duplex (they provide simultaneous data transmission in
both directions) and may be configured in a star or loop topology.
692 SCADA Basics Appendix E

The star and loop topologies employ dedicated point-to-point communications links
between multiplexers. The star configuration (as shown in Figure E.1) does not pro-
vide WAN redundancy. The loop configuration (see Figure E.4) links adjacent multi-
plexers and provides alternative communications paths for redundancy, therefore
providing higher reliability. Looped WANs require data traffic routers, and links must
be dimensioned to carry all WAN traffic.

Figure E.4
Looped WAN
configuration

In some cases, a WAN is not needed. An example is a simple SCADA system where
all RTUs are connected directly to the central host computer via a single multi-drop
communications link. These systems therefore effectively only contain an RTU local
area network.
Multiplexers. Generally, some form of multiplexing is required to connect a
WAN backbone to a local network of RTUs. Multiplexers allow different data streams
to share a single data link, as shown in Figure E.5. Multiplexers combine communica-
tions paths to and from many RTUs into a single bit stream, usually using time divi-
sion multiplexing (TDM) or other such bit stream manipulation techniques. The
multiplexers must be able to combine the traffic to and from tens or sometimes hun-
dreds of RTUs for transmission over the SCADA WAN.
Section E.1 Components of a SCADA System 693

Figure E.5
Basic data multiplexer
configuration

A simple form of multiplexer is to use a data traffic router together with a point-to-
multipoint radio, as shown in Figure E.6. In this diagram, LR refers to Local Radio,
PMR to Point to Multipoint Radio, and ROUT to data router.

Figure E.6
Data router with
point-to-multipoint
radio

The multiplexer may itself be a SCADA processing device that manages the local net-
work and not only combines the data, but also reduces the amount of data that must be
interchanged with the central host. The SCADA system may employ a tree network
with multiple hierarchical levels of multiplexer processors, as shown in Figure E.7.

Local Networks. Local networks connect the RTUs to the multiplexers, or

directly to the SCADA central host computer if there is no need for a WAN connec-
tion. Like the WAN, the local network may comprise cable, radio, or satellite data
communications links depending on the geographic distribution of the SCADA sys-
tem. The links may be private or rented from a telephone company.
694 SCADA Basics Appendix E

Figure E.7
SCADA network with
multiple MUX levels

A common local network configuration is based on point-to-multipoint radio. The

radio links are generally half duplex or simplex, both of which allow transmission in
only one direction at any time. Half duplex links use different frequencies in each
direction, and simplex networks use a single frequency. In the configuration shown in
Figure E.7, the links are configured in a star topology. The local network may also be
a LAN or multidrop circuit.
Most local networks use a logical bus topology. In the bus topology, all stations share
a common transmission medium and some form of network access protocol must be
employed. Such protocols include ordered polling of each RTU, token passing, and
data packet collision detection and avoidance mechanisms.
Communications Protocols. Communications protocols define the method by
which data is transmitted along a communication link. As long as the transmitting
device follows a predefined set of rules for sending the data, the device at the receiv-
ing end is able to unravel the signal into meaningful data. For example, a protocol will
define information such as the length of time that each data packet is sent, the size of
the signal, and the required destination for the data.
An open system is one that allows for communications between different types of
devices (as supplied by different vendors, for example). Proprietary systems are by
definition closed and allow communications only between devices of the same type
(as supplied by a single vendor, for example).
Section E.1 Components of a SCADA System 695

Open systems avoid the disadvantages associated with using proprietary systems,
such as complete dependence on a single vendor and lack of information on how the
protocol functions. However, in order to realize the benefits of open systems, detailed
communications protocol standards are required to specify all aspects of the intercon-
nection between computers and other devices.

The Central Host Computer

The central host computer or master station is most often a single computer or a net-
work of computer servers that provide a man-machine operator interface to the
SCADA system. The computers process the information received from and sent to the
RTU sites and present it to human operators in a form that the operators can work
with. Operator terminals are connected to the central host computer by a computer
network so that the viewing screens and associated data can be displayed for the oper-
ators. Recent SCADA systems are able to offer high resolution computer graphics to
display a graphical user interface or mimic screen of the site or water supply network
in question. Figure E.8 shows the types of display screens offered by most systems.
Some examples include

• System overview pages displaying the entire water distribution system and
often summarizing SCADA sites that might be operating abnormally

• Site mimic screens for each individual RTU location showing up to the
minute site information and offering an interface to control items of equip-
ment at that site

• Alarm summary pages displaying current alarms, alarms that have been
acknowledged by an operator, and alarms that have returned to normal but
remain unacknowledged by an operator

• Trend screens enabling an operator to display the behavior of a particular

variable over time

Historically, SCADA vendors offered proprietary hardware, operating systems, and

software that was largely incompatible with other vendors’ SCADA systems. Expand-
ing the system required a further contract with the original SCADA vendor. Host
computer platforms characteristically employed UNIX-based architecture and the
host computer network was physically removed from any office computing domain.

