Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Analytical Essay 1
Analytical Essay 1
Eliza Christopher
Anthropology 103
6/2/2021
Many people don’t think about anthropologists as hands on researchers, instead they picture
them as researchers who analyze data in an office all day. Although part of their work is data
analyzation, fieldwork is one of the most important practices that anthropologists do. Through
fieldwork anthropologists can collect and observe data from a first-person perspective. This
allows them to not only be confident in their observations, but it allows them as the researcher to
focus their research as variables and concepts change. In this paper I will discuss the importance
and practice of ethnographic fieldwork as well as present real-world examples from my own
fieldwork focused on race, racism, and racially driven issues facing our world today.
Ethnographic fieldwork is a set of methods that anthropologists conduct when researching topics
in our society today (Guest 66). The primary focus is to experience other people firsthand
through interviewing, photographing, note taking, and most of all experiencing what the people
themselves experience. A method used for this type of fieldwork is called participant
observation. Participant observation is important because when you experience the daily
activities of the participant you gain a firsthand understanding from their point of view that
simply looking at data cannot show you. To truly understand society, you cannot watch from a
distance nor just observe; you need to be directly involved to truly experience and understand
your observations. Although this hands-on work is important, it is still only a piece of what it
2
was in the past. Before anthropologists were really their own profession, fieldwork was done
naturally by just traveling, discovering, and meeting people not of your own culture. Almost
2,500 years ago Greek historians such as Herodotus or explorers such as Marco Polo
documented their travels and exploration encountering other cultures (Guest 68). Over time
anthropologic fieldwork emerged mainly in the late twentieth century however the early
beginnings emerged greatly in the twentieth century. This was due to the large number of
Europeans moving internationally such as merchants and missionaries (Guest 69). With all this
information brought back on different cultures, people were interested in what, how, and why
there were differences. Through fieldwork anthropologists observe and then record both
qualitative and quantitative data. Quantitative data is data that represents measurable details such
as population economic observations, and demographic data. Qualitative data is also valid data
interviews. This data is often overlooked by people who are not involved in anthropology. Many
people just analyze the numbers or measurable data they can look at and see instead of the in-
depth observations or accounts that don’t present their worth initially without looking deeper.
This qualitative data collected through ethnographic fieldwork is just as important than the
measurable data because it tells the story not just an overview of a population or part of society.
Following my remarks on what the qualitative and quantitative data mean to researchers, the
perspective of the researcher collecting this data is also important. Observing from the outside
can bring forth completely different data than observing from the inside and vice versa.
Perspective is a very important key to data collection and observation in any field and even more
so in the study of society where different perspectives are necessary. When conducting fieldwork
3
anthropologists have to frequently view things from different perspectives to see the whole
picture. One approach they take to research is to conduct research from an emic perspective. The
emic perspective is to view the local community from an insider perspective to see how they
view the world (Guest 82). Another approach they take is to conduct research from an etic
perspective. This etic perspective is to research and view the community from an outsider’s
Using an anthropologic approach to the topic of race and racism I conducted my own research
from both an etic and emic perspective. This research was done to solidify an understanding on
race and racism in America from the perspective of someone who has been frequently the victim
of racism and racial discrimination and the perspective of myself who would be considered an
outside and has not been a victim of racism. In anthropology ethnographic fieldwork is most
successful with a strong connection or amount of trust with the person to get the most accurate
anthropology makes to considering culture, biology, history, and language through time is
important to seeing the entire picture (Guest 15). I wanted to make sure in my research I took a
holistic approach to choosing an interviewee in regards to someone who wasn’t too young or too
old, had a different upbringing, and had lived on both side of the economic spectrum. With these
professor whose academic focus was on African American history and race relations. With
Amber being my fiancés mother and a professor educated on the topic I was able to collect clean
and unbiased information regarding race and racism. I began the interview asking what her first
recollection of encountering race or racism was. She responded by saying she was only in first
grade when she told a boy she liked him a lot and he responded by saying “Gross, you’re black”.