However, with the increased use of the personal computer, computer networking has
become commonplace in the office and as a result, SCADA systems are now available
that can network with office-based personal computers. Indeed, many of today’s
SCADA systems can reside on computer servers that are identical to those servers and
computers used for traditional office applications. This has opened a range of possi-
bilities for the linking of SCADA systems to office-based applications such as GIS
systems, hydraulic modeling software, drawing management systems, work schedul-
ing systems, and information databases.
696 SCADA Basics Appendix E

Figure E.8
The type of display
screen offered by
most SCADA systems

Operator Workstation Communications System

For water supply SCADA systems, several operators may require simultaneous access
to the SCADA central host computer to view the performance of the system. SCADA
systems are often designed to accommodate this requirement by including communi-
cations channels between the central host and the remote workstations accessed by
the operators.
Operator workstations are most often computer terminals that are networked with the
SCADA central host computer. The central host computer acts as a server for the
SCADA application and the operator terminals are clients that request and send infor-
mation to the central host computer based on the request and action of the operators.
The communications system in place between the central host computer and the oper-
ator terminals is a Local Area Network. SCADA LANs enable multiple users in a rel-
atively small geographical area to exchange files and messages, as well as access
shared resources, such as the central host computer.
Historically, SCADA LANs have been dedicated networks; however, with the
increased deployment of office LANs and Wide Area Networks (WANs) as a solution
for interoffice computer networking, there exists the possibility to integrate SCADA
LANs into everyday office computer networks.
The foremost advantage of this arrangement is that there is no need to invest in a sep-
arate computer network for SCADA operator terminals. In addition, there is an easy
Section E.1 Components of a SCADA System 697

path to integrating SCADA data with existing office applications, such as spread-
sheets, work management systems, data history databases, GIS systems, and water
distribution modeling systems. However, there are several disadvantages that should
be considered before integrating SCADA operator terminal LANs with office LANs:

• Corporate networks are often only supported during office hours while
SCADA LANs are most often required 24 hours per day, 7 days per week
• Communications links associated with SCADA may present a networking
security breach into the corporate computer network because some links
may bypass the office network’s usual security precautions
• During office hours, data traffic on the network associated with the corporate
network may seriously slow the networking of the SCADA operators
• SCADA network traffic generated during emergency operation procedures
may seriously slow the corporate computer network
• Linking the SCADA system with the office LAN provides ways for hackers
or terrorists to interfere with operation of the system

Software Systems
An important aspect of every SCADA system is the computer software used within
the system. The most obvious software component is the operator interface or MMI/
HMI (Man Machine Interface/Human Machine Interface) package; however, software
of some form pervades all levels of a SCADA system. Depending on the size and
nature of the SCADA application, software can be a significant cost item when devel-
oping, maintaining, and expanding a SCADA system. When software is well-defined,
designed, written, checked, and tested, a successful SCADA system will likely be
produced. Poor performances in any of these project phases will very easily cause a
SCADA project to fail.

Many SCADA systems employ commercial proprietary software upon which the
SCADA system is developed. The proprietary software often is configured for a spe-
cific hardware platform and may not interface with the software or hardware pro-
duced by competing vendors. A wide range of commercial off-the-shelf (COTS)
software products also are available, some of which may suit the required application.
COTS software usually is more flexible, and will interface with different types of
hardware and software. Generally, the focus of proprietary software is on processes
and control functionality, while COTS software emphasizes compatibility with a vari-
ety of equipment and instrumentation. It is therefore important to ensure that ade-
quate planning is undertaken to select the software systems appropriate to any new
SCADA system. Such software products are used within the following components of
a SCADA system:

• Central host computer operating system: Software used to control the

central host computer hardware. The software can be based on UNIX or
other popular operating systems.
698 SCADA Basics Appendix E

• Operator terminal operating system: Software used to control the central

host computer hardware. The software is usually the same as the central host
computer operating system. This software, along with that for the central
host computer, usually contributes to the networking of the central host and
the operator terminals.

• Central host computer application: Software that handles the transmittal

and reception of data to and from the RTUs and the central host. The soft-
ware also provides the graphical user interface which offers site mimic
screens, alarm pages, trend pages, and control functions.

• Operator terminal application: Application that enables users to access

information available on the central host computer application. It is usually a
subset of the software used on the central host computers.

• Communications protocol drivers: Software that is usually based within

the central host and the RTUs, and is required to control the translation and
interpretation of the data between ends of the communications links in the
system. The protocol drivers prepare the data for use either at the field
devices or the central host end of the system.

• Communications network management software: Software required to

control the communications network and to allow the communications net-
works themselves to be monitored for performance and failures.

• RTU automation software: Software that allows engineering staff to con-

figure and maintain the application housed within the RTUs (or PLCs). Most
often this includes the local automation application and any data processing
tasks that are performed within the RTU.

The preceding software products provide the building blocks for the application-
specific software, which must be defined, designed, written, tested, and deployed for
each SCADA system.

E.2 DATA ACQUISITION MECHANISMS

Data acquisition within SCADA systems is accomplished first by the RTUs scanning
the field data interface devices connected to the RTU. The time to perform this task is
called the scanning interval and can be faster than two seconds. The central host com-
puter scans the RTUs (usually at a much slower rate) to access the data in a process
referred to as polling the RTUs. Some systems allow the RTU to transmit field values
and alarms to the central host without being polled by the central host. This mecha-
nism is known as unsolicited messaging. Systems that allow this mechanism usually
use it in combination with the process of polling the RTU to solicit information as to
the health of the RTU. Unsolicited messages are usually only transmitted when the
field data has deviated by a prespecified percentage, so as to minimize the use of the
communications channels, or when a suitably urgent alarm indicating some site
abnormality exists.
Section E.3 Processing of Data from the Field 699

Control actions that are performed by using the central host are generally treated as
data that are sent to the RTU. As such, any control actions by an operator logged into
the central host will initiate a communication link with the RTU to allow the control
command to be sent to the field data interface device under control. SCADA systems
usually employ several layers of checking mechanisms to ensure that the transmitted
command is received by the intended target.

E.3 PROCESSING OF DATA FROM THE FIELD

Data can be of three main types:
• Analog data (real numbers), which will be trended (placed in graphs)
• Digital data (on/off), which may have alarms attached to one state or the
other
• Pulse data (for example, counting revolutions of a meter) is analog data nor-
mally accumulated or counted. Such data are treated within the SCADA
operator terminal software displays as analog data and may be trended.
The primary interface to the operator from the operator terminal is a graphical user
interface (GUI) display that shows a representation of the plant or equipment in
graphical form. Live data are shown as graphical shapes (foreground) over a static
background. As the data changes in the field, the foreground is updated. For example,
a valve may be shown as open or closed, depending on the latest digital value from the
field. The most recent analog values are displayed on the screens as numerical values
or as some physical representation, such as the amount of filled color in a tank to rep-
resent water level. Alarms may be represented on a screen as a red flashing icon above
the relevant field device. The system may have many such displays, and the operator
can select from the relevant ones at any time.
Data from the field are processed to detect alarm conditions, and if an alarm is
present, it will be displayed on dedicated alarm lists on the application software run-
ning on the central host computer. Any abnormal conditions that are detected in the
field are registered at the central host as alarms, and operators are notified usually by
an audible alert and by visual signals on the operator terminal computers. Operators
can then investigate the cause of the alarm by using the SCADA system. Historical
records of each alarm and the name of the operator that acknowledged the alarm can
be held within a self-contained archive for later investigation or audit requirements.
Where variables in the field have been changing over time, the SCADA system usu-
ally offers a trending system whereby the behavior of a particular variable can be plot-
ted on a graphical user interface screen.

E.4 LEVELS OF CONTROL

SCADA communications systems may be deployed over a wide geographical area
and hence it can be expected that communications link availability and speed will be
lower than that typical for a link between a computer and a PLC via a hard-wired
Ethernet Local Area Network (LAN).
700 SCADA Basics Appendix E

Computerized control systems that are commonly used at water or wastewater treat-
ment plants are an example of where high-speed Ethernet LANs are employed as the
communications backbone. The control systems are similar to SCADA systems but
are more closely related to those systems developed for manufacturing or factory
floor applications. These are often referred to as Distributed Control Systems (DCS).
They have similar functions to SCADA systems, but the field data interface devices
are usually located within a confined geographical area. The communications LAN
will normally exhibit up to 99.98 percent availability, with substantially greater band-
width than employed in a SCADA system. A DCS system also will usually employ a
significant amount of remote loop control, where the required value of a field variable
is calculated based on the feedback received from a measured variable in the field. In
the case of DCS systems, this calculation is often performed within the central host
computer. In comparison, loop control required to operate a remote pump station, for
example, will regularly be housed within a local loop control device which calculates
the required value of the field variable locally and therefore separately from the cen-
tral host computer.

For example, consider the example of a valve position based on the level of water in a
reservoir. Figure E.9 illustrates a common control problem.

Figure E.9
Valve position control

Consider in this case that the position of the valve depends on the level of water in the
reservoir. An operator may control the process by issuing a Set Point, which is the
desired level at which the tank should stay. Once the level deviates from the level set
point, the controller detects the deviation and sends a signal to the valve position actu-
ator to move the valve to reduce the error. The level of the tank is continuously moni-
tored to enable the controller to trim the valve position.