4
She told me at the time she really had never saw a difference in skin colors and didn’t even
understand why he had said that. She also added that as a young kid from that day forward she
started to associate her skin with being ugly and second class. At this point the boy had
introduced her to her first experience with white skin being hegemonic. Italian philosopher
Antonio Gramsci describes one of the aspects of power being hegemony which is creating an
agreement of power over a population without brute force (Guest 49). Although wrong, the boy
was also a victim of hegemony by being taught the shared system of beliefs that create make
ideas like these normalized. Coupled with this hegemonic influence the boy is also a victim of
ethnocentrism. At such a young age there would be no reason to look down upon another race
unless he was taught or influenced by these ideas in his own culture. At this point in history
racism segregation was still fresh and people around hardly showed any amount of cultural
relativism. I asked Amber how she would describe the cultural environment she grew up in and
her answer was very unique. Amber described her environment as multicultural and multiracial
noting that her mother was white and her father was black so she saw both sides. Amber was
able to observe the traditions, food, and culture from both sides however she wasn’t very
accepted by either. With her mother’s side saying “you’re not white enough” and her father’s
side saying “you’re not dark enough”. In these circumstances you can see that both cultures
although family, still had bias and showed a lack of cultural relativism. They were only able to
make judgements on her white side based on the standards of their own culture instead of making
an unbiased judgement. Amber continued to explain her middle school and high school years
being bullied, assaulted, and treated wrongly for being darker than the main population of her
schools. During this time the level of agency, or ability to go against their own culture’s
normalcies was extremely low. I mentioned a quote from the book Essentials of Cultural
5
Anthropology: Third Edition to Amber that read “Cultural beliefs and practices are not timeless;
they change and can be changed” (Guest 50). Amber and I both resonated with this and
discussed how so many people around her had no sense of agency and also why she wasn’t
influenced by her own culture’s biases and thoughts on lighter skinned individuals. With this
conversation I was able to come up with the theory that agency is not something that is not
something you’re born with but it is something that you gain through breaking your own cultural
barriers. This was one theory I had however Amber also explained how at the time people who
were nice to her or hung out with her were considered weird and unpopular. This shows how
agency can be gained but lost through ethnocentrism and outside influences. I am aware of the
problem with racial discrimination through my years however when you’re not an active victim
or actively involved with making a change it can sometimes go unnoticed. This was the case for
many people in the past few years with a strong voice coming from movement such as Black
Lives Matter and more criminal cases and situations being brought to the public more
consistently. In the past year the voice that these movement have had has gotten louder following
events such as George Floyd’s death. With these recent events race based movement have not
been the only things influenced however with movements to end police brutality and demand
more training being on the top of the priority list. I asked Amber what she thought about these
recent events and specifically the George Floyd situation to see what she thought about not just
this situation but the key concepts of that the cases exposed themselves. Amber didn’t believe
that Derik Chauvin, who was the police officer charged with George Floyd’s death, was right in
any way. Amber did recognize that rational thinking is important and neither her or I could say it
was race based or intended; we are not the judge nor the jury. However, Amber did say that no
matter what the race was it was not okay and it called a lot of attention towards ending police
6
brutality and woke up a lot of people on the subject. I believe the movement that these events
have fired up are very different than movements like the civil rights movement. During the civil
rights movement it was very against the cultural norm and the level of agency people had was
very low. The ones in support of ending the civil rights movement even if they believed in it
were at risk of violence. In today’s world you see these movements against racism and police
As mentioned in the above section I took time in choosing a subject for this topic. I wanted to
maintain a holistic approach considering all aspects of society to create a larger picture.
Although I come from an etic perspective, being able to interview someone that is an insider on
the topic of race and racism was important in creating an accurate point of view from someone
who was not only educated but a victim of racism themselves. My subject had certain
characteristics that allow other researchers to compare data and observations freely. My subject
was neither rich or poor, she was educated on the topic, and a direct victim involved with the
topic. I am recognizing that variables such as gender, class, and age can also produce different
observations but I believe the data I have provided from my subject can be used to compare data
taken from other diverse individuals in the future. With Amber being my fiancés mother, I was
able to ensure answers that were beneath the surface level with the bond of trust I have with the
subject. My fieldwork on race and racism from a victim’s perspective is a perfect example of the
benefits of fieldwork in anthropology. Not only are you able to examine multiple perspectives
but you are able to understand your research from an emic perspective allowing you to see the
Works Cited
Guest, Kenneth. Essentials of Cultural Anthropology: A Toolkit for a Global Age. 3rd ed.,
Norton,2020.