Within plant floor DCS systems, it is common for this controller to reside within the
central host computer. The communication system connecting the local RTU and the
central host is fast and reliable and it is convenient to house the bulk of the computing
power within a centralized location.
Section E.5 Handling of Data During SCADA Failures 701

By contrast, SCADA systems generally cover large geographic areas and rely on a
variety of communications systems that are normally less reliable than a LAN associ-
ated with a DCS. Loop control based in the central host computer is therefore less
desirable. Instead, the controller application is housed in the RTU. The SCADA oper-
ator is able to alter the tank level set point remotely and perhaps may be allowed to
manually drive the valve open and closed when the control loop is disabled. However,
the automatic control of the valve is most often resident in the RTU. If communica-
tion to the remote site is lost, it is desirable that the local automatic control system
continue to operate; therefore, the RTU is an autonomous unit which could control the
valve without constant direction from the central host computer.
Of course, there is always the temptation to allow a great percentage of the automa-
tion functions to be centralized within a SCADA system. This approach has many
advantages, most notably:
• Computing power can be centralized in an office environment, reducing the
cost of field devices which must be designed to operate in sometimes harsh
conditions
• Engineering staff are much more readily able to continuously improve and
update control programs, ensuring that there is a standardization of control
algorithms across the SCADA network
• Expensive redundancy system failure proofing can be located in a central
location
The important thing to consider is the reliability of the communication link between
the SCADA central host and the site. Where a critical control algorithm is required
and the controller must be located remotely, the communication link must be
designed to contribute effectively to the reliability of the entire system. The cost asso-
ciated with this requirement may be prohibitive enough to warrant placing the auto-
matic control function at the site.
SCADA allows for many options by which assets and devices at remote sites may be
controlled. It is not uncommon for modern SCADA systems to employ a combination
of the previously mentioned mechanisms.

E.5 HANDLING OF DATA DURING SCADA FAILURES

Different SCADA systems cope differently with a failure event. Some systems rely
primarily on the inherent redundancy of the SCADA system, and others may use
some form of storage mechanism to archive data that may be recovered once the
SCADA system has returned to normal operating capacity. These options are summa-
rized as follows:
• Storage of data in the RTUs: Some SCADA systems rely on the capacity
of the RTU to store data collected from the field under normal operation and
then periodically transmit that data as an unsolicited message or when polled
by the central host. In times of SCADA system failure, the capacity of the
RTU is used to archive information until a backup central host is brought
online or the original system has recovered.
702 SCADA Basics Appendix E

• System redundancy: Most SCADA systems incorporate some form of

redundancy in their design, such as dual communications channels, dual
RTUs, or dual central host computers. Such systems may be designed for
such redundant equipment to be online (hot standby) to ensure a seamless
transfer upon SCADA system failure, or offline (cold standby) where the
backup mechanism must be manually brought online to operational capacity.
Most SCADA systems employ a combination of the preceding mechanisms to ensure
data continuity during failure events.

E.6 ERRORS AND ACCURACY ISSUES

As previously discussed, SCADA systems for water distribution systems generally
use low bandwidth communication channels. Data from the field may therefore need
to be compressed by the field devices before being transmitted to the central host to
avoid overtaxing the capacity of the communications media to transmit information.
The result may be that data from the field include some form of error that must be
considered before analysis.
Common sources of error include
• Compression algorithms employed by the RTU prior to transmitting time
series data to the central host
• Compression algorithms employed by any data archive software that may be
used to store old data from a SCADA system
• Interpolation by the trending system of a SCADA system.
Such errors are not immediately obvious from the data trends received from a
SCADA system and may appear as unexplained unusual behavior of an analog vari-
able that may lead a data user to mistakenly suspect an error with a measuring instru-
ment located in the field. Through understanding of the particular mechanisms
inherent in the data collection system, it is possible to explain the unexpected behav-
ior of a variable and compensate for the error within the data finally used for model
validation purposes. For more information, see Chapter 6.

REFERENCES

Barnes, M., and Mackay, S. (1992). Data Communications for Instrumentation and Control. Instrument
Data Communications (IDC), Australia.
Cisco Systems, Inc. (2000). CCIE Fundamentals: Network Design and Case Studies. Cisco Press, Second
Edition, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Citect version 5 User’s Guide (1998). CI Technologies Pty. Ltd., Pymble, Australia.
Haime, A. L. (1998). “Practical Guide to SCADA Communications.” SCADA at the Crossroads Confer-
ence Workshop, The Institution of Engineers Australia, Perth, Western Australia.
Williams, R. I. (1992). Handbook of SCADA Systems for the Oil and Gas Industries. Elsevier Advanced
Technology Limited, 1st Edition, Great Yarmouth, United Kingdom.